Financier | Commitments |
---|---|
Borrower/Recipient | 6.00 |
Nordic Development Fund (NDF) | 7.90 |
IDA Credit | 25.00 |
P055991
Closed
Enrique Pantoja
N/A
September 29, 2000
(as of board presentation)
February 26, 2004
December 2, 2004
US$ 38.90 million
N/A
2004
US$ 32.90 million
B
Not Applicable
April 30, 2010
BANK APPROVED
January 15, 2013
Financier | Commitments |
---|---|
Borrower/Recipient | 6.00 |
Nordic Development Fund (NDF) | 7.90 |
IDA Credit | 25.00 |
Product Line | IBRD/IDA |
---|---|
IBRD Commitment | N/A |
IDA Commitment | 25.00 |
IBRD + IDA Commitment | 25.00 |
Lending Instrument | |
---|---|
Grant Amount | 7.90 |
Total Project Cost** | 38.90 |
Period | Financier | Transaction Type | Amount (US$) |
---|---|---|---|
Nov 15, 2021 | IDA-38580 | Int Charges | 73,615.18 |
Nov 15, 2020 | IDA-38580 | Loan Repay | 229,289.48 |
Nov 15, 2020 | IDA-38580 | Int Charges | 75,452.54 |
Nov 15, 2020 | IDA-38580 | Int Charges | 75,452.54 |
Nov 15, 2020 | IDA-38580 | Loan Repay | 4,107.74 |
May 15, 2021 | IDA-38580 | Int Charges | 702.53 |
May 15, 2021 | IDA-38580 | Int Charges | 702.53 |
May 15, 2021 | IDA-38580 | Loan Repay | 236,500.81 |
May 15, 2021 | IDA-38580 | Int Charges | 74,044.72 |
May 15, 2021 | IDA-38580 | Int Charges | 74,044.72 |
May 15, 2020 | IDA-38580 | Int Charges | 290.56 |
May 15, 2020 | IDA-38580 | Int Charges | 290.56 |
May 15, 2020 | IDA-38580 | Loan Repay | 223,463.44 |
May 15, 2020 | IDA-38580 | Int Charges | 73,742.94 |
May 15, 2020 | IDA-38580 | Int Charges | 73,742.94 |
Feb 26, 2004 | IDA-38580 | Loan Commitment | 25,000,000.00 |
May 15, 2024 | IDA-38580 | Int Charges | 65,260.19 |
May 15, 2024 | IDA-38580 | Int Charges | 65,260.19 |
May 15, 2024 | IDA-38580 | Int Charges | 1,645.64 |
May 15, 2024 | IDA-38580 | Int Charges | 1,645.64 |
May 15, 2024 | IDA-38580 | Loan Repay | 435,068.12 |
Nov 15, 2023 | IDA-38580 | Int Charges | 2,463.64 |
Nov 15, 2023 | IDA-38580 | Int Charges | 2,463.64 |
Nov 15, 2016 | IDA-38580 | Int Charges | 3,722.55 |
Nov 15, 2016 | IDA-38580 | Int Charges | 3,722.55 |
Nov 15, 2016 | IDA-38580 | Loan Repay | 224,147.28 |
Nov 15, 2016 | IDA-38580 | Int Charges | 79,852.46 |
Nov 15, 2016 | IDA-38580 | Int Charges | 79,852.46 |
May 15, 2016 | IDA-38580 | Int Charges | 79,647.28 |
May 15, 2016 | IDA-38580 | Int Charges | 79,647.28 |
May 15, 2016 | IDA-38580 | Loan Repay | 6,111.88 |
Nov 15, 2015 | IDA-38580 | Loan Repay | 227,522.10 |
Nov 15, 2015 | IDA-38580 | Int Charges | 82,761.20 |
Nov 15, 2023 | IDA-38580 | Loan Repay | 218,032.16 |
Nov 15, 2023 | IDA-38580 | Int Charges | 64,577.85 |
Nov 15, 2023 | IDA-38580 | Int Charges | 64,577.85 |
May 15, 2023 | IDA-38580 | Int Charges | 65,375.40 |
May 15, 2023 | IDA-38580 | Int Charges | 4,631.56 |
May 15, 2023 | IDA-38580 | Int Charges | 4,631.56 |
May 15, 2023 | IDA-38580 | Loan Repay | 220,713.27 |
May 15, 2023 | IDA-38580 | Int Charges | 65,375.40 |
Nov 15, 2022 | IDA-38580 | Loan Repay | 10,497.05 |
Nov 15, 2022 | IDA-38580 | Loan Repay | 205,828.80 |
Nov 15, 2022 | IDA-38580 | Int Charges | 62,791.96 |
Nov 15, 2022 | IDA-38580 | Int Charges | 62,791.96 |
Nov 15, 2014 | IDA-38580 | Loan Repay | 1,924.30 |
Nov 15, 2014 | IDA-38580 | Loan Repay | 238,751.90 |
Nov 15, 2014 | IDA-38580 | Int Charges | 89,351.07 |
Nov 15, 2014 | IDA-38580 | Int Charges | 89,351.07 |
May 15, 2015 | IDA-38580 | Loan Repay | 224,732.28 |
May 15, 2015 | IDA-38580 | Loan Repay | 8,033.70 |
May 15, 2015 | IDA-38580 | Int Charges | 75,409.93 |
May 15, 2015 | IDA-38580 | Int Charges | 75,409.93 |
May 15, 2014 | IDA-38580 | Int Charges | 552.58 |
May 15, 2014 | IDA-38580 | Int Charges | 552.58 |
May 15, 2014 | IDA-38580 | Int Charges | 95,077.22 |
May 15, 2014 | IDA-38580 | Int Charges | 95,077.22 |
May 15, 2014 | IDA-38580 | Loan Repay | 253,539.33 |
Nov 15, 2013 | IDA-38580 | Int Charges | 92,627.50 |
Nov 15, 2013 | IDA-38580 | Int Charges | 92,627.50 |
Nov 15, 2013 | IDA-38580 | Int Charges | 1,010.36 |
Nov 15, 2013 | IDA-38580 | Int Charges | 1,010.36 |
Nov 15, 2017 | IDA-38580 | Loan Repay | 232,266.25 |
Nov 15, 2017 | IDA-38580 | Int Charges | 81,002.86 |
Nov 15, 2017 | IDA-38580 | Int Charges | 81,002.86 |
Nov 15, 2017 | IDA-38580 | Int Charges | 4,759.01 |
Nov 15, 2017 | IDA-38580 | Int Charges | 4,759.01 |
May 15, 2017 | IDA-38580 | Loan Repay | 216,970.84 |
May 15, 2017 | IDA-38580 | Int Charges | 74,790.91 |
May 15, 2017 | IDA-38580 | Int Charges | 74,790.91 |
May 15, 2017 | IDA-38580 | Loan Repay | 8,295.89 |
May 15, 2016 | IDA-38580 | Loan Repay | 225,830.53 |
Nov 15, 2015 | IDA-38580 | Int Charges | 82,761.20 |
Nov 15, 2015 | IDA-38580 | Int Charges | 9,903.33 |
Nov 15, 2015 | IDA-38580 | Int Charges | 9,903.33 |
Nov 15, 2019 | IDA-38580 | Loan Repay | 2,205.26 |
Nov 15, 2019 | IDA-38580 | Loan Repay | 223,743.67 |
Nov 15, 2019 | IDA-38580 | Int Charges | 75,116.67 |
Nov 15, 2019 | IDA-38580 | Int Charges | 75,116.67 |
May 15, 2019 | IDA-38580 | Loan Repay | 4,636.74 |
May 15, 2019 | IDA-38580 | Loan Repay | 222,597.69 |
May 15, 2019 | IDA-38580 | Int Charges | 76,691.61 |
May 15, 2019 | IDA-38580 | Int Charges | 76,691.61 |
Nov 15, 2018 | IDA-38580 | Loan Repay | 5,542.93 |
May 15, 2018 | IDA-38580 | Int Charges | 80,998.41 |
May 15, 2018 | IDA-38580 | Int Charges | 80,998.41 |
May 15, 2018 | IDA-38580 | Loan Repay | 2,446.66 |
May 15, 2018 | IDA-38580 | Loan Repay | 232,331.40 |
Nov 15, 2018 | IDA-38580 | Loan Repay | 221,583.02 |
Nov 15, 2018 | IDA-38580 | Int Charges | 77,506.71 |
Nov 15, 2018 | IDA-38580 | Int Charges | 77,506.71 |
May 15, 2022 | IDA-38580 | Loan Repay | 214,158.52 |
May 15, 2022 | IDA-38580 | Loan Repay | 4,600.22 |
May 15, 2022 | IDA-38580 | Int Charges | 68,909.00 |
May 15, 2022 | IDA-38580 | Int Charges | 68,909.00 |
Nov 15, 2021 | IDA-38580 | Int Charges | 73,615.18 |
Nov 15, 2021 | IDA-38580 | Int Charges | 2,174.54 |
Nov 15, 2021 | IDA-38580 | Int Charges | 2,174.54 |
Nov 15, 2021 | IDA-38580 | Loan Repay | 230,949.53 |
Name | Review | Date |
---|---|---|
Project Management | Satisfactory | 2010-06-30 |
Counterpart Funding | Satisfactory | 2010-06-30 |
Financial Management | Moderately Unsatisfactory | 2010-06-30 |
Overall Safeguards Rating | Satisfactory | 2010-06-30 |
Monitoring and Evaluation | Satisfactory | 2010-06-30 |
Overall Implementation Progress (IP) | Moderately Satisfactory | 2010-06-30 |
Progress towards achievement of PDO | Moderately Satisfactory | 2010-06-30 |
Procurement | Moderately Satisfactory | 2010-06-30 |
INDICATOR | IMPLEMENTATION COMPLETION & RESULTS REPORT: 10-25-2010 |
---|---|
Outcomes | Moderately Satisfactory |
Risk to Development Outcome | Modest |
Bank Performance | Moderately Satisfactory |
Borrower Performance | Moderately Satisfactory |
Government Performance | Moderately Satisfactory |
Implementing Agency | Moderately Unsatisfactory |
INDICATOR | ICR REVIEW: 05-02-2012 | PROJECT PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT REPORT: |
---|---|---|
Outcome Rating | Moderately Satisfactory | N/a |
Risk To Development Outcome | Moderate | N/a |
Bank Performance | Moderately Satisfactory | N/a |
Borrower Performance | Moderately Unsatisfactory | N/a |
Government Performance | Moderately Unsatisfactory | N/a |
Implementing Agency | Moderately Unsatisfactory | N/a |
Icr Quality | Satisfactory | N/a |
M&e Quality | Modest | N/a |
INDICATOR | BASELINE | CURRENT | TARGET |
---|
Average time to register a land transaction (days) | Value | 90 days or more | 23 days | 7 |
Date | December 2, 2004 | April 30, 2010 | April 30, 2010 | |
Comment | Estimated at Credit closing date (to be confirmed after final evaluation is completed). Original target date of 7 days wasunrealistic, considering worldwide tr ends. In general, the reduction in thetime to register a land transaction, from an average of 90 days at thebeggining of the project to 23 days puts Honduras ahead of many countries inthe region (as corroborated by Doing Business Indicat ors). |
Average administrative cost of registering a land transaction | Value | $6.21 | US$14.96 | $2.07 |
Date | December 2, 2004 | April 30, 2010 | April 30, 2010 | |
Comment | Estimated at Credit closing date (to be confirmed after final evaluation is completed). Baseline is unreliable due to unkownmethodology and poor data. Moreove r, measurement of this indicator still faceslimitations due to IP's accounting methods. |
Registry (now under Property Institute) is self-financed (percent of Registry's operating costs covered by registration fees) | Value | 0 | 100% | 100% |
Date | December 2, 2004 | April 30, 2010 | April 30, 2010 | |
Comment | Estimated at Credit Closing Date (to be confirmed after final evaluation is completed). |
Rating of SINAP services (percentage of users--and % of women-- rating its services as "satisfactory", a third level on a four-level scale) | Value | 0 | 67% total (68% by female users) | 70% |
Date | December 2, 2004 | April 30, 2010 | April 30, 2010 | |
Comment | Estimated at Credit Closing Date (to be confirmed after final evaluation is completed). |
The System maintains a 96% rate of titled lands accurately registered in SINAP | Value | 0 | 89% | 96% |
Date | December 2, 2004 | April 30, 2010 | April 30, 2010 | |
Comment | Estimated at Credit Closing Date (to be confirmed after final evaluation is completed). |
INDICATOR | BASELINE | CURRENT | TARGET |
---|
Number of access/connection points to SINAP established in public and private entities | Value | 0 | 690 | 60 |
Date | December 2, 2004 | April 30, 2010 | April 30, 2010 | |
Comment | Target of 60 amply exceeded. |
Number of registries (now under Property Institute) operating SURE under folio real | Value | 0 | 6 | 8 |
Date | December 2, 2004 | April 30, 2010 | April 30, 2010 | |
Comment | In addition, the project has provided technical assistance for the modernization of 2 additional registries (Islas de la Bahia andYoro/Olanchito). |
Number of people certified to operate SINAP subsystems | Value | 0 | 1260 | 600 |
Date | December 2, 2004 | April 30, 2010 | April 30, 2010 | |
Comment | Target amply exceeded. |
Percentage of land parcels in project area registered in SINAP under folio real | Value | 0 | 14% | 30% |
Date | December 2, 2004 | April 30, 2010 | April 30, 2010 | |
Comment | A total of 223,500 properties under folio real |
Number of parcels in the project area surveyed | Value | 0 | 364238 | 521,500 |
Date | December 2, 2004 | April 30, 2010 | April 30, 2010 | |
Comment | 70% of target achieved |
Number of municipalities demarcated | Value | 0 | 28 (and 1,500 Km of inter-municipal limits defined | 25 (and 1,352 Km of inter-municipal limits defined |
Date | December 2, 2004 | April 30, 2010 | April 30, 2010 | |
Comment |
Number of ethnic communities demarcated, and number registered in SURE | Value | 0 (0) | 20 pilot Miskito communities delimited by the Proj | 12 (8) |
Date | December 2, 2004 | April 30, 2010 | April 30, 2010 | |
Comment | New Government has restarted process to provide collective title to pilot Miskito communities. |
Number of protected areas demarcated | Value | 8 | 2 | 8 |
Date | December 2, 2004 | April 30, 2010 | April 30, 2010 | |
Comment | Two protected areas completely demarcated (Jardin Botanico y Centro de Investigacion and Monumento Nacional San Fernando de Omoa).Four protected areas delimite d and ready for demarcation. |
Percentage of parcels incorporated in SINAP with a woman as main owner | Value | 0 | 45% | Not target established |
Date | October 24, 2007 | April 30, 2010 | April 30, 2010 | |
Comment | 142,948 parcels registered in SINAP with a woman as main owner. |
40% of land transactions in the project area are registered in SINAP under folio real | Value | 0 | 41% | 40% |
Date | February 12, 2004 | April 30, 2010 | April 30, 2010 | |
Comment |
12,000 land parcels surveyed within national forest areas | Value | 0 | 44424 | 12,000 |
Date | February 12, 2004 | April 30, 2010 | April 30, 2010 | |
Comment | Target amply exceeded. |