Skip to Main Navigation

Colombian National Protected Areas Conservation Trust Fund

Abstract*

The Colombian National protected Areas Conservation Trust Fund Project aims at Catalyzing Sustainability of Protected Areas by: (a) establishing a long-term financing mechanism for key protected areas in Colombia, and (b) consolidating fourteen conservation mosaics, to encompass national parks, buffer zones and surrounding landscapes. The project consists of the following components: Component 1) will capitalize the endowment, design and implement...

* The project abstract is drawn from the PAD, SAR or PGD and may not accurately reflect the project's current nature

Show More

Development Objective

The arrest and reverse trends in biodiversity loss in Colombia's globally important ecosystems by strengthening the National Biodiversity and Protected Areas Trust Fund (FUNBAP), whose mission is to support the consolidation of the National Protected Areas System.

Key Details

Project Details

  • P091932

  • Closed

  • Abdelaziz Lagnaoui

  • N/A

  • Colombia

  • May 27, 2005

  • (as of board presentation)

    March 29, 2006

  • June 15, 2006

  • US$ 15.00 million

  • B

  • Not Applicable

  • October 18, 2014

  • BANK APPROVED

  • March 15, 2022

  • Notes

Finances

Financing Plan (US$ Millions)

No data available.
Financier Commitments
Global Environment Facility (GEF) 15.00
Borrower/Recipient 27.40

Total Project Financing (US$ Millions)

Product Line IBRD/IDA
IBRD Commitment N/A
IDA Commitment N/A
IBRD + IDA Commitment N/A
Lending Instrument
Grant Amount 15.00
Total Project Cost** 42.40

Summary Status of World Bank Financing (US$ Millions) as of April 30, 2025

Download:
No data available.
Financier Approval Date Closing Date Principal Disbursed Repayments Interest, Charges & Fees

Detailed Financial Activity as of April 30, 2025

Download:
No data available.
Period Financier Transaction Type Amount (US$)

Footnotes

Ratings

IMPLEMENTATION RATINGS

Name Review Date
Counterpart Funding Satisfactory 2014-12-09
Overall Implementation Progress (IP) Satisfactory 2014-12-09
Project Management Satisfactory 2014-12-09
Procurement Satisfactory 2014-12-09
Summary Global Objective Rating Satisfactory 2014-12-09
Financial Management Satisfactory 2014-12-09
Monitoring and Evaluation Satisfactory 2014-12-09

COMPLETION RATINGS

INDICATORIMPLEMENTATION COMPLETION & RESULTS REPORT: 04-17-2015
Outcomes
Risk to Development OutcomeHighly Satisfactory
Bank Performance
Borrower Performance
Government Performance
Implementing Agency

INDEPENDENT EVALUATION RATINGS

INDICATORICR REVIEW: 07-02-2015PROJECT PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT REPORT:
Outcome RatingModerately Satisfactory N/a
Risk To Development OutcomeModerateN/a
Bank PerformanceSatisfactoryN/a
Borrower PerformanceSatisfactoryN/a
Government PerformanceSatisfactoryN/a
Implementing AgencySatisfactoryN/a
Icr QualityUnsatisfactoryN/a
M&e QualityModestN/a

Results Framework

PROJECT DEVELOPMENT OBJECTIVE INDICATORS

INDICATORBASELINECURRENTTARGET

INTERMEDIATE RESULTS INDICATORS

INDICATORBASELINECURRENTTARGET
  • FUNBAP decision-making structures (Board, management and administrative team) implemented and operational.Value0%100%
    DateMay 29, 2006February 20, 2014October 18, 2014
    Comment
  • Comprehensive sustainable financing strategy and action plan designed and under implementation, incorporating diverse financial mechanisms, by PY3.Value
    DateFebruary 20, 2014
    Comment
  • FUNBAP endowment achieving goals on investment returns (at least a 1 percentage point spread above the Fed Funds Rate) and with operating (non-program) costs at 20% of total revenues by PY5ValueEndowment achieving goals on investment returns (a
    DateFebruary 20, 2014October 18, 2014
    Comment
  • Three conservation mosaics recurrent costs financed by the endowment to perpetuity by project-end.Value03
    DateMay 29, 2006February 20, 2014April 18, 2011
    Comment
  • At least 7 core areas of conservation mosaics with key management issues addressed by effective conservation practices, with improved scoresof effectiveness indicators for at least 4 NPsValue011
    DateMay 29, 2006February 20, 2014October 18, 2014
    Comment
  • At least 3 conservation mosaics adopting land use changes as part of conservation mosaics management strategies by PY5Value06
    DateMay 29, 2006February 20, 2014October 18, 2014
    Comment
  • At least 9 agreements signed with stakeholders and implemented through conservation and/or sustainable use practices by PY5.Value029
    DateMay 29, 2006February 20, 2014October 18, 2014
    Comment
  • At least 30% of baseline families adopting sustainable production and improved management systems, still maintaining them by PY5.Value364 baseline families50%
    DateAugust 28, 2009February 20, 2014October 18, 2014
    Comment
  • Project monitoring program under satisfactory implementation and generating quality information to aid decision-making processes byPY3.Value0%100%
    DateMay 29, 2006February 20, 2014October 18, 2014
    Comment
  • Project results and lessons learned disseminated to 4 national parks and buffer zone communities in rural landscapes.Value09
    DateMay 29, 2006February 20, 2014October 18, 2014
    Comment
  • At least 2 million hectares of core conservation areas (national parks, NPs) and 20% of the surrounding territories within the respective conservation mosaics under improved management systems by PY5.Value0%100%
    DateMay 29, 2006February 20, 2014October 18, 2014
    Comment
  • Conservation mosaic work plans arising as a result of an integrated planning process linking national park objectives and surrounding landscapes development plans in project areas by PY5.Value0%100%
    DateMay 29, 2006February 20, 2014October 18, 2014
    Comment
  • Improve ecological connectivity in at least 3 delimited conservation mosaicsValueNA5
    DateMay 29, 2006February 20, 2014October 18, 2014
    Comment
  • Areas brought under enhanced biodiversity protection (ha)Value0.002442000.002442000.00
    DateMay 29, 2006February 20, 2014October 18, 2014
    Comment
  • New areas outside protected areas managed as biodiversity-friendly (ha)Value0.001394273.00491200.00
    DateMay 29, 2006February 20, 2014October 18, 2014
    Comment
  • Direct project beneficiariesValue364.00346.00182.00
    DateAugust 28, 2009February 20, 2014October 18, 2014
    Comment
  • Improved biodiversity conservation in project sites measured by increased sighting of key indicator speciesValueNA
    DateJanuary 31, 2012February 20, 2014October 18, 2014
    Comment
  • Female beneficiariesValue0.0020.0020.00
    DateAugust 28, 2009February 20, 2014October 18, 2014
    Comment