Financier | Commitments |
---|---|
SWEDEN: Swedish Intl. Dev. Cooperation Agency (SIDA) | 3.93 |
Borrower/Recipient | 0.60 |
Global Environment Facility (GEF) | 9.02 |
EC: European Commission | 0.13 |
Local Communities | 8.46 |
P084604
Closed
Tijen Arin
N/A
Serbia
March 9, 2004
(as of board presentation)
May 12, 2005
December 15, 2005
US$ 22.14 million
N/A
2005
US$ 13.08 million
B
January 15, 2013
April 30, 2011
BANK APPROVED
Financier | Commitments |
---|---|
SWEDEN: Swedish Intl. Dev. Cooperation Agency (SIDA) | 3.93 |
Borrower/Recipient | 0.60 |
Global Environment Facility (GEF) | 9.02 |
EC: European Commission | 0.13 |
Local Communities | 8.46 |
Product Line | IBRD/IDA |
---|---|
IBRD Commitment | N/A |
IDA Commitment | N/A |
IBRD + IDA Commitment | N/A |
Lending Instrument | |
---|---|
Grant Amount | 13.08 |
Total Project Cost** | 22.14 |
Name | Review | Date |
---|---|---|
Procurement | Satisfactory | 2011-05-30 |
Project Management | Satisfactory | 2011-05-30 |
Financial Management | Satisfactory | 2011-05-30 |
Overall Implementation Progress (IP) | Moderately Satisfactory | 2011-05-30 |
Summary Global Objective Rating | Satisfactory | 2011-05-30 |
Counterpart Funding | Satisfactory | 2011-05-30 |
Monitoring and Evaluation | Satisfactory | 2011-05-30 |
INDICATOR | IMPLEMENTATION COMPLETION & RESULTS REPORT: 10-31-2011 |
---|---|
Outcomes | Substantial |
Risk to Development Outcome | Modest |
Bank Performance | Moderately Satisfactory |
Borrower Performance | Moderately Satisfactory |
Government Performance | Substantial |
Implementing Agency | Moderately Satisfactory |
INDICATOR | ICR REVIEW: 05-01-2014 | PROJECT PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT REPORT: |
---|---|---|
Outcome Rating | Moderately Unsatisfactory | N/a |
Risk To Development Outcome | Significant | N/a |
Bank Performance | Moderately Unsatisfactory | N/a |
Borrower Performance | Moderately Satisfactory | N/a |
Government Performance | Satisfactory | N/a |
Implementing Agency | Moderately Satisfactory | N/a |
Icr Quality | Satisfactory | N/a |
M&e Quality | Modest | N/a |
INDICATOR | BASELINE | CURRENT | TARGET |
---|
INDICATOR | BASELINE | CURRENT | TARGET |
---|
Status of development of a Code of Good Agricultural Practices | Value | CGAP non-existent | CGAP finalized, adopted by MAFWM and widely distri | CGAP Adopted by MAFWM |
Date | December 31, 2005 | April 21, 2011 | April 30, 2011 | |
Comment |
Number of slaughterhouses that have invested in proper animal waste management technology | Value | 0 | 3 | 4 |
Date | December 31, 2005 | April 21, 2011 | April 30, 2011 | |
Comment | Forth (Nisprodukt) completed works for wastewater treatment, but investments in WWT equipment stalled. Hence no grant was provided. |
Number of agricultural advisors trained | Value | 0 | 186 | 160 |
Date | December 31, 2005 | April 21, 2011 | April 30, 2011 | |
Comment |
Laboratory equipment installed and operational in Hydro-meteorological Institute | Value | Lab equipment not installed | Installed | Installed |
Date | December 31, 2005 | April 21, 2011 | April 30, 2011 | |
Comment |
Increase in percentage of farmers in the target areas aware of environmental issues in agriculture | Value | NA | 58% | 40% |
Date | December 31, 2005 | April 21, 2011 | April 30, 2011 | |
Comment | Based on July 2010 survey among farmers in the target areas. |
Replication Strategy developed | Value | Strategy non-existent | Strategy prepared. | Strategy prepared. |
Date | December 31, 2005 | April 21, 2011 | April 30, 2011 | |
Comment | An IPARD measure for farm manure management, ideas for post-Project awareness raising, and a pre-feasibility study for anaerobicdigestion have been prepared. |
At least 65% of beneficiary farms and slaughterhouses implementing nutrient reduction plans properly two years after being awarded the sub-grant | Value | 0.00 | 69.00 | 65.00 |
Date | December 31, 2005 | April 21, 2011 | April 30, 2011 | |
Comment | In April 2009, 39 farms had completed nutrient management investments. According to the end-of-project beneficiary survey, 27 ofthese farms found the nutrient management plans useful and were able to implement all aspects. |
Level of decrease of nitrogen (pollution) flows from participating enterprises into water bodies connected with the Danube River | Value | 0.00 | 44.00 | 20.00 |
Date | December 31, 2005 | April 21, 2011 | April 30, 2011 | |
Comment | The nutrient reduction was estimated in percentage terms. |
Level of decrease of phosphorus (pollution) flows from participating enterprises into water bodies connected with the Danube River | Value | 0.00 | 100.00 | 20.00 |
Date | December 31, 2005 | April 21, 2011 | April 30, 2011 | |
Comment | The nutrient reduction was estimated in percentage terms. |
Number of farms which have received nutrient management plans and investment support (works and or equipment) to control nutrient flows | Value | 0.00 | 105.00 | 60.00 |
Date | December 31, 2005 | April 21, 2011 | April 30, 2011 | |
Comment |