| Financier | Commitments |
|---|---|
| African Development Bank | 10.00 |
| Bilateral Agencies (unidentified) | 24.27 |
| Borrower/Recipient | 3.99 |
| Global Environment Facility (GEF) | 21.74 |
Africa Stockpiles Programme - Project 1
Abstract*
The objective of the Africa Stockpile Program for South Africa and Tunisia is for several African countries to eliminate inventoried publicly-held obsolete pesticide stockpiles and associated waste, and implement measures to reduce and prevent future related risks. The project consists of the following components: Component 1) encompasses a full range o f disposal, cleanup and prevention activities to achieve the Project objectives in the participating... Show More
Development Objective
Selected African countries implement measures to prevent the accumulation of pesticides stocks, and ensure safe and environmentally sound elimination or containment of obsolete pesticide stocks and associated waste.
Finances
Financing Plan (US$ Millions)
Total Project Financing (US$ Millions)
| Product Line | IBRD/IDA |
|---|---|
| IBRD Commitment | N/A |
| IDA Commitment | N/A |
| IBRD + IDA Commitment | N/A |
| Lending Instrument | |
|---|---|
| Grant Amount | 56.01 |
| Total Project Cost** | 60.00 |
Summary Status of World Bank Financing (US$ Millions) as of March 31, 2025
No data available.
Detailed Financial Activity as of March 31, 2025
No data available.
Ratings
IMPLEMENTATION RATINGS
| Name | Review | Date |
|---|---|---|
| Counterpart Funding | Moderately Satisfactory | 2012-06-28 |
| Financial Management | Satisfactory | 2012-06-28 |
| Overall Implementation Progress (IP) | Moderately Unsatisfactory | 2012-06-28 |
| Summary Global Objective Rating | Moderately Unsatisfactory | 2012-06-28 |
| Procurement | Moderately Unsatisfactory | 2012-06-28 |
| Project Management | Moderately Unsatisfactory | 2012-06-28 |
| Monitoring and Evaluation | Satisfactory | 2012-06-28 |
COMPLETION RATINGS
| INDICATOR | IMPLEMENTATION COMPLETION & RESULTS REPORT: 06-28-2013 |
|---|---|
| Outcomes | Moderately Satisfactory |
| Risk to Development Outcome | Modest |
| Bank Performance | Moderately Unsatisfactory |
| Borrower Performance | Moderately Satisfactory |
| Government Performance | Substantial |
| Implementing Agency | Moderately Satisfactory |
INDEPENDENT EVALUATION RATINGS
| INDICATOR | ICR REVIEW: 09-29-2016 | PROJECT PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT REPORT: 10-17-2014 |
|---|---|---|
| Outcome Rating | Unsatisfactory | Unsatisfactory |
| Risk To Development Outcome | Modest | Not Rated |
| Bank Performance | Unsatisfactory | Unsatisfactory |
| Borrower Performance | Moderately Unsatisfactory | Moderately Unsatisfactory |
| Government Performance | Not Rated | Moderately Satisfactory |
| Implementing Agency | Moderately Unsatisfactory | Moderately Unsatisfactory |
| Icr Quality | Not Rated | Satisfactory |
| M&e Quality | Negligible | Negligible |
Results Framework
PROJECT DEVELOPMENT OBJECTIVE INDICATORS
| INDICATOR | BASELINE | CURRENT | TARGET |
|---|
INTERMEDIATE RESULTS INDICATORS
| INDICATOR | BASELINE | CURRENT | TARGET |
|---|
An inventory database is in place in 7 ASP countries, accepted by the ASP partnership and being used and updated by gov. staff Value 0 6 7 Date July 1, 2006 June 11, 2012 December 31, 2012 Comment Ethiopia, Mali, Morocco, Nigeria, Tanzania and Tunisia. FAO has not introduced PSMS in South Africa because Government does notwant to use it or appreciate its usefulness. Ethiopia, Mali, Morocco, Nigeria, South Africa, Tanzania and Tunisia. Strategic studies delivered Value 0% 100% 100% Date July 1, 2006 June 11, 2012 December 31, 2012 Comment The Disposal Technology Options study is available and utilized. Locust study is addressed under the Locust Project. All expectedtoolkits have been delivered. Disposal Technology Options study; Locust study, and tool kits such as the Environmental Management Tool Kit (EMTK), communicationtoolkit and CESA guidelines. CESA in 7 countries disclosed and activities implemented. Value 0 6 7 Date July 1, 2006 June 11, 2012 December 31, 2012 Comment Ethiopia, Mali, Nigeria, South Africa, Tanzania and Tunisia.Morocco closed without a finalized and disclosed CESA. South Africaprepared a specific EMP for the disposal activities only. This has been considered adequate by the Bank to meet the needs of theCESA and approved in the Board Level Restructuring Ethiopia, Mali, Morocco, Nigeria, South Africa, Tanzania and Tunisia. Disposal contract completed in 6 ASP counties in line with national and international regulations. Value 0 4 6 Date July 1, 2006 June 11, 2012 December 31, 2012 Comment Ethiopia, Mali, Tanzania and Tunisia. South Africa completed and implemented a disposal contract for 2 of out of 4 plannedprovinces.Morocco closed without a disposal contract. Nigeria is not included in this indicator. Ethiopia, Mali, Morocco, South Africa, Tanzania and TunisiaNigeria is not included in this indicator Communication Strategy implemented. Value 0 5 6 Date July 1, 2006 June 11, 2012 December 31, 2012 Comment No adapted strategies in any of the countries. ASP-Morocco closed without having implemented its communication strategy. Ethiopia, Mali, Morocco, Nigeria, Tanzania and Tunisia.Based on the ASP toolkit. ASP-South Africa is not included in thisindicator following the Board Level Restructuring. Inventoried publicly-held obsolete pesticide stockpiles in 6 ASP-P1 countries eliminated. (Goal = 100% removed). Value 0 6 Date July 1, 2006 June 11, 2012 December 31, 2012 Comment Ethiopia: disposal contractor procured and the activities to start in July;Mali: depending on extension under OP/BP 7.30 andresumption of activities, ASP-Mali may be able to complete its disposal contract;Morocco: the project closed withoutelimination;South Africa: half of the planned provinces have been cleaned up. Full elimination is at risk due to procurementissues;Tanzania: disposal contractor procured and the activities to start in July;Tunisia: elimination is expected by theclosing date.