Financier | Commitments |
---|---|
IDA GRANT FOR POOREST COUNTRY | 40.00 |
Borrower/Recipient | 5.83 |
Sub-borrower(s) | 9.28 |
P086661
Closed
Arif Ahamed
N/A
December 3, 2003
(as of board presentation)
June 17, 2004
February 25, 2005
US$ 55.10 million
N/A
2004
US$ 40.00 million
B
Not Applicable
December 31, 2010
BANK APPROVED
May 1, 2015
Financier | Commitments |
---|---|
IDA GRANT FOR POOREST COUNTRY | 40.00 |
Borrower/Recipient | 5.83 |
Sub-borrower(s) | 9.28 |
Product Line | IBRD/IDA |
---|---|
IBRD Commitment | N/A |
IDA Commitment | 40.00 |
IBRD + IDA Commitment | 40.00 |
Lending Instrument | |
---|---|
Grant Amount | N/A |
Total Project Cost** | 55.10 |
Period | Financier | Transaction Type | Amount (US$) |
---|---|---|---|
Jun 17, 2004 | IDA-H1010 | Loan Commitment | 40,000,000.00 |
Name | Review | Date |
---|---|---|
Procurement | Satisfactory | 2010-12-11 |
Financial Management | Moderately Satisfactory | 2010-12-11 |
Project Management | Satisfactory | 2010-12-11 |
Progress towards achievement of PDO | Satisfactory | 2010-12-11 |
Monitoring and Evaluation | Satisfactory | 2010-12-11 |
Counterpart Funding | Satisfactory | 2010-12-11 |
Overall Implementation Progress (IP) | Satisfactory | 2010-12-11 |
INDICATOR | IMPLEMENTATION COMPLETION & RESULTS REPORT: 06-29-2011 |
---|---|
Outcomes | Moderately Satisfactory |
Risk to Development Outcome | High |
Bank Performance | Moderately Satisfactory |
Borrower Performance | Moderately Unsatisfactory |
Government Performance | Not Applicable |
Implementing Agency | Not Applicable |
INDICATOR | ICR REVIEW: 09-13-2013 | PROJECT PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT REPORT: |
---|---|---|
Outcome Rating | Moderately Satisfactory | N/a |
Risk To Development Outcome | High | N/a |
Bank Performance | Moderately Satisfactory | N/a |
Borrower Performance | Moderately Satisfactory | N/a |
Government Performance | Unsatisfactory | N/a |
Implementing Agency | Moderately Satisfactory | N/a |
Icr Quality | Satisfactory | N/a |
M&e Quality | Modest | N/a |
INDICATOR | BASELINE | CURRENT | TARGET |
---|
Number of people in villages and towns provided with safe water. The piloting of innovative approaches to water supply provision in rural piped schemes. | Value | 0 - This is a demand-based program. It is assumed | 1. Pilot innovative approaches to water supply pro | 1. Pilot innovative approaches to water supply pro |
Date | February 25, 2005 | November 23, 2010 | December 31, 2010 | |
Comment |
INDICATOR | BASELINE | CURRENT | TARGET |
---|
No. of villages with private-sponsor arrangements for the provision of safe water supply. | Value | 0 - None of the villages that will participate in | 1. Implementation of 21 schemes is progressing. 2 | 21 schemes (including 11 schemes continued from BA |
Date | February 25, 2005 | November 23, 2010 | December 31, 2010 | |
Comment |
No. of pourashavas with enhanced quality and quantity of water supply | Value | 0 | 1. Implementation work is completed under 23 Munic | About 0.190 million people having access to safe w |
Date | February 25, 2005 | November 23, 2010 | December 31, 2010 | |
Comment |
No. of arsenic safe point water sources provided | Value | 0 | 1. Implementation works of 3810 point sources in A | About 0.95 million people having access to safe wa |
Date | February 25, 2005 | November 23, 2010 | December 31, 2010 | |
Comment |
No. of water points tested for water quality | Value | 0 | 1. Water quality parameters have been tested/monit | 100% water points (in piped and non-piped systems) |
Date | February 25, 2005 | November 23, 2010 | December 31, 2010 | |
Comment |