| Financier | Commitments |
|---|---|
| Global Environment Facility (GEF) | 7.90 |
| Borrower/Recipient | 44.40 |
| Inter-American Development Bank | 45.00 |
| International Bank for Reconstruction and Development | 45.00 |
PE LIMA TRANSPORT PROJECT
Abstract*
The main objective of the project is to assist the Municipality of Metropolitan Lima (MML) in enhancing the economic productivity and the quality of life within the Lima Metropolitan area through improving mobility and accessibility for the metropolitan population. The project has the following six components: Component 1) comprises primarily infrastructure works to implement the busways along existing road corridors: (i) construction of 28.6 km of... Show More
Development Objective
The main objective of the project is to assist the Municipality of Metropolitan Lima (MML) in enhancing the economic productivity and the quality of life within the Lima Metropolitan area through improving mobility and accessibility for the metropolitan population, especially in the peri-urban poor neighborhoods by establishing an efficient, reliable, cleaner and safer mass rapid transit system.The specific project development objectives are to: (i) implement the new mass rapid transit system on the basis of a Public Private Partnership (PPP) with concessioned bus corridor/feeder routes operations and fare collection system; (ii) improve access within low income areas through facilitating the use of low cost transport alternatives, such as bicycles and walking; (iii) strengthen the local institutional capacity to regulate and manage the metropolitan transport system on a sustainable basis; and (iv) reduce the negative environmental impact of motorized transport in Lima.
Key Details
Project Details
P035740
Closed
Arturo Ardila Gomez
N/A
October 17, 1995
(as of board presentation)
December 9, 2003
December 15, 2004
US$ 142.30 million
N/A
2004
US$ 97.90 million
B
March 11, 2021
April 30, 2011
BANK APPROVED
Finances
Financing Plan (US$ Millions)
Total Project Financing (US$ Millions)
| Product Line | IBRD/IDA |
|---|---|
| IBRD Commitment | 45.00 |
| IDA Commitment | N/A |
| IBRD + IDA Commitment | 45.00 |
| Lending Instrument | |
|---|---|
| Grant Amount | 52.90 |
| Total Project Cost** | 142.30 |
Summary Status of World Bank Financing (US$ Millions) as of February 28, 2025
No data available.
| Period | Financier | Transaction Type | Amount (US$) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 1, 2014 | IBRD-72090 | Int Charges | 56,858.44 |
| Nov 1, 2014 | IBRD-72090 | Loan Repay | 1,953,693.10 |
| Dec 9, 2003 | IBRD-72090 | Loan Commitment | 45,000,000.00 |
| Nov 1, 2013 | IBRD-72090 | Int Charges | 42.70 |
| Nov 1, 2013 | IBRD-72090 | Int Charges | 82,477.90 |
| Nov 1, 2013 | IBRD-72090 | Loan Repay | 2,154,455.80 |
| May 1, 2014 | IBRD-72090 | Int Charges | 65,088.83 |
| May 1, 2014 | IBRD-72090 | Loan Repay | 2,059,777.90 |
| May 1, 2015 | IBRD-72090 | Int Charges | 51,215.47 |
| May 1, 2015 | IBRD-72090 | Loan Repay | 1,849,181.00 |
| May 1, 2016 | IBRD-72090 | Int Charges | 56,463.80 |
| Nov 1, 2016 | IBRD-72090 | Int Charges | 72,396.84 |
| Nov 1, 2016 | IBRD-72090 | Loan Repay | 1,538,524.20 |
| May 1, 2016 | IBRD-72090 | Loan Repay | 1,643,774.80 |
| Nov 1, 2015 | IBRD-72090 | Int Charges | 53,007.72 |
| Nov 1, 2015 | IBRD-72090 | Loan Repay | 1,752,930.40 |
| May 1, 2017 | IBRD-72090 | Int Charges | 81,829.93 |
| May 1, 2017 | IBRD-72090 | Loan Repay | 1,433,868.60 |
| Nov 1, 2017 | IBRD-72090 | Int Charges | 80,239.40 |
| Nov 1, 2017 | IBRD-72090 | Loan Repay | 1,337,761.50 |
| Nov 1, 2018 | IBRD-72090 | Int Charges | 95,911.54 |
| Nov 1, 2018 | IBRD-72090 | Loan Repay | 1,127,164.60 |
| May 1, 2018 | IBRD-72090 | Int Charges | 73,267.48 |
| May 1, 2018 | IBRD-72090 | Loan Repay | 1,232,415.20 |
| May 1, 2020 | IBRD-72090 | Int Charges | 40,521.07 |
| May 1, 2020 | IBRD-72090 | Loan Repay | 817,246.40 |
| Nov 1, 2019 | IBRD-72090 | Int Charges | 67,466.56 |
| Nov 1, 2019 | IBRD-72090 | Loan Repay | 921,758.50 |
| May 1, 2019 | IBRD-72090 | Int Charges | 86,599.98 |
| May 1, 2019 | IBRD-72090 | Loan Repay | 1,031,934.70 |
| Nov 1, 2020 | IBRD-72090 | Int Charges | 15,436.54 |
| Nov 1, 2020 | IBRD-72090 | Loan Repay | 721,277.90 |
| May 1, 2022 | IBRD-72090 | Int Charges | 2,271.84 |
| May 1, 2022 | IBRD-72090 | Loan Repay | 415,859.56 |
| Nov 1, 2021 | IBRD-72090 | Int Charges | 3,616.78 |
| Nov 1, 2021 | IBRD-72090 | Loan Repay | 511,371.70 |
| May 1, 2021 | IBRD-72090 | Loan Repay | 616,765.80 |
| May 1, 2021 | IBRD-72090 | Int Charges | 5,309.30 |
| May 1, 2023 | IBRD-72090 | Loan Repay | 200,762.73 |
| May 1, 2023 | IBRD-72090 | Int Charges | 7,961.05 |
| Nov 1, 2022 | IBRD-72090 | Int Charges | 6,559.08 |
| Nov 1, 2022 | IBRD-72090 | Loan Repay | 305,418.34 |
| Nov 1, 2023 | IBRD-72090 | Int Charges | 3,024.36 |
| Nov 1, 2023 | IBRD-72090 | Loan Repay | 104,915.84 |
Ratings
IMPLEMENTATION RATINGS
| Name | Review | Date |
|---|---|---|
| Counterpart Funding | Highly Satisfactory | 2011-05-20 |
| Overall Implementation Progress (IP) | Satisfactory | 2011-05-20 |
| Progress towards achievement of PDO | Satisfactory | 2011-05-20 |
| Monitoring and Evaluation | Satisfactory | 2011-05-20 |
| Procurement | Satisfactory | 2011-05-20 |
| Project Management | Satisfactory | 2011-05-20 |
| Financial Management | Moderately Satisfactory | 2011-05-20 |
| Overall Safeguards Rating | Satisfactory | 2011-05-20 |
COMPLETION RATINGS
| INDICATOR | IMPLEMENTATION COMPLETION & RESULTS REPORT: 03-29-2012 |
|---|---|
| Outcomes | Substantial |
| Risk to Development Outcome | Negligible |
| Bank Performance | Moderately Satisfactory |
| Borrower Performance | Moderately Satisfactory |
| Government Performance | Moderately Satisfactory |
| Implementing Agency | Substantial |
INDEPENDENT EVALUATION RATINGS
| INDICATOR | ICR REVIEW: 06-28-2013 | PROJECT PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT REPORT: 12-17-2015 |
|---|---|---|
| Outcome Rating | Moderately Satisfactory | Satisfactory |
| Risk To Development Outcome | Moderate | Substantial |
| Bank Performance | Moderately Satisfactory | Moderately Satisfactory |
| Borrower Performance | Moderately Satisfactory | Moderately Satisfactory |
| Government Performance | Moderately Satisfactory | Not Rated |
| Implementing Agency | Moderately Satisfactory | Moderately Satisfactory |
| Icr Quality | Satisfactory | Not Rated |
| M&e Quality | Substantial | Substantial |
Results Framework
PROJECT DEVELOPMENT OBJECTIVE INDICATORS
| INDICATOR | BASELINE | CURRENT | TARGET |
|---|
% of users satified with current transport service (general perception) Value 13.4% of users are satisfied with current transpor According to a user survey, 82% of riders rate the 60% of users of the new system are satisfied and c Date April 29, 2005 March 21, 2011 April 30, 2011 Comment Data quality is improving but more robust data is needed for ICR. For example, other sources have reported that 68% of users ratethe Metropolitano as good or very good, still above the target value. Reduction in average travel times in traffic corridors intervened Value On average, it takes 120 minutes of travel time in There has been a reduction of 34% in the travel ti Travel time for users in traffic corridors interve Date October 30, 2003 April 28, 2011 April 30, 2011 Comment Data quality is improving but more robust data is needed for ICR. Reduction of fatal and serious accidents in the main corridor of COSAC Value On average, there were 26 fatal or serious acciden Fatal and serious accidents in the main corridor o Fatal and serious accidents in the main corridor o Date October 30, 2003 April 27, 2011 April 30, 2011 Comment Reduction in air pollution emissions from the transport sector in El Metropolitano corridor Value Air pollution caused by the transport sector in El Green House Gas (GHG) Emissions caused by the tran Air pollution caused by the transport sector in El Date October 30, 2003 April 26, 2011 April 30, 2011 Comment More robust data is needed as well as the estimation of reduction in air pollution. It is important to point out that about 11% ofMetropolitano riders would use private car or taxi in the without project scenario. Consolidated Lima Urban Transport Sector by improving planning, supervision and control, and management capacity of the participating institutions Value There was a lack of urban traffic and transport st Protransporte's capacity to manage and operate the There is a strategic plan to increase coverage of Date October 30, 2003 April 26, 2011 April 30, 2011 Comment % of low-income population benefited by the project, specially the low income population living in the peri-urban areas Value There is no formal transport system in place A survey showed that 46.8% of users of the Metropo 10% of low income population will benefit from the Date October 30, 2003 April 26, 2011 April 30, 2011 Comment More robust data is need for ICR
INTERMEDIATE RESULTS INDICATORS
| INDICATOR | BASELINE | CURRENT | TARGET |
|---|
Number of kms of high capacity bus corridors completed Value High capacity bus corridors do not exist 100% of high capacity bus corridors have been comp 29.4 km of high capacity bus corridors completed Date October 30, 2003 April 28, 2011 April 30, 2011 Comment Number of Km is 27 because the terminal in the south, Matellini, was reallocated for environmental reasons. It was originallyplanned to build the terminal over a swamp, where migratory ducks arrive during winter in the nothern hemisphere. Number of bus-stops and terminals completed Value Bus-stops and terminals do not exist All stations and terminals have been completed. 35 bus stops and North and South terminals in oper Date October 30, 2003 April 28, 2011 April 30, 2011 Comment Number of passengers using the new system Value There are no passengers using the BRT system since 340,000 per weekday 600,000 passengers on a typical weekday Date October 30, 2003 April 26, 2011 April 30, 2011 Comment 304,000 ppd is with only 176 of the 312 trunk buses and 159 of the 232 feeder buses operating . Once the entire trunk fleet andallfeeder buses are operating it is expected to reach the 600,000 ppd. We estimate this goal will be reached on December 2011 forfourreasons: (i) The new administration has publicly committed to remove the traditional buses on parallel routes to theMetropolitano(about 40 routes); (ii) a new fare policy will create incentives for the feeder-trunk trips. Currently only 10% of thefeeder tripstransfer to the trunk corridor; (iii) Protransporte will implement by July 2011 a new route design to improve thequality of service; and (iv) currently demand is naturally increasing every month at a rate of 2% in the trunk corridor and 10% inthe feeder corridors Operation of high capacity buses: through buses, fare collection and control system in place Value Unplanned and unregulated route system in operatio 176 articulated buses, out of 312 are operating an Whole system covered by the Project in operation a Date October 30, 2003 April 26, 2011 April 30, 2011 Comment The operation of the full fleet is related with the demand increase. See previous indicator and the measures taken to reach thetargeted demand. Recovery and improvement of public spaces and green areas Value There are no areas of recovery and improvement of About 50,000 square meter of public space recovere 100,000 square meters of public space recuperated Date October 30, 2003 April 28, 2011 April 30, 2011 Comment Date needs to be refined for ICR. Air quality monitoring and report system in place Value Monitoring of air quality do not exist There are 16 reports per month. The implementation Monitoring results available in Annual report to Date October 30, 2003 April 28, 2011 April 30, 2011 Comment Institutional strengthening of municipal transport agencies Value No member of municipal staff has been trained in u 58 members of the MML have been trained. At least 50 municipal staff trained in urban tran Date October 30, 2003 April 26, 2011 April 30, 2011 Comment Team obtained a $40,000 capacity building grant that will help train more staff. Social Impact Mitigation Value 5,942 worker from public transport were estimated Thanks to careful studies to reorganize the old op At least 2,500 affected workers from public transp Date October 30, 2003 January 12, 2011 April 30, 2011 Comment At least one concessionaire for the high-capacity segregated busways has offered buses for scrapping Value Date March 26, 2009 April 16, 2010 June 30, 2010 Comment Not yet achieved (achievement still possible). At least 250 aged and polluting public transport vehicles retired through PROTRANSPORTE's owns scrapping scheme Value Date March 26, 2009 April 16, 2010 June 30, 2010 Comment Not yet achieved (achievement still possible). At least 250 of displaced bus operators by the first BRT system in Lima have been retrained / received technical and economic support to opt for new employments or new business outside the sector Value Date March 26, 2009 April 16, 2010 June 30, 2010 Comment Not yet achieved (achievement still possible). 32.5 km of bikeways rehabilitated 27.5 km of bikeways rehabilitated with project funds Value Date January 1, 2005 April 16, 2010 April 30, 2011 Comment Fully achieved. 6.1 Kms of bikeways extension to connect Lima's two main universities Value Date January 1, 2005 April 16, 2010 June 30, 2010 Comment Fully achieved. At least 3,000 people (local auth., civil servants, community leaders, civil society, general pop.) informed about sustainable transport options and their effect on air quality, GHG & environment Value Date January 1, 2005 April 16, 2010 June 30, 2010 Comment Fully achieved. 5 provincial and 38 district municipalities as well as FONAM have benefited from institutional strengthening programs Value Date January 1, 2005 April 16, 2010 June 30, 2010 Comment Fully achieved. Doubling of the number of bicycle trips in the Project financed bikeway in comparison to the base line Value Date January 1, 2005 April 16, 2010 June 30, 2010 Comment Only partially achieved. Study to consolidate the integrated public transport system in Metropolitan Lima considered satisfactory by PROTRANSPORTE/Bank Value Date March 26, 2009 April 16, 2010 June 30, 2010 Comment Study still ongoing. 3 staff of PROTRANSPORTE trained in areas related to public transport integration (participation in the study and formal training through the study) Value Date March 26, 2009 April 16, 2010 April 30, 2011 Comment Fully achieved.