Skip to Main Navigation

Decentralized Planning and Financing Project

Abstract*

The Decentralized Planning and Financing Project for Mozambique aims to improve the institutional capacity of District Administrations, and to plan and manage small infrastructure investments in response to community demand. Continued commitment by Government to fiscal and administrative decentralization, particularly from Ministries of State Administration and Planning and Finance; as well as continued Government commitment to community participation...

* The project abstract is drawn from the PAD, SAR or PGD and may not accurately reflect the project's current nature

Show More

Development Objective

Improve the institutional capacity of District Administrations to plan and manage small infrastructure investments in response to community demand.

Key Details

Project Details

  • P001807

  • Closed

  • Ali Alwahti

  • N/A

  • Mozambique

  • March 7, 2002

  • (as of board presentation)

    November 20, 2003

  • April 16, 2004

  • US$ 42.00 million

  • B

  • Not Applicable

  • March 31, 2009

  • BANK APPROVED

  • January 15, 2013

  • Notes

Finances

Financing Plan (US$ Millions)

No data available.
Financier Commitments
Borrower/Recipient 4.29
IDA GRANT FOR DEBT VULNERABLE 42.00

Total Project Financing (US$ Millions)

Product Line IBRD/IDA
IBRD Commitment N/A
IDA Commitment 42.00
IBRD + IDA Commitment 42.00
Lending Instrument
Grant Amount N/A
Total Project Cost** 46.29

Summary Status of World Bank Financing (US$ Millions) as of June 30, 2025

Download:
No data available.
Financier Approval Date Closing Date Principal Disbursed Repayments Interest, Charges & Fees

Detailed Financial Activity as of June 30, 2025

Download:
No data available.
Period Financier Transaction Type Amount (US$)
Nov 20, 2003 IDA-H0670 Loan Commitment 42,000,000.00

Footnotes

Ratings

IMPLEMENTATION RATINGS

Name Review Date
Progress towards achievement of PDO Satisfactory 2009-03-30
Project Management Satisfactory 2009-03-30
Financial Management Satisfactory 2009-03-30
Monitoring and Evaluation Satisfactory 2009-03-30
Counterpart Funding Satisfactory 2009-03-30
Overall Implementation Progress (IP) Satisfactory 2009-03-30
Overall Safeguards Rating Moderately Satisfactory 2009-03-30
Procurement Satisfactory 2009-03-30

COMPLETION RATINGS

INDICATORIMPLEMENTATION COMPLETION & RESULTS REPORT: 09-30-2009
OutcomesSubstantial
Risk to Development OutcomeNegligible
Bank PerformanceSubstantial
Borrower PerformanceSubstantial
Government PerformanceSubstantial
Implementing AgencySubstantial

INDEPENDENT EVALUATION RATINGS

INDICATORICR REVIEW: 03-16-2010PROJECT PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT REPORT: 02-18-2014
Outcome RatingSatisfactory Satisfactory
Risk To Development OutcomeNegligible To LowLow
Bank PerformanceSatisfactorySatisfactory
Borrower PerformanceModerately SatisfactoryModerately Satisfactory
Government PerformanceModerately SatisfactoryNot Rated
Implementing AgencyModerately SatisfactoryNot Rated
Icr QualitySatisfactoryNot Rated
M&e QualitySubstantialNot Rated

Results Framework

PROJECT DEVELOPMENT OBJECTIVE INDICATORS

INDICATORBASELINECURRENTTARGET
  • Percentage of districts with District Development Plans (DDPs) and Annual Investment Plans (PAIs) approved/updatedValueNil49 with DDPs (100%) and 49 with PAIs (100%) achiev80% of districts with DDPs and PAIs
    DateApril 16, 2004December 31, 2008March 31, 2009
    Comment
  • Percentage of districts with District Consultative Councils organized and agreeing with plans and implementation reportsValueNil100% achieved and exceeded100%
    DateApril 16, 2004December 31, 2008March 31, 2009
    Comment
  • Percentage of districts in which participants in planning processes express satisfaction with responsiveness and accountability of district governmentValueNilPreliminary assessment of the community participat80%
    DateApril 16, 2004December 31, 2008March 31, 2009
    Comment
  • Percentage of districts rated good or excellent on annual Local Investment Grant performance assessmentsValueNil67% for 2007. EOP target achieved and exceeded.50%
    DateApril 16, 2004December 31, 2008March 31, 2009
    Comment
  • Percentage of districts at national level adopting DPFP approach and methodologies (verify numbers based on PARPA targets)ValueNil128 out of 128 (100%). Target for end of project a60%
    DateApril 16, 2004December 31, 2008March 31, 2009
    Comment
  • Key administrative and fiscal instruments adopted supporting transparent district planning and managementValueNil5/5 done according to DGA. EOP target achieved and4/5
    DateApril 16, 2004December 31, 2008March 31, 2009
    Comment

INTERMEDIATE RESULTS INDICATORS

INDICATORBASELINECURRENTTARGET
  • Percentage of Local Inverstment Grants (LIG) projects with funds disbursed and properly accounted for based on the approved plans.ValueNilTotal disbursement for LIG 1 and LIG 2 is 100% (re80% for LIG 1 and 2 and 70% for LIG 3.
    DateApril 16, 2004September 20, 2008June 30, 2008
    Comment