Skip to Main Navigation

TOCANTINS SUSTAINABLE REGIONAL DEVELOPMENT PROJECT

Abstract*

The main objective of the Tocantins Sustainable Regional Development Project is to contribute to raising living standards and to reducing inequalities and regional disparities in Brazil by improving access to markets, job opportunities, infrastructure and social services for rural communities in Tocantins' poorest regions, while ensuring sustainable use of natural resources and the protection of fragile ecosystems. The project is comprised of three...

* The project abstract is drawn from the PAD, SAR or PGD and may not accurately reflect the project's current nature

Show More

Development Objective

The project development objective is to contribute to raising living standards and to reducing inequalities and regional disparities by improving access to markets, job opportunities, infrastructure and social services for rural communities in Tocantins' poorest regions, while ensuring sustainable use of natural resources and the protection of fragile ecosystems.

Key Details

Project Details

  • P060573

  • Closed

  • Eric Lancelot

  • N/A

  • Brazil

  • April 18, 2002

  • (as of board presentation)

    December 9, 2003

  • December 20, 2004

  • US$ 60.00 million

  • A

  • Not Applicable

  • October 31, 2011

  • BANK APPROVED

  • March 11, 2021

  • Notes

Finances

Financing Plan (US$ Millions)

No data available.
Financier Commitments
Borrower/Recipient 40.00
International Bank for Reconstruction and Development 60.00

Total Project Financing (US$ Millions)

Product Line IBRD/IDA
IBRD Commitment 60.00
IDA Commitment N/A
IBRD + IDA Commitment 60.00
Lending Instrument
Grant Amount N/A
Total Project Cost** 100.00

Summary Status of World Bank Financing (US$ Millions) as of July 31, 2025

Download:
No data available.
Financier Approval Date Closing Date Principal Disbursed Repayments Interest, Charges & Fees

Detailed Financial Activity as of July 31, 2025

Download:
No data available.
Period Financier Transaction Type Amount (US$)
Mar 15, 2016 IBRD-72080 Int Charges 0.01
Sep 15, 2013 IBRD-72080 Int Charges 106,566.98
Dec 9, 2003 IBRD-72080 Loan Commitment 60,000,000.00
Mar 15, 2018 IBRD-72080 Int Charges 17,662.81
Mar 15, 2018 IBRD-72080 Loan Repay 1,030,090.75
Sep 15, 2018 IBRD-72080 Loan Repay 1,024,323.56
Sep 15, 2018 IBRD-72080 Int Charges 13,350.34
Mar 15, 2017 IBRD-72080 Loan Repay 3,391,621.80
Mar 15, 2017 IBRD-72080 Int Charges 48,840.78
Sep 15, 2017 IBRD-72080 Int Charges 26,485.60
Sep 15, 2017 IBRD-72080 Loan Repay 1,030,090.75
Sep 15, 2016 IBRD-72080 Int Charges 0.01
Sep 15, 2016 IBRD-72080 Int Charges 58,504.79
Sep 15, 2016 IBRD-72080 Loan Repay 3,391,621.80
Sep 15, 2013 IBRD-72080 Loan Repay 3,391,621.80
Mar 15, 2016 IBRD-72080 Int Charges 52,956.43
Mar 15, 2016 IBRD-72080 Loan Repay 3,391,621.80
Sep 15, 2015 IBRD-72080 Loan Repay 3,391,621.80
Sep 15, 2015 IBRD-72080 Int Charges 55,318.27
Sep 15, 2015 IBRD-72080 Int Charges 0.01
Sep 15, 2014 IBRD-72080 Int Charges 0.01
Sep 15, 2014 IBRD-72080 Int Charges 69,469.49
Sep 15, 2014 IBRD-72080 Loan Repay 3,391,621.80
Mar 15, 2015 IBRD-72080 Int Charges 0.01
Mar 15, 2015 IBRD-72080 Int Charges 58,446.48
Mar 15, 2015 IBRD-72080 Loan Repay 3,391,621.80
Mar 15, 2014 IBRD-72080 Int Charges 84,970.89
Mar 15, 2014 IBRD-72080 Loan Repay 3,391,621.80

Footnotes

Ratings

IMPLEMENTATION RATINGS

Name Review Date
Progress towards achievement of PDO Satisfactory 2011-07-29
Financial Management Satisfactory 2011-07-29
Monitoring and Evaluation Satisfactory 2011-07-29
Procurement Satisfactory 2011-07-29
Overall Implementation Progress (IP) Moderately Satisfactory 2011-07-29
Project Management Satisfactory 2011-07-29
Counterpart Funding Satisfactory 2011-07-29

COMPLETION RATINGS

INDICATORIMPLEMENTATION COMPLETION & RESULTS REPORT: 04-30-2012
OutcomesModerately Satisfactory
Risk to Development OutcomeNegligible
Bank PerformanceSubstantial
Borrower PerformanceModerately Satisfactory
Government PerformanceModerately Satisfactory
Implementing AgencySubstantial

INDEPENDENT EVALUATION RATINGS

INDICATORICR REVIEW: 01-28-2014PROJECT PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT REPORT:
Outcome RatingModerately Satisfactory N/a
Risk To Development OutcomeModerateN/a
Bank PerformanceModerately SatisfactoryN/a
Borrower PerformanceModerately SatisfactoryN/a
Government PerformanceModerately UnsatisfactoryN/a
Implementing AgencyModerately SatisfactoryN/a
Icr QualityUnsatisfactoryN/a
M&e QualitySubstantialN/a

Results Framework

PROJECT DEVELOPMENT OBJECTIVE INDICATORS

INDICATORBASELINECURRENTTARGET
  • Decreased price (inclusive transport cost component) of key commodities and inputsValue0%
    DateDecember 31, 2002May 19, 2011October 31, 2011
    CommentEvaluation is underway. 200 road sections completed so far (about 3,500km) have contributed positively to decrease price.
  • Decrease in time needed to get to municipal and regional centersValue0%
    DateDecember 31, 2002May 19, 2011October 31, 2011
    CommentEvaluation is underway. 200 road sections completed so far (about 1,200km) have contributed positively to reduce access time.

INTERMEDIATE RESULTS INDICATORS

INDICATORBASELINECURRENTTARGET
  • Increase in number of municipalities presenting annual statements conforming accounting standards and the requirements of the Law on Fiscal ResponsibilityValue20% by end 2005, 30% by end 2008.
    DateDecember 31, 2002May 19, 2011December 31, 2009
    Comment
  • Land use management tools approved and in useValueTarget to be achieved by 2008. Tools could be: For
    DateDecember 31, 2002May 19, 2011December 31, 2009
    Comment
  • Number of regional development agenda finalizedValue1 by end 2006, 4 by end 2008
    DateDecember 31, 2002May 19, 2011October 31, 2011
    Comment
  • Number of finalized municipal development agenda prepared by MDFsValue206760
    DateDecember 31, 2002May 19, 2011October 31, 2011
    Comment20 by end 2003, 40 by end 2005, and 60 by end 2007
  • Number of UTRs established (cum.)ValueAssignment of SEPLAN staff44
    DateDecember 31, 2002May 19, 2011October 31, 2011
    Comment2 by end 2004, 4 by end 2006.May 19, 2011 - all are active. May be constituted within Regional Administrations after Project.
  • Number of inter-municipal consortia createdValue00
    DateDecember 31, 2002May 19, 2011December 31, 2009
    Comment1 by end 2005, 4 by end 2008No progress due to difficulty in cultural communication between municipalities, lack of availability, legal questions, andimprecise definition of State assistance
  • State planning system strengthenedValue
    DateDecember 31, 2002May 19, 2011December 31, 2009
    CommentTarget to be achieved by end 2008.May 19,2011 - an Institutional Development Plan had not been prepared. Instead, this activity focused on training technicians onpublic management and a Strategic Agenda was made. In the Southeast, a Regional Strategic Plan was made.
  • Number of regional zonings readyValue
    DateDecember 31, 2002May 19, 2011December 31, 2009
    Comment3 by end 2005, 6 by end 2008May 19, 2011 - divergent ideas over definition of a regional zone (conservation, economic, etc.). TOR was pre-approved by Bank andenvironmental studies prepared (land use and coverage, fitoecological maps)
  • Number of protected areas establishedValue
    DateDecember 31, 2002May 19, 2011December 31, 2009
    Comment6 areas to be achieved by 2008May 19, 2011 - Ecological evaluations had prioritized 18 areas for protection
  • Critical points on the main municipal road networks eliminated (number cum.)Value084.91% in Southeast, 28.31% in Northeast
    DateDecember 31, 2002May 19, 2011December 31, 2009
    Comment85% eliminated by 2008
  • Connecting roads improved (km cum.)ValueRoads identified through participatory process0 km by the end of 2005, 40 km by the end of 2006,
    DateDecember 31, 2002May 19, 2011December 31, 2009
    CommentOriginal indicator: traffic on improved roads increased 15%. More relevant is the km rather than traffic.to be evaluated.
  • DERTINS planning, operations, and monitoring capacity strengthenedValueTOR ready
    DateDecember 31, 2002May 19, 2011December 31, 2007
    CommentMay 19, 2011 - entire state road network geo-referenced, State manages this database; Traffic count system implemented andmaintained by Unit; 2 road condition evaluations undertaken; training in various functions to more than 200 individuals;
  • Number of pilot CONDERs establishedValue2 by end 2005, 4 by end 2006
    DateDecember 31, 2002May 19, 2011October 31, 2011
    Comment