Skip to Main Navigation

Sichuan Urban Development Project

Abstract*

The Sichuan Urban Development Project for China will improve core urban functions in an equitable and resource efficient manner by removing identified infrastructure bottlenecks hampering land development, transport, and environmental conditions in four second-tier cities in Sichuan Province. The project has the following components: Urban Infrastructure Investment Component will support spatial planning priorities in the four cities. Mianyang: the...

* The project abstract is drawn from the PAD, SAR or PGD and may not accurately reflect the project's current nature

Show More

Development Objective

To improve core urban functions in an equitable and resource efficient manner by removing identified infrastructure bottlenecks hampering land development, transport, and environmental conditions in four second-tier cities in Sichuan Province.

Key Details

Project Details

  • P083322

  • Closed

  • Paul Procee

  • N/A

  • China

  • November 1, 2004

  • (as of board presentation)

    September 7, 2006

  • January 5, 2007

  • US$ 180.00 million

  • A

  • Not Applicable

  • December 31, 2013

  • BANK APPROVED

  • August 15, 2014

  • Notes

Finances

Financing Plan (US$ Millions)

No data available.
Financier Commitments
Borrower/Recipient 219.87
International Bank for Reconstruction and Development 180.00

Total Project Financing (US$ Millions)

Product Line IBRD/IDA
IBRD Commitment 180.00
IDA Commitment N/A
IBRD + IDA Commitment 180.00
Lending Instrument
Grant Amount N/A
Total Project Cost** 399.87

Summary Status of World Bank Financing (US$ Millions) as of July 31, 2025

Download:
No data available.
Financier Approval Date Closing Date Principal Disbursed Repayments Interest, Charges & Fees

Detailed Financial Activity as of July 31, 2025

Download:
No data available.
Period Financier Transaction Type Amount (US$)
Nov 15, 2013 IBRD-48380 Int Charges 475.64
May 15, 2024 IBRD-48380 Loan Repay 7,535,000.00
Nov 15, 2013 IBRD-48380 Loan Repay 4,290,000.00
Nov 15, 2014 IBRD-48380 Int Charges 471,657.97
Nov 15, 2014 IBRD-48380 Loan Repay 4,525,000.00
May 15, 2014 IBRD-48380 Int Charges 509,696.97
May 15, 2014 IBRD-48380 Loan Repay 4,405,000.00
Nov 15, 2015 IBRD-48380 Loan Repay 4,775,000.00
Nov 15, 2015 IBRD-48380 Int Charges 559,405.44
May 15, 2015 IBRD-48380 Int Charges 481,860.20
May 15, 2015 IBRD-48380 Loan Repay 4,650,000.00
May 15, 2017 IBRD-48380 Int Charges 1,128,477.60
May 15, 2017 IBRD-48380 Loan Repay 5,175,000.00
Nov 15, 2016 IBRD-48380 Int Charges 910,378.30
Nov 15, 2016 IBRD-48380 Loan Repay 5,040,000.00
May 15, 2016 IBRD-48380 Int Charges 689,808.80
May 15, 2016 IBRD-48380 Loan Repay 4,905,000.00
Nov 15, 2017 IBRD-48380 Int Charges 1,249,491.90
Nov 15, 2017 IBRD-48380 Loan Repay 5,315,000.00
May 15, 2018 IBRD-48380 Loan Repay 5,460,000.00
May 15, 2018 IBRD-48380 Int Charges 1,298,023.40
Nov 15, 2018 IBRD-48380 Int Charges 1,816,462.40
Nov 15, 2018 IBRD-48380 Loan Repay 5,610,000.00
May 15, 2019 IBRD-48380 Int Charges 1,908,499.20
May 15, 2019 IBRD-48380 Loan Repay 5,765,000.00
Nov 15, 2019 IBRD-48380 Loan Repay 5,920,000.00
Nov 15, 2019 IBRD-48380 Int Charges 1,698,349.60
May 15, 2020 IBRD-48380 Int Charges 1,237,175.40
May 15, 2020 IBRD-48380 Loan Repay 6,080,000.00
May 15, 2021 IBRD-48380 Int Charges 333,510.60
May 15, 2021 IBRD-48380 Loan Repay 6,415,000.00
Nov 15, 2020 IBRD-48380 Int Charges 568,491.50
Nov 15, 2020 IBRD-48380 Loan Repay 6,245,000.00
Nov 15, 2021 IBRD-48380 Int Charges 302,014.28
Nov 15, 2021 IBRD-48380 Loan Repay 6,590,000.00
May 15, 2022 IBRD-48380 Int Charges 288,977.84
May 15, 2022 IBRD-48380 Loan Repay 6,770,000.00
Nov 15, 2022 IBRD-48380 Int Charges 1,037,885.80
Nov 15, 2022 IBRD-48380 Loan Repay 6,955,000.00
Nov 15, 2023 IBRD-48380 Loan Repay 7,340,000.00
May 15, 2023 IBRD-48380 Int Charges 97,987.85
May 15, 2023 IBRD-48380 Int Charges 1,559,961.80
May 15, 2023 IBRD-48380 Loan Repay 7,145,000.00
Nov 15, 2023 IBRD-48380 Int Charges 37,688.72
Nov 15, 2023 IBRD-48380 Int Charges 1,672,683.60
Sep 7, 2006 IBRD-48380 Loan Commitment 180,000,000.00
May 15, 2024 IBRD-48380 Int Charges 10,995.71
May 15, 2024 IBRD-48380 Int Charges 1,537,735.80
Nov 15, 2013 IBRD-48380 Int Charges 581,886.50

Footnotes

Ratings

IMPLEMENTATION RATINGS

Name Review Date
Counterpart Funding Satisfactory 2013-06-22
Financial Management Satisfactory 2013-06-22
Overall Implementation Progress (IP) Satisfactory 2013-06-22
Project Management Satisfactory 2013-06-22
Progress towards achievement of PDO Satisfactory 2013-06-22
Procurement Satisfactory 2013-06-22
Monitoring and Evaluation Satisfactory 2013-06-22

COMPLETION RATINGS

INDICATORIMPLEMENTATION COMPLETION & RESULTS REPORT: 06-19-2014
OutcomesModerately Satisfactory
Risk to Development OutcomeSubstantial
Bank PerformanceModerately Satisfactory
Borrower PerformanceSubstantial
Government PerformanceSubstantial
Implementing AgencySubstantial

INDEPENDENT EVALUATION RATINGS

INDICATORICR REVIEW: 02-23-2015PROJECT PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT REPORT:
Outcome RatingModerately Satisfactory N/a
Risk To Development OutcomeSignificantN/a
Bank PerformanceModerately SatisfactoryN/a
Borrower PerformanceSatisfactoryN/a
Government PerformanceSatisfactoryN/a
Implementing AgencySatisfactoryN/a
Icr QualitySatisfactoryN/a
M&e QualityNegligibleN/a

Results Framework

PROJECT DEVELOPMENT OBJECTIVE INDICATORS

INDICATORBASELINECURRENTTARGET
  • Evidence that identified bottlenecks have been removed, as expected by the strategic investments of the project, including a high level of satisfaction among users of investments and PAPValueNot applicableTime savings on the roads are apparent adn overal Evidence identified via reports from technical and
    DateSeptember 7, 2006April 30, 2013June 28, 2013
    CommentCritical bottlenecks have been addressed and roads are operational.

INTERMEDIATE RESULTS INDICATORS

INDICATORBASELINECURRENTTARGET
  • Mianyang: Area of land sold (ha)Value0Pioneer Park: 208haSEDZ: 192.4haPioneer Park: 238; SEDZ: 312
    DateDecember 1, 2005April 30, 2013June 28, 2013
    CommentThe previous number in the report for SEDZ was wrong and has been corrected.Difficult to quantify in how far this (infrastructure) project contributes to land sales and values.
  • Mianyang: Number of new residents on siteValue0Pioneer Park: 65,020SEDZ: 3,85030,440 (Pioneer Park), 18,202 (SEDZ)
    DateDecember 1, 2005April 30, 2013June 28, 2013
    CommentThe numbers reflect changes in policies after the Earthquake, with more residents moving to PP.
  • Mianyang: Satisfaction of PAPs with resettlement process and outcome in both Pioneer Park and SEDZ.ValueNot applicable75% of PAPs satisfied with resettlement process an
    DateDecember 1, 2005April 30, 2013June 28, 2013
    CommentFinal survey is being prepared as the reported number of 100% is not believable and need to be substantiated.
  • Suining: Area of land sold (ha)Value070.6ha141 ha
    DateDecember 1, 2005April 30, 2013June 28, 2013
    CommentDifficult to quantify in how far this (infrastructure) project contributes to this indicator (land area sold).
  • Suining: Number of new residents on siteValue017,50019,820
    DateDecember 1, 2005April 30, 2013June 28, 2013
    Comment
  • Suining: Satisfaction of PAPs with resettlement process and outcomeValueNot applicable75% of PAPs satisfied with resettlement process an
    DateDecember 1, 2005April 30, 2013June 28, 2013
    CommentSite visits find the majority of PAP satisfied, but more detailed information needs to be collected after completion of activities.
  • Yibin: Reduced travel time from Mianjiang Bridge to Chang Jiang Bridge: Travel time in minutes at peakValue10 min6 min7.5 min
    DateDecember 1, 2005April 30, 2013June 28, 2013
    Comment
  • Yibin: Satisfaction level of landscape improvementsValueNot applicable75% of sampled people satisfied with landscape imp
    DateDecember 1, 2005April 30, 2013June 28, 2013
    CommentA proper survey needs to be conducted.
  • Yibin: Satisfaction of PAPs with resettlement process and outcomeValueNot applicable75% of PAPs satisfied with resettlement process an
    DateDecember 1, 2005April 30, 2013June 28, 2013
    CommentA proper survey needs to be conducted.
  • Panzhihua: Wastewater service coverage (average wastewater volume collected and treated, 1000 m3/d)Value408885
    DateDecember 1, 2005April 30, 2013June 28, 2013
    CommentRevised since the previous number was wrong (referred to length of sewer constructed).
  • Panzhihua: Reduced travel time at peak in minutes -- East Duren Road at KM 49 to railway stationValue56.4 min.2049.9 min.
    DateDecember 1, 2005April 30, 2013June 28, 2013
    CommentGreatly reduced as a result of a tunnel built.
  • Panzhihua: Satisfaction level of scenic improvementsValueNot applicable75% of sampled people satisfied with landscape imp
    DateDecember 1, 2005April 30, 2013June 28, 2013
    CommentResults will be provided as part of the final survey.
  • Panzhihua: Satisfaction of PAPs with resettlement process and outcomeValueNot applicable75% of PAPs satisfied with resettlement process an
    DateDecember 1, 2005April 30, 2013June 28, 2013
    CommentA survey will be conducted at the end of project when resettlement activities have been fully completed.
  • Suining: Travel time in minutes at peak from Railway station to Xining DistrictValue25 min16 min
    DateDecember 1, 2005April 30, 2013June 28, 2013
    CommentNo data has been reported recently.
  • Roads constructed, non-ruralValue0.0080.7087.10
    DateDecember 1, 2005April 30, 2013June 28, 2013
    CommentThis include all roads and sewage and drainage pipelines (including service roads as described in the restructuring paper).Core indicators being measured first time at an aggregate level for all cities.Cumulative for all 4 cities.
  • People provided with access to ‘improved sanitation facilities” under the proj.Value0.0021300.0024375.00
    DateApril 30, 2013June 30, 2013
    CommentBased on number of households connected (7,100) x 3 people/household.
  • People provided with access to “improved sanitation facilities” - urbanValue0.0021300.0024375.00
    DateApril 30, 2013June 30, 2013
    CommentBased on number of households connected (7,100) x 3 people/household.Based on number of households connected (8,125) x 3 people/household.