Skip to Main Navigation

Development Objective

The Global GEF objective of the project is to support long-term protection of globally important forest and mountain ecosystems in Vietnam through: (i) the establishment of a Vietnam Conservation Fund; and (ii) strengthening the planning and management of SUF.

Key Details

Project Details

  • P074414

  • Closed

  • Lan Nguyen

  • N/A

  • Viet Nam

  • February 11, 2002

  • (as of board presentation)

    July 8, 2004

  • August 4, 2005

  • US$ 15.95 million

  • Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Development

  • East Asia and Pacific

  • 2005

  • US$ 14.35 million

  • B

  • September 22, 2015

  • March 31, 2015

  • BANK APPROVED

  • P066051

  • Notes

Finances

Financing Plan (US$ Millions)

No data available.
Financier Commitments
Borrower/Recipient 1.60
NETHERLANDS: Min. of Foreign Affairs / Min. of Dev. Coop. 5.35
Global Environment Facility (GEF) 9.00

Total Project Financing (US$ Millions)

Product Line IBRD/IDA
IBRD Commitment N/A
IDA Commitment N/A
IBRD + IDA Commitment N/A
Lending Instrument
Grant Amount 14.35
Total Project Cost** 15.95

Summary Status of World Bank Financing (US$ Millions) as of February 28, 2025

Download:
No data available.
Financier Approval Date Closing Date Principal Disbursed Repayments Interest, Charges & Fees

Detailed Financial Activity as of February 28, 2025

Download:
No data available.
Period Financier Transaction Type Amount (US$)

Footnotes

Ratings

IMPLEMENTATION RATINGS

Name Review Date
Project Management Satisfactory 2015-03-31
Overall Safeguards Rating Satisfactory 2015-03-31
Counterpart Funding Satisfactory 2015-03-31
Procurement Moderately Satisfactory 2015-03-31
Financial Management Moderately Satisfactory 2015-03-31
Summary Global Objective Rating Satisfactory 2015-03-31
Monitoring and Evaluation Satisfactory 2015-03-31
Overall Implementation Progress (IP) Satisfactory 2015-03-31
Overall Safeguards Rating Satisfactory 2015-03-31

COMPLETION RATINGS

INDICATORIMPLEMENTATION COMPLETION & RESULTS REPORT: 12-30-2015
OutcomesSubstantial
Risk to Development OutcomeModest
Bank PerformanceSubstantial
Borrower PerformanceModerately Satisfactory
Government PerformanceModerately Satisfactory
Implementing AgencySubstantial

INDEPENDENT EVALUATION RATINGS

No data available.

Results Framework

PROJECT DEVELOPMENT OBJECTIVE INDICATORS

INDICATORBASELINECURRENTTARGET
  • 50 percent of the smallholder plantation area of the project is certifiable according to international standards for sustainable forestry.Value0To date 22,500 hectares of plantations have been e50 % of the smallholder plantation area of the pro
    DateJuly 31, 2004November 16, 2009March 31, 2011
    Comment

INTERMEDIATE RESULTS INDICATORS

INDICATORBASELINECURRENTTARGET
  • Plantation management, land allocation guidelines, investment procedures and institutional models for smallholder plantation management developed in participating provinces.Value0Draft studies on procedures on land allocation, crProcedures developed and applied in participating
    DateJuly 31, 2004November 16, 2009March 31, 2011
    Comment
  • Compliance checks by four provincial DARDs meet prescribed project implementation standards for approximately 70 percent of the plantation area.Value0Pilot compliance check conducted in all four provi70% of plantation area meet project standards.
    DateJuly 31, 2004November 16, 2009December 31, 2011
    Comment
  • Rotation yields (measured in % of expected yields of prescribed models) at the end of first cycle are in line with project plantation models.Value0Rotation yields can only be assessed at the end of100% of prescribed yields are met.
    DateJuly 31, 2004November 16, 2009March 31, 2011
    Comment
  • 30 supported SUFs are implementing management plans of international standards and are managed in cooperation with local communities.Value016 Operational Management Plans completed and unde30 SUFs under operational management plans.
    DateJuly 31, 2004November 16, 2009March 31, 2011
    Comment
  • Plantation management, land allocation guidelines, investment procedures and institutional models for smallholder plantation management developed in participating provinces.Value0Draft studies on procedures on land allocation, crProcedures developed and applied in participating
    DateJuly 31, 2004January 21, 2009March 31, 2011
    Comment
  • Compliance checks by four provincial DARDs meet prescribed project implementation standards for approximately 70 percent of the plantation area.Value0No compliance checks conducted in a systematic man70% of plantation area meet project standards.
    DateJuly 31, 2004January 21, 2009December 31, 2011
    Comment
  • Rotation yields (measured in % of expected yields of prescribed models) at the end of first cycle are in line with project plantation models.Value0No systematic data collection in place yet.100% of prescribed yields are met.
    DateJuly 31, 2004January 21, 2009March 31, 2011
    Comment
  • 30 supported SUFs are implementing management plans of international standards and are managed in cooperation with local communities.Value017 operational management plans have been develope30 SUFs under operational management plans.
    DateJuly 31, 2004January 21, 2009March 31, 2011
    Comment
  • Management effectiveness in SUFs will improve (in %) and measured by using the Management Effectiveness Tracking Tool (METT).Value
    DateJuly 31, 2004November 16, 2009March 31, 2011
    Comment