Financier | Commitments |
---|---|
International Bank for Reconstruction and Development | 50.26 |
Borrower/Recipient | 40.00 |
P076807
Closed
Veronica Raffo
N/A
September 3, 2003
(as of board presentation)
December 16, 2004
August 16, 2005
US$ 90.26 million
N/A
2005
US$ 50.26 million
B
Not Applicable
December 31, 2011
BANK APPROVED
March 11, 2021
Financier | Commitments |
---|---|
International Bank for Reconstruction and Development | 50.26 |
Borrower/Recipient | 40.00 |
Product Line | IBRD/IDA |
---|---|
IBRD Commitment | 50.26 |
IDA Commitment | N/A |
IBRD + IDA Commitment | 50.26 |
Lending Instrument | |
---|---|
Grant Amount | N/A |
Total Project Cost** | 90.26 |
Period | Financier | Transaction Type | Amount (US$) |
---|---|---|---|
Dec 16, 2004 | IBRD-72690 | Loan Commitment | 50,260,000.00 |
Name | Review | Date |
---|---|---|
Progress towards achievement of PDO | Highly Satisfactory | 2011-07-27 |
Procurement | Satisfactory | 2011-07-27 |
Project Management | Satisfactory | 2011-07-27 |
Financial Management | Satisfactory | 2011-07-27 |
Counterpart Funding | Satisfactory | 2011-07-27 |
Monitoring and Evaluation | Satisfactory | 2011-07-27 |
Overall Implementation Progress (IP) | Satisfactory | 2011-07-27 |
INDICATOR | IMPLEMENTATION COMPLETION & RESULTS REPORT: 06-20-2012 |
---|---|
Outcomes | Substantial |
Risk to Development Outcome | Modest |
Bank Performance | Substantial |
Borrower Performance | Substantial |
Government Performance | Substantial |
Implementing Agency | Substantial |
INDICATOR | ICR REVIEW: 12-16-2013 | PROJECT PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT REPORT: |
---|---|---|
Outcome Rating | Satisfactory | N/a |
Risk To Development Outcome | Moderate | N/a |
Bank Performance | Moderately Satisfactory | N/a |
Borrower Performance | Moderately Satisfactory | N/a |
Government Performance | Satisfactory | N/a |
Implementing Agency | Moderately Satisfactory | N/a |
Icr Quality | Unsatisfactory | N/a |
M&e Quality | Modest | N/a |
INDICATOR | BASELINE | CURRENT | TARGET |
---|
Water and sanitation: % of population benefiting from project PMDTs with sustained access and effective use of services provided bythe project (as measured by demand for services) | Value | 0% | 42% of potential beneficiaries of the water and sa | 90% |
Date | November 19, 2004 | July 15, 2011 | December 31, 2011 | |
Comment |
Roads: increased use of transportation services along rehabilitated road infrastructure (as measured by pro-rated increase in demand six months after completion of works, for a representative sample) | Value | 0% | To be assessed through final impact evaluation | 20% |
Date | November 19, 2004 | July 15, 2011 | December 31, 2011 | |
Comment |
Electrification: % of population benefiting from project PMDTs with increased use of electrificity for economic activities (as measured by surveys) | Value | 0% | 18% of potential beneficiaries of the electricity | 90% |
Date | November 19, 2004 | July 15, 2011 | December 31, 2011 | |
Comment |
INDICATOR | BASELINE | CURRENT | TARGET |
---|
Number of PMDTs approved by the CORES with agreed standards including: (i) evidence of indigenous and gender participation, (ii) sign-off of communities; and (iii) consideration of socioenv safeguards | Value | 5 | The 18 completed PMDT1s have been approved. There | 25 (cumulative) |
Date | November 19, 2004 | July 15, 2011 | December 31, 2011 | |
Comment |
Annual % of level of compliance with targets set in PMDTs for: % w&s and electric. connections constructed with providers having revenues higher than costs; and % kms of roads rehab. with maintenance | Value | n/a | Based on PMDT1s: Water and Sanitation: 42% Roa | Water and sanitation: 95% Roads: 95% Electrificati |
Date | November 19, 2004 | July 15, 2011 | December 31, 2011 | |
Comment |
Percent of subprojects (by initial cost amount) managed by local organizations or entities, with adequate consideration of indigenous and gender issues | Value | n/a | 4 projects in indigenous communities have been com | 80% |
Date | November 19, 2004 | July 15, 2011 | December 31, 2011 | |
Comment |
MIDEPLAN evaluation methodology expanded to include assessment of projects within the territorial development approach advanced by the project | Value | n/a | The new methodology was published in March 2010 an | Defined by mid-term review, and tested and applied |
Date | November 19, 2004 | July 15, 2011 | June 30, 2009 | |
Comment |
New approaches adopted for provision of water and sanitation services | Value | n/a | The water and sanitation law influenced by the stu | Defined by mid-term review and implemented by proj |
Date | November 19, 2004 | July 15, 2011 | December 31, 2011 | |
Comment |
Number of quality PMDTs implemented outside project regions using non-project resources or % of regional public investment program implemented with a territorial approach, outside of project financing | Value | n/a | There are 13 PMDTs that are programmed to be prepa | Number of quality PMDTs: 5 (cumulative) Percent of |
Date | November 19, 2004 | July 15, 2011 | December 31, 2011 | |
Comment |
Roads rehabilitated, Rural | Value | 0.00 | 839.00 | 0.00 |
Date | November 19, 2004 | January 27, 2011 | December 31, 2011 | |
Comment | 73 road works have been completed out of 91 contracted for a total length of 839 km. Completed PMDT1s have prioritized 1,222 km ofroads to be rehabilitated. | this was not a target agreed during preparation; we are including it as part of the core indicators reform. |