Financier | Commitments |
---|---|
Borrower/Recipient | 0.08 |
IDA GRANT FOR HIV/AIDS | 25.00 |
UK: British Department for International Development (DFID) | 1.90 |
P087003
Closed
Nedim Jaganjac
N/A
Central Asia
March 10, 2004
(as of board presentation)
March 15, 2005
November 4, 2005
US$ 26.98 million
N/A
2005
US$ 26.90 million
C
Not Applicable
December 31, 2011
BANK APPROVED
January 15, 2013
Financier | Commitments |
---|---|
Borrower/Recipient | 0.08 |
IDA GRANT FOR HIV/AIDS | 25.00 |
UK: British Department for International Development (DFID) | 1.90 |
Product Line | IBRD/IDA |
---|---|
IBRD Commitment | N/A |
IDA Commitment | 25.00 |
IBRD + IDA Commitment | 25.00 |
Lending Instrument | |
---|---|
Grant Amount | 1.90 |
Total Project Cost** | 26.98 |
Period | Financier | Transaction Type | Amount (US$) |
---|---|---|---|
Mar 15, 2005 | IDA-H1490 | Loan Commitment | 25,000,000.00 |
Name | Review | Date |
---|---|---|
Procurement | Satisfactory | 2011-12-27 |
Project Management | Moderately Satisfactory | 2011-12-27 |
Financial Management | Moderately Satisfactory | 2011-12-27 |
Overall Safeguards Rating | Satisfactory | 2011-12-27 |
Counterpart Funding | Satisfactory | 2011-12-27 |
Overall Implementation Progress (IP) | Moderately Satisfactory | 2011-12-27 |
Overall Safeguards Rating | Satisfactory | 2011-12-27 |
Progress towards achievement of PDO | Moderately Unsatisfactory | 2011-12-27 |
Monitoring and Evaluation | Moderately Unsatisfactory | 2011-12-27 |
INDICATOR | IMPLEMENTATION COMPLETION & RESULTS REPORT: 06-27-2012 |
---|---|
Outcomes | Moderately Unsatisfactory |
Risk to Development Outcome | Substantial |
Bank Performance | Moderately Unsatisfactory |
Borrower Performance | Moderately Unsatisfactory |
Government Performance | Moderately Unsatisfactory |
Implementing Agency | Moderately Satisfactory |
INDICATOR | ICR REVIEW: 11-20-2012 | PROJECT PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT REPORT: |
---|---|---|
Outcome Rating | Moderately Unsatisfactory | N/a |
Risk To Development Outcome | Significant | N/a |
Bank Performance | Moderately Unsatisfactory | N/a |
Borrower Performance | Moderately Unsatisfactory | N/a |
Government Performance | Moderately Unsatisfactory | N/a |
Implementing Agency | Moderately Unsatisfactory | N/a |
Icr Quality | Satisfactory | N/a |
M&e Quality | Negligible | N/a |
INDICATOR | BASELINE | CURRENT | TARGET |
---|
Develop institutional framework to inform policies at national/regional levels | Value | No | Yes | Yes |
Date | December 18, 2009 | November 30, 2011 | December 31, 2011 | |
Comment | Based on restructuring introduced on 12/18/2009 | ACHIEVED. Numerous policies are changed based on various regional cooperation activities., laws introduced etc regionaltechnical and political working groups established including parliamentarian Journalists religious leaders etc established.Training for NGOs targeting high risk groups established with support of partner organizations such as AIHA, UNODC etc. Trainingcenters established. |
Central Asia RAF is established | Value | No | Yes | Yes |
Date | December 1, 2005 | December 1, 2011 | December 31, 2011 | |
Comment | ACHIEVED and SURPASSED. RAF established and support provided way beyond funds available from the Bank including GF, DFID etc.Funding for high risk groups secured beyond RAF although regional activities may no longer be the priority and therefore focusremained on national funding which didn't exist before. | Basis for cooperation with civil society established. |
Strengthen the capacity and cooperation between the Public, Nongovernmental(NGOs) and the Private sectors on the Regional and National levels | Value | No | Yes | Yes |
Date | December 18, 2009 | October 31, 2011 | December 31, 2011 | |
Comment | ACHIEVED. Project served as vehicle for almost all other major donors to strengthen cooperation. guidelines, manuals and numerousoperational trainings completed. |
INDICATOR | BASELINE | CURRENT | TARGET |
---|
RPMU is in compliance with GAC policies | Value | n/a | RPMU is in compliance with GAC policies | RPMU is in compliance with GAC policies |
Date | December 18, 2009 | December 31, 2011 | ||
Comment | Achieved. No evidence of fraud/corruption was identified. | Achieved. |
4 regional centers established and are providing support to policies in at least 4 areas (e.g. epidemiological surveillance, injection safety, harm reduction, stigma reduction, etc) | Value | No | Yes | Yes |
Date | December 18, 2009 | November 13, 2011 | December 31, 2011 | |
Comment | My decision of MOH the proposed training center for injection safety was replaced with training center for sentinel surveillance. | PARTIALY ACHIEVED. Centers with different areas of expertise established and working |
Technical capacity of public sector and NGOs in policy development, grant management/implementation and service provision is enhanced | Value | No | Yes | Yes |
Date | December 18, 2009 | November 13, 2011 | December 31, 2011 | |
Comment | PARTIALLY ACHIEVED. Technical capacity of the public sector agencies and NGOs has been enhanced through (i) the creation of a poolof regional and national trainers on project design, implementation and monitoring in collaboration with IDF Grant activities; (ii)training provided by the RTCs in respective areas; (iii) participation in international study tours; training provided under the232sub-projects funded from the RAF. Specific technical assistance in delivery of peer-based sex work condom interventions was weakor absent. | Enhanced technical capacity |
Communication capacity on HIV/AIDS related issues among stakeholders (e.g. parliamentarians, religious leaders, journalists, NGOs,etc) improved | Value | No | Yes | Yes |
Date | December 18, 2009 | December 1, 2011 | December 31, 2011 | |
Comment | ACHIEVED. Training provided for those groups and results are reflected in changes in national policies. | Achieved |
Strategy for RAF developed | Value | No | Yes | Yes |
Date | December 18, 2009 | November 1, 2011 | December 31, 2011 | |
Comment | ACHIEVED. RAF was instrumental to GF and other donors entry in HIV/AIDS cooperation. RAF is not envisaged after the life of theproject as GF is in place. | Achieved. The RAF strategy outlined in the RAF Handbook, consisting of the RAF Manual, Grant Recipient and M&E Manuals developedin2005, was revised twice and re-approved by RPSC in May 2008. |
Mechanism to distribute funds is in place | Value | No | Yes | Yes |
Date | December 18, 2009 | November 30, 2011 | December 31, 2011 | |
Comment | ACHIEVED. All fiduciary procedures fully satisfactory and in place. | Achieved |
At least 4 grant cycles implemented | Value | No | Yes | Yes |
Date | December 18, 2009 | November 30, 2011 | December 31, 2011 | |
Comment | 3 cycles of small grants and 2 cycles of large grants implemented | Partially Achieved. 4 cycles of small grants and 3 cycles of large grants implemented, 230 projects funded | 4 grant cycles completed |
RPMU fully staffed and operational | Value | No | Yes | Yes |
Date | December 18, 2009 | November 30, 2011 | December 31, 2011 | |
Comment | Achieved. RPMU is fully staffed and operational | Achieved |
M&E/MIS systems in place | Value | No | Yes | Yes |
Date | December 18, 2009 | November 30, 2011 | December 31, 2011 | |
Comment | ACHIEVED. All required Project Management Reports prepared and submitted timely on monthly and quarterly basis to EurAsEC, and onquarterly basis to WB and DfID. | Achieved. |
Procurement and financial management in place and satisfactory to the Bank RPMU in compliance with GAC policies | Value | No | Yes | Yes |
Date | December 18, 2009 | November 30, 2011 | December 31, 2011 | |
Comment | ACHIEVED. All FM and procurement satisfactory to the Bank. | Achieved. Procurement and financial management were upgraded to “satisfactory” status in September 2009 and June 2010respectively,and maintained this status until the end of the project |
At least 3 rounds of sentinel surveillance with involvement of NGOs are conducted | Value | No | Yes | Yes |
Date | December 18, 2009 | November 30, 2011 | December 31, 2011 | |
Comment | Achieved and surpassed. Still there are some technical problems and frequency of sentinel surveillance that needs to be taken intothe account in the future which CDC is addressing. | Exceeded at 133%. 4 rounds of sentinel surveillance with involvement of NGOs were conducted in the period from 2007 to 2010 withinvolvement of NGO’s and a total of 16 national surveillance reports were prepared and disseminated. |