Financier | Commitments |
---|---|
GLOBAL ENVIRONMENT - Associated IBRD Fund | 7.70 |
Global Environment Facility (GEF) | 12.50 |
Borrower/Recipient | 11.77 |
P074971
Closed
Sanyu Lutalo
N/A
November 29, 2004
(as of board presentation)
April 18, 2006
August 11, 2006
US$ 31.97 million
N/A
2006
US$ 12.50 million
B
January 15, 2013
December 31, 2011
BANK APPROVED
Financier | Commitments |
---|---|
GLOBAL ENVIRONMENT - Associated IBRD Fund | 7.70 |
Global Environment Facility (GEF) | 12.50 |
Borrower/Recipient | 11.77 |
Product Line | IBRD/IDA |
---|---|
IBRD Commitment | N/A |
IDA Commitment | N/A |
IBRD + IDA Commitment | N/A |
Lending Instrument | |
---|---|
Grant Amount | 12.50 |
Total Project Cost** | 31.97 |
Name | Review | Date |
---|---|---|
Procurement | Satisfactory | 2011-12-24 |
Financial Management | Satisfactory | 2011-12-24 |
Overall Safeguards Rating | Satisfactory | 2011-12-24 |
Overall Implementation Progress (IP) | Satisfactory | 2011-12-24 |
Summary Global Objective Rating | Satisfactory | 2011-12-24 |
Counterpart Funding | Moderately Satisfactory | 2011-12-24 |
Overall | Low | 2011-12-24 |
Overall Safeguards Rating | Satisfactory | 2011-12-24 |
Project Management | Satisfactory | 2011-12-24 |
Monitoring and Evaluation | Moderately Satisfactory | 2011-12-24 |
INDICATOR | IMPLEMENTATION COMPLETION & RESULTS REPORT: 06-19-2012 |
---|---|
Outcomes | Substantial |
Risk to Development Outcome | Negligible |
Bank Performance | Moderately Satisfactory |
Borrower Performance | Moderately Satisfactory |
Government Performance | Moderately Satisfactory |
Implementing Agency | Substantial |
INDICATOR | ICR REVIEW: 12-20-2013 | PROJECT PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT REPORT: |
---|---|---|
Outcome Rating | Moderately Unsatisfactory | N/a |
Risk To Development Outcome | Moderate | N/a |
Bank Performance | Moderately Unsatisfactory | N/a |
Borrower Performance | Moderately Satisfactory | N/a |
Government Performance | Moderately Satisfactory | N/a |
Implementing Agency | Moderately Satisfactory | N/a |
Icr Quality | Satisfactory | N/a |
M&e Quality | Modest | N/a |
INDICATOR | BASELINE | CURRENT | TARGET |
---|
INDICATOR | BASELINE | CURRENT | TARGET |
---|
Component A: Quantity of nutrients discharged from the NBWWTP (in Kg/day). | Value | BOD: 20,586; Nitrogen (N): 9,230; Phosphorus (P): | BOD: 1,185N: 1604P: 195 (exceeded the target) | BOD: 3,200; N: 2,945; P: 310 |
Date | February 16, 2006 | October 14, 2011 | December 31, 2011 | |
Comment | Target exceeded. |
Component B: Number of hectares of wetlands rehabilitated in the DDNP (ha) | Value | 0 | 4300 | 4,300 |
Date | February 16, 2006 | October 14, 2011 | December 31, 2011 | |
Comment | Works on the entire area are either complete, or almost (80% on two remaining sites) by reporting time, but covering the entireplanned area. |
Component B: Annual Water flow in the wetlands of DDNP (m3/ha/a) | Value | 37000 m3/ha/a | 11860 - 99,534 m3/ha/a | 43,000 m3/ha/a |
Date | February 16, 2006 | October 14, 2011 | December 31, 2011 | |
Comment | An interval was provided based on variations in water levels. |
Component B: Percentage of intervention area covered by monitoring system (%) | Value | 0 | 100% | 100% |
Date | February 16, 2006 | June 6, 2011 | December 31, 2011 | |
Comment |
Component C: Project experience and impact evaluation studies disseminated according to communication strategy | Value | No | Consultant being selected for Impact Evaluation Su | Communication strategy fully implemented. |
Date | February 16, 2006 | June 6, 2011 | December 31, 2011 | |
Comment |
Overall reduction of the nutrient flow into the Danube River and the Black Sea (from component A and component B) (tons / annum) | Value | 0 | 3000 (A)720 (B) | 3,000 (component A) + 1,000 (component B) = 4,000 |
Date | February 16, 2006 | November 16, 2011 | December 31, 2011 | |
Comment | The NBWWTP is currently operating at ~ 80% capacity, but will be able to exceed the target once operating at full capacity (aftercompletion of the ongoing canalization program being implemented in part of Budapest is completed). Component B nutrient removalisbased on average estimates of 650 (N) and 70 (P) removal, excluding removal by plant uptake considered at appraisal. Range ofresults was considered due to variation with water levels, i.e. low, mid, and high, with maximum removal at highest water levelsestimated at 770 (N) and 140 (P). |
Overall improvement to the water regime in Gemenc and Beda Karapancsa wetlands (ha ) | Value | No monitoring system in place and no interventions | Monitoring system installed. Pilot intervention an | Monitoring system fully installed and 9 interventi |
Date | February 16, 2006 | November 16, 2011 | December 31, 2011 | |
Comment |
Dissemination of a comprehensive project impact evaluation study in order to serve as a model of other nutrient reduction initiatives | Value | No impact evaluation or communication strategy | Impact evaluation study on-going and due to be com | Impact evaluation completed and disseminated |
Date | February 16, 2006 | November 16, 2011 | December 31, 2010 | |
Comment |
Enhanced nutrient trapping capacity of Gemenc and Beda-Karapancsa wetlands (this is the contribution of component B to the overall nutrient reduction) (ton/a) | Value | 0.00 | 720.00 | 1000.00 |
Date | February 16, 2009 | November 16, 2011 | December 31, 2011 | |
Comment | Estimated at 720 tons/a, comprising 650 tons of N and 70 tons of P. This excludes nutrients trapped through plant uptake, but itisestimated that if this method which was considered at appraisal is considered, it would entail a higher result. |