Skip to Main Navigation

Disaster Hazard Mitigation Project

Abstract*

The Disaster Hazard Mitigation Project for the Kyrgyz Republic aims to: (a) minimize the exposure of humans, livestock, and riverine flora and fauna to radionuclides associated with abandoned uranium mine tailings and waste rock dumps in the Mailuu-Suu area; (b) improve the effectiveness of emergency management and response by national and sub-national authorities and local communities to disaster situations; and (c) reduce the loss of life and property...

* The project abstract is drawn from the PAD, SAR or PGD and may not accurately reflect the project's current nature

Show More

Development Objective

Within the context of the country's longer-term interests in disaster hazard mitigation, the development objective of the proposed Disaster Hazard Mitigation Project (DHMP) is to: (i) minimize the exposure of humans, livestock, and riverine flora and fauna to radionuclides associated with abandoned uranium mine tailings and waste rock dumps in the Mailuu-Suu area;(ii) improve the effectiveness of emergency management and response by national and sub-national authorities and local communities to disaster situations; and (iii) reduce the loss of life and property in key landslide areas of the country. These objectives will be accomplished through key mitigation measures designed to: (i) isolate and protect abandoned uranium mine tailings and waste rock dumps from disturbance by natural processes such as landslides and floods, and from leaching and dispersal processes associated with ground- and surface-water drainage; isolate long-standing hazards and prevent their disturbance; (ii) create an effective disaster management and response system; and (iii) develop a system to detect and warn against active landslide movements in about 20 key hazard areas.

Key Details

Project Details

  • P083235

  • Closed

  • Katelijn Van den Berg

  • N/A

  • Kyrgyz Republic

  • November 3, 2003

  • (as of board presentation)

    June 15, 2004

  • September 28, 2004

  • US$ 10.85 million

  • B

  • Not Applicable

  • December 31, 2012

  • BANK APPROVED

  • June 4, 2013

  • Notes

Finances

Financing Plan (US$ Millions)

No data available.
Financier Commitments
Borrower/Recipient 1.91
Global Environment Facility (GEF) 1.00
IDA GRANT FOR DEBT VULNERABLE 7.90
JAPAN: Ministry of Finance - PHRD Grants 1.95

Total Project Financing (US$ Millions)

Product Line IBRD/IDA
IBRD Commitment N/A
IDA Commitment 7.90
IBRD + IDA Commitment 7.90
Lending Instrument
Grant Amount 2.95
Total Project Cost** 12.76

Summary Status of World Bank Financing (US$ Millions) as of April 30, 2025

Download:
No data available.
Financier Approval Date Closing Date Principal Disbursed Repayments Interest, Charges & Fees

Detailed Financial Activity as of April 30, 2025

Download:
No data available.
Period Financier Transaction Type Amount (US$)
Jun 9, 2011 IDA-H6960 Loan Commitment 1,000,000.00
Jun 15, 2004 IDA-H0960 Loan Commitment 6,900,000.00

Footnotes

Ratings

IMPLEMENTATION RATINGS

Name Review Date
Progress towards achievement of PDO Moderately Satisfactory 2012-12-26
Procurement Satisfactory 2012-12-26
Financial Management Moderately Satisfactory 2012-12-26
Counterpart Funding Moderately Satisfactory 2012-12-26
Project Management Moderately Unsatisfactory 2012-12-26
Monitoring and Evaluation Satisfactory 2012-12-26
Overall Implementation Progress (IP) Moderately Satisfactory 2012-12-26

COMPLETION RATINGS

INDICATORIMPLEMENTATION COMPLETION & RESULTS REPORT: 11-28-2013
OutcomesModerately Satisfactory
Risk to Development OutcomeModest
Bank PerformanceModerately Satisfactory
Borrower PerformanceModerately Satisfactory
Government PerformanceModerately Satisfactory
Implementing AgencyModerately Satisfactory

INDEPENDENT EVALUATION RATINGS

INDICATORICR REVIEW: 08-26-2014PROJECT PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT REPORT:
Outcome RatingModerately Satisfactory N/a
Risk To Development OutcomeModerateN/a
Bank PerformanceModerately SatisfactoryN/a
Borrower PerformanceModerately SatisfactoryN/a
Government PerformanceModerately SatisfactoryN/a
Implementing AgencyModerately SatisfactoryN/a
Icr QualitySatisfactoryN/a
M&e QualityModestN/a

Results Framework

PROJECT DEVELOPMENT OBJECTIVE INDICATORS

INDICATORBASELINECURRENTTARGET
  • Evidence that applicable parameters are below hazardous thresholds for humans and livestock in samples of soil, water and air from monitored sites in the Mailuu-Suu area.ValueToxic and radioactive parameters intermittently abNear-complete (ca. 98%) reduction ofpollution souDiscontinuation ofpollution infiltration ofradio
    DateOctober 1, 2004December 14, 2012December 31, 2012
    CommentDiscontinuation ofpollution infiltration ofradionuclides andassociated heavy metalsinto the groundwaterfrom selectedhigh-riskmine tailings and wastedumps is used as a validproxy PDO indicator tomeasure the impact ofpublic healthoutcomeduring the lifeof theproject, as impact ofremediation measuresin groundwaterdownstream can onlybe measured aftertheproject closure.Discontinuation ofpollution infiltration ofradionuclides andassociated heavy metalsinto the groundwaterfrom selectedhigh-riskmine tailings and wastedumps is used as a validproxy PDO indicator tomeasure the impact ofpublic healthoutcomeduring the lifeof theproject, as impact ofremediation measuresin groundwaterdownstream can onlybe measured aftertheproject closure.
  • Evidence that a disaster hazard monitoring, warning and response system is functioning and being used effectively by cooperating national, oblast, and raion authorities, and local communities.ValueNo evidence of improved effectiveness, as system nEmergency ResponseCenters established in Bishkek Emergency ResponseCenters established andoperati
    DateOctober 1, 2004December 14, 2012December 31, 2012
    CommentNational Radiation Safety Agency is progressively assuming responsibility for finalized objects under project.Nat Agency for Tailings Management assumes full, responsibility, for O&M as well as early warning and emergency response.
  • Evidence that real-time landslide monitoring, warning and response systems are functioning and being used effectively by cooperating national, oblast, and rayon authorities, and local communities.ValueNo systems in place, thus no evidence.One landslidemonitoring and warningsystems instaTwenty landslide areashave been surveyed. Five la
    DateOctober 1, 2004December 14, 2012December 31, 2012
    CommentActivity not expected to recover from severe setbacks during civil unrest (theft and vandalism) and related hiatus in projectmanagement. Focus now on community based low tech / low cost monitoring and maintenance.Costs per landslideexceeded the estimatedcosts due to highcomplexity of selectedhigh risk sites. Fivelandslide areaswereequipped.

INTERMEDIATE RESULTS INDICATORS

INDICATORBASELINECURRENTTARGET
  • Progress towards improved isolation and protection of uranium wastes from disturbance by landslides, floods, and leaching and dispersal by ground- and surface-water drainage in the Mailuu Suu area.ValueNo designs ready.Interventions for high risk facilities completed 9Necessary interventions for selected high-risk tai
    DateOctober 1, 2004December 31, 2012December 31, 2012
    CommentSome delays encountered due to repeated flooding due to extreme precipitation, and a very harsh and long winter 2011/12
  • Ability to communicate within MES improved as a step towards effective emergency management.ValueAbility to communicate only via telephone, which iCommunication equipment is installed, maintained, Capacity to communicate between the new Osh HQ, B
    DateOctober 1, 2004December 14, 2012December 29, 2012
    CommentOsh continues to be an effective and functioning communication hub, which performed well during the avalanche responsecoordinationby MES in March 2012.