Antioquia Upper Secondary Education

Abstract*

The Upper Secondary Education Project of Colombia will support the Department of Antioquia's long-term vision to improve the employability of young people and increase the competitiveness of the labor force by: (i) increasing equitable access and retention in upper-secondary education, (ii) improving equitable educational achievement in upper-secondary education, and (iii) increasing the proportion of public school secondary-education graduates who... Show More

Development Objective

The proposed Project will support the Department of Antioquia's long-term vision to improve the employability of young people a nd increase the competitiveness of the labor force by: (i) increasing equitable access and retention in upper-secondary education, (ii) improving equitable educational achievement in upper-secondary education, and (iii) increasing the proportion of public school secondary-education graduates who continue on to tertiary education.

Key Details

Project Details

Project ID
P052608
Status
Closed
Team Leader
Marcelo Becerra , Janet Entwistle
Borrower 2
N/A

Country
Colombia
Disclosure Date
February 6, 2007
Approval Date
(as of board presentation)
November 27, 2007
Effective Date
May 7, 2008

Total Project Cost 1
US$ 42.00 million
Implementing Agency
Secretaria de Educacion de Antioquia,Gobernacion de Antioquia
Region
Latin America and Caribbean
Fiscal Year 3
2008

Commitment Amount
US$ 20.00 million
Environmental Category
C
Environmental and Social Risk
Not Applicable
Closing Date
June 30, 2014

Last Stage Reached
BANK APPROVED
Last Update Date
September 28, 2021

Notes
1. Total project cost includes funding from World Bank and non-bank sources in US$ millions. Active and Closed projects show current commitments. Proposed (pipeline) and dropped projects show the forecast amount. The commitment amount for projects in the pipeline is indicative and may be modified during the project preparation.
2. Borrower refers to the Borrower of a Loan or Recipient of a Grant.
3. ”Fiscal Year” is the fiscal year in which the project was approved (or dropped if the status is dropped). The World Bank's fiscal year is from July 1 - June 30. For example, a fiscal year of 1996 corresponds to July 1, 1995 - June 30, 1996.

Sectors

Themes

FY17 - Human Development and Gender

FY17 - Education80%
- FY17 - Access to Education30%
- FY17 - Education Financing20%
- FY17 - Science and Technology10%
- FY17 - Standards, Curriculum and Textbooks10%
- FY17 - Teachers10%

FY17 - Private Sector Development

FY17 - Jobs100%

FY17 - Social Development and Protection

FY17 - Social Protection20%
- FY17 - Social Safety Nets20%

Project Map

Interactive Map

Finances

Financing Plan (US$ Millions)

Financier	Commitments
Borrower/Recipient	22.00
International Bank for Reconstruction and Development	20.00

Total Project Financing (US$ Millions)

Product Line	IBRD/IDA
IBRD Commitment	20.00
IDA Commitment	N/A
IBRD + IDA Commitment	20.00

Lending Instrument
Grant Amount	N/A
Total Project Cost**	42.00

Summary Status of World Bank Financing (US$ Millions) as of April 30, 2025

No data available.

Detailed Financial Activity as of April 30, 2025

Download:

Period	Financier	Transaction Type	Amount (US$)
May 16, 2017	IBRD-74920	Int Charges	89,221.09
Nov 15, 2016	IBRD-74920	Int Charges	0.01
Nov 16, 2016	IBRD-74920	Int Charges	70,626.19
Nov 16, 2016	IBRD-74920	Loan Repay	847,642.60
May 15, 2016	IBRD-74920	Int Charges	50,085.47
May 15, 2016	IBRD-74920	Loan Repay	847,642.60
Nov 15, 2015	IBRD-74920	Int Charges	37,827.50
Nov 15, 2015	IBRD-74920	Loan Repay	847,642.60
May 15, 2015	IBRD-74920	Int Charges	60.49
May 15, 2015	IBRD-74920	Int Charges	32,358.79
May 15, 2015	IBRD-74920	Loan Repay	847,642.60
Jun 17, 2014	IBRD-74920	Loan Disb	1,018,000.00
May 15, 2014	IBRD-74920	Int Charges	32,659.04
May 15, 2014	IBRD-74920	Loan Repay	739,385.50
Nov 15, 2013	IBRD-74920	Int Charges	39,826.44
Nov 15, 2013	IBRD-74920	Loan Repay	706,398.00
Dec 20, 2013	IBRD-74920	Loan Disb	30,000.00
Feb 28, 2014	IBRD-74920	Loan Disb	695,000.00
Nov 10, 2014	IBRD-74920	Loan Cancel	123,022.62
Oct 29, 2014	IBRD-74920	Loan Disb	-6,999.58
Nov 10, 2014	IBRD-74920	Loan Disb	1,200,977.00
Oct 29, 2014	IBRD-74920	Loan Disb	-0.02
Nov 15, 2014	IBRD-74920	Int Charges	30,916.33
May 15, 2024	IBRD-74920	Int Charges	49,490.54
Nov 27, 2007	IBRD-74920	Loan Commitment	20,000,000.00
Nov 15, 2014	IBRD-74920	Loan Repay	787,944.10
May 15, 2024	IBRD-74920	Loan Repay	847,642.60
Nov 15, 2023	IBRD-74920	Int Charges	69,743.19
Nov 15, 2023	IBRD-74920	Loan Repay	847,642.60
May 15, 2023	IBRD-74920	Int Charges	87,038.60
May 15, 2023	IBRD-74920	Loan Repay	847,642.60
Nov 15, 2022	IBRD-74920	Int Charges	43,376.20
Nov 15, 2022	IBRD-74920	Loan Repay	847,642.60
May 15, 2022	IBRD-74920	Int Charges	7,137.24
May 15, 2022	IBRD-74920	Loan Repay	847,642.60
Nov 15, 2021	IBRD-74920	Int Charges	7,258.80
Nov 15, 2021	IBRD-74920	Loan Repay	847,642.60
May 15, 2021	IBRD-74920	Int Charges	10,204.09
May 15, 2021	IBRD-74920	Loan Repay	847,642.60
Nov 15, 2020	IBRD-74920	Int Charges	28,404.14
Nov 15, 2020	IBRD-74920	Loan Repay	847,642.60
May 15, 2020	IBRD-74920	Int Charges	84,261.15
May 15, 2020	IBRD-74920	Loan Repay	847,642.60
May 15, 2019	IBRD-74920	Int Charges	0.01
May 16, 2019	IBRD-74920	Int Charges	148,586.52
May 16, 2019	IBRD-74920	Loan Repay	847,642.60
Nov 15, 2019	IBRD-74920	Int Charges	0.01
Nov 15, 2019	IBRD-74920	Int Charges	62.15
Nov 15, 2019	IBRD-74920	Int Charges	125,596.86
Nov 15, 2019	IBRD-74920	Loan Repay	847,642.60
Nov 15, 2018	IBRD-74920	Loan Repay	847,642.60
Nov 15, 2018	IBRD-74920	Int Charges	144,535.16
May 15, 2018	IBRD-74920	Loan Repay	847,642.60
May 15, 2018	IBRD-74920	Int Charges	39.32
May 15, 2018	IBRD-74920	Int Charges	99,505.57
Nov 16, 2017	IBRD-74920	Int Charges	35.09
Nov 16, 2017	IBRD-74920	Int Charges	96,707.20
Nov 16, 2017	IBRD-74920	Loan Repay	847,642.60
May 16, 2017	IBRD-74920	Loan Repay	847,642.60
May 16, 2017	IBRD-74920	Int Charges	30.84

Footnotes

Ratings

IMPLEMENTATION RATINGS

Name	Review	Date
Counterpart Funding	Satisfactory	2014-01-07
Monitoring and Evaluation	Satisfactory	2014-01-07
Overall Implementation Progress (IP)	Satisfactory	2014-01-07
Progress towards achievement of PDO	Satisfactory	2014-01-07
Procurement	Moderately Satisfactory	2014-01-07
Project Management	Satisfactory	2014-01-07
Financial Management	Moderately Satisfactory	2014-01-07

COMPLETION RATINGS

INDICATOR	IMPLEMENTATION COMPLETION & RESULTS REPORT: 04-01-2015
Outcomes	Moderately Unsatisfactory
Risk to Development Outcome	Modest
Bank Performance	Moderately Unsatisfactory
Borrower Performance	Moderately Satisfactory
Government Performance	Moderately Satisfactory
Implementing Agency	Moderately Satisfactory

INDEPENDENT EVALUATION RATINGS

INDICATOR	ICR REVIEW: 06-22-2015	PROJECT PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT REPORT:
Outcome Rating	Moderately Unsatisfactory	N/a
Risk To Development Outcome	Moderate	N/a
Bank Performance	Moderately Unsatisfactory	N/a
Borrower Performance	Moderately Satisfactory	N/a
Government Performance	Moderately Satisfactory	N/a
Implementing Agency	Moderately Satisfactory	N/a
Icr Quality	Satisfactory	N/a
M&e Quality	Modest	N/a

Results Framework

PROJECT DEVELOPMENT OBJECTIVE INDICATORS

INDICATOR		BASELINE	CURRENT	TARGET

Increased in the poorest areas upper-secondary gross enrollment from 46% to 66%, and net enrollment rate from 22% to 36%.	Value	GER 46% NER 22%	GER 56.2% NER 27.2%	GER 66% NER 36%
	Date	December 31, 2006	November 30, 2013	June 30, 2014
	Comment	Enrollment in the 25 poorest municipalities.	Enrollment in the 25 poorest municipalities. Please note that the enrollment rate is for 2012, since data is only available a yearafter. Data reflects 2012 Ministry of Education thorough review of enrollment which reduced enrollment figures by 400,000 students.

Increased average mathematics and language test scores (national ICFES test) in the poorest areas. Mathematics test scores from 44 to 47. Language test scores from 46 to 49.	Value	Math Pri/Pub: 41.8/42.3 Lang Pri/Pub: 42.7/43.6	Math Pri/Pub: 42.5/42.6 Lang Pri/Pub: 43.8/43.0	Math Pri/Pub: 41.0/42.0 Lang Pri/Pub: 43.5/43.0
	Date		November 30, 2013	June 30, 2014
	Comment

Increased transition rate from secondary to tertiary education from 23% to 31% Value 23.00 30.00 31.00
Date December 31, 2006 November 30, 2013 June 30, 2014
Comment

Increase upper secondary completion rate in the poorest areas from 78.5% to 85%.	Value	78.50	82.00	85.00
	Date	December 31, 2006	November 30, 2013	June 30, 2014
	Comment		Please note that this is the completion rate for 2012 since the data is provided one year later.

INTERMEDIATE RESULTS INDICATORS

INDICATOR		BASELINE	CURRENT	TARGET

75% of school principals, teachers and municipal staff report that they are satisfied with the support they are receiving from the Local Advisor Groups.	Value	0	88%	90.0%
	Date	October 24, 2007	November 30, 2013	June 30, 2014
	Comment

80% of upper secondary schools with monitoring and evaluation software installed and producing standard reports, and fulfilling their obligations to publish information on their school performance	Value	0	100%	80%
	Date	October 24, 2007	November 30, 2013	June 30, 2014
	Comment		Monitoring system is being used by the schools as instrument to improve the managerial skills.

The Department has implemented the impact evaluation, published the results, and released a set of proposed policy actions based onthe results of the evaluation.	Value	None	The following have been completed (i) Classroom ob	Impact evaluation report is completed and delivere
	Date	October 24, 2007	November 30, 2013	June 30, 2014
	Comment		Not yet due.

Reduced upper secondary dropout rate in the poorest areas: from 7.5% to 4.3%. Value 5.8% 4.5% 3.5%
Date December 31, 2006 November 30, 2013 June 30, 2014
Comment Dropout rate of the 25 poorest municipalities.
Proportion of secondary school students from the targeted population who receive direct subsides Value 0 92.68% 94%
Date October 24, 2007 November 30, 2013 June 30, 2014
Comment
Rate of targeting leakage among beneficiary population is less than 5% Value 0 Less than 5% Less than 5%
Date October 24, 2007 November 30, 2013 June 30, 2014
Comment

Proportion of 9th grade students in target population who benefited from the Conditional Scholarship program and end up entering into tertiary.	Value	0	4.4%	15%
	Date	October 24, 2007	November 30, 2013	June 30, 2014
	Comment		Scholarship granted for the first semester 2013.

80% of students in grades 10 and 11 who received vocational and professional orientation from a school counselor trained under the Project said they are satisfied.	Value	0%	70%	80%
	Date	October 24, 2007	November 30, 2013	June 30, 2014
	Comment

Every year, 80% of schools are able to determine the status of 50% of their graduates 6 months after those graduates left school. Value 0% 71% 80%
Date October 24, 2007 November 30, 2013 June 30, 2014
Comment
80% of schools implement a competency-based curriculum. Value 28% 76% 80%
Date October 24, 2007 November 30, 2013 June 30, 2014
Comment

80% of upper secondary rural schools with predominantly indigenous and Afro-Colombian student populations implement flexible curricula models adjusted to the cultural context and expectations	Value	5%	70%	80%
	Date	October 24, 2007	November 30, 2013	June 30, 2014
	Comment

80% of secondary school principals and coordinators are reported by their staff to use modern management skills most of the time Value 0% 89% 90%
Date October 24, 2007 November 30, 2013 June 30, 2014
Comment
60% of teachers who have participated in Project activities have improved their pedagogical practices. Value 0 65% 70%
Date October 24, 2007 November 30, 2013 June 30, 2014
Comment

80% of schools have achieved at least 75% of the objectives of projects that were designed to strengthen peace and social cohesion among the student population	Value	0	65%	80%
	Date	October 24, 2007	November 30, 2013	June 30, 2014
	Comment

A reform proposal to improve secondary technical education in the Department has been adopted by the government following public consultation with key stakeholders.	Value	None	Revised proposal in process to be adopted by SEDUC	Proposal adopted by SEDUCA
	Date	October 24, 2007	November 30, 2013	June 30, 2014
	Comment

The reform is implemented in accordance with the annual action plans (as amended during the course of implementation).	Value	None	Under implementation.	Reform implemented on time.
	Date	October 24, 2007	November 30, 2013	June 30, 2014
	Comment

Increased transition rate from secondary to tertiary education from 23% to 31%	Value	23.00	30.00	31.00
	Date	December 31, 2006	November 30, 2013	June 30, 2014
	Comment

Reduced upper secondary dropout rate in the poorest areas: from 7.5% to 4.3%.	Value	5.8%	4.5%	3.5%
	Date	December 31, 2006	November 30, 2013	June 30, 2014
	Comment		Dropout rate of the 25 poorest municipalities.

Proportion of secondary school students from the targeted population who receive direct subsides	Value	0	92.68%	94%
	Date	October 24, 2007	November 30, 2013	June 30, 2014
	Comment

Rate of targeting leakage among beneficiary population is less than 5%	Value	0	Less than 5%	Less than 5%
	Date	October 24, 2007	November 30, 2013	June 30, 2014
	Comment