Financier | Commitments |
---|---|
Borrower/Recipient | 0.81 |
IDA Credit | 3.00 |
P083453
Closed
Liba C. Strengerowski-Feldblyum
N/A
October 21, 2002
(as of board presentation)
November 9, 2004
March 14, 2005
US$ 3.81 million
N/A
2005
US$ 3.00 million
B
January 15, 2013
March 31, 2011
BANK APPROVED
Financier | Commitments |
---|---|
Borrower/Recipient | 0.81 |
IDA Credit | 3.00 |
Product Line | IBRD/IDA |
---|---|
IBRD Commitment | N/A |
IDA Commitment | 3.00 |
IBRD + IDA Commitment | 3.00 |
Lending Instrument | |
---|---|
Grant Amount | N/A |
Total Project Cost** | 3.81 |
Period | Financier | Transaction Type | Amount (US$) |
---|---|---|---|
Aug 1, 2020 | IDA-39970 | Int Charges | 72.93 |
Aug 1, 2020 | IDA-39970 | Int Charges | 2,553.56 |
Aug 1, 2020 | IDA-39970 | Int Charges | 2,553.56 |
Feb 1, 2020 | IDA-39970 | Loan Repay | 0.25 |
Feb 1, 2020 | IDA-39970 | Debt Relief Principal | 28,717.70 |
Feb 1, 2020 | IDA-39970 | Loan Repay | 28,717.70 |
Feb 1, 2020 | IDA-39970 | Loan Repay | 198.01 |
Feb 1, 2020 | IDA-39970 | Debt Relief Charges | 7,469.46 |
Feb 4, 2022 | IDA-39970 | Int Charges | 2,743.16 |
Aug 5, 2022 | IDA-39970 | Int Charges | 964.94 |
Aug 5, 2022 | IDA-39970 | Int Charges | 964.94 |
Aug 1, 2021 | IDA-39970 | Debt Relief Charges | 5,660.04 |
Aug 1, 2021 | IDA-39970 | Int Charges | 5,660.04 |
Aug 1, 2021 | IDA-39970 | Int Charges | 5,660.04 |
Aug 1, 2021 | IDA-39970 | Int Charges | 4,046.76 |
Aug 1, 2021 | IDA-39970 | Int Charges | 4,046.76 |
Aug 1, 2021 | IDA-39970 | Int Charges | 82.01 |
Aug 1, 2021 | IDA-39970 | Int Charges | 82.01 |
Aug 1, 2021 | IDA-39970 | Debt Relief Charges | 218.62 |
Aug 1, 2021 | IDA-39970 | Int Charges | 218.62 |
Aug 1, 2021 | IDA-39970 | Int Charges | 218.62 |
Aug 1, 2021 | IDA-39970 | Debt Relief Principal | 30,004.17 |
Aug 1, 2021 | IDA-39970 | Loan Repay | 30,004.17 |
Feb 1, 2021 | IDA-39970 | Int Charges | 4,997.39 |
Feb 1, 2021 | IDA-39970 | Int Charges | 4,997.39 |
Aug 4, 2023 | IDA-39970 | Int Charges | 1,984.88 |
Aug 4, 2023 | IDA-39970 | Int Charges | 1,984.88 |
Aug 1, 2023 | IDA-39970 | Debt Relief Charges | 818.47 |
Aug 1, 2023 | IDA-39970 | Int Charges | 818.47 |
Aug 1, 2023 | IDA-39970 | Int Charges | 818.47 |
Aug 1, 2023 | IDA-39970 | Debt Relief Principal | 28,133.91 |
Aug 1, 2023 | IDA-39970 | Loan Repay | 28,133.91 |
Aug 1, 2023 | IDA-39970 | Debt Relief Charges | 6,524.62 |
Aug 1, 2023 | IDA-39970 | Int Charges | 6,524.62 |
Aug 1, 2023 | IDA-39970 | Int Charges | 6,524.62 |
Feb 6, 2023 | IDA-39970 | Int Charges | 292.86 |
Feb 6, 2023 | IDA-39970 | Int Charges | 292.86 |
Feb 1, 2023 | IDA-39970 | Loan Repay | 623.67 |
Feb 1, 2023 | IDA-39970 | Debt Relief Principal | 27,758.67 |
Feb 1, 2023 | IDA-39970 | Loan Repay | 27,758.67 |
Feb 1, 2023 | IDA-39970 | Debt Relief Charges | 7,819.73 |
Feb 1, 2023 | IDA-39970 | Int Charges | 7,819.73 |
Feb 1, 2023 | IDA-39970 | Int Charges | 7,819.73 |
Feb 1, 2022 | IDA-39970 | Loan Repay | 317.25 |
Feb 1, 2022 | IDA-39970 | Debt Relief Principal | 29,039.91 |
Feb 1, 2022 | IDA-39970 | Loan Repay | 29,039.91 |
Feb 1, 2022 | IDA-39970 | Debt Relief Charges | 6,741.41 |
Feb 1, 2022 | IDA-39970 | Int Charges | 6,741.41 |
Feb 1, 2022 | IDA-39970 | Int Charges | 6,741.41 |
Aug 1, 2022 | IDA-39970 | Debt Relief Charges | 7,901.07 |
Aug 1, 2022 | IDA-39970 | Int Charges | 7,901.07 |
Aug 1, 2022 | IDA-39970 | Int Charges | 7,901.07 |
Aug 1, 2022 | IDA-39970 | Loan Repay | 40.91 |
Aug 1, 2022 | IDA-39970 | Debt Relief Principal | 27,778.84 |
Aug 1, 2022 | IDA-39970 | Loan Repay | 27,778.84 |
Feb 4, 2022 | IDA-39970 | Int Charges | 2,743.16 |
Nov 9, 2004 | IDA-39970 | Loan Commitment | 3,000,000.00 |
Aug 1, 2024 | IDA-39970 | Loan Repay | 81.00 |
Feb 1, 2024 | IDA-39970 | Debt Relief Principal | 27,906.90 |
Feb 1, 2024 | IDA-39970 | Loan Repay | 27,906.90 |
Feb 1, 2024 | IDA-39970 | Debt Relief Charges | 7,227.57 |
Feb 1, 2024 | IDA-39970 | Int Charges | 7,227.57 |
Feb 1, 2024 | IDA-39970 | Int Charges | 7,227.57 |
Feb 1, 2024 | IDA-39970 | Int Charges | 1,353.80 |
Feb 1, 2024 | IDA-39970 | Int Charges | 1,353.80 |
Feb 1, 2024 | IDA-39970 | Debt Relief Charges | 241.02 |
Feb 1, 2024 | IDA-39970 | Int Charges | 241.02 |
Feb 1, 2024 | IDA-39970 | Int Charges | 241.02 |
Aug 1, 2024 | IDA-39970 | Debt Relief Charges | 7,515.58 |
Aug 1, 2024 | IDA-39970 | Int Charges | 7,515.58 |
Aug 1, 2024 | IDA-39970 | Int Charges | 7,515.58 |
Aug 1, 2024 | IDA-39970 | Debt Relief Principal | 27,758.49 |
Aug 1, 2024 | IDA-39970 | Loan Repay | 27,758.49 |
Aug 1, 2024 | IDA-39970 | Int Charges | 859.82 |
Aug 1, 2024 | IDA-39970 | Int Charges | 859.82 |
Feb 1, 2014 | IDA-39970 | Debt Relief Charges | 62.75 |
Feb 1, 2014 | IDA-39970 | Int Charges | 62.75 |
Feb 1, 2014 | IDA-39970 | Int Charges | 62.75 |
Feb 1, 2014 | IDA-39970 | Debt Relief Charges | 10,083.18 |
Feb 1, 2014 | IDA-39970 | Int Charges | 10,083.18 |
Feb 1, 2014 | IDA-39970 | Int Charges | 10,083.18 |
Aug 1, 2013 | IDA-39970 | Int Charges | 21.99 |
Aug 1, 2013 | IDA-39970 | Int Charges | 21.99 |
Aug 1, 2013 | IDA-39970 | Debt Relief Charges | 10,145.93 |
Aug 1, 2013 | IDA-39970 | Int Charges | 10,145.93 |
Aug 1, 2013 | IDA-39970 | Int Charges | 10,145.93 |
Aug 1, 2013 | IDA-39970 | Int Charges | 1,665.56 |
Aug 1, 2013 | IDA-39970 | Int Charges | 1,665.56 |
Aug 1, 2015 | IDA-39970 | Debt Relief Charges | 8,893.22 |
Aug 1, 2015 | IDA-39970 | Int Charges | 8,893.22 |
Aug 1, 2015 | IDA-39970 | Int Charges | 8,893.22 |
Aug 1, 2015 | IDA-39970 | Debt Relief Principal | 28,207.12 |
Aug 1, 2015 | IDA-39970 | Loan Repay | 28,207.12 |
Aug 1, 2015 | IDA-39970 | Int Charges | 1,057.20 |
Aug 1, 2015 | IDA-39970 | Int Charges | 1,057.20 |
Feb 1, 2015 | IDA-39970 | Debt Relief Principal | 29,569.70 |
Feb 1, 2015 | IDA-39970 | Loan Repay | 29,569.70 |
Feb 1, 2015 | IDA-39970 | Debt Relief Charges | 7,632.05 |
Feb 1, 2015 | IDA-39970 | Int Charges | 7,632.05 |
Feb 1, 2015 | IDA-39970 | Int Charges | 7,632.05 |
Feb 1, 2015 | IDA-39970 | Loan Repay | 36.10 |
Feb 4, 2015 | IDA-39970 | Int Charges | 3,486.37 |
Feb 4, 2015 | IDA-39970 | Int Charges | 3,486.37 |
Aug 1, 2014 | IDA-39970 | Int Charges | 17.33 |
Aug 1, 2014 | IDA-39970 | Int Charges | 17.33 |
Aug 1, 2014 | IDA-39970 | Debt Relief Charges | 10,145.94 |
Aug 1, 2014 | IDA-39970 | Int Charges | 10,145.94 |
Aug 1, 2014 | IDA-39970 | Int Charges | 10,145.94 |
Aug 1, 2014 | IDA-39970 | Int Charges | 1,893.83 |
Aug 1, 2014 | IDA-39970 | Int Charges | 1,893.83 |
Feb 28, 2014 | IDA-39970 | Int Charges | 2,015.84 |
Aug 1, 2016 | IDA-39970 | Int Charges | 7,557.99 |
Aug 25, 2016 | IDA-39970 | Int Charges | 3,129.86 |
Aug 25, 2016 | IDA-39970 | Int Charges | 3,129.86 |
Feb 1, 2017 | IDA-39970 | Debt Relief Principal | 28,441.01 |
Feb 1, 2017 | IDA-39970 | Loan Repay | 28,441.01 |
Feb 1, 2019 | IDA-39970 | Int Charges | 546.32 |
Feb 1, 2019 | IDA-39970 | Int Charges | 546.32 |
Feb 1, 2019 | IDA-39970 | Loan Repay | 351.30 |
Feb 1, 2019 | IDA-39970 | Debt Relief Principal | 29,016.15 |
Feb 1, 2019 | IDA-39970 | Loan Repay | 29,016.15 |
Feb 1, 2019 | IDA-39970 | Debt Relief Charges | 7,373.93 |
Feb 1, 2019 | IDA-39970 | Int Charges | 7,373.93 |
Feb 1, 2019 | IDA-39970 | Int Charges | 7,373.93 |
Aug 1, 2018 | IDA-39970 | Debt Relief Charges | 6,162.35 |
Aug 1, 2018 | IDA-39970 | Int Charges | 6,162.35 |
Aug 1, 2018 | IDA-39970 | Int Charges | 6,162.35 |
Aug 1, 2018 | IDA-39970 | Debt Relief Principal | 29,465.10 |
Aug 1, 2018 | IDA-39970 | Loan Repay | 29,465.10 |
Aug 1, 2018 | IDA-39970 | Debt Relief Charges | 864.13 |
Aug 1, 2018 | IDA-39970 | Int Charges | 864.13 |
Aug 1, 2018 | IDA-39970 | Int Charges | 864.13 |
Aug 1, 2018 | IDA-39970 | Int Charges | 4,113.57 |
Aug 1, 2018 | IDA-39970 | Int Charges | 4,113.57 |
Feb 1, 2018 | IDA-39970 | Debt Relief Charges | 639.19 |
Feb 1, 2018 | IDA-39970 | Int Charges | 639.19 |
Feb 1, 2018 | IDA-39970 | Int Charges | 639.19 |
Feb 1, 2018 | IDA-39970 | Int Charges | 1.48 |
Feb 1, 2018 | IDA-39970 | Int Charges | 1.48 |
Feb 1, 2018 | IDA-39970 | Debt Relief Principal | 30,565.29 |
Feb 1, 2018 | IDA-39970 | Loan Repay | 30,565.29 |
Feb 1, 2018 | IDA-39970 | Debt Relief Charges | 5,388.52 |
Feb 28, 2014 | IDA-39970 | Int Charges | 2,015.84 |
Feb 1, 2017 | IDA-39970 | Debt Relief Charges | 8,354.91 |
Feb 1, 2017 | IDA-39970 | Int Charges | 8,354.91 |
Feb 1, 2017 | IDA-39970 | Int Charges | 8,354.91 |
Feb 1, 2017 | IDA-39970 | Loan Repay | 181.78 |
Feb 15, 2016 | IDA-39970 | Int Charges | 2,784.16 |
Feb 15, 2016 | IDA-39970 | Int Charges | 2,784.16 |
Feb 1, 2016 | IDA-39970 | Debt Relief Principal | 28,934.22 |
Feb 1, 2016 | IDA-39970 | Loan Repay | 28,934.22 |
Feb 1, 2016 | IDA-39970 | Int Charges | 747.96 |
Feb 1, 2016 | IDA-39970 | Int Charges | 747.96 |
Feb 1, 2016 | IDA-39970 | Debt Relief Charges | 163.84 |
Feb 1, 2016 | IDA-39970 | Int Charges | 163.84 |
Feb 1, 2016 | IDA-39970 | Int Charges | 163.84 |
Feb 1, 2016 | IDA-39970 | Debt Relief Charges | 7,900.78 |
Feb 1, 2016 | IDA-39970 | Int Charges | 7,900.78 |
Feb 1, 2016 | IDA-39970 | Int Charges | 7,900.78 |
Aug 1, 2015 | IDA-39970 | Loan Repay | 1,081.58 |
Feb 1, 2018 | IDA-39970 | Int Charges | 4,489.36 |
Aug 1, 2017 | IDA-39970 | Debt Relief Charges | 272.01 |
Aug 1, 2017 | IDA-39970 | Int Charges | 272.01 |
Aug 1, 2017 | IDA-39970 | Int Charges | 272.01 |
Aug 1, 2017 | IDA-39970 | Debt Relief Principal | 29,650.32 |
Aug 1, 2017 | IDA-39970 | Loan Repay | 29,650.32 |
Aug 1, 2017 | IDA-39970 | Debt Relief Charges | 6,772.18 |
Aug 1, 2017 | IDA-39970 | Int Charges | 6,772.18 |
Aug 1, 2017 | IDA-39970 | Int Charges | 6,772.18 |
Aug 1, 2017 | IDA-39970 | Int Charges | 3,169.21 |
Aug 1, 2017 | IDA-39970 | Int Charges | 3,169.21 |
Feb 20, 2017 | IDA-39970 | Int Charges | 1,676.68 |
Feb 20, 2017 | IDA-39970 | Int Charges | 1,676.68 |
Aug 1, 2016 | IDA-39970 | Debt Relief Charges | 3.90 |
Aug 1, 2016 | IDA-39970 | Int Charges | 3.90 |
Aug 1, 2016 | IDA-39970 | Int Charges | 3.90 |
Aug 1, 2016 | IDA-39970 | Debt Relief Principal | 29,335.53 |
Aug 1, 2016 | IDA-39970 | Loan Repay | 29,335.53 |
Aug 1, 2016 | IDA-39970 | Debt Relief Charges | 7,557.99 |
Aug 1, 2016 | IDA-39970 | Int Charges | 7,557.99 |
Feb 1, 2018 | IDA-39970 | Int Charges | 5,388.52 |
Feb 1, 2018 | IDA-39970 | Int Charges | 5,388.52 |
Feb 1, 2018 | IDA-39970 | Int Charges | 4,489.36 |
Feb 1, 2020 | IDA-39970 | Int Charges | 7,469.46 |
Feb 1, 2020 | IDA-39970 | Int Charges | 7,469.46 |
Feb 1, 2020 | IDA-39970 | Int Charges | 2,184.77 |
Feb 1, 2020 | IDA-39970 | Int Charges | 2,184.77 |
Aug 1, 2019 | IDA-39970 | Int Charges | 2,167.49 |
Aug 1, 2019 | IDA-39970 | Int Charges | 2,167.49 |
Aug 1, 2019 | IDA-39970 | Debt Relief Charges | 7,126.57 |
Aug 1, 2019 | IDA-39970 | Int Charges | 7,126.57 |
Aug 1, 2019 | IDA-39970 | Int Charges | 7,126.57 |
Aug 1, 2019 | IDA-39970 | Int Charges | 521.01 |
Aug 1, 2019 | IDA-39970 | Int Charges | 521.01 |
Aug 1, 2019 | IDA-39970 | Debt Relief Principal | 28,762.23 |
Aug 1, 2019 | IDA-39970 | Loan Repay | 28,762.23 |
Aug 1, 2019 | IDA-39970 | Debt Relief Charges | 399.86 |
Aug 1, 2019 | IDA-39970 | Int Charges | 399.86 |
Aug 1, 2019 | IDA-39970 | Int Charges | 399.86 |
Feb 1, 2019 | IDA-39970 | Int Charges | 1,803.25 |
Feb 1, 2019 | IDA-39970 | Int Charges | 1,803.25 |
Feb 1, 2021 | IDA-39970 | Debt Relief Charges | 1,029.98 |
Feb 1, 2021 | IDA-39970 | Int Charges | 1,029.98 |
Feb 1, 2021 | IDA-39970 | Int Charges | 1,029.98 |
Feb 1, 2021 | IDA-39970 | Debt Relief Charges | 4,749.96 |
Feb 1, 2021 | IDA-39970 | Int Charges | 4,749.96 |
Feb 1, 2021 | IDA-39970 | Int Charges | 4,749.96 |
Feb 1, 2021 | IDA-39970 | Debt Relief Principal | 30,204.30 |
Feb 1, 2021 | IDA-39970 | Loan Repay | 30,204.30 |
Aug 1, 2020 | IDA-39970 | Debt Relief Principal | 29,674.47 |
Aug 1, 2020 | IDA-39970 | Loan Repay | 29,674.47 |
Aug 1, 2020 | IDA-39970 | Debt Relief Charges | 6,338.34 |
Aug 1, 2020 | IDA-39970 | Int Charges | 6,338.34 |
Aug 1, 2020 | IDA-39970 | Int Charges | 6,338.34 |
Aug 1, 2020 | IDA-39970 | Int Charges | 34.73 |
Aug 1, 2020 | IDA-39970 | Int Charges | 34.73 |
Aug 1, 2020 | IDA-39970 | Debt Relief Charges | 72.93 |
Aug 1, 2020 | IDA-39970 | Int Charges | 72.93 |
Name | Review | Date |
---|---|---|
Overall Safeguards Rating | Moderately Satisfactory | 2011-03-29 |
Progress towards achievement of PDO | Moderately Satisfactory | 2011-03-29 |
Financial Management | Moderately Satisfactory | 2011-03-29 |
Monitoring and Evaluation | Moderately Satisfactory | 2011-03-29 |
Overall Implementation Progress (IP) | Moderately Satisfactory | 2011-03-29 |
Project Management | Moderately Satisfactory | 2011-03-29 |
Procurement | Moderately Unsatisfactory | 2011-03-29 |
Counterpart Funding | Satisfactory | 2011-03-29 |
Overall Safeguards Rating | Moderately Satisfactory | 2011-03-29 |
INDICATOR | IMPLEMENTATION COMPLETION & RESULTS REPORT: 10-26-2011 |
---|---|
Outcomes | Moderately Satisfactory |
Risk to Development Outcome | Modest |
Bank Performance | Moderately Satisfactory |
Borrower Performance | Moderately Satisfactory |
Government Performance | Moderately Satisfactory |
Implementing Agency | Highly Satisfactory |
INDICATOR | ICR REVIEW: 04-30-2013 | PROJECT PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT REPORT: |
---|---|---|
Outcome Rating | Moderately Satisfactory | N/a |
Risk To Development Outcome | High | N/a |
Bank Performance | Moderately Unsatisfactory | N/a |
Borrower Performance | Moderately Satisfactory | N/a |
Government Performance | Moderately Unsatisfactory | N/a |
Implementing Agency | Moderately Satisfactory | N/a |
Icr Quality | Satisfactory | N/a |
M&e Quality | Modest | N/a |
INDICATOR | BASELINE | CURRENT | TARGET |
---|
METT score: Management effectiveness score of the 5 protected conservation areas (KPI) | Value | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Date | March 14, 2005 | January 28, 2011 | March 31, 2011 | |
Comment | 3,500 sq km of land and water under improved management measured through the METT | see scores in the next section.This is the KPI - the METT scores are not indicators, but a tool to measure effectiveness | end target was set at mid-term only in response to management demands, it was never part of the original M&E package for theproject in the PAD. Targets were overly ambitious. |
Sub- (micro) projects funded by FIAL satisfactorily achieved their objectives (KPI) | Value | 0.00 | 81.30 | 75.00 |
Date | March 14, 2005 | January 28, 2011 | March 31, 2011 | |
Comment | Data from internal evaluation from the project team |
Infringements of the applicable regulatory framework related to the Reserved Fishing Zones by fishing vessels decreased (KPI) | Value | regulatory framework not established | 10 % decline at community level (framework adopted | No. of infringement declined by 10% |
Date | March 14, 2005 | January 28, 2011 | March 31, 2011 | |
Comment | framework was signed on March 16, 2010 |
Government provides sufficient financial resources to cover the operational and maintenance costs of all fisheries surveillance activities, including surveillance stations (KPI) | Value | no operational and maintenance funds | the Government has started to contribute financial | Full coverage of operational costs of project - fu |
Date | March 14, 2005 | January 28, 2011 | March 31, 2011 | |
Comment | The Government in the last year provided what was necessary to operationalize the surveillance post of Caravela such as salariesfor staff based in Caravela, supplied the post with two vessels and funds for maintenance. |
Public or private development projects eligible for review submitted for EIA review prior to being implemented (KPI) | Value | 0.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 |
Date | March 14, 2005 | January 28, 2011 | March 31, 2011 | |
Comment | Instituion to conduct such reviews is being created at project start | based on data from CAIA | All eligible projects submitted for review |
Cacheu | Value | 56.00 | 107.00 | 136.00 |
Date | March 14, 2005 | January 28, 2011 | March 31, 2011 | |
Comment | The KPI is: 3,500 sq km of land and water under improved : the METT scores are not indicators, but a tool to measureeffectiveness. It must be noted that although the end target was not achieved, it made quantifiable progress almost at 100% (almostdoubled from the baseline). It should also be noted that when using the METT scores, progress is not Linear. | end target was set at mid-term only only in response to management demands, it was never part of the original M&E package for theproject in the PAD. Targets were overly ambitious. |
Cantanhez | Value | 40.00 | 56.00 | 70.00 |
Date | March 14, 2005 | January 28, 2011 | March 31, 2011 | |
Comment | The KPI is: 3,500 sq km of land and water under improved : the METT scores are not indicators, but a tool to measureeffectiveness. It must be noted that although the end target was not achieved, it made quantifiable progress for a Park that wasestablished during the project's tenure | end target was set at mid-term only only in response to management demands, it was never part of the original M&E package for theproject in the PAD. Targets were overly |
Cufada | Value | 54.00 | 75.00 | 70.00 |
Date | March 14, 2005 | January 28, 2011 | March 31, 2011 | |
Comment | although end targets were overly ambitious, Cufada managed to surpass the target value | end target was set at mid-term only only in response to management demands, it was never part of the original M&E package for theproject in the PAD. Targets were overly ambitious. |
Joao Vieira | Value | 65.00 | 105.00 | 139.00 |
Date | March 14, 2005 | January 28, 2011 | March 31, 2011 | |
Comment | The KPI is: 3,500 sq km of land and water under improved : the METT scores are not indicators, but a tool to measureeffectiveness. It must be noted that although the end target was not achieved, it made quantifiable progress almost at 100% (almostdoubled from the baseline).It should also be noted that when using the METT scores, progress is not Linear. | end target was set at mid-term only only in response to management demands, it was never part of the original M&E package for theproject in the PAD. Targets were overly ambitious. |
Orango | Value | 63.00 | 114.00 | 139.00 |
Date | March 14, 2005 | January 28, 2011 | March 31, 2011 | |
Comment | The KPI is: 3,500 sq km of land and water under improved : the METT scores are not indicators, but a tool to measureeffectiveness. It must be noted that although the end target was not achieved, it made quantifiable progress almost at 100% (almostdoubled from the baseline).It should also be noted that when using the METT scores, progress is not Linear. | end target was set at mid-term only only in response to management demands, it was never part of the original M&E package for theproject in the PAD. Targets were overly |
INDICATOR | BASELINE | CURRENT | TARGET |
---|
75% of community development micro-projects funded by the Community Fund, FIAL, each year considered to have satisfactorialy achieved their objectives. | Value | 0, as no micro-projects have been funded yet | 81.3% | 75% of micro-projects considered satisfactory. |
Date | March 14, 2005 | January 28, 2011 | March 31, 2011 | |
Comment | Target overly achieved. |
Ecosystem health and function maintained or improved within protected areas, their buffer zones, the Biosphere Reserve and fishing reserves. | Value | |||
Date | March 14, 2005 | January 28, 2011 | ||
Comment | This indicator will be monitored through the same measurements as PDO indicator 1, the PA and MPA tracking tool (see values forPDOindicator 1). |
Sector policies, procedures and regulations required for EIA prepared | Value | Not prepared | Prepared | |
Date | March 14, 2005 | January 28, 2011 | March 31, 2011 | |
Comment | The Environmental Impact Assessment Law was approved by the Parliament in May 2010 and was promulgated and published in theofficial gazette in September 2010 |
Quality and timeliness of project implementation | Value | |||
Date | January 28, 2011 | March 31, 2011 | ||
Comment | Project implementation is progressing well, indicators are close to their targets and Financial reports are delivered on time -there was a delay in submitting the audit report for 2009. |