| Financier | Commitments |
|---|---|
| Local Communities | 0.90 |
| International Bank for Reconstruction and Development | 58.50 |
| Borrower/Recipient | 15.00 |
SOCIAL INCLUSION PROJECT
Abstract*
The Social Inclusion Project (SIP) will help the Government of Romania implement the Joint Inclusion Memorandum (JIM) through assistance given to the existing, or emerging programs that address the needs of the vulnerable/disadvantaged groups of Roma, persons with disabilities (PWDs), youth at risk, and victims of domestic violence. Through the SIP, the technical relationships that have already been developed will continue, by explicitly using, and... Show More
Development Objective
The development objective of the Social Inclusion Program (SIP) is to improve the living conditions and the social inclusion of the most disadvantaged/vulnerable people (Roma, persons with disabilities, children at risk, victims of domestic violence) in Romania.
Key Details
Project Details
P093096
Closed
Richard Florescu
N/A
Romania
December 6, 2005
(as of board presentation)
June 13, 2006
March 16, 2007
US$ 74.40 million
N/A
2006
US$ 58.50 million
F
November 25, 2015
June 30, 2014
BANK APPROVED
Finances
Financing Plan (US$ Millions)
Total Project Financing (US$ Millions)
| Product Line | IBRD/IDA |
|---|---|
| IBRD Commitment | 58.50 |
| IDA Commitment | N/A |
| IBRD + IDA Commitment | 58.50 |
| Lending Instrument | |
|---|---|
| Grant Amount | N/A |
| Total Project Cost** | 74.40 |
Summary Status of World Bank Financing (US$ Millions) as of February 28, 2025
No data available.
| Period | Financier | Transaction Type | Amount (US$) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 15, 2016 | IBRD-48250 | Loan Repay | 1,531,281.10 |
| Sep 15, 2016 | IBRD-48250 | Int Charges | 26,335.43 |
| Sep 15, 2015 | IBRD-48250 | Int Charges | 49,184.77 |
| Sep 15, 2015 | IBRD-48250 | Loan Repay | 637,264.25 |
| Sep 15, 2015 | IBRD-48250 | Loan Repay | 902,941.10 |
| Mar 15, 2016 | IBRD-48250 | Int Charges | 42,433.99 |
| Mar 15, 2016 | IBRD-48250 | Loan Repay | 1,510,299.10 |
| Mar 15, 2015 | IBRD-48250 | Int Charges | 50.54 |
| Mar 15, 2015 | IBRD-48250 | Int Charges | 76.57 |
| Mar 15, 2015 | IBRD-48250 | Int Charges | 10,938.14 |
| Mar 15, 2015 | IBRD-48250 | Int Charges | 48,758.09 |
| Mar 15, 2015 | IBRD-48250 | Loan Repay | 1,441,835.00 |
| Sep 15, 2014 | IBRD-48250 | Int Charges | 266.28 |
| Sep 15, 2014 | IBRD-48250 | Int Charges | 306.08 |
| Sep 15, 2014 | IBRD-48250 | Int Charges | 25,219.85 |
| Sep 15, 2014 | IBRD-48250 | Int Charges | 81,434.67 |
| Sep 15, 2014 | IBRD-48250 | Loan Repay | 2,539,271.20 |
| Aug 12, 2014 | IBRD-48250 | Loan Disb | 273,641.90 |
| Dec 17, 2014 | IBRD-48250 | Loan Disb | 2,015,757.80 |
| Jan 7, 2015 | IBRD-48250 | Loan Disb | 374,542.97 |
| Jan 7, 2015 | IBRD-48250 | Loan Disb | 26,646.90 |
| Sep 25, 2014 | IBRD-48250 | Loan Disb | 7,049.70 |
| Mar 15, 2014 | IBRD-48250 | Int Charges | 33,209.82 |
| Jun 13, 2006 | IBRD-48250 | Loan Commitment | 58,500,000.00 |
| Mar 15, 2023 | IBRD-48250 | Int Charges | 14,855.08 |
| Mar 15, 2023 | IBRD-48250 | Loan Repay | 1,477,302.20 |
| Sep 15, 2022 | IBRD-48250 | Int Charges | 842.47 |
| Sep 15, 2022 | IBRD-48250 | Loan Repay | 1,359,746.10 |
| Mar 15, 2022 | IBRD-48250 | Loan Repay | 1,498,309.40 |
| Sep 15, 2021 | IBRD-48250 | Loan Repay | 1,611,462.60 |
| Mar 15, 2021 | IBRD-48250 | Loan Repay | 1,625,496.00 |
| Sep 15, 2020 | IBRD-48250 | Loan Repay | 1,621,272.40 |
| Mar 15, 2020 | IBRD-48250 | Int Charges | 1,079.22 |
| Mar 15, 2020 | IBRD-48250 | Loan Repay | 1,520,381.40 |
| Sep 15, 2019 | IBRD-48250 | Int Charges | 11,770.10 |
| Sep 15, 2019 | IBRD-48250 | Loan Repay | 1,511,184.80 |
| Mar 15, 2019 | IBRD-48250 | Int Charges | 10,491.67 |
| Mar 15, 2019 | IBRD-48250 | Loan Repay | 1,542,249.00 |
| Sep 15, 2018 | IBRD-48250 | Int Charges | 9,798.25 |
| Sep 15, 2018 | IBRD-48250 | Loan Repay | 1,594,295.50 |
| Mar 15, 2018 | IBRD-48250 | Int Charges | 13,065.73 |
| Mar 15, 2018 | IBRD-48250 | Loan Repay | 1,684,354.80 |
| Sep 15, 2017 | IBRD-48250 | Int Charges | 18,006.76 |
| Mar 15, 2014 | IBRD-48250 | Loan Repay | 2,729,483.20 |
| Mar 15, 2014 | IBRD-48250 | Int Charges | 66,343.14 |
| Sep 15, 2017 | IBRD-48250 | Loan Repay | 1,628,289.10 |
| May 7, 2014 | IBRD-48250 | Loan Disb | 2,566,813.50 |
| Jan 31, 2014 | IBRD-48250 | Loan Disb | 947,969.80 |
| Oct 11, 2013 | IBRD-48250 | Loan Disb | 2,010,446.00 |
| Dec 23, 2013 | IBRD-48250 | Loan Disb | 4,261,080.00 |
| Sep 15, 2013 | IBRD-48250 | Int Charges | 37,393.08 |
| Sep 15, 2013 | IBRD-48250 | Int Charges | 55,451.29 |
| Sep 15, 2013 | IBRD-48250 | Loan Repay | 2,610,993.80 |
| Sep 15, 2013 | IBRD-48250 | Int Charges | 409.67 |
| Sep 15, 2013 | IBRD-48250 | Int Charges | 703.51 |
| Nov 13, 2014 | IBRD-48250 | Loan Disb | 3,172,613.00 |
| Oct 9, 2014 | IBRD-48250 | Loan Disb | 31,089.57 |
| Jan 7, 2015 | IBRD-48250 | Loan Cancel | 12,123,253.00 |
| Mar 15, 2017 | IBRD-48250 | Int Charges | 18,003.95 |
| Mar 15, 2017 | IBRD-48250 | Loan Repay | 1,447,489.20 |
Ratings
IMPLEMENTATION RATINGS
| Name | Review | Date |
|---|---|---|
| Progress towards achievement of PDO | Moderately Satisfactory | 2014-06-27 |
| Procurement | Satisfactory | 2014-06-27 |
| Monitoring and Evaluation | Moderately Satisfactory | 2014-06-27 |
| Overall | Moderately Low | 2014-06-27 |
| Counterpart Funding | Moderately Satisfactory | 2014-06-27 |
| Project Management | Satisfactory | 2014-06-27 |
| Overall Safeguards Rating | Satisfactory | 2014-06-27 |
| Financial Management | Satisfactory | 2014-06-27 |
| Overall Implementation Progress (IP) | Moderately Satisfactory | 2014-06-27 |
| Overall Safeguards Rating | Satisfactory | 2014-06-27 |
COMPLETION RATINGS
| INDICATOR | IMPLEMENTATION COMPLETION & RESULTS REPORT: 03-03-2015 |
|---|---|
| Outcomes | Moderately Satisfactory |
| Risk to Development Outcome | Negligible |
| Bank Performance | Moderately Satisfactory |
| Borrower Performance | Moderately Satisfactory |
| Government Performance | Moderately Satisfactory |
| Implementing Agency | Moderately Satisfactory |
INDEPENDENT EVALUATION RATINGS
| INDICATOR | ICR REVIEW: 06-26-2015 | PROJECT PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT REPORT: |
|---|---|---|
| Outcome Rating | Moderately Satisfactory | N/a |
| Risk To Development Outcome | Moderate | N/a |
| Bank Performance | Moderately Satisfactory | N/a |
| Borrower Performance | Moderately Satisfactory | N/a |
| Government Performance | Moderately Satisfactory | N/a |
| Implementing Agency | Moderately Satisfactory | N/a |
| Icr Quality | Satisfactory | N/a |
| M&e Quality | Modest | N/a |
Results Framework
PROJECT DEVELOPMENT OBJECTIVE INDICATORS
| INDICATOR | BASELINE | CURRENT | TARGET |
|---|
% reduction in the gap between targeted poor Roma settlements and neighboring communities as measured by the living conditions index Value 504.46 index points 61.77% reduction (20% reduction) Date December 31, 2008 June 9, 2014 June 30, 2014 Comment Baseline value is the number of index points difference between targeted settlements and neighboring communities for 81 pairs ofcommunities, using a methodology developed by RSDF to measure the living conditions. In the final assessment the number of points difference in living conditions between targeted settlements and neighboringcommunities decreased by 61.77% Target exceeded Percentage points increase of children from vulnerable groups in targeted communities participating in ECE. Value 70% 76% 75% Date June 30, 2007 June 9, 2014 June 30, 2014 Comment Works for all 27 units completed. The net impact evaluation study used control pairs of localities (included and not included inprogram). Target exceeded % of services for PWD scoring at least 80% on the standards compliance index for each main category of quality standards. Value 0 0 25% Date June 30, 2007 June 9, 2014 June 30, 2014 Comment 11 Centers for PWD recently completed and staffing in progress. 4 Centers works ongoing will be completed beyond closing date.Staff training was canceled. Rate of employment of youth 18+ benefiting from multifunctional centers (from the total number of beneficiaries). Value 0 39.6% 40% Date June 30, 2007 June 9, 2014 June 30, 2014 Comment No centers were available prior the project start. 39.6% of youths benefiting from multifunctional centers were got employment.Likely to exceed the target during the preparation ofthe ICR The scope of NASB MIS, measured by number of large social assistance programs (or their successors) paid through SAFIR, increases from 4 to all programs by 2013 Value 4.00 8.00 8.00 Date April 6, 2011 June 9, 2014 June 30, 2014 Comment Universal Child Allowances, Child Raise Benefits, Family Support Allowance, GMI, Heating Allowances, Disabled Child RaiseBenefits,Benefits for PWDs, Placement Monthly Allowance Target achieved. Project Beneficiaries (direct and indirect) Value NA Direct: 66775Indirect: 85883 Date June 30, 2007 June 9, 2014 June 30, 2014 Comment If needed, breakdown by project components is available too.
INTERMEDIATE RESULTS INDICATORS
| INDICATOR | BASELINE | CURRENT | TARGET |
|---|
% of targeted Roma settlements having access to improved infrastructure (e.g. water, roads). Value 10%(2008) 82.71% 60% Date December 31, 2008 June 9, 2014 June 30, 2014 Comment Calculated after the completion of all 133 sub-projects. Target exceeded by 22.71 percentage points. Number of annual consultations of Roma in poor settlements with local authorities for addressing community needs (cummulative). Value 0 1659 (Average of 4.93/year) 360 (Average of 3/year) Date June 30, 2007 June 9, 2014 June 30, 2014 Comment Calculated for all 133 communities included in the program. Target exceeded by an average of 1.93 consultations/year. Increase in ECE staff with skills in inclusive education. Value 0 10.56% 3,500 staff trained 10% Date December 31, 2008 June 9, 2014 June 30, 2014 Comment The INCLUSIVE education concept did not exist prior the project. Training completed. Target exceeded. % increase in number of qualified staff in PWD services. Value 0 0 10% Date June 30, 2007 June 9, 2014 June 30, 2014 Comment Consultant was selected but activity was dropped as a result in the delays of works completion and of staff hiring. Target will not be met. % increase in number of staff with improved competences in integrated services for youth. Value 0 0 70% Date June 30, 2007 June 9, 2014 June 30, 2014 Comment The hiring of staff has been completed but training of staff has been finally dropped due to time constraints Target will not be met. Percentage increase in number of NAR staff with improved competencies in M&E. Value 0.00 10.00 30.00 Date December 31, 2007 June 9, 2014 June 30, 2014 Comment No staff specialized in M&E existed before in NAR. One staff trained in M&E out of10 staff with some M&E attributions. Target formally revised on the April 2011 restructuring. Target will not be met. NASB MIS cross-checks information with an increasing number of external databases (Pension House, Employment Agency, Labor Inspection, Civil and Tax Registries) Value 0.00 5.00 4.00 Date April 6, 2011 June 9, 2014 June 30, 2014 Comment Data cross-checks operating with other 5 databases from Pensions House, Employment Agency, Min of Education, Min of Finance andMinof Interior, based on signed protocols. Target exceeded. Evaluations of targeting accuracy of social protection programs, and of administrative and client participation costs of social assistance programs carried on and disseminated (cumulative number). Value 0.00 0.00 4.00 Date April 6, 2011 June 9, 2014 June 30, 2014 Comment The second selection of consulting services was canceled due to the high cost that exceed the CQ threshold and the timeconstrains.It will be transfered to SASMP following the upcoming restructuring. Target will not be met. Percentage of SIP assisted promoters of mature project proposals eligible for EU financing Value 0.00 100.00 60.00 Date December 31, 2007 June 9, 2014 June 30, 2014 Comment All of the RSDF assisted 4 TA programs were eligible for for EU financing. However only one was financed and completed. Theother3 are waiting for the opening of a new round of calls for proposals, if any until the closing of the ongoing EU fundingperiod. Target exceeded.