Financier | Commitments |
---|---|
IDA Credit | 67.50 |
NETHERLANDS: Min. of Foreign Affairs / Min. of Dev. Coop. | 25.30 |
Borrower/Recipient | 34.94 |
P089479
Closed
Rosfita Roesli
N/A
July 26, 2005
(as of board presentation)
June 27, 2006
December 22, 2004
US$ 127.74 million
N/A
2006
US$ 92.80 million
C
August 5, 2024
December 31, 2013
BANK APPROVED
Financier | Commitments |
---|---|
IDA Credit | 67.50 |
NETHERLANDS: Min. of Foreign Affairs / Min. of Dev. Coop. | 25.30 |
Borrower/Recipient | 34.94 |
Product Line | IBRD/IDA |
---|---|
IBRD Commitment | N/A |
IDA Commitment | 67.50 |
IBRD + IDA Commitment | 67.50 |
Lending Instrument | |
---|---|
Grant Amount | 25.30 |
Total Project Cost** | 127.74 |
Period | Financier | Transaction Type | Amount (US$) |
---|---|---|---|
Apr 1, 2018 | IDA-42050 | Int Charges | 162,263.25 |
Oct 1, 2017 | IDA-42050 | Int Charges | 167,053.60 |
Oct 1, 2017 | IDA-42050 | Loan Repay | 1,599,761.80 |
Oct 1, 2017 | IDA-42050 | Loan Repay | 7,743.19 |
Apr 1, 2017 | IDA-42050 | Loan Repay | 1,449.10 |
Apr 1, 2017 | IDA-42050 | Loan Repay | 1,541,848.90 |
Apr 1, 2017 | IDA-42050 | Int Charges | 167,833.45 |
Apr 1, 2017 | IDA-42050 | Int Charges | 167,833.45 |
Oct 1, 2017 | IDA-42050 | Int Charges | 167,053.60 |
Sep 29, 2016 | IDA-42050 | Loan Cancel | 5,091.99 |
Oct 1, 2016 | IDA-42050 | Int Charges | 39,541.11 |
Oct 1, 2016 | IDA-42050 | Int Charges | 39,541.11 |
Oct 1, 2016 | IDA-42050 | Loan Repay | 1,587,786.90 |
Oct 1, 2016 | IDA-42050 | Int Charges | 178,626.05 |
Oct 1, 2016 | IDA-42050 | Int Charges | 178,626.05 |
Oct 1, 2016 | IDA-42050 | Int Charges | 3.52 |
Oct 1, 2016 | IDA-42050 | Int Charges | -3.52 |
Sep 29, 2016 | IDA-42050 | Loan Disb | -5,091.99 |
Jun 27, 2006 | IDA-42050 | Loan Commitment | 67,500,000.00 |
Oct 1, 2023 | IDA-42050 | Int Charges | 44,870.22 |
Oct 1, 2023 | IDA-42050 | Int Charges | 44,870.22 |
Oct 1, 2023 | IDA-42050 | Loan Repay | 2,976,725.80 |
Oct 1, 2023 | IDA-42050 | Loan Repay | 14,623.27 |
Apr 1, 2024 | IDA-42050 | Int Charges | 33,875.35 |
Apr 1, 2024 | IDA-42050 | Int Charges | 33,875.35 |
Apr 1, 2024 | IDA-42050 | Loan Repay | 57,100.27 |
Apr 1, 2024 | IDA-42050 | Loan Repay | 2,954,039.80 |
Oct 1, 2022 | IDA-42050 | Int Charges | 65,508.79 |
Oct 1, 2022 | IDA-42050 | Int Charges | 65,508.79 |
Oct 1, 2022 | IDA-42050 | Loan Repay | 41,041.20 |
Oct 1, 2022 | IDA-42050 | Loan Repay | 2,870,461.50 |
Apr 1, 2023 | IDA-42050 | Loan Repay | 104,367.97 |
Apr 1, 2023 | IDA-42050 | Int Charges | 57,378.07 |
Apr 1, 2023 | IDA-42050 | Int Charges | 57,378.07 |
Apr 1, 2023 | IDA-42050 | Loan Repay | 2,955,794.50 |
Apr 1, 2022 | IDA-42050 | Loan Repay | 3,100,079.50 |
Apr 1, 2022 | IDA-42050 | Int Charges | 82,428.23 |
Apr 1, 2022 | IDA-42050 | Int Charges | 82,428.23 |
Apr 1, 2022 | IDA-42050 | Loan Repay | 40,043.06 |
Oct 1, 2021 | IDA-42050 | Loan Repay | 26,231.13 |
Oct 1, 2021 | IDA-42050 | Loan Repay | 3,185,093.50 |
Oct 1, 2021 | IDA-42050 | Int Charges | 96,339.71 |
Oct 1, 2021 | IDA-42050 | Int Charges | 96,339.71 |
Apr 1, 2021 | IDA-42050 | Loan Repay | 1,608,185.00 |
Apr 1, 2021 | IDA-42050 | Int Charges | 102,719.20 |
Apr 1, 2021 | IDA-42050 | Int Charges | 102,719.20 |
Apr 1, 2021 | IDA-42050 | Loan Repay | 3,096.19 |
Oct 1, 2020 | IDA-42050 | Int Charges | 108,293.15 |
Oct 1, 2020 | IDA-42050 | Int Charges | 108,293.15 |
Oct 1, 2020 | IDA-42050 | Loan Repay | 13,506.12 |
Oct 1, 2020 | IDA-42050 | Loan Repay | 1,590,836.80 |
Apr 1, 2020 | IDA-42050 | Loan Repay | 9,369.81 |
Apr 1, 2020 | IDA-42050 | Loan Repay | 1,544,233.10 |
Apr 1, 2020 | IDA-42050 | Int Charges | 117,426.49 |
Apr 1, 2020 | IDA-42050 | Int Charges | 117,426.49 |
Jan 15, 2020 | IDA-42050 | Loan Repay | 3,142,579.50 |
Oct 1, 2019 | IDA-42050 | Int Charges | 127,807.22 |
Oct 1, 2019 | IDA-42050 | Int Charges | 127,807.22 |
Oct 1, 2019 | IDA-42050 | Loan Repay | 1,536,452.60 |
Oct 1, 2019 | IDA-42050 | Loan Repay | 12,725.80 |
Apr 1, 2019 | IDA-42050 | Loan Repay | 9,075.17 |
Apr 1, 2019 | IDA-42050 | Loan Repay | 1,569,823.90 |
Apr 1, 2019 | IDA-42050 | Int Charges | 136,180.02 |
Apr 1, 2019 | IDA-42050 | Int Charges | 136,180.02 |
Apr 1, 2016 | IDA-42050 | Int Charges | 146,441.73 |
Feb 19, 2016 | IDA-42050 | Loan Cancel | 6,012.28 |
Oct 1, 2015 | IDA-42050 | Int Charges | 184,077.16 |
Oct 1, 2015 | IDA-42050 | Int Charges | 184,077.16 |
Oct 1, 2015 | IDA-42050 | Loan Repay | 38,930.63 |
Oct 1, 2015 | IDA-42050 | Loan Repay | 1,578,427.40 |
Oct 2, 2015 | IDA-42050 | Loan Disb | -15,856.50 |
Oct 2, 2015 | IDA-42050 | Loan Cancel | 752,134.75 |
Apr 1, 2015 | IDA-42050 | Loan Repay | 63,391.62 |
Apr 1, 2015 | IDA-42050 | Loan Repay | 1,530,231.10 |
Apr 1, 2015 | IDA-42050 | Int Charges | 194,491.52 |
Apr 1, 2015 | IDA-42050 | Int Charges | 194,491.52 |
Jul 3, 2014 | IDA-42050 | Loan Disb | -192,572.20 |
Apr 1, 2014 | IDA-42050 | Int Charges | 34,714.45 |
Apr 1, 2014 | IDA-42050 | Int Charges | 34,714.45 |
Apr 1, 2014 | IDA-42050 | Loan Repay | 1,784,752.20 |
Apr 1, 2014 | IDA-42050 | Int Charges | 217,268.69 |
Apr 1, 2014 | IDA-42050 | Int Charges | 217,268.69 |
Nov 13, 2013 | IDA-42050 | Loan Disb | -70,433.82 |
Nov 13, 2013 | IDA-42050 | Loan Disb | 70,433.82 |
Oct 1, 2013 | IDA-42050 | Loan Repay | 55,576.99 |
Oct 1, 2013 | IDA-42050 | Loan Repay | 1,719,519.40 |
Oct 1, 2013 | IDA-42050 | Int Charges | 202,636.48 |
Oct 1, 2013 | IDA-42050 | Int Charges | 202,636.48 |
Jul 31, 2013 | IDA-42050 | Loan Disb | 65,000.00 |
Oct 1, 2014 | IDA-42050 | Int Charges | 14,062.75 |
Oct 1, 2014 | IDA-42050 | Int Charges | 14,062.75 |
Oct 1, 2014 | IDA-42050 | Int Charges | 215,773.50 |
Oct 1, 2014 | IDA-42050 | Int Charges | 215,773.50 |
Oct 1, 2014 | IDA-42050 | Loan Repay | 1,712,483.90 |
Oct 1, 2018 | IDA-42050 | Int Charges | 142,882.02 |
Oct 1, 2018 | IDA-42050 | Int Charges | 142,882.02 |
Oct 1, 2018 | IDA-42050 | Loan Repay | 2,037.89 |
Oct 1, 2018 | IDA-42050 | Loan Repay | 1,585,539.60 |
Apr 1, 2018 | IDA-42050 | Int Charges | 1,784.24 |
Apr 1, 2018 | IDA-42050 | Int Charges | 1,784.24 |
Jan 16, 2018 | IDA-42050 | Loan Repay | 3,272,676.80 |
Apr 1, 2018 | IDA-42050 | Int Charges | 162,263.25 |
Apr 1, 2018 | IDA-42050 | Loan Repay | 1,653,638.40 |
Feb 19, 2016 | IDA-42050 | Loan Disb | -6,012.28 |
Apr 1, 2016 | IDA-42050 | Int Charges | 7,291.68 |
Apr 1, 2016 | IDA-42050 | Int Charges | 7,291.68 |
Apr 1, 2016 | IDA-42050 | Loan Repay | 1,603,141.20 |
Apr 1, 2016 | IDA-42050 | Int Charges | 146,441.73 |
Name | Review | Date |
---|---|---|
Counterpart Funding | Satisfactory | 2013-12-29 |
Progress towards achievement of PDO | Moderately Satisfactory | 2013-12-29 |
Financial Management | Moderately Satisfactory | 2013-12-29 |
Overall Implementation Progress (IP) | Moderately Satisfactory | 2013-12-29 |
Overall Safeguards Rating | Moderately Satisfactory | 2013-12-29 |
Monitoring and Evaluation | Satisfactory | 2013-12-29 |
Procurement | Moderately Satisfactory | 2013-12-29 |
Project Management | Moderately Satisfactory | 2013-12-29 |
Overall Safeguards Rating | Moderately Satisfactory | 2013-12-29 |
INDICATOR | IMPLEMENTATION COMPLETION & RESULTS REPORT: 06-30-2014 |
---|---|
Outcomes | Moderately Satisfactory |
Risk to Development Outcome | Substantial |
Bank Performance | Moderately Satisfactory |
Borrower Performance | Moderately Satisfactory |
Government Performance | Moderately Satisfactory |
Implementing Agency | Moderately Satisfactory |
INDICATOR | ICR REVIEW: 11-05-2014 | PROJECT PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT REPORT: |
---|---|---|
Outcome Rating | Moderately Satisfactory | N/a |
Risk To Development Outcome | Significant | N/a |
Bank Performance | Moderately Satisfactory | N/a |
Borrower Performance | Moderately Satisfactory | N/a |
Government Performance | Moderately Satisfactory | N/a |
Implementing Agency | Moderately Satisfactory | N/a |
Icr Quality | Satisfactory | N/a |
M&e Quality | Substantial | N/a |
INDICATOR | BASELINE | CURRENT | TARGET |
---|
The percentage of children who a re moderately stunted, wasted, or have low Body Mass Index (BMI) for age. | Value | 24.25% are moderately stunted are and 2.05% have | ||
Date | April 30, 2009 | August 31, 2010 | ||
Comment | In the baseline, children are aged 1 years old and moderate stunted rates are 24.25% and 2.05% of children have moderately lowBMIfor age. | In the midline, the children are aged 2 years old, and the rates of stunting, wasting, and moderately low BMI decrease. Thedetails as follows: moderate stunting rate 37.44%, moderate wasting rate 36.28% and moderately low BMI 37.7%. |
The number of tasks children are able to complete. These tasks cover the domains of gross motor, fine motor, language, cognitive and socio emotional development. | Value | 13.7 tasks for gross motor skills; 6.1 tasks fo | awaiting endlien result | |
Date | April 30, 2009 | August 31, 2010 | ||
Comment | For children aged 1 year old, children are able to complete: 13.7 tasks for gross motor skills (max possible 20), 6.1 tasks forfine motor skills (max possible : 12); language skills 3.0 (max possible : 5); cognitive 4.43 (max possible: 8); and socioemotionalskills is 1.63 (max possible: 2). | In the midline, children’s scores improved. On average, children were able to complete more tasks - Gross motor skills 18 (maxpossible 20); fine motor skills 10 (max possible : 12); language skills 4.75 (max possible : 5); cognitive skills 7 (max possible:8); and socio emotional skills 1.45 (max possible: 2). |
The percentage of children able to answer the receptive and expressive language questions correctly | Value | the percentage able to answer the receptive langua | awaiting endline result | |
Date | April 30, 2009 | June 25, 2013 | December 30, 2013 | |
Comment | At baseline (2009), there are 37.01% children aged 1 year old able to complete the receptive language questions correctly, whilefor the expressive language questions, there are 39.73% children able to answer the questions correctly. | At midline (2010), the percentage of children able to answer the language questions correctly is much higher: the percentage ableto answer the receptive language questions is 85.33% and able to answer expressive language questions is 100%. | Items were dropped because midline values were already close to 100% |
Increase in early development scores of children entering kindergarten or first grade of primary school | Value | Physical health and well-being 18%;Social compete | awaiting endline result | Physical health and well-being 8%;Social competen |
Date | April 30, 2009 | June 25, 2013 | December 31, 2013 | |
Comment | Result from baseline study:Percent of 4-year old children vulnerable on:Physical health and well-being 18%Socialcompetence 6%Emotional maturity 36%Language and cognitive skills 88%Communication skills and general knowledge 1% | Midline survey reports increases in development scores based on the EDI on average for both enrolled and not enrolled children, ascompared to baseline. Percent of 5-year old children vulnerable on:Physical health and well-being 5.60Social competence4.40Emotional maturity 26.40Language and cognitive skills 47.50Communication skills and general knowledge 0.40Impactevaluation results are obtained by comparing children in villages that received the project with children in similar villages thatdid not receive the project. Using data from the baseline (collected in 2009) and the midline (collected in 2010), shows the impactof the projectin the short term. The project causes increases in enrollment for both cohorts that are tracked in the impactevaluation (a cohort that is 1 years old and a cohort that is 4 years old cohort when first assessed in 2009). For the one-year oldcohort, the average impacts are mostly small and not statistically significant. There are positive | Physical health and well-being 8%;Social competence 8%;Emotional maturity 28%;Language and cognitive skills 3%;Communicationskills and general knowledge 1%. |
Increase in Child Growth and Development (DDTK) scores of children 0-3 years | Value | Please refer to sub indicators below | awaiting endline result | |
Date | April 30, 2009 | June 25, 2013 | December 31, 2013 | |
Comment |
INDICATOR | BASELINE | CURRENT | TARGET |
---|
Percentage of targeted districts with regulations supporting ECED positions in district government | Value | 0.00 | 96.10 | 80.00 |
Date | December 31, 2007 | June 17, 2013 | December 31, 2013 | |
Comment | Almost all of participating 51 districts governments (96.1%) have established PAUD section in the district education office. (1 ofthe district splits into 2)Date 17-June-2013 Comment The establishment of ECED section in district education office is used asaproxy indicator of the presence of local regulations that supports ECED program. Only 2 out of the 51 districts governments(Tobasaand Tapanuli Tengah districts) have not established the PAUD section in Dinas Pendidikan kabupaten. An attempt is beingundertakenbythese two district governments to enact the PAUD section. End of year target has been achieved. | exceeded |
Development of standards and recognition of model ECED centers | Value | 0.00 | 25.00 | 36.00 |
Date | December 31, 2006 | September 12, 2013 | December 31, 2013 | |
Comment | ECED standard (Permendiknas No.58/2009) was issued in September 2009District resource centres established. | partially achieved |
Percentage of targeted districts with qualified and functioning district training teams | Value | 0.00 | 72.20 | 80.00 |
Date | December 31, 2007 | September 12, 2013 | December 31, 2013 | |
Comment | All of 192 provincial and district master trainers have been trained and provide post-training supervision. The two mainresponsibilities of master trainers are providing training to all of ECED teachers (Tendik/CDW) and conducting field supervision tothem. Despite the training to overall ECED teachers have been completed, only 72.2% of master trainers have supervised theoperations of TPK (ECED service center). Lack of budget for field supervision was the main reason for this.It is worth notingthat, in most cases, the master trainers have also invited by DPIU (districtproject management) to participate as a trainer inteachers’ in-service training activity funded by local government budget. They also participated in monitoring activities conductedby the DPIU. | partially achieved |
Percentage of villages undertaking annual community assessments | Value | 0.00 | 80.90 | 80.00 |
Date | December 31, 2007 | September 12, 2013 | December 31, 2013 | |
Comment | TPP (community-based monitoring team) has been established and some of them (80.9%) have conducted their oversight function. | achieved |
Percentage of villages submitting routine reports to districts | Value | 0.00 | 96.00 | 80.00 |
Date | December 31, 2007 | September 12, 2013 | December 31, 2013 | |
Comment | As of 30 April 2011, 96% of TPK have submitted their routine report to DPIU. | exceeded |
Impact study undertaken | Value | N/A | Baseline and midline studies have been completed. | Impact study completed |
Date | December 31, 2007 | September 12, 2013 | December 31, 2013 | |
Comment | Midline survey data collection is completed. The full report has been presented to MONE. The endline survey is underway. | achieved |
Increased enrollment in ECED services by poor children | Value | 0.00 | 673162.00 | 738000.00 |
Date | December 31, 2007 | September 12, 2013 | December 31, 2013 | |
Comment | 673,162 as of June 2013 (end school year) | likely new children enrolled in new school year August 2013 |
Percentage of parents/communities who have received information regarding ECED | Value | 0.00 | 99.80 | 80.00 |
Date | December 31, 2007 | September 12, 2013 | December 31, 2013 | |
Comment | A major ECED information campaign was delivered during community preparation/social mapping prior to the establishment of TPK(ECEDservice center). This awareness campaign on ECED was conducted in all of participating villages with the objective ofincreasing theknowledge of parents on the importance of ECED. The actual coverage of ECED socialization conducted prior to theselection of sub-villages to host the TPK may well be greater than the selected sub-villages where the TPK are established. | exceeded |
Number of communities submitting an expression of interest to receive grants for ECED service development | Value | 0.00 | 5990.00 | 6000.00 |
Date | December 31, 2007 | September 12, 2013 | December 31, 2013 | |
Comment | Community interest is interpreted as the grant proposal (RKM) submitted by community group selected to manage the ECED services.The actual number of the expression of interest was greater than this cited number but the government focused on the potentialcommunity interests that keen to establish the ECED centers. | achieved |
Number of block grants awarded to communities | Value | 0.00 | 5990.00 | 6000.00 |
Date | December 31, 2007 | September 12, 2013 | December 31, 2013 | |
Comment | End of year target is nearly achieved |