Skip to Main Navigation

Agricultural Competitiveness Project

Abstract*

The Agricultural Competitiveness Project for Kazakhstan will increase the competitiveness of the agricultural sector in Kazakhstan. To achieve this objective, the project will facilitate access to markets by supporting measures to improve the quality and safety of agricultural products, enhance access to information, and harmonize standards. The project has the following components: Component 1) will enhance the management of food safety controls...

* The project abstract is drawn from the PAD, SAR or PGD and may not accurately reflect the project's current nature

Show More

Development Objective

The projects development objective is to increase the competitiveness of the agricultural sector in Kazakhstan. To achieve this objective, the project would facilitate access to markets by supporting measures to improve the quality and safety of agricultural products, enhance access to information, and harmonize standards. It will also help to increase the quality, quantity, and relevance of applied agricultural research and facilitate transfer of knowledge to farmers.

Key Details

Project Details

  • P049721

  • Closed

  • Talimjan Urazov

  • N/A

  • Kazakhstan

  • February 17, 2004

  • (as of board presentation)

    April 28, 2005

  • September 18, 2006

  • US$ 14.70 million

  • F

  • Not Applicable

  • June 30, 2012

  • BANK APPROVED

  • January 15, 2013

  • Notes

Finances

Financing Plan (US$ Millions)

No data available.
Financier Commitments
Borrower/Recipient 37.90
Local Beneficiaries 12.30
International Bank for Reconstruction and Development 14.70

Total Project Financing (US$ Millions)

Product Line IBRD/IDA
IBRD Commitment 14.70
IDA Commitment N/A
IBRD + IDA Commitment 14.70
Lending Instrument
Grant Amount N/A
Total Project Cost** 64.90

Summary Status of World Bank Financing (US$ Millions) as of July 31, 2025

Download:
No data available.
Financier Approval Date Closing Date Principal Disbursed Repayments Interest, Charges & Fees

Detailed Financial Activity as of July 31, 2025

Download:
No data available.
Period Financier Transaction Type Amount (US$)
Oct 15, 2014 IBRD-47740 Int Charges 26,048.37
Apr 28, 2005 IBRD-47740 Loan Commitment 24,000,000.00
Oct 15, 2013 IBRD-47740 Int Charges 34,862.16
Oct 15, 2013 IBRD-47740 Loan Repay 552,184.25
Apr 15, 2014 IBRD-47740 Int Charges 29,423.46
Apr 15, 2014 IBRD-47740 Loan Repay 552,184.25
Oct 15, 2015 IBRD-47740 Int Charges 28,686.91
Oct 15, 2015 IBRD-47740 Loan Repay 552,184.25
Apr 15, 2015 IBRD-47740 Int Charges 25,543.12
Apr 15, 2015 IBRD-47740 Loan Repay 552,184.25
Oct 15, 2016 IBRD-47740 Int Charges 42,440.87
Oct 15, 2016 IBRD-47740 Loan Repay 552,184.25
Apr 15, 2016 IBRD-47740 Loan Repay 552,184.25
Apr 15, 2016 IBRD-47740 Int Charges 31,381.55
Apr 15, 2017 IBRD-47740 Int Charges 50,974.60
Apr 15, 2017 IBRD-47740 Loan Repay 552,184.25
Oct 15, 2017 IBRD-47740 Loan Repay 552,184.25
Oct 15, 2017 IBRD-47740 Int Charges 51,647.63
Apr 15, 2018 IBRD-47740 Int Charges 49,746.26
Apr 15, 2018 IBRD-47740 Loan Repay 552,184.25
Apr 15, 2018 IBRD-47740 Int Charges 280.69
Oct 15, 2018 IBRD-47740 Int Charges 66,019.15
Oct 15, 2018 IBRD-47740 Loan Repay 552,184.25
Apr 15, 2019 IBRD-47740 Int Charges 60,968.53
Apr 15, 2019 IBRD-47740 Loan Repay 552,184.25
Apr 15, 2020 IBRD-47740 Int Charges 34,525.34
Apr 15, 2020 IBRD-47740 Loan Repay 552,184.25
Oct 15, 2019 IBRD-47740 Int Charges 52,545.85
Oct 15, 2019 IBRD-47740 Loan Repay 552,184.25
Oct 15, 2020 IBRD-47740 Int Charges 19,199.46
Oct 15, 2020 IBRD-47740 Loan Repay 552,184.25
Apr 15, 2021 IBRD-47740 Int Charges 6,197.34
Apr 15, 2021 IBRD-47740 Loan Repay 552,184.25
Apr 15, 2022 IBRD-47740 Int Charges 1,898.32
Apr 15, 2022 IBRD-47740 Loan Repay 552,184.10
Oct 15, 2021 IBRD-47740 Int Charges 4,154.22
Oct 15, 2021 IBRD-47740 Loan Repay 552,184.25
Oct 15, 2014 IBRD-47740 Loan Repay 552,184.25

Footnotes

Ratings

IMPLEMENTATION RATINGS

Name Review Date
Procurement Moderately Satisfactory 2012-06-24
Financial Management Satisfactory 2012-06-24
Overall Implementation Progress (IP) Moderately Unsatisfactory 2012-06-24
Counterpart Funding Satisfactory 2012-06-24
Progress towards achievement of PDO Moderately Unsatisfactory 2012-06-24
Project Management Moderately Satisfactory 2012-06-24
Monitoring and Evaluation Unsatisfactory 2012-06-24

COMPLETION RATINGS

INDICATORIMPLEMENTATION COMPLETION & RESULTS REPORT: 01-31-2013
OutcomesModerately Satisfactory
Risk to Development OutcomeModest
Bank PerformanceModerately Satisfactory
Borrower PerformanceModerately Unsatisfactory
Government PerformanceModerately Unsatisfactory
Implementing AgencyModerately Unsatisfactory

INDEPENDENT EVALUATION RATINGS

INDICATORICR REVIEW: 02-28-2014PROJECT PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT REPORT:
Outcome RatingModerately Unsatisfactory N/a
Risk To Development OutcomeSignificantN/a
Bank PerformanceModerately UnsatisfactoryN/a
Borrower PerformanceModerately UnsatisfactoryN/a
Government PerformanceModerately UnsatisfactoryN/a
Implementing AgencyModerately UnsatisfactoryN/a
Icr QualitySatisfactoryN/a
M&e QualityNegligibleN/a

Results Framework

PROJECT DEVELOPMENT OBJECTIVE INDICATORS

INDICATORBASELINECURRENTTARGET
  • Number of farmers with increased income compared with 2005 levels.Value0.003200.002400.00
    DateMay 7, 2009May 31, 2012June 30, 2012
    CommentThe estimate exceeds the final target due to a) number of grant beneficiaries (600); b) dissemination campaign that induced manyfarmers to adopt technologies developed with grants; and c) training and extension services that were financed with the project (atotal of 8,000 people benefited).
  • Value of agricultural exports, including livestock products, rises compared with 2005.Value800000000.001670000000.001400000000.00
    DateJanuary 31, 2006May 31, 2012June 30, 2012
    CommentTotal agricultural exports in 2005: $0.8 billionFinal objective achieved - Total agricultural exports in 2010 - $1.67 billion. Data for 2011 are not yet available, they will beavailable for ICR and expected to increase comparing to 2010.Total agricultural exports $1.4 billion
  • Increased proportion of agricultural products that are tested and that meet international standards for quality and safetyValue10.0015.0030.00
    DateDecember 31, 2004May 31, 2012June 30, 2012
    CommentPace of increase fell short of expectations due to failure in NRL construction. Project is hiring a company to do an analysis oflaboratory testing. Better number should be available for ICR.
  • Satisfaction of potential direct and indirect beneficiaries of the project. Percentage of surveyed beneficiaries who knows and use the projectValue0.0099.0020.00
    DateDecember 31, 2004May 31, 2012June 30, 2012
    CommentEnd of project target achieved. Almost all beneficiaries expressed high satisfaction with the project.

INTERMEDIATE RESULTS INDICATORS

INDICATORBASELINECURRENTTARGET
  • Seven technical regulations, each consisting of a number of individual standards, are harmonizedValue0.007.007.00
    DateDecember 31, 2004May 31, 2012June 30, 2012
    CommentEnd of project target achieved.
  • 60 laboratories are equipped according to international accreditation standards.Value0.0060.0060.00
    DateDecember 31, 2004May 31, 2012June 30, 2012
    CommentEquipment was delivered to all intended recipients. However, issues have been identified regarding lack of staff training, lack ofequipment calibration, underutlization of the equipment. An Action Plan to remedy the issues is being developed by the MOA.
  • At least 140 market-oriented subprojects implemented under the CGS.Value0.0086.00140.00
    DateDecember 31, 2004May 31, 2012June 30, 2012
    CommentActual number of projects turned to be less then projected due to increased actual size of the subprojects (considering inflation)
  • 600 applied research and extension subprojects implemented under the CGSValue0.00523.00600.00
    DateDecember 31, 2004May 31, 2012June 30, 2012
    CommentRequest for additional financing of CGS was not supported by Min Fin. Actual number of projects turned to be less then projecteddue to increased actual size of the subprojects (considering inflation)
  • At least 40 scientists under age of 40 receive advanced education.Value0.0052.0040.00
    DateMay 19, 2005May 31, 2012June 30, 2012
    CommentFinal target achieved
  • Governing Board, Coordination Center, and the roster of independent peer reviewers established and operating, as demonstrated through minutes of the meetings.Value0.0010.0010.00
    DateDecember 31, 2004May 31, 2012June 30, 2012
    CommentFinal target achieved