Financier | Commitments |
---|---|
Borrower/Recipient | 4.29 |
IDA GRANT FOR DEBT VULNERABLE | 42.00 |
P001807
Closed
Ali Alwahti
N/A
March 7, 2002
(as of board presentation)
November 20, 2003
April 16, 2004
US$ 46.29 million
N/A
2004
US$ 42.00 million
B
Not Applicable
March 31, 2009
BANK APPROVED
January 15, 2013
Financier | Commitments |
---|---|
Borrower/Recipient | 4.29 |
IDA GRANT FOR DEBT VULNERABLE | 42.00 |
Product Line | IBRD/IDA |
---|---|
IBRD Commitment | N/A |
IDA Commitment | 42.00 |
IBRD + IDA Commitment | 42.00 |
Lending Instrument | |
---|---|
Grant Amount | N/A |
Total Project Cost** | 46.29 |
Period | Financier | Transaction Type | Amount (US$) |
---|---|---|---|
Nov 20, 2003 | IDA-H0670 | Loan Commitment | 42,000,000.00 |
Name | Review | Date |
---|---|---|
Progress towards achievement of PDO | Satisfactory | 2009-03-30 |
Project Management | Satisfactory | 2009-03-30 |
Financial Management | Satisfactory | 2009-03-30 |
Monitoring and Evaluation | Satisfactory | 2009-03-30 |
Counterpart Funding | Satisfactory | 2009-03-30 |
Overall Implementation Progress (IP) | Satisfactory | 2009-03-30 |
Overall Safeguards Rating | Moderately Satisfactory | 2009-03-30 |
Procurement | Satisfactory | 2009-03-30 |
INDICATOR | IMPLEMENTATION COMPLETION & RESULTS REPORT: 09-30-2009 |
---|---|
Outcomes | Substantial |
Risk to Development Outcome | Negligible |
Bank Performance | Substantial |
Borrower Performance | Substantial |
Government Performance | Substantial |
Implementing Agency | Substantial |
INDICATOR | ICR REVIEW: 03-16-2010 | PROJECT PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT REPORT: 02-18-2014 |
---|---|---|
Outcome Rating | Satisfactory | Satisfactory |
Risk To Development Outcome | Negligible To Low | Low |
Bank Performance | Satisfactory | Satisfactory |
Borrower Performance | Moderately Satisfactory | Moderately Satisfactory |
Government Performance | Moderately Satisfactory | Not Rated |
Implementing Agency | Moderately Satisfactory | Not Rated |
Icr Quality | Satisfactory | Not Rated |
M&e Quality | Substantial | Not Rated |
INDICATOR | BASELINE | CURRENT | TARGET |
---|
Percentage of districts with District Development Plans (DDPs) and Annual Investment Plans (PAIs) approved/updated | Value | Nil | 49 with DDPs (100%) and 49 with PAIs (100%) achiev | 80% of districts with DDPs and PAIs |
Date | April 16, 2004 | December 31, 2008 | March 31, 2009 | |
Comment |
Percentage of districts with District Consultative Councils organized and agreeing with plans and implementation reports | Value | Nil | 100% achieved and exceeded | 100% |
Date | April 16, 2004 | December 31, 2008 | March 31, 2009 | |
Comment |
Percentage of districts in which participants in planning processes express satisfaction with responsiveness and accountability of district government | Value | Nil | Preliminary assessment of the community participat | 80% |
Date | April 16, 2004 | December 31, 2008 | March 31, 2009 | |
Comment |
Percentage of districts rated good or excellent on annual Local Investment Grant performance assessments | Value | Nil | 67% for 2007. EOP target achieved and exceeded. | 50% |
Date | April 16, 2004 | December 31, 2008 | March 31, 2009 | |
Comment |
Percentage of districts at national level adopting DPFP approach and methodologies (verify numbers based on PARPA targets) | Value | Nil | 128 out of 128 (100%). Target for end of project a | 60% |
Date | April 16, 2004 | December 31, 2008 | March 31, 2009 | |
Comment |
Key administrative and fiscal instruments adopted supporting transparent district planning and management | Value | Nil | 5/5 done according to DGA. EOP target achieved and | 4/5 |
Date | April 16, 2004 | December 31, 2008 | March 31, 2009 | |
Comment |
INDICATOR | BASELINE | CURRENT | TARGET |
---|
Percentage of Local Inverstment Grants (LIG) projects with funds disbursed and properly accounted for based on the approved plans. | Value | Nil | Total disbursement for LIG 1 and LIG 2 is 100% (re | 80% for LIG 1 and 2 and 70% for LIG 3. |
Date | April 16, 2004 | September 20, 2008 | June 30, 2008 | |
Comment |