| Financier | Commitments |
|---|---|
| Borrower/Recipient | 21.00 |
| International Bank for Reconstruction and Development | 31.50 |
PERNAMBUCO INTEGRATED DEVELOPMENT: EDUCATION QUALITY IMPROVEMENT PROJECT
Abstract*
The objectives of the Pernambuco Integrated Development: Education Quality Improvement Project are to improve the quality, efficiency, and inclusiveness of the public education system; modernize and strengthen the managerial, financial, and administrative capacity of the Secretariat of Education. The project has the following four components: 1) This component seeks to improve the quality and efficiency of the 1,086 state schools in Pernambuco. 2)... Show More
Development Objective
The development objectives o f the Pernambuco Integrated Development: Education Quality Improvement Project are to (a) improve the quality, efficiency, and inclusiveness o f the public education system; (b) modernize and strengthen the managerial, financial, and administrative capacity o f the Secretariat of Education to set policies and guidelines for the sector and deliver public education efficiently; and (c) support the overall state modernization effort through interventions to be carried out in the Secretariat of Education and to be replicated in other state institutions.
Key Details
Project Details
P069934
Closed
Ricardo Rocha Silveira
N/A
January 12, 2003
(as of board presentation)
October 14, 2004
August 1, 2005
US$ 52.50 million
N/A
2005
US$ 31.50 million
C
Not Applicable
June 30, 2010
BANK APPROVED
September 28, 2021
Finances
Financing Plan (US$ Millions)
Total Project Financing (US$ Millions)
| Product Line | IBRD/IDA |
|---|---|
| IBRD Commitment | 31.50 |
| IDA Commitment | N/A |
| IBRD + IDA Commitment | 31.50 |
| Lending Instrument | |
|---|---|
| Grant Amount | N/A |
| Total Project Cost** | 52.50 |
Summary Status of World Bank Financing (US$ Millions) as of June 30, 2025
No data available.
| Period | Financier | Transaction Type | Amount (US$) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 14, 2004 | IBRD-47540 | Loan Commitment | 31,500,000.00 |
| May 15, 2015 | IBRD-47540 | Loan Repay | 1,314,906.60 |
| Nov 15, 2020 | IBRD-47540 | Int Charges | 593.17 |
| Nov 15, 2020 | IBRD-47540 | Int Charges | 23,032.10 |
| May 15, 2021 | IBRD-47540 | Int Charges | 9,561.16 |
| May 15, 2021 | IBRD-47540 | Loan Repay | 1,305,345.50 |
| May 15, 2021 | IBRD-47540 | Loan Repay | 9,561.16 |
| Nov 16, 2021 | IBRD-47540 | Int Charges | 4,553.93 |
| Nov 16, 2021 | IBRD-47540 | Loan Repay | 1,250,357.00 |
| Nov 16, 2021 | IBRD-47540 | Loan Repay | 4,553.93 |
| Nov 15, 2018 | IBRD-47540 | Loan Repay | 1,314,906.60 |
| May 15, 2019 | IBRD-47540 | Int Charges | 131,478.10 |
| May 15, 2019 | IBRD-47540 | Loan Repay | 1,314,906.60 |
| Nov 15, 2019 | IBRD-47540 | Int Charges | 102,553.29 |
| Nov 15, 2019 | IBRD-47540 | Loan Repay | 1,314,906.60 |
| May 29, 2020 | IBRD-47540 | Loan Repay | 1,314,906.60 |
| May 29, 2020 | IBRD-47540 | Int Charges | 63,088.86 |
| Nov 15, 2017 | IBRD-47540 | Int Charges | 113,136.62 |
| Nov 15, 2017 | IBRD-47540 | Loan Repay | 1,314,906.60 |
| May 15, 2018 | IBRD-47540 | Int Charges | 108,854.72 |
| May 15, 2018 | IBRD-47540 | Loan Repay | 1,314,906.60 |
| Nov 15, 2018 | IBRD-47540 | Int Charges | 139,278.62 |
| Nov 15, 2015 | IBRD-47540 | Int Charges | 63,554.98 |
| Nov 15, 2015 | IBRD-47540 | Loan Repay | 1,314,906.60 |
| May 15, 2016 | IBRD-47540 | Loan Repay | 1,314,906.60 |
| May 15, 2016 | IBRD-47540 | Int Charges | 74,699.63 |
| May 15, 2017 | IBRD-47540 | Int Charges | 109,242.83 |
| May 15, 2017 | IBRD-47540 | Loan Repay | 1,314,906.60 |
| Nov 15, 2016 | IBRD-47540 | Int Charges | 93,497.81 |
| Nov 15, 2016 | IBRD-47540 | Loan Repay | 1,314,906.60 |
| Nov 15, 2014 | IBRD-47540 | Int Charges | 58,291.63 |
| Nov 15, 2014 | IBRD-47540 | Loan Repay | 1,314,906.60 |
| Nov 15, 2013 | IBRD-47540 | Int Charges | 77,482.00 |
| Nov 15, 2013 | IBRD-47540 | Loan Repay | 1,314,906.60 |
| May 15, 2014 | IBRD-47540 | Int Charges | 65,394.66 |
| May 15, 2014 | IBRD-47540 | Loan Repay | 1,314,906.60 |
| May 15, 2015 | IBRD-47540 | Int Charges | 57,196.97 |
| Nov 15, 2020 | IBRD-47540 | Loan Repay | 1,314,906.60 |
Ratings
IMPLEMENTATION RATINGS
| Name | Review | Date |
|---|---|---|
| Overall Safeguards Rating | Satisfactory | 2010-06-26 |
| Overall Implementation Progress (IP) | Moderately Satisfactory | 2010-06-26 |
| Progress towards achievement of PDO | Moderately Satisfactory | 2010-06-26 |
| Procurement | Moderately Satisfactory | 2010-06-26 |
| Project Management | Moderately Satisfactory | 2010-06-26 |
| Financial Management | Moderately Satisfactory | 2010-06-26 |
| Counterpart Funding | Satisfactory | 2010-06-26 |
| Monitoring and Evaluation | Moderately Unsatisfactory | 2010-06-26 |
COMPLETION RATINGS
| INDICATOR | IMPLEMENTATION COMPLETION & RESULTS REPORT: 12-23-2010 |
|---|---|
| Outcomes | Moderately Satisfactory |
| Risk to Development Outcome | Negligible |
| Bank Performance | Moderately Satisfactory |
| Borrower Performance | Moderately Satisfactory |
| Government Performance | Moderately Satisfactory |
| Implementing Agency | Moderately Satisfactory |
INDEPENDENT EVALUATION RATINGS
| INDICATOR | ICR REVIEW: 08-19-2011 | PROJECT PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT REPORT: |
|---|---|---|
| Outcome Rating | Moderately Unsatisfactory | N/a |
| Risk To Development Outcome | Negligible To Low | N/a |
| Bank Performance | Moderately Unsatisfactory | N/a |
| Borrower Performance | Moderately Unsatisfactory | N/a |
| Government Performance | Moderately Unsatisfactory | N/a |
| Implementing Agency | Moderately Unsatisfactory | N/a |
| Icr Quality | Satisfactory | N/a |
| M&e Quality | Modest | N/a |
Results Framework
PROJECT DEVELOPMENT OBJECTIVE INDICATORS
| INDICATOR | BASELINE | CURRENT | TARGET |
|---|
Increase grade 4 completion rate from 81% to 86% (note: the state is using approval rate rather than completion rate) Value 81%Baseline revised after 2003/04 data became avai State schools 81.5% Municipal schools 83% 86% Date January 1, 2004 May 31, 2010 December 31, 2009 Comment Baseline was revised downwards to 76.3% (state schools) and 77.8% (municipal schools). 77.5% total public schools. Projectachieved at least five percentage po ints increase in the indicator which wasthe targeted objetive. Increase fundamental level completion rate from 54% to 60% (note: completion rate means total students approved in 8th grade in year t/total students enrolled in 5th grade in year t - 3 Value 54%Data revised based on different calculation:42. State schools 48.6% Municipal schools 34% 60% Date January 1, 2004 May 31, 2010 December 31, 2009 Comment The original baseline was calculated with data projections. The baseline was revised using actual and official data provided byINEP. Baseline was revised downwards to 42.1% (state schools) and 36.1% (municipal schools). Project achieved targeted increase of sixpercentage points in state scho ols but failed to meet the target for municipalschools. Reduce age-grade distortion at the fundamental cycle from 53% to 46%. Value 53%DATA REVISED DEC. 2007:all public schools 48.8% State schools 38.4% Municipal schools 31% 46% Date January 1, 2004 May 31, 2010 December 31, 2009 Comment Baseline was revised downwards to 56.8 (state schools) and 44.8% (municipal schools); 48.8% (all public schools). Project exceeded targeted percentage pointsreduction. Increase SAEB scores to reach the national average. Value 4th grade Portuguesenat'l 169,4 PE 157,14th grade 4th grade Portuguese nat'l 175,8; PE 166,8 4th g SAEB scores increased Date December 1, 2003 May 31, 2010 December 31, 2009 Comment Updated data will only be available on the second semester of CY2010 .To-date, scores for 4th grade show improvements in SAEBscores and scores for 8th grade sh ow basically no change. Decrease repetition rates from 31% to 23% in State schools. Value Fundamental: 16.1%Secondary: 7.85% Fundamental 17.5% Secondary 9.5% 23% Date January 1, 2004 May 31, 2010 December 31, 2009 Comment The original baseline was calculated with data projections. The baseline was revised using actual and official data provided byINEP. Baseline line was revised downwards. Targets were not met. Increase approval rates in Indigenous Schools from 60% to 70%. Value 62.3% 72.3% 70% Date January 1, 2004 May 31, 2010 December 31, 2009 Comment The original baseline was calculated with data projections. The baseline was revised using actual and official data provided byINEP. Baseline was revised updwards. Project has exceeded target. Decrease drop-out rates in Indigenous Schools from 13% to 10%.(This number refers to "abandono" - student enrolled at beginning of school year who drops out-- not "evasao") Value 10.4% 7.9% 10% Date January 1, 2004 May 31, 2010 December 31, 2009 Comment The original baseline was calculated with data projections. The baseline was revised using actual and official data provided byINEP. Baseline was revised downwards. Project has exceeded target. Complete SEDUC's state personnel census and formulate a medium-term staffing strategy. Value 0 1 census completed 1 census completed Date January 1, 2004 May 31, 2010 December 31, 2009 Comment SEDUC meets Law of Fiscal Responsibility personnel expenditure ceiling, each year. Value State in compliance law met Date May 31, 2010 December 31, 2009 Comment Increase fundamental level approval rate from 69% to 78% Value all public schools 69%DATA ADDED ON DEC. 2007:stat state schools 74.1% municipal schools 79.1% 78% Date January 1, 2004 May 31, 2010 December 31, 2009 Comment Reduce age-grade distortion at the secondary level from 68% to 60%. Value 68%UPDATED DATA ON DECEMBER:all public schools 70. state schools 53.2% municipal schools 51.8% 60% Date January 1, 2004 May 31, 2010 December 31, 2009 Comment Performance-based personnel management proposal implemented. Value 0 Proposal approved and implemented in 2009. proposal implemented. Date January 1, 2004 December 31, 2009 December 31, 2009 Comment Education personnel costs decreased as a share of total education budget. Value 48.5% (2004) below 48.5% below 48.5% Date December 17, 2007 December 31, 2009 December 31, 2009 Comment Beneficiary satisfaction improves. Value n.a. survey results positive survey results positive Date January 1, 2004 December 31, 2009 December 31, 2009 Comment Coordination among Municipal Secretariats of Education and between Municipalities and SEDUC improves. Value In 2008,state worked with 170 municipalities in im coordination improved measured by joint partnershi Date May 31, 2010 December 31, 2009 Comment
INTERMEDIATE RESULTS INDICATORS
| INDICATOR | BASELINE | CURRENT | TARGET |
|---|
987 PDEs prepared annually in State Schools.99 PDEs prepared annually in Indigenous Schools1,600 PMEs implemented (total)95 PMEs in Indigenous schools implemented (total) Value 0 PDEs State Schools with Fundescola resources - 99 3,948 state school PDEs396 indigenous PDEs1,600 PM Date January 1, 2004 December 31, 2009 December 31, 2009 Comment 6,293 school directors trained in management program.7,896 school council members trained. Value 0 2224 school directors trained in management progra 6,293 directors trained7,896 school council member Date January 1, 2004 December 31, 2009 December 31, 2009 Comment 145 state schools rehabilitated 24 indigenous schools rehabilitated 534 comp. labs equipped99 packages for indigenous schools16 centers disabled kids equipped4 vans disabled kids purchased Value 0 46 schools rehabilitated; 13 schools with furnitur 145 state schools rehabilitated24 indigenous schoo Date January 1, 2004 December 31, 2009 December 31, 2009 Comment All targets achieved. 300 State teachers complete tertiary education w/ new curriculum Value 0 Activity cancelled. 300 Date January 1, 2004 December 31, 2009 December 31, 2009 Comment 300 teachers trained with Secretariat's, and not loan, funds. Studies/seminars: in-service teacher training; pre-service teacher training; teacher accreditation process; simulation in demand for educ. in 10 yrs.; proposal to strengthen municipal educ. colleges. Value 0 simulation of demand study concluded; resources fr seminars Date January 1, 2004 November 17, 2008 December 31, 2007 Comment 200,000 overage students in 1st-4th grade graduate from accelerated classes.58,000 overage stud. in 5th - 8th grade graduate fromaccel. classes. Value 0 172,000 students covered by Se Liga, Acelera and A 200,00058,000 Date January 1, 2004 October 30, 2009 December 31, 2007 Comment Total of students covered by the project: 1th # 4th grade: 413,655 5th-8th grade: 85,000 4,300 state and 1000 municipal teachers benefit from in-service training in Portuguese and mathematics. Value 0 24,030 teachers trained 4,300 teachers trained Date January 1, 2004 December 31, 2009 December 31, 2009 Comment 30 "critical schools" w/ youth at programs Value 0 It was agreed to offer training programs to select 30 schools with programs Date January 1, 2004 December 31, 2009 December 31, 2009 Comment 1,200 municipal schools prepare PDEs1,200 municipal schools implement PMEs30 Quilombola schools prepare PDEs30 Quilombola schools prepare PMEs Value 0 PDEs Municipal Schools # 397 Quilombolas # 7 1,200 municipal schools with PDEs1,200 municipal s Date January 1, 2004 December 31, 2009 December 31, 2007 Comment Education training modules developed by School of Government Value 0 Activity discontinued. New administration doesn't Education training modules developed Date January 1, 2004 November 17, 2008 December 31, 2009 Comment 29 SEDUC and 51 GEREs personnel trained at School of Government Value 0 Activity discontinued 29 SEDUC and 51 GEREs personnel trained at School Date January 1, 2004 November 17, 2008 December 31, 2007 Comment Government decided to train SEDUC and GREs staff based on a proposal of INDG (Instituto de Desenvolvimento Gerencial) whichestabilished a result based platafor m for education. Technology platform supporting schools implemented. Value 0 platform implemented platform implemented Date January 1, 2004 November 17, 2008 December 31, 2009 Comment MIS and SIGAP fully operational Value 0 MIS and SIGAP fully operational MIS and SIGAP operational Date January 1, 2004 October 30, 2009 December 31, 2009 Comment Development and integration of eGovernment Value 0 Data not available Development and integration of eGovernment Date January 1, 2004 December 31, 2009 December 31, 2009 Comment Reviews carried out on:gov't wide staffing;SEDUC legal framework, policies & procedures; budget mgmt; PER; impact evaluation ofproject; career path w/ performance based salary Value 0 Legal framework, policies & procedures: done. I 0Reviews carried out on:gov't wide staffing;SEDUC Date January 1, 2004 December 31, 2009 December 31, 2009 Comment Gov't wide staffing: done with Secretariat resources. Instead of performance-based salary, a performance-based incentive system for school and teachers was estabilished (BDE # Bônus deDesempenho Educacional)