Skip to Main Navigation

Chile Infrastructure for Territorial Development

Abstract*

The Infrastructure for Territorial Development Project for Chile aims to increase the effective and productive use of sustainable infrastructure services by poor rural communities in selected territories o f the regions of Coquimbo, Maule, BioBio, Araucania, and Los Lagos (or any other region as may be proposed by the Borrower and agreed to by the Bank). The project has the following three components: Component 1) will assist local stakeholders and...

* The project abstract is drawn from the PAD, SAR or PGD and may not accurately reflect the project's current nature

Show More

Development Objective

The project development objective is to increase the effective and productive use of sustainable infrastructure services by poor rural communities in selected territories of the regions of Coquimbo, Maule, BioBio, Araucania, and Los Lagos (and any other region as may be proposed by the Borrower and agreed to by the Bank).

Key Details

Project Details

  • P076807

  • Closed

  • Veronica Raffo

  • N/A

  • Chile

  • September 3, 2003

  • (as of board presentation)

    December 16, 2004

  • August 16, 2005

  • US$ 50.26 million

  • B

  • Not Applicable

  • December 31, 2011

  • BANK APPROVED

  • March 11, 2021

  • Notes

Finances

Financing Plan (US$ Millions)

No data available.
Financier Commitments
International Bank for Reconstruction and Development 50.26
Borrower/Recipient 40.00

Total Project Financing (US$ Millions)

Product Line IBRD/IDA
IBRD Commitment 50.26
IDA Commitment N/A
IBRD + IDA Commitment 50.26
Lending Instrument
Grant Amount N/A
Total Project Cost** 90.26

Summary Status of World Bank Financing (US$ Millions) as of July 31, 2025

Download:
No data available.
Financier Approval Date Closing Date Principal Disbursed Repayments Interest, Charges & Fees

Detailed Financial Activity as of July 31, 2025

Download:
No data available.
Period Financier Transaction Type Amount (US$)
Dec 16, 2004 IBRD-72690 Loan Commitment 50,260,000.00

Footnotes

Ratings

IMPLEMENTATION RATINGS

Name Review Date
Progress towards achievement of PDO Highly Satisfactory 2011-07-27
Procurement Satisfactory 2011-07-27
Project Management Satisfactory 2011-07-27
Financial Management Satisfactory 2011-07-27
Counterpart Funding Satisfactory 2011-07-27
Monitoring and Evaluation Satisfactory 2011-07-27
Overall Implementation Progress (IP) Satisfactory 2011-07-27

COMPLETION RATINGS

INDICATORIMPLEMENTATION COMPLETION & RESULTS REPORT: 06-20-2012
OutcomesSubstantial
Risk to Development OutcomeModest
Bank PerformanceSubstantial
Borrower PerformanceSubstantial
Government PerformanceSubstantial
Implementing AgencySubstantial

INDEPENDENT EVALUATION RATINGS

INDICATORICR REVIEW: 12-16-2013PROJECT PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT REPORT:
Outcome RatingSatisfactory N/a
Risk To Development OutcomeModerateN/a
Bank PerformanceModerately SatisfactoryN/a
Borrower PerformanceModerately SatisfactoryN/a
Government PerformanceSatisfactoryN/a
Implementing AgencyModerately SatisfactoryN/a
Icr QualityUnsatisfactoryN/a
M&e QualityModestN/a

Results Framework

PROJECT DEVELOPMENT OBJECTIVE INDICATORS

INDICATORBASELINECURRENTTARGET
  • Water and sanitation: % of population benefiting from project PMDTs with sustained access and effective use of services provided bythe project (as measured by demand for services)Value0%42% of potential beneficiaries of the water and sa90%
    DateNovember 19, 2004July 15, 2011December 31, 2011
    Comment
  • Roads: increased use of transportation services along rehabilitated road infrastructure (as measured by pro-rated increase in demand six months after completion of works, for a representative sample)Value0%To be assessed through final impact evaluation20%
    DateNovember 19, 2004July 15, 2011December 31, 2011
    Comment
  • Electrification: % of population benefiting from project PMDTs with increased use of electrificity for economic activities (as measured by surveys)Value0%18% of potential beneficiaries of the electricity 90%
    DateNovember 19, 2004July 15, 2011December 31, 2011
    Comment

INTERMEDIATE RESULTS INDICATORS

INDICATORBASELINECURRENTTARGET
  • Number of PMDTs approved by the CORES with agreed standards including: (i) evidence of indigenous and gender participation, (ii) sign-off of communities; and (iii) consideration of socioenv safeguardsValue5The 18 completed PMDT1s have been approved. There 25 (cumulative)
    DateNovember 19, 2004July 15, 2011December 31, 2011
    Comment
  • Annual % of level of compliance with targets set in PMDTs for: % w&s and electric. connections constructed with providers having revenues higher than costs; and % kms of roads rehab. with maintenanceValuen/aBased on PMDT1s: Water and Sanitation: 42% RoaWater and sanitation: 95% Roads: 95% Electrificati
    DateNovember 19, 2004July 15, 2011December 31, 2011
    Comment
  • Percent of subprojects (by initial cost amount) managed by local organizations or entities, with adequate consideration of indigenous and gender issuesValuen/a4 projects in indigenous communities have been com80%
    DateNovember 19, 2004July 15, 2011December 31, 2011
    Comment
  • MIDEPLAN evaluation methodology expanded to include assessment of projects within the territorial development approach advanced by the projectValuen/aThe new methodology was published in March 2010 anDefined by mid-term review, and tested and applied
    DateNovember 19, 2004July 15, 2011June 30, 2009
    Comment
  • New approaches adopted for provision of water and sanitation servicesValuen/aThe water and sanitation law influenced by the stuDefined by mid-term review and implemented by proj
    DateNovember 19, 2004July 15, 2011December 31, 2011
    Comment
  • Number of quality PMDTs implemented outside project regions using non-project resources or % of regional public investment program implemented with a territorial approach, outside of project financingValuen/aThere are 13 PMDTs that are programmed to be prepaNumber of quality PMDTs: 5 (cumulative) Percent of
    DateNovember 19, 2004July 15, 2011December 31, 2011
    Comment
  • Roads rehabilitated, RuralValue0.00839.000.00
    DateNovember 19, 2004January 27, 2011December 31, 2011
    Comment73 road works have been completed out of 91 contracted for a total length of 839 km. Completed PMDT1s have prioritized 1,222 km ofroads to be rehabilitated.this was not a target agreed during preparation; we are including it as part of the core indicators reform.