Financier | Commitments |
---|---|
IDA Credit | 100.00 |
SWEDEN: Swedish Intl. Dev. Cooperation Agency (SIDA) | 8.60 |
Bilateral Agencies (unidentified) | 112.90 |
CANADA: Canadian International Development Agency (CIDA) | 38.80 |
Borrower/Recipient | 137.50 |
P074020
Closed
Elsa Araya
N/A
February 21, 2003
(as of board presentation)
May 11, 2004
November 22, 2004
US$ 397.80 million
N/A
2004
US$ 260.30 million
C
Not Applicable
December 31, 2012
BANK APPROVED
June 20, 2013
Financier | Commitments |
---|---|
IDA Credit | 100.00 |
SWEDEN: Swedish Intl. Dev. Cooperation Agency (SIDA) | 8.60 |
Bilateral Agencies (unidentified) | 112.90 |
CANADA: Canadian International Development Agency (CIDA) | 38.80 |
Borrower/Recipient | 137.50 |
Product Line | IBRD/IDA |
---|---|
IBRD Commitment | N/A |
IDA Commitment | 100.00 |
IBRD + IDA Commitment | 100.00 |
Lending Instrument | |
---|---|
Grant Amount | 160.30 |
Total Project Cost** | 397.80 |
Period | Financier | Transaction Type | Amount (US$) |
---|---|---|---|
Apr 1, 2017 | IDA-38990 | Int Charges | 260,297.44 |
Apr 1, 2017 | IDA-38990 | Int Charges | 260,297.44 |
Oct 1, 2016 | IDA-38990 | Int Charges | 22,867.43 |
Oct 1, 2016 | IDA-38990 | Int Charges | 22,867.43 |
Oct 1, 2016 | IDA-38990 | Loan Repay | 751,639.30 |
Oct 1, 2016 | IDA-38990 | Int Charges | 270,590.12 |
Oct 1, 2016 | IDA-38990 | Int Charges | 270,590.12 |
Mar 6, 2017 | IDA-46690 | Int Charges | 158,735.19 |
Mar 6, 2017 | IDA-46690 | Int Charges | 158,735.19 |
Sep 1, 2016 | IDA-46690 | Int Charges | 428.16 |
Sep 1, 2016 | IDA-46690 | Int Charges | 428.16 |
Sep 1, 2016 | IDA-46690 | Int Charges | 164,405.83 |
Sep 1, 2016 | IDA-46690 | Int Charges | 164,405.83 |
Apr 1, 2016 | IDA-38990 | Int Charges | 4,157.19 |
Apr 1, 2016 | IDA-38990 | Int Charges | 4,157.19 |
Apr 1, 2016 | IDA-38990 | Loan Repay | 758,812.06 |
Apr 1, 2016 | IDA-38990 | Int Charges | 252,932.23 |
Apr 1, 2016 | IDA-38990 | Int Charges | 252,932.23 |
Mar 1, 2016 | IDA-46690 | Int Charges | 163,262.94 |
Mar 1, 2016 | IDA-46690 | Int Charges | 163,262.94 |
Mar 1, 2016 | IDA-46690 | Int Charges | 661.01 |
Mar 1, 2016 | IDA-46690 | Int Charges | 661.01 |
Oct 1, 2015 | IDA-38990 | Loan Repay | 22,181.95 |
Oct 1, 2015 | IDA-38990 | Loan Repay | 731,880.56 |
Oct 1, 2015 | IDA-38990 | Int Charges | 272,986.78 |
Oct 1, 2015 | IDA-38990 | Int Charges | 272,986.78 |
Apr 1, 2015 | IDA-38990 | Loan Repay | 707,096.00 |
Apr 1, 2015 | IDA-38990 | Int Charges | 275,837.40 |
Apr 1, 2015 | IDA-38990 | Int Charges | 275,837.40 |
Apr 1, 2015 | IDA-38990 | Loan Repay | 35,900.43 |
Sep 1, 2015 | IDA-46690 | Int Charges | 4,892.74 |
Sep 1, 2015 | IDA-46690 | Int Charges | 4,892.74 |
Sep 1, 2015 | IDA-46690 | Int Charges | 160,737.40 |
Sep 1, 2015 | IDA-46690 | Int Charges | 160,737.40 |
Sep 1, 2014 | IDA-46690 | Int Charges | 179,358.64 |
Sep 1, 2014 | IDA-46690 | Int Charges | 179,358.64 |
Mar 1, 2015 | IDA-46690 | Int Charges | 162,688.30 |
Mar 1, 2015 | IDA-46690 | Int Charges | 162,688.30 |
Mar 1, 2015 | IDA-46690 | Int Charges | 3,559.66 |
Mar 1, 2015 | IDA-46690 | Int Charges | 3,559.66 |
Sep 1, 2014 | IDA-46690 | Int Charges | 865.04 |
Sep 1, 2014 | IDA-46690 | Int Charges | 865.04 |
Sep 2, 2021 | IDA-46690 | Int Charges | 18.69 |
Sep 1, 2021 | IDA-46690 | Loan Repay | 1,351.71 |
Sep 2, 2021 | IDA-46690 | Loan Repay | 446,968.88 |
Apr 1, 2021 | IDA-38990 | Int Charges | 248,878.34 |
Apr 1, 2021 | IDA-38990 | Int Charges | 248,878.34 |
Apr 1, 2021 | IDA-38990 | Loan Repay | 1,826.31 |
Apr 1, 2021 | IDA-38990 | Loan Repay | 761,019.10 |
Mar 3, 2021 | IDA-46690 | Int Charges | 20,358.25 |
Mar 3, 2021 | IDA-46690 | Int Charges | 20,358.25 |
Mar 3, 2021 | IDA-46690 | Loan Repay | 452,730.60 |
Mar 3, 2021 | IDA-46690 | Int Charges | 168,076.19 |
Mar 3, 2021 | IDA-46690 | Int Charges | 168,076.19 |
Oct 1, 2020 | IDA-38990 | Loan Repay | 751,631.44 |
Oct 1, 2020 | IDA-38990 | Int Charges | 250,655.02 |
Oct 1, 2020 | IDA-38990 | Int Charges | 250,655.02 |
Oct 1, 2020 | IDA-38990 | Loan Repay | 7,929.14 |
Sep 1, 2020 | IDA-46690 | Int Charges | 1,129.54 |
Sep 1, 2020 | IDA-46690 | Int Charges | 1,129.54 |
Sep 1, 2020 | IDA-46690 | Loan Repay | 448,415.10 |
Sep 1, 2020 | IDA-46690 | Int Charges | 147,991.47 |
Sep 1, 2020 | IDA-46690 | Int Charges | 147,991.47 |
Apr 1, 2020 | IDA-38990 | Loan Repay | 5,481.27 |
Apr 1, 2020 | IDA-38990 | Loan Repay | 730,057.00 |
Apr 1, 2020 | IDA-38990 | Int Charges | 245,485.90 |
Apr 1, 2020 | IDA-38990 | Int Charges | 245,485.90 |
Mar 6, 2020 | IDA-46690 | Int Charges | 161,007.64 |
Mar 6, 2020 | IDA-46690 | Int Charges | 161,007.64 |
Sep 1, 2019 | IDA-46690 | Int Charges | 161,635.16 |
Sep 1, 2019 | IDA-46690 | Int Charges | 427.70 |
Sep 1, 2019 | IDA-46690 | Int Charges | 427.70 |
Sep 1, 2019 | IDA-46690 | Int Charges | 161,635.16 |
Oct 1, 2019 | IDA-38990 | Loan Repay | 7,575.77 |
Oct 1, 2019 | IDA-38990 | Loan Repay | 725,867.75 |
Oct 1, 2019 | IDA-38990 | Int Charges | 45.51 |
Oct 1, 2019 | IDA-38990 | Int Charges | 45.51 |
Oct 1, 2019 | IDA-38990 | Int Charges | 247,537.19 |
Oct 1, 2019 | IDA-38990 | Int Charges | 247,537.19 |
Mar 1, 2020 | IDA-46690 | Int Charges | 2,339.15 |
Mar 1, 2020 | IDA-46690 | Int Charges | 2,339.15 |
Mar 1, 2019 | IDA-46690 | Int Charges | 620.29 |
Mar 1, 2019 | IDA-46690 | Int Charges | 620.29 |
Mar 1, 2019 | IDA-46690 | Int Charges | 163,666.78 |
Mar 1, 2019 | IDA-46690 | Int Charges | 163,666.78 |
Apr 4, 2019 | IDA-38990 | Loan Repay | 742,111.10 |
Apr 4, 2019 | IDA-38990 | Int Charges | 255,054.39 |
Apr 4, 2019 | IDA-38990 | Int Charges | 255,054.39 |
Apr 1, 2019 | IDA-38990 | Loan Repay | 5,301.71 |
Oct 1, 2018 | IDA-38990 | Loan Repay | 1,185.03 |
Oct 1, 2018 | IDA-38990 | Loan Repay | 750,438.10 |
Oct 1, 2018 | IDA-38990 | Int Charges | 259,309.98 |
Oct 1, 2018 | IDA-38990 | Int Charges | 259,309.98 |
Sep 1, 2018 | IDA-46690 | Int Charges | 2,273.73 |
Sep 1, 2018 | IDA-46690 | Int Charges | 2,273.73 |
Sep 1, 2018 | IDA-46690 | Int Charges | 165,539.19 |
Sep 1, 2018 | IDA-46690 | Int Charges | 165,539.19 |
Apr 1, 2018 | IDA-38990 | Loan Repay | 782,899.06 |
Apr 1, 2018 | IDA-38990 | Int Charges | 273,036.03 |
Apr 1, 2018 | IDA-38990 | Int Charges | 273,036.03 |
Sep 1, 2017 | IDA-46690 | Int Charges | 600.58 |
Sep 1, 2017 | IDA-46690 | Int Charges | 600.58 |
Sep 1, 2017 | IDA-46690 | Int Charges | 164,346.94 |
Sep 1, 2017 | IDA-46690 | Int Charges | 164,346.94 |
Apr 1, 2018 | IDA-38990 | Int Charges | 1,033.91 |
Apr 1, 2018 | IDA-38990 | Int Charges | 1,033.91 |
May 11, 2004 | IDA-38990 | Loan Commitment | 100,000,000.00 |
Mar 23, 2010 | IDA-46690 | Loan Commitment | 50,000,000.00 |
Mar 1, 2024 | IDA-46690 | Int Charges | 145,740.75 |
Mar 1, 2024 | IDA-46690 | Int Charges | 145,740.75 |
Mar 1, 2024 | IDA-46690 | Int Charges | 60.89 |
Mar 1, 2024 | IDA-46690 | Int Charges | 60.89 |
Mar 1, 2024 | IDA-46690 | Loan Repay | 413,543.22 |
Mar 1, 2024 | IDA-46690 | Loan Repay | 4,351.54 |
Apr 1, 2024 | IDA-38990 | Loan Repay | 19,719.50 |
Apr 1, 2024 | IDA-38990 | Loan Repay | 693,078.00 |
Apr 1, 2024 | IDA-38990 | Int Charges | 429.89 |
Apr 1, 2024 | IDA-38990 | Int Charges | 429.89 |
Apr 1, 2024 | IDA-38990 | Int Charges | 216,512.22 |
Apr 1, 2024 | IDA-38990 | Int Charges | 216,512.22 |
Oct 30, 2023 | IDA-38990 | Int Charges | 217,201.45 |
Oct 30, 2023 | IDA-38990 | Int Charges | 217,201.45 |
Oct 30, 2023 | IDA-38990 | Loan Repay | 705,101.60 |
Oct 30, 2023 | IDA-38990 | Int Charges | 56.27 |
Oct 30, 2023 | IDA-38990 | Int Charges | 56.27 |
Oct 1, 2023 | IDA-38990 | Loan Repay | 1,247.82 |
Sep 1, 2023 | IDA-46690 | Loan Repay | 349.18 |
Sep 8, 2023 | IDA-46690 | Int Charges | 16.83 |
Sep 8, 2023 | IDA-46690 | Int Charges | 146,552.84 |
Sep 8, 2023 | IDA-46690 | Int Charges | 146,552.84 |
Sep 8, 2023 | IDA-46690 | Loan Repay | 415,406.25 |
Sep 8, 2023 | IDA-46690 | Int Charges | 16.83 |
Mar 3, 2023 | IDA-46690 | Loan Repay | 406,979.78 |
Mar 3, 2023 | IDA-46690 | Int Charges | 149,244.16 |
Mar 3, 2023 | IDA-46690 | Int Charges | 149,244.16 |
Mar 1, 2023 | IDA-46690 | Loan Repay | 11,986.64 |
Oct 1, 2022 | IDA-38990 | Loan Repay | 12,484.31 |
Oct 1, 2022 | IDA-38990 | Loan Repay | 676,727.06 |
Oct 1, 2022 | IDA-38990 | Int Charges | 217,101.62 |
Oct 1, 2022 | IDA-38990 | Int Charges | 217,101.62 |
Apr 1, 2023 | IDA-38990 | Loan Repay | 31,773.49 |
Apr 1, 2023 | IDA-38990 | Loan Repay | 0.01 |
Apr 1, 2023 | IDA-38990 | Int Charges | -0.01 |
Apr 1, 2023 | IDA-38990 | Int Charges | -0.01 |
Apr 5, 2023 | IDA-38990 | Loan Repay | 695,048.56 |
Apr 5, 2023 | IDA-38990 | Int Charges | 226,257.88 |
Apr 5, 2023 | IDA-38990 | Int Charges | 226,257.88 |
Sep 1, 2022 | IDA-46690 | Loan Repay | 408,018.16 |
Sep 1, 2022 | IDA-46690 | Int Charges | 147,636.60 |
Sep 1, 2022 | IDA-46690 | Int Charges | 147,636.60 |
Sep 1, 2022 | IDA-46690 | Loan Repay | 2,083.50 |
Mar 1, 2022 | IDA-46690 | Loan Repay | 297.23 |
Mar 1, 2022 | IDA-46690 | Loan Repay | 439,045.88 |
Mar 1, 2022 | IDA-46690 | Int Charges | 9.14 |
Mar 1, 2022 | IDA-46690 | Int Charges | 9.14 |
Mar 1, 2022 | IDA-46690 | Int Charges | 159,811.02 |
Mar 1, 2022 | IDA-46690 | Int Charges | 159,811.02 |
Apr 1, 2014 | IDA-38990 | Int Charges | 4,702.85 |
Apr 1, 2014 | IDA-38990 | Int Charges | 4,702.85 |
Apr 1, 2014 | IDA-38990 | Int Charges | 309,777.10 |
Apr 1, 2014 | IDA-38990 | Int Charges | 309,777.10 |
Oct 9, 2013 | IDA-38990 | Int Charges | 296,483.60 |
Oct 9, 2013 | IDA-38990 | Int Charges | 296,483.60 |
Oct 1, 2013 | IDA-38990 | Int Charges | 8,543.19 |
Oct 1, 2013 | IDA-38990 | Int Charges | 8,543.19 |
Sep 1, 2013 | IDA-46690 | Int Charges | 172,518.55 |
Sep 1, 2013 | IDA-46690 | Int Charges | 172,518.55 |
Mar 1, 2014 | IDA-46690 | Int Charges | 1,556.61 |
Mar 1, 2014 | IDA-46690 | Int Charges | 1,556.61 |
Mar 1, 2014 | IDA-46690 | Int Charges | 181,905.06 |
Mar 1, 2014 | IDA-46690 | Int Charges | 181,905.06 |
Sep 1, 2013 | IDA-46690 | Int Charges | 2,541.72 |
Sep 1, 2013 | IDA-46690 | Int Charges | 2,541.72 |
Oct 1, 2014 | IDA-38990 | Int Charges | 299,404.88 |
Oct 1, 2014 | IDA-38990 | Int Charges | 299,404.88 |
Oct 1, 2014 | IDA-38990 | Int Charges | 2,171.36 |
Oct 1, 2014 | IDA-38990 | Int Charges | 2,171.36 |
Oct 1, 2014 | IDA-38990 | Loan Repay | 798,413.10 |
Mar 1, 2018 | IDA-46690 | Int Charges | 3,136.89 |
Mar 1, 2018 | IDA-46690 | Int Charges | 3,136.89 |
Mar 1, 2018 | IDA-46690 | Int Charges | 168,183.05 |
Mar 1, 2018 | IDA-46690 | Int Charges | 168,183.05 |
Apr 1, 2017 | IDA-38990 | Loan Repay | 838.57 |
Mar 1, 2017 | IDA-46690 | Int Charges | 63.80 |
Mar 1, 2017 | IDA-46690 | Int Charges | 63.80 |
Oct 1, 2017 | IDA-38990 | Loan Repay | 4,484.26 |
Oct 1, 2017 | IDA-38990 | Int Charges | 267,267.75 |
Oct 1, 2017 | IDA-38990 | Int Charges | 267,267.75 |
Oct 1, 2017 | IDA-38990 | Loan Repay | 756,573.40 |
Apr 1, 2017 | IDA-38990 | Loan Repay | 729,820.90 |
Apr 1, 2022 | IDA-38990 | Loan Repay | 12,170.85 |
Apr 1, 2022 | IDA-38990 | Loan Repay | 731,159.44 |
Apr 1, 2022 | IDA-38990 | Int Charges | 236,936.56 |
Apr 1, 2022 | IDA-38990 | Int Charges | 236,936.56 |
Oct 1, 2021 | IDA-38990 | Loan Repay | 15,483.43 |
Oct 1, 2021 | IDA-38990 | Int Charges | 245,159.77 |
Oct 1, 2021 | IDA-38990 | Int Charges | 245,159.77 |
Oct 1, 2021 | IDA-38990 | Loan Repay | 744,701.80 |
Sep 2, 2021 | IDA-46690 | Int Charges | 164,757.81 |
Sep 2, 2021 | IDA-46690 | Int Charges | 164,757.81 |
Sep 2, 2021 | IDA-46690 | Int Charges | 18.69 |
Name | Review | Date |
---|---|---|
Counterpart Funding | Moderately Satisfactory | 2012-12-29 |
Project Management | Satisfactory | 2012-12-29 |
Progress towards achievement of PDO | Satisfactory | 2012-12-29 |
Monitoring and Evaluation | Satisfactory | 2012-12-29 |
Overall Implementation Progress (IP) | Satisfactory | 2012-12-29 |
Procurement | Moderately Satisfactory | 2012-12-29 |
Financial Management | Moderately Satisfactory | 2012-12-29 |
INDICATOR | IMPLEMENTATION COMPLETION & RESULTS REPORT: 06-26-2013 |
---|---|
Outcomes | Substantial |
Risk to Development Outcome | Modest |
Bank Performance | Substantial |
Borrower Performance | Substantial |
Government Performance | Substantial |
Implementing Agency | Substantial |
INDICATOR | ICR REVIEW: 12-03-2013 | PROJECT PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT REPORT: |
---|---|---|
Outcome Rating | Satisfactory | N/a |
Risk To Development Outcome | Moderate | N/a |
Bank Performance | Satisfactory | N/a |
Borrower Performance | Satisfactory | N/a |
Government Performance | Satisfactory | N/a |
Implementing Agency | Satisfactory | N/a |
Icr Quality | Satisfactory | N/a |
M&e Quality | Substantial | N/a |
INDICATOR | BASELINE | CURRENT | TARGET |
---|
2.1) Participatory budgeting and public reporting on budgets | Value | 2.1) No formal participatory budgeting and reporti | 2.1) Voluntary bi-annual public meeting on prepara | 2.1) Participation of citizens is to be an establi |
Date | November 23, 2004 | November 15, 2012 | December 31, 2012 | |
Comment | 2.1) Target is met. |
4.1) Average civil service salary | Value | 4.1) Weighted average civil service salary is 94% | 4.1) Weighted average civil service salary is 82% | 4.1) Reduced gap between living wage and average c |
Date | November 23, 2004 | November 15, 2012 | December 31, 2012 | |
Comment | The relevance of this indicator is questionable because there was no activity that is related to it in the civil service reformsub-program 5-year action plan. |
6.1) Reduced corruption and arbitrariness in rule enforcement | Value | 6.1) 4.3% of respondents in the Woreda and City B | 6.1) 6.5% of respondents in the Woreda and City B | 6.1) Reduction in incidence of corruption. |
Date | November 23, 2008 | November 15, 2012 | December 31, 2012 | |
Comment | In the absence of the reform program, it is probable that petty corruption would have been much higher. |
4.2) Private-public wage comparison | Value | 4.2) The public- average private wage comparison f | 4.2) The public- average private wage comparison f | 4.2) Reduced the gap between public and private wa |
Date | November 23, 2004 | November 15, 2012 | December 31, 2012 | |
Comment | The relevance of this indicator is questionable because there was no activity that is related to it in the civil service reformsub-program 5-year action plan. |
4.3) Wage decompression ratios | Value | 4.3) Using the civil service base salary, wage de | 4.3) Using the civil service base salary, wage de | 4.3) Improved salary scale for skilled professiona |
Date | November 23, 2004 | November 15, 2012 | December 31, 2012 | |
Comment | The ratio shows salary scale for skilled professionals has improved relative to the non-skilled. | The relevance of this indicator is questionable because there was no activity that is related to it in the civil service reformsub-program 5-year action plan. |
1.2) Reduced fed-regional and regional-local fiscal gaps | Value | 1.2a) Federal- regional transfer indicated in budg | 1.2a) The proclaimed federal-regional transfer for | 1.2a) The target federal-regional transfer for 12 |
Date | November 23, 2004 | November 15, 2012 | December 31, 2012 | |
Comment | the target for 1.2a is met by 97% and 1.2b is met by 120% |
2.2) Involvement of civil society in planning and review processes | Value | 2.2) No formal involvement of civil society in pla | 2.2) Civil society involvement in plan preparation | 2.2) Participation of civil society organizations |
Date | November 23, 2004 | November 15, 2012 | December 31, 2012 | |
Comment | 2.2) Target is met. |
5.2) Reduced unit costs and processing time in priority sectors | Value | 5.2.a) In 2004/05 -Unit recurrent cost per perso | 5.2.a) In 2010/11 -unit recurrent cost per perso | 5.2.a) -Reduced unit cost5.2.b) -Average pr |
Date | November 23, 2004 | November 15, 2012 | December 31, 2012 | |
Comment |
6.2) Increased access to justice | Value | 6.2) Number of courts were 850, kebele social cou | 6.2) Number of courts increased to over 942, addit | 6.2) Increased access to justice. |
Date | November 23, 2005 | November 15, 2012 | December 31, 2012 | |
Comment | 6.2) Target is met. |
6.3) Independence of courts | Value | 6.3) Independence of judiciary is adequately recog | 6.3) Improvements were made in independence of the | 6.3) Enhanced independence of the judiciary |
Date | November 23, 2004 | November 15, 2012 | December 31, 2012 | |
Comment |
6.4) Freedom of information | Value | 6.4.a) There is no proclamation on right to infor | 6.4a) Right to information proclamation is enacte | 6.4a) Information act to be issued and institution |
Date | November 23, 2004 | November 15, 2012 | December 31, 2012 | |
Comment | Target is met. |
3.2) Increased tax effort | Value | 93.00 | 101.00 | 100.00 |
Date | November 23, 2004 | November 15, 2012 | December 31, 2012 | |
Comment | 3.2) Nationwide tax collection target for 2004/05 was 13.4 billion birr and the actual tax collection was 12.4 billion birr whichis 93% of the target | 3.2) Nationwide tax collection target for 2011/12 was 70 billion birr and the actual is 70.7 which is 101% of the target | 3.2) The target is met. |
1.1) Reduced budget variance | Value | 14.00 | 4.00 | 10.00 |
Date | November 23, 2004 | November 15, 2012 | December 31, 2012 | |
Comment | Reduced budget variance contributes to increased predictability and adequacy of financial resources flows. | The variation between budgeted and actual expenditure has narrowed down and target is met |
3.1) Increased own revenues and unconditional transfers as a share of total expenditures | Value | 91.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 |
Date | November 23, 2004 | November 15, 2012 | December 31, 2012 | |
Comment | 3.1) 91% of regional expenditure is covered by own revenues and unconditional transfer. | 3.1) The regional expenditure is covered by own revenue and unconditional transfer. The target is met. |
5.1) Improved access, responsiveness and cost efficiency in priority sectors | Value | 25.00 | 88.00 | 85.00 |
Date | November 23, 2005 | November 15, 2012 | December 31, 2012 | |
Comment | 5.1) 25% of the local jurisdictions surveyed in 2005 independent Woreda/District and City Benchmarking Survey are providing basicservices. (Health, education, agriculture, water supply). | 5.1) 88% of the local jurisdictions surveyed in 2011 independent Woreda/District and City Benchmarking Survey are providing basicservices. (Health, education, agriculture, water supply). | 5.1) The target is met. |
INDICATOR | BASELINE | CURRENT | TARGET |
---|
Legal and regulatory framework established | Value | 1.1) Studies that will lead to new laws are being | 1.1) At federal level, the following laws are ena | 1.1) Laws to be enacted and strategies to be adopt |
Date | November 23, 2004 | November 15, 2012 | December 31, 2012 | |
Comment |
Personnel management systems reformed and rolled out | Value | 4.1) No medium-term policy developed. | 1) The medium-term remuneration policy is not yet | 4.1) Medium-term remuneration policy to be develo |
Date | November 23, 2004 | November 15, 2012 | December 31, 2012 | |
Comment | 4.1) target is not met. Although the development of medium-term remuneration policy is included as one of the output indicators,there was no activity related to it in the civil service reform program 5-year action plan. |
Vertical accountability mechanisms (service standards) established | Value | 6.1) No service standards developed. | 6.1) Service standards were developed in service o | 6.1) Service standards to be established at all le |
Date | November 23, 2004 | November 15, 2012 | December 31, 2012 | |
Comment | Target is met. |
3.6) Procurement legislation adopted and directives issued | Value | 3.6) Outdated procurement act and directive. | 3.6) The revised procurement legislation and direc | 3.6) Procurement legislation and directive to be e |
Date | November 23, 2004 | November 15, 2012 | December 31, 2012 | |
Comment | The target is met. |
3.7) Accounts and audits backlog reduced at federal, regional levels | Value | 3.7) 2 years accounts backlog at national level- | 3.7) No accounts backlog at federal and regional l | 3.7) No accounts and audit backlog |
Date | November 23, 2004 | November 15, 2012 | December 31, 2012 | |
Comment | 3.7) Target is substantially met. Another program led by USAID and protection of basic services (PBS) have also supported theactivity. |
4.2) Results-Oriented Performance Appraisal (ROPA) rolled out at all levels HR guidelines in woredas and municipalities developed, adopted | Value | 4.2) ROPA study completed and piloted in selected | 4.2) The upgraded performance management system, n | 4.2) ROPAS to be implemented in 20 Ministries. |
Date | November 15, 2012 | December 31, 2012 | ||
Comment | Target is met. |
2.4) No. of regions adopting sector-specific automated IT solutions | Value | 2.4) Data centers existed in 560 locations at all | 2.4) Data centers are expanded to 735 locations. | 2.4) Data centers to be expanded to all levels of |
Date | November 23, 2004 | November 15, 2012 | December 31, 2012 | |
Comment | 2.4) The target is met. |
5.3) Guidelines developed and implemented for implementing withholding taxes, assessing presumptive tax bases | Value | 5.3) Presumptive taxation guideline developed and | 5.3) Presumptive taxation guidelines for implemen | 5.3) Presumptive taxation guideline to be adopted |
Date | November 23, 2004 | November 15, 2012 | December 31, 2012 | |
Comment | 5.3) Target is met. |
5.4) Strengthening and performance improvement of FIRA and Customs | Value | 5.4) Tax system reform action plan prepared. | 5.4) The tax system reform program implemented at | 5.4) Tax system reform to be implemented in all re |
Date | November 23, 2004 | November 15, 2012 | December 31, 2012 | |
Comment | 5.4) Target is met. |
7.3) Enhanced independence and efficiency of judiciary | Value | 7.3) Please see the 6.3 of the PDO indicators. Th | 7.3) Please see the 6.3 of the PDO indicators. Th | 7.3) Enhanced independence of the judiciary. |
Date | November 23, 2004 | November 15, 2012 | November 30, 2012 | |
Comment |
7.4) Judges and lawyers trained | Value | 7.4) Judges in Federal courts and 2 Regional Supre | 7.4) A total of 30,700 judges and court supporting | 7.4) All judges are to be trained. |
Date | November 23, 2004 | November 15, 2012 | December 29, 2012 | |
Comment | 7.4) Target is met. |
2.3) Percentage of courts at each level initiating performance improvement | Value | 1.00 | 100.00 | 75.00 |
Date | November 23, 2004 | November 30, 2012 | ||
Comment | 2.3) Federal Supreme Court, few federal courts and two regional supreme courts initiated court reform.Additional Note:In 2005,average clearance rate is 60% and congestion rate is more than 1:3.6 nationally. | 2.3) The court reform program is rolled out to the three levels of courts at federal, regional and woreda courts. AdditionalNoteAverage clearance rate improved to 98% in 2011/12 and congestion rate improved to 1:1.5 in 2012. | 2.3) The target is met. |
1.2) No. of regions adopting enabling legislation for local authorities | Value | 4.00 | 11.00 | 11.00 |
Date | November 23, 2004 | November 15, 2012 | December 31, 2012 | |
Comment | 1.2) Municipal enabling legislation adopted in only 4 regions. | All regions adopted municipal proclamation and urban development policy and strategy. | 1.2) Municipal Legislation enacted and urban development policy and strategy implemented in all regions. The target is met. |
1.3) No. of regions adopting various tax proclamations (income, excise, TOT) | Value | 0.00 | 11.00 | 11.00 |
Date | November 23, 2004 | November 15, 2012 | November 30, 2012 | |
Comment | 1.3) income, turnover tax, VAT and withholding tax laws passed at federal level and only 4 big regions. | 1.3) In addition to the targeted proclamations, a large No. of tax laws were issued by regional governments such as agriculturalincome and land use fee, customs duty, stamp duty proclamation, chat tax, livestock, presumptive tax regulation, municipality taxlawsand service charge laws, etc | 1.3) The target is met. |
3.8) Percentage of budgetary institutions preparing standardized internal audit reports | Value | 23.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 |
Date | November 23, 2004 | November 15, 2012 | December 31, 2012 | |
Comment | 3.8) preparation of internal audit report was limited to federal level. | 3.8) All offices across the nation prepare internal audit reports.Additional Note: audit organizational structure implementedandthe new internal audit manual introduced at all level. | 3.8) Target is substantially met. |
3.3) No. of regions adopting of double entry, modified cash systems at all levels | Value | 5.00 | 11.00 | 0.00 |
Date | November 23, 2004 | November 15, 2012 | ||
Comment | 3.3) Double entry modified cash systems in all federal budgetary institutions and the 5 regions. | 3.3) All regions adopted the double entry modified cash system. |
3.4) Percentage of budgetary institutions each level adopting cash management directives | Value | 23.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 |
Date | November 23, 2004 | November 15, 2012 | December 31, 2012 | |
Comment | 3.4) Cash management directive adopted at federal level budgetary institutions only. | 3.4) All regions adopted the cash management directive. | 3.4) The target is met. |
3.1) Percentage of budgetary institutions at each level implementing medium term and strategic planning | Value | 23.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 |
Date | November 23, 2004 | November 15, 2012 | December 31, 2012 | |
Comment | 3.1) Medium term and strategic plan is used at federal level budgetary institutions. | 3.1) Medium term and strategic plan is used at all levels of government, which made up the Growth and Transformation Plan (GTP). | 3.1) Target is met. |
2.1) Percentage of ministries, bureaus and agencies (MABs) (at federal and in each region) initiating restructuring and performanceimprovement | Value | 3.00 | 100.00 | 75.00 |
Date | December 31, 2012 | |||
Comment | 2.1) Performance and service delivery program (PSIP) modality has been adopted by 11 Ministries, Agencies and Bureaus (MABs) | 2.1) The Business process re-engineering (BPR), a more comprehensive performance improvement system than the PSIP, is implementedin145 federal and 404 regional level ministries, bureaus and agencies (MABs). | 2.1) The target is met. |
2.2) Percentage of woredas and municipalities undergoing restructuring | Value | 0.00 | 98.00 | 75.00 |
Date | November 23, 2004 | November 15, 2012 | December 31, 2012 | |
Comment | 2.2) The BPR is implemented in 19, 635 offices at 693 rural woreda level. | 2.2) The target is met. |
3.2) No. of regions adopting new budget structure at all levels | Value | 8.00 | 11.00 | 11.00 |
Date | November 23, 2004 | November 15, 2012 | December 31, 2012 | |
Comment | 3.2) New budget structure and new chart of account introduced in 8 regions. | 3.2) All regions are using the new budget structure and chart of accounts.Additional Note:The program budgeting is introducedat federal level. | 3.2) The target is met. Another program led by USAID has also supported the activity excluding the program budgeting. |
3.5) Percentage of budgetary institutions at each level rolling out automated financial systems | Value | 56.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 |
Date | November 23, 2004 | November 15, 2012 | December 31, 2012 | |
Comment | 3.5) Budget Information System (BIS) and Budget, Disbursement and Accounts (BDA) in federal budgetary institutions and 4 regions. | 3.5) BIS and BDA are adopted at all levels. Additional Note:An upgraded Integrated budget and expenditure system (IBEX) isadopted in over 90% of budgetary institutions at federal and regional level.Government has also initiated IFMIS using own funding. | 3.5) Target is met.Another program led by USAID has also supported the activity. PSCAP supported the system until 2009. |
4.3) Percentage of budgetary institutions at each level implementing IT based HRM systems | Value | 0.00 | 55.00 | 100.00 |
Date | November 23, 2004 | November 15, 2012 | December 31, 2012 | |
Comment | 4.3) No budgetary institutions implemented IT-based HRM systems. | 4.3) Six regions attempted to develop IT-based personnel management system including Addis Ababa, SNNPR, Amhara, Somali, Tigray,Benshanagul and Afar. Moreover, the nation-wide integrated civil service management information system is now under development. | The Target is not fully met. |
5.1) No. of regions adopting fiscal decentralization strategy including capital funding mechanisms | Value | 4.00 | 11.00 | 11.00 |
Date | November 23, 2004 | June 19, 2012 | November 30, 2012 | |
Comment | 5.1) The federal government and the 4 big regions have fiscal transfer formula. | 5.1) The federal government and all regions except Harari have fiscal transfer formula to provide predictable and transparentfiscal transfers to lower level government. | 5.1) The target is met. |
5.2) No. of regions implementing TIN | Value | 11.00 | 11.00 | 11.00 |
Date | November 23, 2004 | November 15, 2012 | December 31, 2012 | |
Comment | 5.2) TIN implemented in 11 regions and the total number of taxpayers issued with TIN were 15,555 but there is no biometric-basedTIN system. | 5.2) The computerized tax identification number (TIN) is now implemented in all regions. Currently, 2,021,087 million taxpayerswere issued TIN certificates. TIN is complemented with the biometric technologies and total of 1.98 million tax payer informationhas been collected nation-wide using the biometric system. | 5.2) Target is met. |
7.1) No. of regions implementing guidelines for citizen participation at the woreda and municipal levels | Value | 0.00 | 11.00 | 11.00 |
Date | November 23, 2004 | November 15, 2012 | December 31, 2012 | |
Comment | 7.1) Government white paper on woreda participation is under development. | 7.1) All regions have implemented the guidelines for citizens’ participation at woreda, municipal and kebele levels through theadoption of the rural and urban good governance package (GGP). | The target is met. |
7.2) Percentage of courts at each level undergoing performance improvement | Value | 1.00 | 100.00 | 75.00 |
Date | November 23, 2004 | November 15, 2012 | December 31, 2012 | |
Comment | 7.2) Please see 2.3 of Intermediate Results Indicators. They are exactly the same. | 7.2) Please see 2.3 of the Intermediate Results Indicators. They are exactly the same. | 7.2) Target is met. |
4.4) HR guidelines in woredas and municipalities developed, adopted | Value | 4.4) Federal and most regional Civil Service Procl | 4.4) The federal civil service proclamation was re | 4.4) HR guidelines are developed at all level. The |
Date | November 23, 2004 | November 15, 2012 | December 31, 2012 | |
Comment |