Financier | Commitments |
---|---|
Borrower/Recipient | 16.32 |
Global Environment Facility (GEF) | 17.00 |
P075035
Closed
Liping Jiang
N/A
September 6, 2002
(as of board presentation)
April 15, 2004
September 22, 2004
US$ 33.32 million
N/A
2004
US$ 17.00 million
C
Not Applicable
June 30, 2011
BANK APPROVED
January 15, 2013
Financier | Commitments |
---|---|
Borrower/Recipient | 16.32 |
Global Environment Facility (GEF) | 17.00 |
Product Line | IBRD/IDA |
---|---|
IBRD Commitment | N/A |
IDA Commitment | N/A |
IBRD + IDA Commitment | N/A |
Lending Instrument | |
---|---|
Grant Amount | 17.00 |
Total Project Cost** | 33.32 |
Name | Review | Date |
---|---|---|
Overall Safeguards Rating | Satisfactory | 2011-06-20 |
Summary Global Objective Rating | Highly Satisfactory | 2011-06-20 |
Procurement | Satisfactory | 2011-06-20 |
Project Management | Satisfactory | 2011-06-20 |
Financial Management | Satisfactory | 2011-06-20 |
Overall | Low | 2011-06-20 |
Counterpart Funding | Satisfactory | 2011-06-20 |
Monitoring and Evaluation | Satisfactory | 2011-06-20 |
Overall Implementation Progress (IP) | Satisfactory | 2011-06-20 |
Overall Safeguards Rating | Satisfactory | 2011-06-20 |
INDICATOR | IMPLEMENTATION COMPLETION & RESULTS REPORT: 12-27-2011 |
---|---|
Outcomes | Highly Satisfactory |
Risk to Development Outcome | Negligible |
Bank Performance | Substantial |
Borrower Performance | Highly Satisfactory |
Government Performance | Highly Satisfactory |
Implementing Agency | Highly Satisfactory |
INDICATOR | ICR REVIEW: 05-13-2013 | PROJECT PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT REPORT: 06-19-2015 |
---|---|---|
Outcome Rating | Moderately Satisfactory | Satisfactory |
Risk To Development Outcome | Negligible To Low | Substantial |
Bank Performance | Satisfactory | Satisfactory |
Borrower Performance | Moderately Satisfactory | Satisfactory |
Government Performance | Moderately Satisfactory | Not Rated |
Implementing Agency | Moderately Satisfactory | Satisfactory |
Icr Quality | Satisfactory | Not Rated |
M&e Quality | Modest | Substantial |
INDICATOR | BASELINE | CURRENT | TARGET |
---|
INDICATOR | BASELINE | CURRENT | TARGET |
---|
Substantial reduction of pollution loading and groundwater overdraft in the selected counties. | Value | For the 16 pilot counties: 1. COD:108,372 tons/ye | Substantial reduction in 2009 has been made: 1. C | Pollution loading to the rivers is reduced by 30% |
Date | September 22, 2004 | December 17, 2010 | June 30, 2011 | |
Comment | The above baseline data were updated based on the final review of the historical data by MEP and MWR. | The above data were based on the M&E data for 2009. The data for 2010 was not available. | The targets were consistent with the PAD. |
Cooperation mechanisms between water departments and environment departments at central, provincial, municipal and county levels have been prepared, updated every year and implemented. | Value | No cooperation mechanisms were established and imp | The documents on cooperation mechanisms were prepa | Implementation of the cooperation mechanisms betwe |
Date | September 22, 2004 | December 17, 2010 | June 30, 2011 | |
Comment |
16 IWEMPs for the selected 16 pilot counties, IWEMP for Tianjin, 2 Action Plans for Hai Basin and ZWN sub-basin were prepared and supported by 10 strategic studies, KM/ET and demonstration projects. | Value | No IWEMPs, Action Plans, Strategic Studies, KM/ET | IWEMPs, Action Plans, Strategic Studies, KM/ET, an | IWEMPs, Action Plans, Strategic Studies, KM/ET, an |
Date | September 22, 2004 | December 17, 2010 | June 30, 2011 | |
Comment |
Tianjin Coastal Wastewater Management component including Dagu industrial pollution control, Hangu wastewater management with financial incentives is well implemented and produces good impacts. | Value | The waste water treatment in small towns was not s | Tianjin coastal waste water management component i | Impact of Dagu industrial pollution control was ac |
Date | September 22, 2004 | December 17, 2010 | June 30, 2011 | |
Comment |