Skip to Main Navigation

PERNAMBUCO INTEGRATED DEVELOPMENT: EDUCATION QUALITY IMPROVEMENT PROJECT

Abstract*

The objectives of the Pernambuco Integrated Development: Education Quality Improvement Project are to improve the quality, efficiency, and inclusiveness of the public education system; modernize and strengthen the managerial, financial, and administrative capacity of the Secretariat of Education. The project has the following four components: 1) This component seeks to improve the quality and efficiency of the 1,086 state schools in Pernambuco. 2)...

* The project abstract is drawn from the PAD, SAR or PGD and may not accurately reflect the project's current nature

Show More

Development Objective

The development objectives o f the Pernambuco Integrated Development: Education Quality Improvement Project are to (a) improve the quality, efficiency, and inclusiveness o f the public education system; (b) modernize and strengthen the managerial, financial, and administrative capacity o f the Secretariat of Education to set policies and guidelines for the sector and deliver public education efficiently; and (c) support the overall state modernization effort through interventions to be carried out in the Secretariat of Education and to be replicated in other state institutions.

Key Details

Project Details

  • P069934

  • Closed

  • Ricardo Rocha Silveira

  • N/A

  • Brazil

  • January 12, 2003

  • (as of board presentation)

    October 14, 2004

  • August 1, 2005

  • US$ 31.50 million

  • C

  • Not Applicable

  • June 30, 2010

  • BANK APPROVED

  • September 28, 2021

  • Notes

Finances

Financing Plan (US$ Millions)

No data available.
Financier Commitments
Borrower/Recipient 21.00
International Bank for Reconstruction and Development 31.50

Total Project Financing (US$ Millions)

Product Line IBRD/IDA
IBRD Commitment 31.50
IDA Commitment N/A
IBRD + IDA Commitment 31.50
Lending Instrument
Grant Amount N/A
Total Project Cost** 52.50

Summary Status of World Bank Financing (US$ Millions) as of June 30, 2025

Download:
No data available.
Financier Approval Date Closing Date Principal Disbursed Repayments Interest, Charges & Fees

Detailed Financial Activity as of June 30, 2025

Download:
No data available.
Period Financier Transaction Type Amount (US$)
Oct 14, 2004 IBRD-47540 Loan Commitment 31,500,000.00
May 15, 2015 IBRD-47540 Loan Repay 1,314,906.60
Nov 15, 2020 IBRD-47540 Int Charges 593.17
Nov 15, 2020 IBRD-47540 Int Charges 23,032.10
May 15, 2021 IBRD-47540 Int Charges 9,561.16
May 15, 2021 IBRD-47540 Loan Repay 1,305,345.50
May 15, 2021 IBRD-47540 Loan Repay 9,561.16
Nov 16, 2021 IBRD-47540 Int Charges 4,553.93
Nov 16, 2021 IBRD-47540 Loan Repay 1,250,357.00
Nov 16, 2021 IBRD-47540 Loan Repay 4,553.93
Nov 15, 2018 IBRD-47540 Loan Repay 1,314,906.60
May 15, 2019 IBRD-47540 Int Charges 131,478.10
May 15, 2019 IBRD-47540 Loan Repay 1,314,906.60
Nov 15, 2019 IBRD-47540 Int Charges 102,553.29
Nov 15, 2019 IBRD-47540 Loan Repay 1,314,906.60
May 29, 2020 IBRD-47540 Loan Repay 1,314,906.60
May 29, 2020 IBRD-47540 Int Charges 63,088.86
Nov 15, 2017 IBRD-47540 Int Charges 113,136.62
Nov 15, 2017 IBRD-47540 Loan Repay 1,314,906.60
May 15, 2018 IBRD-47540 Int Charges 108,854.72
May 15, 2018 IBRD-47540 Loan Repay 1,314,906.60
Nov 15, 2018 IBRD-47540 Int Charges 139,278.62
Nov 15, 2015 IBRD-47540 Int Charges 63,554.98
Nov 15, 2015 IBRD-47540 Loan Repay 1,314,906.60
May 15, 2016 IBRD-47540 Loan Repay 1,314,906.60
May 15, 2016 IBRD-47540 Int Charges 74,699.63
May 15, 2017 IBRD-47540 Int Charges 109,242.83
May 15, 2017 IBRD-47540 Loan Repay 1,314,906.60
Nov 15, 2016 IBRD-47540 Int Charges 93,497.81
Nov 15, 2016 IBRD-47540 Loan Repay 1,314,906.60
Nov 15, 2014 IBRD-47540 Int Charges 58,291.63
Nov 15, 2014 IBRD-47540 Loan Repay 1,314,906.60
Nov 15, 2013 IBRD-47540 Int Charges 77,482.00
Nov 15, 2013 IBRD-47540 Loan Repay 1,314,906.60
May 15, 2014 IBRD-47540 Int Charges 65,394.66
May 15, 2014 IBRD-47540 Loan Repay 1,314,906.60
May 15, 2015 IBRD-47540 Int Charges 57,196.97
Nov 15, 2020 IBRD-47540 Loan Repay 1,314,906.60

Footnotes

Ratings

IMPLEMENTATION RATINGS

Name Review Date
Overall Safeguards Rating Satisfactory 2010-06-26
Overall Implementation Progress (IP) Moderately Satisfactory 2010-06-26
Progress towards achievement of PDO Moderately Satisfactory 2010-06-26
Procurement Moderately Satisfactory 2010-06-26
Project Management Moderately Satisfactory 2010-06-26
Financial Management Moderately Satisfactory 2010-06-26
Counterpart Funding Satisfactory 2010-06-26
Monitoring and Evaluation Moderately Unsatisfactory 2010-06-26

COMPLETION RATINGS

INDICATORIMPLEMENTATION COMPLETION & RESULTS REPORT: 12-23-2010
OutcomesModerately Satisfactory
Risk to Development OutcomeNegligible
Bank PerformanceModerately Satisfactory
Borrower PerformanceModerately Satisfactory
Government PerformanceModerately Satisfactory
Implementing AgencyModerately Satisfactory

INDEPENDENT EVALUATION RATINGS

INDICATORICR REVIEW: 08-19-2011PROJECT PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT REPORT:
Outcome RatingModerately Unsatisfactory N/a
Risk To Development OutcomeNegligible To LowN/a
Bank PerformanceModerately UnsatisfactoryN/a
Borrower PerformanceModerately UnsatisfactoryN/a
Government PerformanceModerately UnsatisfactoryN/a
Implementing AgencyModerately UnsatisfactoryN/a
Icr QualitySatisfactoryN/a
M&e QualityModestN/a

Results Framework

PROJECT DEVELOPMENT OBJECTIVE INDICATORS

INDICATORBASELINECURRENTTARGET
  • Increase grade 4 completion rate from 81% to 86% (note: the state is using approval rate rather than completion rate)Value81%Baseline revised after 2003/04 data became avaiState schools 81.5% Municipal schools 83%86%
    DateJanuary 1, 2004May 31, 2010December 31, 2009
    Comment Baseline was revised downwards to 76.3% (state schools) and 77.8% (municipal schools). 77.5% total public schools. Projectachieved at least five percentage po ints increase in the indicator which wasthe targeted objetive.
  • Increase fundamental level completion rate from 54% to 60% (note: completion rate means total students approved in 8th grade in year t/total students enrolled in 5th grade in year t - 3Value54%Data revised based on different calculation:42.State schools 48.6% Municipal schools 34%60%
    DateJanuary 1, 2004May 31, 2010December 31, 2009
    CommentThe original baseline was calculated with data projections. The baseline was revised using actual and official data provided byINEP.Baseline was revised downwards to 42.1% (state schools) and 36.1% (municipal schools). Project achieved targeted increase of sixpercentage points in state scho ols but failed to meet the target for municipalschools.
  • Reduce age-grade distortion at the fundamental cycle from 53% to 46%.Value53%DATA REVISED DEC. 2007:all public schools 48.8%State schools 38.4% Municipal schools 31%46%
    DateJanuary 1, 2004May 31, 2010December 31, 2009
    Comment Baseline was revised downwards to 56.8 (state schools) and 44.8% (municipal schools); 48.8% (all public schools). Project exceeded targeted percentage pointsreduction.
  • Increase SAEB scores to reach the national average.Value4th grade Portuguesenat'l 169,4 PE 157,14th grade 4th grade Portuguese nat'l 175,8; PE 166,8 4th gSAEB scores increased
    DateDecember 1, 2003May 31, 2010December 31, 2009
    Comment Updated data will only be available on the second semester of CY2010 .To-date, scores for 4th grade show improvements in SAEBscores and scores for 8th grade sh ow basically no change.
  • Decrease repetition rates from 31% to 23% in State schools.ValueFundamental: 16.1%Secondary: 7.85%Fundamental 17.5% Secondary 9.5%23%
    DateJanuary 1, 2004May 31, 2010December 31, 2009
    CommentThe original baseline was calculated with data projections. The baseline was revised using actual and official data provided byINEP.Baseline line was revised downwards. Targets were not met.
  • Increase approval rates in Indigenous Schools from 60% to 70%.Value62.3%72.3%70%
    DateJanuary 1, 2004May 31, 2010December 31, 2009
    CommentThe original baseline was calculated with data projections. The baseline was revised using actual and official data provided byINEP.Baseline was revised updwards. Project has exceeded target.
  • Decrease drop-out rates in Indigenous Schools from 13% to 10%.(This number refers to "abandono" - student enrolled at beginning of school year who drops out-- not "evasao")Value10.4%7.9%10%
    DateJanuary 1, 2004May 31, 2010December 31, 2009
    CommentThe original baseline was calculated with data projections. The baseline was revised using actual and official data provided byINEP.Baseline was revised downwards. Project has exceeded target.
  • Complete SEDUC's state personnel census and formulate a medium-term staffing strategy.Value01 census completed1 census completed
    DateJanuary 1, 2004May 31, 2010December 31, 2009
    Comment
  • SEDUC meets Law of Fiscal Responsibility personnel expenditure ceiling, each year.Value State in compliancelaw met
    DateMay 31, 2010December 31, 2009
    Comment
  • Increase fundamental level approval rate from 69% to 78%Valueall public schools 69%DATA ADDED ON DEC. 2007:statstate schools 74.1% municipal schools 79.1%78%
    DateJanuary 1, 2004May 31, 2010December 31, 2009
    Comment
  • Reduce age-grade distortion at the secondary level from 68% to 60%.Value68%UPDATED DATA ON DECEMBER:all public schools 70.state schools 53.2% municipal schools 51.8%60%
    DateJanuary 1, 2004May 31, 2010December 31, 2009
    Comment
  • Performance-based personnel management proposal implemented.Value0Proposal approved and implemented in 2009.proposal implemented.
    DateJanuary 1, 2004December 31, 2009December 31, 2009
    Comment
  • Education personnel costs decreased as a share of total education budget.Value48.5% (2004)below 48.5%below 48.5%
    DateDecember 17, 2007December 31, 2009December 31, 2009
    Comment
  • Beneficiary satisfaction improves.Valuen.a.survey results positivesurvey results positive
    DateJanuary 1, 2004December 31, 2009December 31, 2009
    Comment
  • Coordination among Municipal Secretariats of Education and between Municipalities and SEDUC improves.Value In 2008,state worked with 170 municipalities in imcoordination improved measured by joint partnershi
    DateMay 31, 2010December 31, 2009
    Comment

INTERMEDIATE RESULTS INDICATORS

INDICATORBASELINECURRENTTARGET
  • 987 PDEs prepared annually in State Schools.99 PDEs prepared annually in Indigenous Schools1,600 PMEs implemented (total)95 PMEs in Indigenous schools implemented (total)Value0PDEs State Schools with Fundescola resources - 993,948 state school PDEs396 indigenous PDEs1,600 PM
    DateJanuary 1, 2004December 31, 2009December 31, 2009
    Comment
  • 6,293 school directors trained in management program.7,896 school council members trained.Value02224 school directors trained in management progra6,293 directors trained7,896 school council member
    DateJanuary 1, 2004December 31, 2009December 31, 2009
    Comment
  • 145 state schools rehabilitated 24 indigenous schools rehabilitated 534 comp. labs equipped99 packages for indigenous schools16 centers disabled kids equipped4 vans disabled kids purchasedValue046 schools rehabilitated; 13 schools with furnitur145 state schools rehabilitated24 indigenous schoo
    DateJanuary 1, 2004December 31, 2009December 31, 2009
    Comment All targets achieved.
  • 300 State teachers complete tertiary education w/ new curriculumValue0Activity cancelled.300
    DateJanuary 1, 2004December 31, 2009December 31, 2009
    Comment 300 teachers trained with Secretariat's, and not loan, funds.
  • Studies/seminars: in-service teacher training; pre-service teacher training; teacher accreditation process; simulation in demand for educ. in 10 yrs.; proposal to strengthen municipal educ. colleges.Value0simulation of demand study concluded; resources frseminars
    DateJanuary 1, 2004November 17, 2008December 31, 2007
    Comment
  • 200,000 overage students in 1st-4th grade graduate from accelerated classes.58,000 overage stud. in 5th - 8th grade graduate fromaccel. classes.Value0172,000 students covered by Se Liga, Acelera and A200,00058,000
    DateJanuary 1, 2004October 30, 2009December 31, 2007
    Comment Total of students covered by the project: 1th # 4th grade: 413,655 5th-8th grade: 85,000
  • 4,300 state and 1000 municipal teachers benefit from in-service training in Portuguese and mathematics.Value024,030 teachers trained4,300 teachers trained
    DateJanuary 1, 2004December 31, 2009December 31, 2009
    Comment
  • 30 "critical schools" w/ youth at programsValue0It was agreed to offer training programs to select30 schools with programs
    DateJanuary 1, 2004December 31, 2009December 31, 2009
    Comment
  • 1,200 municipal schools prepare PDEs1,200 municipal schools implement PMEs30 Quilombola schools prepare PDEs30 Quilombola schools prepare PMEsValue0PDEs Municipal Schools # 397 Quilombolas # 7 1,200 municipal schools with PDEs1,200 municipal s
    DateJanuary 1, 2004December 31, 2009December 31, 2007
    Comment
  • Education training modules developed by School of GovernmentValue0Activity discontinued. New administration doesn'tEducation training modules developed
    DateJanuary 1, 2004November 17, 2008December 31, 2009
    Comment
  • 29 SEDUC and 51 GEREs personnel trained at School of GovernmentValue0Activity discontinued29 SEDUC and 51 GEREs personnel trained at School
    DateJanuary 1, 2004November 17, 2008December 31, 2007
    Comment Government decided to train SEDUC and GREs staff based on a proposal of INDG (Instituto de Desenvolvimento Gerencial) whichestabilished a result based platafor m for education.
  • Technology platform supporting schools implemented.Value0platform implementedplatform implemented
    DateJanuary 1, 2004November 17, 2008December 31, 2009
    Comment
  • MIS and SIGAP fully operationalValue0MIS and SIGAP fully operationalMIS and SIGAP operational
    DateJanuary 1, 2004October 30, 2009December 31, 2009
    Comment
  • Development and integration of eGovernmentValue0Data not availableDevelopment and integration of eGovernment
    DateJanuary 1, 2004December 31, 2009December 31, 2009
    Comment
  • Reviews carried out on:gov't wide staffing;SEDUC legal framework, policies & procedures; budget mgmt; PER; impact evaluation ofproject; career path w/ performance based salaryValue0Legal framework, policies & procedures: done. I0Reviews carried out on:gov't wide staffing;SEDUC
    DateJanuary 1, 2004December 31, 2009December 31, 2009
    Comment Gov't wide staffing: done with Secretariat resources. Instead of performance-based salary, a performance-based incentive system for school and teachers was estabilished (BDE # Bônus deDesempenho Educacional)