| Financier | Commitments |
|---|---|
| State and Peace Building Fund | 2.21 |
IDP COMMUNITY DEVT PROJECT
Development Objective
The development objective of IDP-CDP is to enhance the social and economic reintegration of target IDP populations in Georgia by i) increased opportunities for IDPs in target communities to participate in community development activities, ii) increased access for IDPs in target communities to basic infrastructure, services, employment and livelihood opportunities, iii) enhancing national capacity to provide support to IDPs
Key Details
Project Details
P116534
Closed
Joanna De Berry
N/A
March 17, 2009
(as of board presentation)
March 17, 2009
June 15, 2009
US$ 2.21 million
N/A
2009
US$ 2.21 million
C
Not Applicable
December 31, 2012
BANK APPROVED
January 15, 2013
Finances
Financing Plan (US$ Millions)
Total Project Financing (US$ Millions)
| Product Line | IBRD/IDA |
|---|---|
| IBRD Commitment | N/A |
| IDA Commitment | N/A |
| IBRD + IDA Commitment | N/A |
| Lending Instrument | |
|---|---|
| Grant Amount | 2.21 |
| Total Project Cost** | 2.21 |
Summary Status of World Bank Financing (US$ Millions) as of July 31, 2025
No data available.
Detailed Financial Activity as of July 31, 2025
No data available.
Ratings
IMPLEMENTATION RATINGS
| Name | Review | Date |
|---|---|---|
| Counterpart Funding | Satisfactory | 2013-03-17 |
| Procurement | Moderately Satisfactory | 2013-03-17 |
| Monitoring and Evaluation | Moderately Unsatisfactory | 2013-03-17 |
| Project Management | Moderately Satisfactory | 2013-03-17 |
| Overall Implementation Progress (IP) | Moderately Satisfactory | 2013-03-17 |
| Progress towards achievement of PDO | Satisfactory | 2013-03-17 |
| Financial Management | Satisfactory | 2013-03-17 |
COMPLETION RATINGS
| INDICATOR | IMPLEMENTATION COMPLETION & RESULTS REPORT: |
|---|---|
| Outcomes | |
| Risk to Development Outcome | Moderately Satisfactory |
| Bank Performance | |
| Borrower Performance | |
| Government Performance | |
| Implementing Agency |
INDEPENDENT EVALUATION RATINGS
No data available.
Results Framework
PROJECT DEVELOPMENT OBJECTIVE INDICATORS
| INDICATOR | BASELINE | CURRENT | TARGET |
|---|
Improvement in indicators of living conditions and access by community members to services, infrastructure, employment and livelihood opportunities Value 0.00 0.00 0.00 Date February 28, 2013 March 31, 2014 Comment Since the micro-projects are of various types, an aggregate baseline is not possible. Baseline data for each investment has beencollected at the majority of micro-projects sites but some improvement is still required and being attended to by the implementingagency. Final data for this indicator was supposed to be collected in the final project evaluation undertaken by the PIU but the datacollected was of poor quality and incomplete. This data deficiency will be somewhat rectified for the ICM but it is likely thatfull dataon improved living conditions will not be available. % of community's desired results for micro-projects that are fully achieved Value 0.00 0.00 80.00 Date June 17, 2010 February 28, 2013 December 31, 2012 Comment Final data for this indicator was supposed to be collected in the final project evaluation undertaken by the PIU but the datacollected was of poor quality and incomplete. This data deficiency will be somewhat rectified for the ICM through a new survey butit is likely that full data on the perceptions by community members of whether their expected results for micro-projects wereachieved will not be available. # of community meetings held Value 0.00 181.00 80.00 Date June 17, 2010 February 28, 2013 December 31, 2012 Comment Full community mobilization procedures have been completed with an average of 4 community meetings held at targeted communities.The target is exceeded due to the increased number of selected communities under the project and the implementation of a moreintensive mobilization process than was originally intended. # of community members attending community meetings Value 0.00 13862.00 50.00 Date June 17, 2010 February 28, 2013 December 31, 2012 Comment 13,862 persons, attended all 181 community meetings. The same people may have attended different community meetings and it was notpossible to verify the extent of double counting and therefore the percentage of attendance from the overall community populationisnot given. The target is given as a percentage. % of community members who agree that micro-project proposal is their development priority Value 0.00 75.00 75.00 Date February 28, 2013 December 31, 2012 Comment
INTERMEDIATE RESULTS INDICATORS
| INDICATOR | BASELINE | CURRENT | TARGET |
|---|
Number and type of community micro-projects Value 0.00 47.00 30.00 Date February 28, 2013 December 31, 2012 Comment # of direct and indirect beneficiaries (by gender, IDP status) Value 0.00 16781.00 0.00 Date February 28, 2013 December 31, 2012 Comment Number of women is 8721 (52%). Number of families is 5534. # of IDPs who receive employment in the course of the micro-project implementation Value 0.00 940.00 0.00 Date February 28, 2013 December 31, 2012 Comment # and composition of MPMC Value 0.00 41.00 30.00 Date February 28, 2013 December 31, 2012 Comment Verified data shows that total membership is 336 persons of which women are 41% # of CBOs created Value 0.00 2.00 0.00 Date February 28, 2013 December 31, 2012 Comment # and type of information material distributed Value 0.00 4000.00 0.00 Date February 28, 2013 December 31, 2012 Comment 2 leaflets describing the project objectives and activities were delivered to all members of targeted communities, with a total of4000 copies made. # and type of trainings Value 0.00 2.00 0.00 Date February 28, 2013 December 31, 2012 Comment Financial Management training was delivered across the Ministry.English language courses were delivered to regional staff. # of people trained Value 0.00 38.00 0.00 Date February 28, 2013 December 31, 2012 Comment 38 members of the Ministry have been trained in English or Financial Management. # and type of other capacity building activities completed Value 0.00 1.00 0.00 Date February 28, 2013 December 31, 2012 Comment A project website was developed.IT and other telecommunication resources acquired for the new MRA site were not required due tothe reversal of the relocatoon decision. .