Financier | Commitments |
---|---|
IDA Credit | 15.00 |
P078990
Closed
Michael Drabble
N/A
March 3, 2004
(as of board presentation)
September 2, 2004
August 19, 2004
US$ 15.00 million
N/A
2005
US$ 15.00 million
C
Not Applicable
June 30, 2011
BANK APPROVED
September 28, 2021
Financier | Commitments |
---|---|
IDA Credit | 15.00 |
Product Line | IBRD/IDA |
---|---|
IBRD Commitment | N/A |
IDA Commitment | 15.00 |
IBRD + IDA Commitment | 15.00 |
Lending Instrument | |
---|---|
Grant Amount | N/A |
Total Project Cost** | 15.00 |
Period | Financier | Transaction Type | Amount (US$) |
---|---|---|---|
Feb 15, 2020 | IDA-39780 | Loan Repay | 140,833.40 |
Feb 15, 2020 | IDA-39780 | Int Charges | 47,954.06 |
Feb 15, 2020 | IDA-39780 | Int Charges | 47,954.06 |
Feb 15, 2020 | IDA-39780 | Loan Repay | 1,252.69 |
Aug 15, 2020 | IDA-39780 | Loan Repay | 2,304.11 |
Aug 15, 2020 | IDA-39780 | Loan Repay | 144,163.52 |
Aug 15, 2013 | IDA-39780 | Int Charges | 409.11 |
Aug 15, 2013 | IDA-39780 | Int Charges | 409.11 |
Aug 15, 2013 | IDA-39780 | Int Charges | 58,742.57 |
Aug 15, 2013 | IDA-39780 | Int Charges | 58,742.57 |
Feb 15, 2014 | IDA-39780 | Int Charges | 59,675.71 |
Aug 15, 2014 | IDA-39780 | Int Charges | 240.78 |
Aug 15, 2014 | IDA-39780 | Int Charges | 240.78 |
Aug 15, 2014 | IDA-39780 | Int Charges | 59,576.38 |
Aug 15, 2014 | IDA-39780 | Int Charges | 59,576.38 |
Feb 15, 2015 | IDA-39780 | Loan Repay | 146,662.73 |
Feb 15, 2015 | IDA-39780 | Int Charges | 55,152.13 |
Feb 15, 2015 | IDA-39780 | Int Charges | 55,152.13 |
Feb 15, 2015 | IDA-39780 | Loan Repay | 409.59 |
Feb 15, 2014 | IDA-39780 | Int Charges | 244.29 |
Feb 15, 2014 | IDA-39780 | Int Charges | 244.29 |
Feb 15, 2014 | IDA-39780 | Int Charges | 59,675.71 |
Aug 15, 2015 | IDA-39780 | Loan Repay | 6,556.05 |
Aug 15, 2015 | IDA-39780 | Loan Repay | 139,284.02 |
Aug 15, 2015 | IDA-39780 | Int Charges | 54,143.08 |
Aug 15, 2015 | IDA-39780 | Int Charges | 54,143.08 |
Aug 15, 2016 | IDA-39780 | Int Charges | 1,691.18 |
Aug 15, 2016 | IDA-39780 | Int Charges | 1,691.18 |
Aug 15, 2016 | IDA-39780 | Loan Repay | 145,001.58 |
Aug 15, 2016 | IDA-39780 | Int Charges | 52,744.34 |
Aug 15, 2016 | IDA-39780 | Int Charges | 52,744.34 |
Feb 15, 2016 | IDA-39780 | Loan Repay | 108.29 |
Feb 15, 2016 | IDA-39780 | Loan Repay | 145,958.28 |
Feb 15, 2016 | IDA-39780 | Int Charges | 51,975.89 |
Feb 15, 2016 | IDA-39780 | Int Charges | 51,975.89 |
Feb 15, 2017 | IDA-39780 | Loan Repay | 138,736.92 |
Feb 15, 2017 | IDA-39780 | Int Charges | 49,061.25 |
Feb 15, 2017 | IDA-39780 | Int Charges | 49,061.25 |
Aug 15, 2024 | IDA-39780 | Int Charges | 39,407.39 |
Sep 2, 2004 | IDA-39780 | Loan Commitment | 15,000,000.00 |
Feb 15, 2024 | IDA-39780 | Int Charges | 42,263.62 |
Feb 15, 2024 | IDA-39780 | Loan Repay | 312.15 |
Feb 15, 2024 | IDA-39780 | Loan Repay | 137,130.61 |
Feb 15, 2024 | IDA-39780 | Int Charges | 42,263.62 |
Aug 15, 2020 | IDA-39780 | Int Charges | 44,680.50 |
Aug 15, 2020 | IDA-39780 | Int Charges | 44,680.50 |
Feb 15, 2021 | IDA-39780 | Int Charges | 4,295.73 |
Feb 15, 2021 | IDA-39780 | Int Charges | 4,295.73 |
Feb 15, 2021 | IDA-39780 | Loan Repay | 149,695.84 |
Feb 15, 2021 | IDA-39780 | Int Charges | 49,008.57 |
Feb 15, 2021 | IDA-39780 | Int Charges | 49,008.57 |
Aug 15, 2021 | IDA-39780 | Int Charges | 48,146.74 |
Aug 15, 2021 | IDA-39780 | Int Charges | 48,146.74 |
Aug 15, 2021 | IDA-39780 | Int Charges | 385.50 |
Aug 15, 2021 | IDA-39780 | Int Charges | 385.50 |
Aug 15, 2021 | IDA-39780 | Loan Repay | 147,576.25 |
Aug 15, 2022 | IDA-39780 | Int Charges | 556.93 |
Aug 15, 2022 | IDA-39780 | Int Charges | 556.93 |
Aug 15, 2022 | IDA-39780 | Loan Repay | 137,190.28 |
Aug 15, 2022 | IDA-39780 | Int Charges | 43,729.42 |
Aug 15, 2022 | IDA-39780 | Int Charges | 43,729.42 |
Feb 15, 2022 | IDA-39780 | Loan Repay | 142,950.66 |
Feb 15, 2022 | IDA-39780 | Int Charges | 46,348.74 |
Feb 15, 2022 | IDA-39780 | Int Charges | 46,348.74 |
Feb 15, 2022 | IDA-39780 | Loan Repay | 2,598.49 |
Aug 15, 2023 | IDA-39780 | Int Charges | 894.29 |
Aug 15, 2023 | IDA-39780 | Int Charges | 894.29 |
Aug 15, 2023 | IDA-39780 | Loan Repay | 138,432.94 |
Aug 15, 2023 | IDA-39780 | Int Charges | 43,087.24 |
Aug 15, 2023 | IDA-39780 | Int Charges | 43,087.24 |
Feb 15, 2023 | IDA-39780 | Loan Repay | 137,384.61 |
Feb 15, 2023 | IDA-39780 | Int Charges | 42,873.34 |
Feb 15, 2023 | IDA-39780 | Int Charges | 42,873.34 |
Feb 15, 2023 | IDA-39780 | Loan Repay | 1,570.95 |
Aug 15, 2024 | IDA-39780 | Int Charges | 39,407.39 |
Aug 15, 2024 | IDA-39780 | Loan Repay | 136,637.95 |
Aug 15, 2024 | IDA-39780 | Loan Repay | 2,441.24 |
Feb 15, 2017 | IDA-39780 | Loan Repay | 1,520.53 |
Aug 15, 2017 | IDA-39780 | Loan Repay | 146,226.58 |
Aug 15, 2017 | IDA-39780 | Int Charges | 48,521.07 |
Aug 15, 2017 | IDA-39780 | Int Charges | 48,521.07 |
Feb 15, 2018 | IDA-39780 | Int Charges | 47,050.48 |
Feb 15, 2018 | IDA-39780 | Int Charges | 3,702.16 |
Feb 15, 2018 | IDA-39780 | Int Charges | 3,702.16 |
Aug 15, 2017 | IDA-39780 | Int Charges | 1,492.35 |
Aug 15, 2017 | IDA-39780 | Int Charges | 1,492.35 |
Feb 15, 2019 | IDA-39780 | Loan Repay | 3,998.44 |
Feb 15, 2019 | IDA-39780 | Loan Repay | 140,068.03 |
Aug 15, 2018 | IDA-39780 | Int Charges | 6,042.17 |
Aug 15, 2018 | IDA-39780 | Int Charges | 6,042.17 |
Aug 15, 2018 | IDA-39780 | Loan Repay | 143,735.02 |
Aug 15, 2018 | IDA-39780 | Int Charges | 50,127.55 |
Aug 15, 2018 | IDA-39780 | Int Charges | 50,127.55 |
Feb 15, 2018 | IDA-39780 | Loan Repay | 151,549.44 |
Feb 15, 2018 | IDA-39780 | Int Charges | 47,050.48 |
Feb 15, 2019 | IDA-39780 | Int Charges | 48,643.68 |
Feb 15, 2019 | IDA-39780 | Int Charges | 48,643.68 |
Aug 15, 2019 | IDA-39780 | Loan Repay | 142,800.95 |
Aug 15, 2019 | IDA-39780 | Int Charges | 48,730.81 |
Aug 15, 2019 | IDA-39780 | Int Charges | 48,730.81 |
Aug 15, 2019 | IDA-39780 | Int Charges | 1,049.98 |
Aug 15, 2019 | IDA-39780 | Int Charges | 1,049.98 |
Name | Review | Date |
---|---|---|
Overall Implementation Progress (IP) | Moderately Satisfactory | 2011-06-22 |
Progress towards achievement of PDO | Moderately Satisfactory | 2011-06-22 |
Procurement | Moderately Satisfactory | 2011-06-22 |
Project Management | Moderately Satisfactory | 2011-06-22 |
Financial Management | Moderately Satisfactory | 2011-06-22 |
Counterpart Funding | Satisfactory | 2011-06-22 |
Monitoring and Evaluation | Satisfactory | 2011-06-22 |
INDICATOR | IMPLEMENTATION COMPLETION & RESULTS REPORT: 12-23-2011 |
---|---|
Outcomes | Moderately Satisfactory |
Risk to Development Outcome | Modest |
Bank Performance | Moderately Satisfactory |
Borrower Performance | Moderately Satisfactory |
Government Performance | Moderately Satisfactory |
Implementing Agency | Moderately Unsatisfactory |
INDICATOR | ICR REVIEW: 05-28-2013 | PROJECT PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT REPORT: 06-12-2015 |
---|---|---|
Outcome Rating | Moderately Unsatisfactory | Moderately Satisfactory |
Risk To Development Outcome | Moderate | Modest |
Bank Performance | Moderately Unsatisfactory | Moderately Satisfactory |
Borrower Performance | Moderately Unsatisfactory | Moderately Satisfactory |
Government Performance | Moderately Satisfactory | Not Rated |
Implementing Agency | Moderately Unsatisfactory | Moderately Unsatisfactory |
Icr Quality | Satisfactory | Not Rated |
M&e Quality | Modest | Modest |
INDICATOR | BASELINE | CURRENT | TARGET |
---|
Student achievement on national standardized tests for 6th grade | Value | Spanish 2002: Basic 66.4%; Intermediate 27.4% and | Spanish 2009: Basic 43.5%; Intermediate 38.3% and | Spanish 2006: Basic 67.4%; Intermediate 27.6% and |
Date | May 3, 2004 | May 6, 2011 | June 30, 2011 | |
Comment | Tests were changed in 2009 and this indicator can not be measured anymore. | The primary education curriculum was changed in 2007. The Ministry of Education decided to collect a new student learningassessment baseline in grades 4th, 6th and 9th. The tests carried out in 2009 are not comparable with the baseline established in2002 for student achievements in Spanish and Math. However, the 2009 results show a large improvement in the percentage ofstudents achievingthe intermediate and proficiency levels in Spanish and mathematics. |
Textbooks to student ratio for grades 1 through grade 3 | Value | 2005: Spanish and Mathematics 1st grade 34.5 %, Sp | 100% | Spanish, Math and Life Skills for grades 1 throug |
Date | May 3, 2004 | May 6, 2011 | June 30, 2011 | |
Comment | New textbooks were distributed for all the grades of primary education. At the Ministry of Education request, the Project ispurchasing an additional 35,000 mathematics primary school textbooks to replace those missing. The ratio of one textbook persubject matter per child will be achieved once these mathematics textbooks will have been distributed. |
Formal acceptance of 3 year rolling Common Work Program (CWP) evidenced by signed MOU by all donors | Value | CWP presented to donors in 2004 and updated in 200 | CWP for 2010 was signed by the donors. The Minist | Institutional Development Plan adpoted by donors a |
Date | May 3, 2004 | May 6, 2011 | June 30, 2011 | |
Comment |
Student achievement on national standardized tests for 3rd grade | Value | Spanish 2002: basic 68.4%, intermediate 22.1%, pro | Results for 4th grade: Spanish 2009: basic 63%, in | Spanish 2006: basic 68.4%, intermediate 23.0%, pro |
Date | May 3, 2004 | May 6, 2011 | June 30, 2011 | |
Comment | Tests were changed in 2009 and this indicator can not be measured anymore. | The primary education curriculum was changed in 2007. The Ministry of Education decided to collect a new student learningassessment baseline in grades 4th, 6th and 9th. The tests carried out in 2009 are not comparable with the baseline established in2002 for student achievements in Spanish and Math. Results show a large percentage of students achieving the intermediate andproficient levels in both Spanish and mathematics in fourth grade. Although this is not comparable, it is at least an indicationthat students are meeting the learning standards of the new curriculum. |
% of donor financing that shares harmonized financial management arrangements | Value | 3 donors shared institutional assessment for finan | There were 4 donors in the common basket (Canada, | 3 donors in the common basket and the rest support |
Date | May 3, 2004 | May 6, 2011 | June 30, 2011 | |
Comment |
# of donors attending joint supervision missions expressed as a % of total number of active donors | Value | 0.00 | 100.00 | 90.00 |
Date | May 3, 2004 | January 13, 2011 | June 30, 2011 | |
Comment | All donors involved in the sector met 3 times a year at the request of the Government to review progress in the sector and discussthe education sector plan. |
INDICATOR | BASELINE | CURRENT | TARGET |
---|
% of departmental delegations and municipalities implementing the new Decentralized and Participatory Education Management Model | Value | none | 100% of the departemental delegations implemented | 100% of departmental delegations implementing the |
Date | May 3, 2004 | May 6, 2011 | June 30, 2011 | |
Comment | 2,216 Ministry staff of departmental delegations, municipalities and schools were trained on: human resources management,administration, finance, educational planning and education statistics. |
% of departmental delegations and municipalities equipped with information technology to implement the National Information System | Value | none | 100% | 100% |
Date | May 3, 2004 | May 6, 2011 | June 30, 2011 | |
Comment | Project financed the purchase of motorcycles, cellular phones, fax machines and generators to ensure good quality communicationbetween the local and central levels. |
Improvement in the % of budget execution | Value | Unknown | 95.1% (2010) | 96% |
Date | May 3, 2004 | May 6, 2011 | June 30, 2011 | |
Comment | This is only slightly below the target. This is still a commendable achievement. |
Number of modules of the National Information System integrated at the end of 2008 and Number of modules implemented at the end of 2009 | Value | None | MINED completed the elaboration of 31 modules. 19 | 16 modules designed and implemented in the nationa |
Date | May 3, 2004 | May 6, 2011 | June 30, 2011 | |
Comment |
Dissemination of 2006 national student test results in 768 schools | Value | None | 22 workshops were organized at the departmental le | Dissemination workshop carried out. |
Date | May 3, 2004 | May 6, 2011 | June 30, 2011 | |
Comment |
Dissemination of 2006 international student test results in 239 schools | Value | None | 11 workshops were organized at the departmental le | Dissemination workshop carried out. |
Date | May 3, 2004 | May 6, 2011 | June 30, 2011 | |
Comment |
Number of schools receiving teaching guides on Spanish and Mathematics for the third and sixth grades in primary, to improve the pedagogical practices of teachers. | Value | None | 9,000 primary schools received teaching guides in | 9000 teaching guides distributed to schools. |
Date | May 3, 2004 | May 6, 2011 | June 30, 2011 | |
Comment | Teaching guides were based on an analysis of the 2006 national standardized test results. |
Round of student tests for Spanish and Mathematics for grades 4th and 6th and 9th and 11th grades at the beginning of 2009 in 30% of schools participating in training courses. | Value | None | 517 schools participated in the 2009 national stan | Rounds of test applied. |
Date | May 3, 2004 | May 6, 2011 | June 30, 2011 | |
Comment | The targeting to apply the test on 30% of the schools that received training was not maintained. Schools could not be selected onthe basis of having participated in a training if one wanted to have a national representative sample to apply the standardizedtest. |
Development of a baseline for 2009 student test results to improve the curricular transformation initiative | Value | None | The national standardized student test for 4th, 6t | Baseline prepared. |
Date | May 3, 2004 | May 6, 2011 | June 30, 2011 | |
Comment |
Number of authors participating in the design and validation of the textbooks design for 1st through 6th grade in Spanish and Literature, Life and Env. Sciencees, social studies and life skills | Value | 2007: no textbooks under design | More than 30 authors were contracted to elaborate | 30 authors hired to design textbooks |
Date | May 3, 2004 | May 6, 2011 | June 30, 2011 | |
Comment |
1st to 3rd grade textbooks in Spanish and Life Skills printed and distributed | Value | 2007: no textbooks designed | 1st Grade: Spanish & Literature 318,858; 2nd grade | 1st Grade: Spanish & Literature 277,268; 2nd grade |
Date | May 3, 2004 | May 6, 2011 | June 30, 2011 | |
Comment |
# of departmental and municipal staff members training according to the formation plan | Value | 2007: no training plan under implementation | 324 staff of departmental and municipal education | 181 |
Date | May 3, 2004 | May 6, 2011 | June 30, 2011 | |
Comment |
# of pedagogical advisors trained in classroom techniques, statistics management, communication and leadership | Value | 2007: no training plan under implementation | In 2007 and 2008, 344 pedagogic advisors participa | 344 |
Date | May 3, 2004 | May 6, 2011 | June 30, 2011 | |
Comment |
# of rural teachers trained in pedagogical techniques for multi-grade settings. | Value | 2007: no training plan under implementation | 1000 multigrade rural primary school teachers wer | 1000 |
Date | May 3, 2004 | May 6, 2011 | June 30, 2011 | |
Comment |
# of secondary teachers trained in Math and Spanish in the usage of study guides. | Value | 2007: no guidelines designed | 922 mathematics and 992 Spanish secondary school t | 1984 |
Date | May 3, 2004 | May 6, 2011 | June 30, 2011 | |
Comment |
Study guides for 4th and 5th year of secondary education in the areas of Math and Spanish developed and distributed. | Value | None | 17,500 guides in Spanish and 17,500 guides in math | 60000 |
Date | May 3, 2004 | May 6, 2011 | June 30, 2011 | |
Comment | The study guides were intended to provide extra help and training for students preparing the university entry exam. |
Number of workshops for rural multigrade teachers in planning and evaluation of curricular activities (TEPCEs) | Value | None | 11 TEPCES for rural multigrade teachers were carri | 11 TEPCES carried out for rural multi-grade school |
Date | May 3, 2004 | May 6, 2011 | June 30, 2011 | |
Comment |
System for learning assessment at the primary level | Value | No | Yes | Yes |
Date | May 3, 2004 | May 6, 2011 | June 30, 2011 | |
Comment | The Ministry of Education carried out a national standardized test for students in grades 4, 6 and 9 in November, 2009. TheMinistry of Education eliminated the testing in grade 11 for this academic year. Results were published and disseminated in April2011 to the regional and municipal education offices and to the participating schools. The second round of testings in grades 4, 6,and 9 took place in November 2010 and results will be compiled in July-August. The pilot testings in grade 11 will take place inOctober 2011. |
Number of teachers and school principals participating in the dissemination workshops for national tests. | Value | Round of test done in 2006 | 22 workshops were organized at the departmental le | 768 directors, 1536 teachers, 161 pedagogical advi |
Date | May 3, 2004 | May 6, 2011 | June 30, 2011 | |
Comment |
Number of teachers and school principals participating in the dissemination workshops for international tests | Value | rouond of test done in 2006 | 11 workshops were organized at the departmental le | 239 directors, 478 teachers, 147 pedagogical advis |
Date | May 3, 2004 | May 6, 2011 | June 30, 2011 | |
Comment |
National strategy for learning assessments developed that includes rounds of national tests according to MINED criteria | Value | 2007: no strategy under implementation | Strategy designed | Strategy designed |
Date | May 3, 2004 | May 6, 2011 | June 30, 2011 | |
Comment |