Financier | Commitments |
---|---|
Borrower/Recipient | 40.00 |
International Bank for Reconstruction and Development | 60.00 |
P060573
Closed
Eric Lancelot
N/A
April 18, 2002
(as of board presentation)
December 9, 2003
December 20, 2004
US$ 100.00 million
N/A
2004
US$ 60.00 million
A
Not Applicable
October 31, 2011
BANK APPROVED
March 11, 2021
Financier | Commitments |
---|---|
Borrower/Recipient | 40.00 |
International Bank for Reconstruction and Development | 60.00 |
Product Line | IBRD/IDA |
---|---|
IBRD Commitment | 60.00 |
IDA Commitment | N/A |
IBRD + IDA Commitment | 60.00 |
Lending Instrument | |
---|---|
Grant Amount | N/A |
Total Project Cost** | 100.00 |
Period | Financier | Transaction Type | Amount (US$) |
---|---|---|---|
Mar 15, 2016 | IBRD-72080 | Int Charges | 0.01 |
Sep 15, 2013 | IBRD-72080 | Int Charges | 106,566.98 |
Dec 9, 2003 | IBRD-72080 | Loan Commitment | 60,000,000.00 |
Mar 15, 2018 | IBRD-72080 | Int Charges | 17,662.81 |
Mar 15, 2018 | IBRD-72080 | Loan Repay | 1,030,090.75 |
Sep 15, 2018 | IBRD-72080 | Loan Repay | 1,024,323.56 |
Sep 15, 2018 | IBRD-72080 | Int Charges | 13,350.34 |
Mar 15, 2017 | IBRD-72080 | Loan Repay | 3,391,621.80 |
Mar 15, 2017 | IBRD-72080 | Int Charges | 48,840.78 |
Sep 15, 2017 | IBRD-72080 | Int Charges | 26,485.60 |
Sep 15, 2017 | IBRD-72080 | Loan Repay | 1,030,090.75 |
Sep 15, 2016 | IBRD-72080 | Int Charges | 0.01 |
Sep 15, 2016 | IBRD-72080 | Int Charges | 58,504.79 |
Sep 15, 2016 | IBRD-72080 | Loan Repay | 3,391,621.80 |
Sep 15, 2013 | IBRD-72080 | Loan Repay | 3,391,621.80 |
Mar 15, 2016 | IBRD-72080 | Int Charges | 52,956.43 |
Mar 15, 2016 | IBRD-72080 | Loan Repay | 3,391,621.80 |
Sep 15, 2015 | IBRD-72080 | Loan Repay | 3,391,621.80 |
Sep 15, 2015 | IBRD-72080 | Int Charges | 55,318.27 |
Sep 15, 2015 | IBRD-72080 | Int Charges | 0.01 |
Sep 15, 2014 | IBRD-72080 | Int Charges | 0.01 |
Sep 15, 2014 | IBRD-72080 | Int Charges | 69,469.49 |
Sep 15, 2014 | IBRD-72080 | Loan Repay | 3,391,621.80 |
Mar 15, 2015 | IBRD-72080 | Int Charges | 0.01 |
Mar 15, 2015 | IBRD-72080 | Int Charges | 58,446.48 |
Mar 15, 2015 | IBRD-72080 | Loan Repay | 3,391,621.80 |
Mar 15, 2014 | IBRD-72080 | Int Charges | 84,970.89 |
Mar 15, 2014 | IBRD-72080 | Loan Repay | 3,391,621.80 |
Name | Review | Date |
---|---|---|
Progress towards achievement of PDO | Satisfactory | 2011-07-29 |
Financial Management | Satisfactory | 2011-07-29 |
Monitoring and Evaluation | Satisfactory | 2011-07-29 |
Procurement | Satisfactory | 2011-07-29 |
Overall Implementation Progress (IP) | Moderately Satisfactory | 2011-07-29 |
Project Management | Satisfactory | 2011-07-29 |
Counterpart Funding | Satisfactory | 2011-07-29 |
INDICATOR | IMPLEMENTATION COMPLETION & RESULTS REPORT: 04-30-2012 |
---|---|
Outcomes | Moderately Satisfactory |
Risk to Development Outcome | Negligible |
Bank Performance | Substantial |
Borrower Performance | Moderately Satisfactory |
Government Performance | Moderately Satisfactory |
Implementing Agency | Substantial |
INDICATOR | ICR REVIEW: 01-28-2014 | PROJECT PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT REPORT: |
---|---|---|
Outcome Rating | Moderately Satisfactory | N/a |
Risk To Development Outcome | Moderate | N/a |
Bank Performance | Moderately Satisfactory | N/a |
Borrower Performance | Moderately Satisfactory | N/a |
Government Performance | Moderately Unsatisfactory | N/a |
Implementing Agency | Moderately Satisfactory | N/a |
Icr Quality | Unsatisfactory | N/a |
M&e Quality | Substantial | N/a |
INDICATOR | BASELINE | CURRENT | TARGET |
---|
Decreased price (inclusive transport cost component) of key commodities and inputs | Value | 0% | ||
Date | December 31, 2002 | May 19, 2011 | October 31, 2011 | |
Comment | Evaluation is underway. 200 road sections completed so far (about 3,500km) have contributed positively to decrease price. |
Decrease in time needed to get to municipal and regional centers | Value | 0% | ||
Date | December 31, 2002 | May 19, 2011 | October 31, 2011 | |
Comment | Evaluation is underway. 200 road sections completed so far (about 1,200km) have contributed positively to reduce access time. |
INDICATOR | BASELINE | CURRENT | TARGET |
---|
Increase in number of municipalities presenting annual statements conforming accounting standards and the requirements of the Law on Fiscal Responsibility | Value | 20% by end 2005, 30% by end 2008. | ||
Date | December 31, 2002 | May 19, 2011 | December 31, 2009 | |
Comment |
Land use management tools approved and in use | Value | Target to be achieved by 2008. Tools could be: For | ||
Date | December 31, 2002 | May 19, 2011 | December 31, 2009 | |
Comment |
Number of regional development agenda finalized | Value | 1 by end 2006, 4 by end 2008 | ||
Date | December 31, 2002 | May 19, 2011 | October 31, 2011 | |
Comment |
Number of finalized municipal development agenda prepared by MDFs | Value | 20 | 67 | 60 |
Date | December 31, 2002 | May 19, 2011 | October 31, 2011 | |
Comment | 20 by end 2003, 40 by end 2005, and 60 by end 2007 |
Number of UTRs established (cum.) | Value | Assignment of SEPLAN staff | 4 | 4 |
Date | December 31, 2002 | May 19, 2011 | October 31, 2011 | |
Comment | 2 by end 2004, 4 by end 2006. | May 19, 2011 - all are active. May be constituted within Regional Administrations after Project. |
Number of inter-municipal consortia created | Value | 0 | 0 | |
Date | December 31, 2002 | May 19, 2011 | December 31, 2009 | |
Comment | 1 by end 2005, 4 by end 2008 | No progress due to difficulty in cultural communication between municipalities, lack of availability, legal questions, andimprecise definition of State assistance |
State planning system strengthened | Value | |||
Date | December 31, 2002 | May 19, 2011 | December 31, 2009 | |
Comment | Target to be achieved by end 2008. | May 19,2011 - an Institutional Development Plan had not been prepared. Instead, this activity focused on training technicians onpublic management and a Strategic Agenda was made. In the Southeast, a Regional Strategic Plan was made. |
Number of regional zonings ready | Value | |||
Date | December 31, 2002 | May 19, 2011 | December 31, 2009 | |
Comment | 3 by end 2005, 6 by end 2008 | May 19, 2011 - divergent ideas over definition of a regional zone (conservation, economic, etc.). TOR was pre-approved by Bank andenvironmental studies prepared (land use and coverage, fitoecological maps) |
Number of protected areas established | Value | |||
Date | December 31, 2002 | May 19, 2011 | December 31, 2009 | |
Comment | 6 areas to be achieved by 2008 | May 19, 2011 - Ecological evaluations had prioritized 18 areas for protection |
Critical points on the main municipal road networks eliminated (number cum.) | Value | 0 | 84.91% in Southeast, 28.31% in Northeast | |
Date | December 31, 2002 | May 19, 2011 | December 31, 2009 | |
Comment | 85% eliminated by 2008 |
Connecting roads improved (km cum.) | Value | Roads identified through participatory process | 0 km by the end of 2005, 40 km by the end of 2006, | |
Date | December 31, 2002 | May 19, 2011 | December 31, 2009 | |
Comment | Original indicator: traffic on improved roads increased 15%. More relevant is the km rather than traffic. | to be evaluated. |
DERTINS planning, operations, and monitoring capacity strengthened | Value | TOR ready | ||
Date | December 31, 2002 | May 19, 2011 | December 31, 2007 | |
Comment | May 19, 2011 - entire state road network geo-referenced, State manages this database; Traffic count system implemented andmaintained by Unit; 2 road condition evaluations undertaken; training in various functions to more than 200 individuals; |
Number of pilot CONDERs established | Value | 2 by end 2005, 4 by end 2006 | ||
Date | December 31, 2002 | May 19, 2011 | October 31, 2011 | |
Comment |