Skip to Main Navigation

Transitional Agriculture Reform Project

Abstract*

The Transitional Agriculture Reform Project development objective is to enhance the competitiveness of Serbian agriculture. The global environmental objective is to conserve the globally important ecosystem in the Stara Planina mountainous area. The project objectives will be achieved through a series of strategic public investments that aim to: (i) improve and strengthen the Government of Serbia system for transparently delivering rural development...

* The project abstract is drawn from the PAD, SAR or PGD and may not accurately reflect the project's current nature

Show More

Development Objective

To enhance the competitiveness of Serbian agriculture.

Key Details

Project Details

  • P094212

  • Closed

  • Olivera Jordanovic

  • N/A

  • Serbia

  • April 20, 2006

  • (as of board presentation)

    June 20, 2007

  • November 12, 2008

  • US$ 17.00 million

  • B

  • Not Applicable

  • May 31, 2013

  • BANK APPROVED

  • January 15, 2013

  • Notes

Finances

Financing Plan (US$ Millions)

No data available.
Financier Commitments
International Bank for Reconstruction and Development 17.00

Total Project Financing (US$ Millions)

Product Line IBRD/IDA
IBRD Commitment 17.00
IDA Commitment N/A
IBRD + IDA Commitment 17.00
Lending Instrument
Grant Amount N/A
Total Project Cost** 17.00

Summary Status of World Bank Financing (US$ Millions) as of July 31, 2025

Download:
No data available.
Financier Approval Date Closing Date Principal Disbursed Repayments Interest, Charges & Fees

Detailed Financial Activity as of July 31, 2025

Download:
No data available.
Period Financier Transaction Type Amount (US$)
Aug 15, 2013 IBRD-74650 Int Charges 3,732.59
Aug 15, 2013 IBRD-74650 Int Charges 26,240.84
Aug 15, 2013 IBRD-74650 Loan Repay 446,947.50
Aug 15, 2015 IBRD-74650 Int Charges 12,166.27
Aug 15, 2015 IBRD-74650 Loan Repay 373,821.78
Aug 15, 2014 IBRD-74650 Int Charges 27,424.87
Aug 15, 2014 IBRD-74650 Loan Repay 447,528.88
Feb 15, 2015 IBRD-74650 Int Charges 19,639.90
Feb 15, 2015 IBRD-74650 Loan Repay 381,968.72
Feb 15, 2014 IBRD-74650 Int Charges 26,114.46
Feb 15, 2014 IBRD-74650 Loan Repay 458,620.10
Feb 15, 2014 IBRD-74650 Int Charges 1,249.45
Oct 16, 2013 IBRD-74650 Loan Cancel 2,959,751.00
Oct 16, 2013 IBRD-74650 Loan Disb -52,687.53
Aug 15, 2013 IBRD-74650 Int Charges 10.00
Aug 15, 2013 IBRD-74650 Int Charges 22.07
Aug 15, 2018 IBRD-74650 Loan Repay 378,706.60
Feb 15, 2018 IBRD-74650 Loan Repay 417,299.94
Aug 15, 2017 IBRD-74650 Int Charges 552.68
Aug 15, 2017 IBRD-74650 Loan Repay 393,126.80
Feb 15, 2017 IBRD-74650 Int Charges 1,893.05
Feb 15, 2017 IBRD-74650 Loan Repay 353,195.20
Aug 15, 2016 IBRD-74650 Int Charges 4,529.10
Aug 15, 2016 IBRD-74650 Loan Repay 373,721.40
Feb 15, 2016 IBRD-74650 Int Charges 10,399.94
Feb 15, 2016 IBRD-74650 Loan Repay 374,457.47
Feb 15, 2022 IBRD-74650 Loan Repay 379,609.94
Aug 15, 2021 IBRD-74650 Loan Repay 393,093.38
Feb 15, 2021 IBRD-74650 Loan Repay 405,941.10
Aug 15, 2020 IBRD-74650 Loan Repay 395,117.56
Feb 15, 2020 IBRD-74650 Loan Repay 362,596.75
Aug 15, 2019 IBRD-74650 Loan Repay 373,186.10
Feb 15, 2019 IBRD-74650 Loan Repay 377,150.80
Jun 20, 2007 IBRD-74650 Loan Commitment 17,000,000.00
Feb 15, 2024 IBRD-74650 Int Charges 7,564.48
Feb 15, 2024 IBRD-74650 Loan Repay 352,382.20
Aug 15, 2023 IBRD-74650 Int Charges 12,279.16
Aug 15, 2023 IBRD-74650 Loan Repay 365,825.40
Feb 15, 2023 IBRD-74650 Int Charges 5,623.94
Feb 15, 2023 IBRD-74650 Loan Repay 358,364.38
Aug 15, 2022 IBRD-74650 Loan Repay 341,401.38

Footnotes

Ratings

IMPLEMENTATION RATINGS

Name Review Date
Overall Implementation Progress (IP) Moderately Unsatisfactory 2013-06-07
Project Management Moderately Unsatisfactory 2013-06-07
Financial Management Satisfactory 2013-06-07
Counterpart Funding Satisfactory 2013-06-07
Progress towards achievement of PDO Moderately Unsatisfactory 2013-06-07
Procurement Moderately Satisfactory 2013-06-07
Monitoring and Evaluation Moderately Unsatisfactory 2013-06-07

COMPLETION RATINGS

INDICATORIMPLEMENTATION COMPLETION & RESULTS REPORT: 11-29-2013
OutcomesModerately Unsatisfactory
Risk to Development OutcomeModest
Bank PerformanceModerately Unsatisfactory
Borrower PerformanceModerately Unsatisfactory
Government PerformanceUnsatisfactory
Implementing AgencyModerately Satisfactory

INDEPENDENT EVALUATION RATINGS

INDICATORICR REVIEW: 08-21-2014PROJECT PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT REPORT:
Outcome RatingModerately Unsatisfactory N/a
Risk To Development OutcomeModerateN/a
Bank PerformanceUnsatisfactoryN/a
Borrower PerformanceUnsatisfactoryN/a
Government PerformanceUnsatisfactoryN/a
Implementing AgencyUnsatisfactoryN/a
Icr QualitySatisfactoryN/a
M&e QualityNegligibleN/a

Results Framework

PROJECT DEVELOPMENT OBJECTIVE INDICATORS

INDICATORBASELINECURRENTTARGET
  • Improved MAFWM ability to disburse and track rural development funds and to evaluate their impact on the agri-food sectorValueInformation lacking to forecast uptake, reporting No twice-yearly reporting with details on applicatTwice yearly reports with details on applications,
    DateJune 20, 2007April 27, 2013May 31, 2013
    CommentSerbia does not have access to EU-IPARD funds yet, due to delayed EU accession process. However, a compliant rural developmentstrategy is under preparation; and a paper-based EU-compliant rural development and agrarian payment processes in place in thePaying Agency (PA) which was established in 2009. PA is under self-evaluation process which is the step toward accreditation forprocessing the EU funds. End target partially achieved. Gap to end target caused by overall delays in EU accession process and lackof commitment on part of the Ministry.
  • Improved farmer access to appropriate technology.ValueApplied research and extension services not adapteThe applied research system is functioning on a coFully functioning competitive applied research and
    DateJune 20, 2007April 27, 2013May 31, 2013
    Comment2010 extension law created a public extension service, however, fee-based advisory services also available from certified privateproviders. Extension advisor registration law under preparation. End target partially achieved. Sustainability challenged bylimited budget funding and competitive grant schemes not being streamlined by the MAFWM.
  • Rising profitability and competitiveness of Serbian agricultureValueBaseline will be estimated ex-ante by the M&E consDirect project beneficiaries have increased their Increased income of farms
    DateJune 20, 2007April 27, 2013May 31, 2013
    CommentAchieved from an aggregate sector perspective. Rapidly rising agriculture exports confirm export competitiveness. Attribution toproject unmeasured. Final project evaluation confirmed improved competitiveness of direct project beneficiaries.

INTERMEDIATE RESULTS INDICATORS

INDICATORBASELINECURRENTTARGET
  • Payment Agency established and transparent and efficient EU-compliant procedures adoptedValueFiduciary system and supporting manuals under deveRegular reporting on disbursements of national rurQuarterly reports from Payment Agency on applicati
    DateJune 20, 2007April 27, 2013May 31, 2013
    CommentPaying Agency functioning and EU accreditation initiated, however, delayed EU accession and limited funding have constrained IPARDsystems application. Harmonization of PA procedures with IPARD procedures is ongoing.
  • EU compliant rural development Managing Authority (MA) and Monitoring Committee (MC) operating effectivelyValueInstitutional and organizational concept under devNo reporting harmonized with EU IPARD requirementsTwice yearly reports on inspection activities in l
    DateJune 20, 2011April 27, 2013May 31, 2013
    CommentHarmonization with IPARD requirements underway. Limited national funding of Rural Development measures. Managing Authorityestablished, preparing national rural development strategy 2014-2020. Monitoring Committee not formally established.
  • Number of farmers within target group who implement activities directly related to knowledge products developed with project assistanceValueNone25,000Approximately 20,000 farmers adopt technology & kn
    DateJune 20, 2007April 27, 2013May 31, 2013
    CommentAchieved.30% of 83,548 farmers (about 25,000) who benefited from applied research & extension service competitive grant schemes(ARES CGS) are estimated to have adopted the technology and knowledge disseminated through ARES CGS program.
  • Number of extension service providers accredited with specific competenciesValueNone347Some 200 service providers accredited to deliver e
    DateJune 20, 2007April 27, 2013May 31, 2013
    CommentNone of original 347 providers had been accredited at project start.End target achieved and exceeded.
  • Management plan for SPNP prepared in a participatory manner with communities, landowners and Srbijasume, including areas of highestpriority for wild biodiversity in core protection zoneValueNo SPNP management planSPNP Management plan in place endorsed by all stakSPNP Management plan in place endorsed by all stak
    DateJune 20, 2007April 27, 2013May 31, 2013
    CommentTarget achieved. Possible EU LEADER activities are likely to strengthen future SPNP management.
  • Area of abandoned and degraded meadows/grasslands and pastures restored (Pilot program)ValueNone3029 ha4000 ha
    DateJune 20, 2007April 27, 2013May 31, 2013
    CommentGrazing practices as a management tool for high mountain grasslands was re-introduced through GEF grant program. First callresulted in 400 livestock units brought to selected endangered pastures, while there was 532 livestock units under the second call.The ministry needs to continue support in order to maintain the increasing trend in the number of livestock brought to the selectedpastures. Without a subsidy policy, current numbers will be difficult to maintain, especially given the ongoing drop in livestockfigures. Target 75 percent achieved.
  • Increase in number of RD grants to SPNP municipalities for targeted activitiesValue6 RD grants in 2005Total of 177 RD grants implemented, 100% of the pr100% of project RD grants budget allocated to the
    DateJune 20, 2007April 27, 2013May 31, 2013
    CommentComplex administrative procedures and clearances have prevented the optimization of the program so as to absorb more projectresources, where demand existed, and capacity to undertake works was adequate.
  • Expanded areas under ecological management and/or restoration within the Stara Planina Park and surrounding areaValueLess than 1 haIntegrated ecological management plan partially imIntegrated ecological management implemented on th
    DateJune 20, 2007May 31, 2013May 31, 2013
    CommentCommunity attitudes towards ecologically sustainable farming practices adoption substantially improved.Target mainly achieved.Srbijashume not yet implemented all aspects of the monitoring plan for the ecological management plan (Monitoring Plan), aspastures and biodiversity monitoring is lacking.
  • Collaborative research/extension sub-projects under implementation/completedValue0.0072.0076.00
    DateDecember 31, 2008April 27, 2013May 31, 2013
    Comment4 canceled during implementation. End target 93 percent achieved.
  • Clients who have adopted an improved agr. technology promoted by the projectValue0.0025000.0025000.00
    DateDecember 31, 2008April 27, 2013May 31, 2013
    Comment30% of the 83,548 framers and SMEs involved in the program.
  • Technologies demonstrated in the project areas (number)Value0.0022.0022.00
    DateDecember 31, 2008April 27, 2013May 31, 2013
    CommentEnd target achieved.
  • Collaborative research or extension sub-projects - under implementationValue0.000.000.00
    DateDecember 31, 2008April 27, 2013May 31, 2013
    CommentNo sub-projects under implementation as all have been completed.
  • Collaborative research or extension sub-projects - completed (number)Value0.0072.0076.00
    DateDecember 31, 2008December 11, 2012May 31, 2013
    Comment4 canceled during implementation. End target 93 percent achieved.
  • Clients who adopted an improved agr. technology promoted by project – femaleValue0.000.000.00
    DateDecember 31, 2008April 27, 2013May 31, 2013
    CommentGender-disaggregated data not availableGender-disaggregated data not available.