Financier | Commitments |
---|---|
International Bank for Reconstruction and Development | 17.00 |
P094212
Closed
Olivera Jordanovic
N/A
April 20, 2006
(as of board presentation)
June 20, 2007
November 12, 2008
US$ 17.00 million
N/A
2007
US$ 17.00 million
B
Not Applicable
May 31, 2013
BANK APPROVED
January 15, 2013
Financier | Commitments |
---|---|
International Bank for Reconstruction and Development | 17.00 |
Product Line | IBRD/IDA |
---|---|
IBRD Commitment | 17.00 |
IDA Commitment | N/A |
IBRD + IDA Commitment | 17.00 |
Lending Instrument | |
---|---|
Grant Amount | N/A |
Total Project Cost** | 17.00 |
Period | Financier | Transaction Type | Amount (US$) |
---|---|---|---|
Aug 15, 2013 | IBRD-74650 | Int Charges | 3,732.59 |
Aug 15, 2013 | IBRD-74650 | Int Charges | 26,240.84 |
Aug 15, 2013 | IBRD-74650 | Loan Repay | 446,947.50 |
Aug 15, 2015 | IBRD-74650 | Int Charges | 12,166.27 |
Aug 15, 2015 | IBRD-74650 | Loan Repay | 373,821.78 |
Aug 15, 2014 | IBRD-74650 | Int Charges | 27,424.87 |
Aug 15, 2014 | IBRD-74650 | Loan Repay | 447,528.88 |
Feb 15, 2015 | IBRD-74650 | Int Charges | 19,639.90 |
Feb 15, 2015 | IBRD-74650 | Loan Repay | 381,968.72 |
Feb 15, 2014 | IBRD-74650 | Int Charges | 26,114.46 |
Feb 15, 2014 | IBRD-74650 | Loan Repay | 458,620.10 |
Feb 15, 2014 | IBRD-74650 | Int Charges | 1,249.45 |
Oct 16, 2013 | IBRD-74650 | Loan Cancel | 2,959,751.00 |
Oct 16, 2013 | IBRD-74650 | Loan Disb | -52,687.53 |
Aug 15, 2013 | IBRD-74650 | Int Charges | 10.00 |
Aug 15, 2013 | IBRD-74650 | Int Charges | 22.07 |
Aug 15, 2018 | IBRD-74650 | Loan Repay | 378,706.60 |
Feb 15, 2018 | IBRD-74650 | Loan Repay | 417,299.94 |
Aug 15, 2017 | IBRD-74650 | Int Charges | 552.68 |
Aug 15, 2017 | IBRD-74650 | Loan Repay | 393,126.80 |
Feb 15, 2017 | IBRD-74650 | Int Charges | 1,893.05 |
Feb 15, 2017 | IBRD-74650 | Loan Repay | 353,195.20 |
Aug 15, 2016 | IBRD-74650 | Int Charges | 4,529.10 |
Aug 15, 2016 | IBRD-74650 | Loan Repay | 373,721.40 |
Feb 15, 2016 | IBRD-74650 | Int Charges | 10,399.94 |
Feb 15, 2016 | IBRD-74650 | Loan Repay | 374,457.47 |
Feb 15, 2022 | IBRD-74650 | Loan Repay | 379,609.94 |
Aug 15, 2021 | IBRD-74650 | Loan Repay | 393,093.38 |
Feb 15, 2021 | IBRD-74650 | Loan Repay | 405,941.10 |
Aug 15, 2020 | IBRD-74650 | Loan Repay | 395,117.56 |
Feb 15, 2020 | IBRD-74650 | Loan Repay | 362,596.75 |
Aug 15, 2019 | IBRD-74650 | Loan Repay | 373,186.10 |
Feb 15, 2019 | IBRD-74650 | Loan Repay | 377,150.80 |
Jun 20, 2007 | IBRD-74650 | Loan Commitment | 17,000,000.00 |
Feb 15, 2024 | IBRD-74650 | Int Charges | 7,564.48 |
Feb 15, 2024 | IBRD-74650 | Loan Repay | 352,382.20 |
Aug 15, 2023 | IBRD-74650 | Int Charges | 12,279.16 |
Aug 15, 2023 | IBRD-74650 | Loan Repay | 365,825.40 |
Feb 15, 2023 | IBRD-74650 | Int Charges | 5,623.94 |
Feb 15, 2023 | IBRD-74650 | Loan Repay | 358,364.38 |
Aug 15, 2022 | IBRD-74650 | Loan Repay | 341,401.38 |
Name | Review | Date |
---|---|---|
Overall Implementation Progress (IP) | Moderately Unsatisfactory | 2013-06-07 |
Project Management | Moderately Unsatisfactory | 2013-06-07 |
Financial Management | Satisfactory | 2013-06-07 |
Counterpart Funding | Satisfactory | 2013-06-07 |
Progress towards achievement of PDO | Moderately Unsatisfactory | 2013-06-07 |
Procurement | Moderately Satisfactory | 2013-06-07 |
Monitoring and Evaluation | Moderately Unsatisfactory | 2013-06-07 |
INDICATOR | IMPLEMENTATION COMPLETION & RESULTS REPORT: 11-29-2013 |
---|---|
Outcomes | Moderately Unsatisfactory |
Risk to Development Outcome | Modest |
Bank Performance | Moderately Unsatisfactory |
Borrower Performance | Moderately Unsatisfactory |
Government Performance | Unsatisfactory |
Implementing Agency | Moderately Satisfactory |
INDICATOR | ICR REVIEW: 08-21-2014 | PROJECT PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT REPORT: |
---|---|---|
Outcome Rating | Moderately Unsatisfactory | N/a |
Risk To Development Outcome | Moderate | N/a |
Bank Performance | Unsatisfactory | N/a |
Borrower Performance | Unsatisfactory | N/a |
Government Performance | Unsatisfactory | N/a |
Implementing Agency | Unsatisfactory | N/a |
Icr Quality | Satisfactory | N/a |
M&e Quality | Negligible | N/a |
INDICATOR | BASELINE | CURRENT | TARGET |
---|
Improved MAFWM ability to disburse and track rural development funds and to evaluate their impact on the agri-food sector | Value | Information lacking to forecast uptake, reporting | No twice-yearly reporting with details on applicat | Twice yearly reports with details on applications, |
Date | June 20, 2007 | April 27, 2013 | May 31, 2013 | |
Comment | Serbia does not have access to EU-IPARD funds yet, due to delayed EU accession process. However, a compliant rural developmentstrategy is under preparation; and a paper-based EU-compliant rural development and agrarian payment processes in place in thePaying Agency (PA) which was established in 2009. PA is under self-evaluation process which is the step toward accreditation forprocessing the EU funds. End target partially achieved. Gap to end target caused by overall delays in EU accession process and lackof commitment on part of the Ministry. |
Improved farmer access to appropriate technology. | Value | Applied research and extension services not adapte | The applied research system is functioning on a co | Fully functioning competitive applied research and |
Date | June 20, 2007 | April 27, 2013 | May 31, 2013 | |
Comment | 2010 extension law created a public extension service, however, fee-based advisory services also available from certified privateproviders. Extension advisor registration law under preparation. End target partially achieved. Sustainability challenged bylimited budget funding and competitive grant schemes not being streamlined by the MAFWM. |
Rising profitability and competitiveness of Serbian agriculture | Value | Baseline will be estimated ex-ante by the M&E cons | Direct project beneficiaries have increased their | Increased income of farms |
Date | June 20, 2007 | April 27, 2013 | May 31, 2013 | |
Comment | Achieved from an aggregate sector perspective. Rapidly rising agriculture exports confirm export competitiveness. Attribution toproject unmeasured. Final project evaluation confirmed improved competitiveness of direct project beneficiaries. |
INDICATOR | BASELINE | CURRENT | TARGET |
---|
Payment Agency established and transparent and efficient EU-compliant procedures adopted | Value | Fiduciary system and supporting manuals under deve | Regular reporting on disbursements of national rur | Quarterly reports from Payment Agency on applicati |
Date | June 20, 2007 | April 27, 2013 | May 31, 2013 | |
Comment | Paying Agency functioning and EU accreditation initiated, however, delayed EU accession and limited funding have constrained IPARDsystems application. Harmonization of PA procedures with IPARD procedures is ongoing. |
EU compliant rural development Managing Authority (MA) and Monitoring Committee (MC) operating effectively | Value | Institutional and organizational concept under dev | No reporting harmonized with EU IPARD requirements | Twice yearly reports on inspection activities in l |
Date | June 20, 2011 | April 27, 2013 | May 31, 2013 | |
Comment | Harmonization with IPARD requirements underway. Limited national funding of Rural Development measures. Managing Authorityestablished, preparing national rural development strategy 2014-2020. Monitoring Committee not formally established. |
Number of farmers within target group who implement activities directly related to knowledge products developed with project assistance | Value | None | 25,000 | Approximately 20,000 farmers adopt technology & kn |
Date | June 20, 2007 | April 27, 2013 | May 31, 2013 | |
Comment | Achieved.30% of 83,548 farmers (about 25,000) who benefited from applied research & extension service competitive grant schemes(ARES CGS) are estimated to have adopted the technology and knowledge disseminated through ARES CGS program. |
Number of extension service providers accredited with specific competencies | Value | None | 347 | Some 200 service providers accredited to deliver e |
Date | June 20, 2007 | April 27, 2013 | May 31, 2013 | |
Comment | None of original 347 providers had been accredited at project start. | End target achieved and exceeded. |
Management plan for SPNP prepared in a participatory manner with communities, landowners and Srbijasume, including areas of highestpriority for wild biodiversity in core protection zone | Value | No SPNP management plan | SPNP Management plan in place endorsed by all stak | SPNP Management plan in place endorsed by all stak |
Date | June 20, 2007 | April 27, 2013 | May 31, 2013 | |
Comment | Target achieved. Possible EU LEADER activities are likely to strengthen future SPNP management. |
Area of abandoned and degraded meadows/grasslands and pastures restored (Pilot program) | Value | None | 3029 ha | 4000 ha |
Date | June 20, 2007 | April 27, 2013 | May 31, 2013 | |
Comment | Grazing practices as a management tool for high mountain grasslands was re-introduced through GEF grant program. First callresulted in 400 livestock units brought to selected endangered pastures, while there was 532 livestock units under the second call.The ministry needs to continue support in order to maintain the increasing trend in the number of livestock brought to the selectedpastures. Without a subsidy policy, current numbers will be difficult to maintain, especially given the ongoing drop in livestockfigures. Target 75 percent achieved. |
Increase in number of RD grants to SPNP municipalities for targeted activities | Value | 6 RD grants in 2005 | Total of 177 RD grants implemented, 100% of the pr | 100% of project RD grants budget allocated to the |
Date | June 20, 2007 | April 27, 2013 | May 31, 2013 | |
Comment | Complex administrative procedures and clearances have prevented the optimization of the program so as to absorb more projectresources, where demand existed, and capacity to undertake works was adequate. |
Expanded areas under ecological management and/or restoration within the Stara Planina Park and surrounding area | Value | Less than 1 ha | Integrated ecological management plan partially im | Integrated ecological management implemented on th |
Date | June 20, 2007 | May 31, 2013 | May 31, 2013 | |
Comment | Community attitudes towards ecologically sustainable farming practices adoption substantially improved.Target mainly achieved.Srbijashume not yet implemented all aspects of the monitoring plan for the ecological management plan (Monitoring Plan), aspastures and biodiversity monitoring is lacking. |
Collaborative research/extension sub-projects under implementation/completed | Value | 0.00 | 72.00 | 76.00 |
Date | December 31, 2008 | April 27, 2013 | May 31, 2013 | |
Comment | 4 canceled during implementation. End target 93 percent achieved. |
Clients who have adopted an improved agr. technology promoted by the project | Value | 0.00 | 25000.00 | 25000.00 |
Date | December 31, 2008 | April 27, 2013 | May 31, 2013 | |
Comment | 30% of the 83,548 framers and SMEs involved in the program. |
Technologies demonstrated in the project areas (number) | Value | 0.00 | 22.00 | 22.00 |
Date | December 31, 2008 | April 27, 2013 | May 31, 2013 | |
Comment | End target achieved. |
Collaborative research or extension sub-projects - under implementation | Value | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Date | December 31, 2008 | April 27, 2013 | May 31, 2013 | |
Comment | No sub-projects under implementation as all have been completed. |
Collaborative research or extension sub-projects - completed (number) | Value | 0.00 | 72.00 | 76.00 |
Date | December 31, 2008 | December 11, 2012 | May 31, 2013 | |
Comment | 4 canceled during implementation. End target 93 percent achieved. |
Clients who adopted an improved agr. technology promoted by project – female | Value | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Date | December 31, 2008 | April 27, 2013 | May 31, 2013 | |
Comment | Gender-disaggregated data not available | Gender-disaggregated data not available. |