Financier | Commitments |
---|---|
IDA Credit | 15.00 |
Borrower/Recipient | 2.00 |
P096200
Closed
Gavin Adlington
N/A
Bosnia and Herzegovina
July 22, 2005
(as of board presentation)
April 27, 2006
April 13, 2007
US$ 17.00 million
N/A
2006
US$ 15.00 million
B
January 15, 2013
June 30, 2012
BANK APPROVED
Financier | Commitments |
---|---|
IDA Credit | 15.00 |
Borrower/Recipient | 2.00 |
Product Line | IBRD/IDA |
---|---|
IBRD Commitment | N/A |
IDA Commitment | 15.00 |
IBRD + IDA Commitment | 15.00 |
Lending Instrument | |
---|---|
Grant Amount | N/A |
Total Project Cost** | 17.00 |
Period | Financier | Transaction Type | Amount (US$) |
---|---|---|---|
Jan 15, 2019 | IDA-41670 | Int Charges | 37,390.33 |
Jan 15, 2019 | IDA-41670 | Int Charges | 37,390.33 |
Jul 15, 2018 | IDA-41670 | Loan Repay | 654,122.80 |
Jul 15, 2018 | IDA-41670 | Int Charges | 35,558.13 |
Jul 15, 2018 | IDA-41670 | Int Charges | 35,558.13 |
Jul 15, 2018 | IDA-41670 | Loan Repay | 13,771.92 |
Jan 15, 2018 | IDA-41670 | Loan Repay | 19,413.68 |
Jan 15, 2020 | IDA-41670 | Int Charges | 32,083.05 |
Jan 15, 2020 | IDA-41670 | Loan Repay | 3,823.36 |
Jul 15, 2015 | IDA-41670 | Int Charges | 49,046.37 |
Jul 15, 2015 | IDA-41670 | Int Charges | 49,046.37 |
Jul 15, 2014 | IDA-41670 | Int Charges | 452.07 |
Jul 15, 2014 | IDA-41670 | Int Charges | 452.07 |
Jul 15, 2014 | IDA-41670 | Int Charges | 54,447.17 |
Jul 15, 2014 | IDA-41670 | Int Charges | 54,447.17 |
Jan 15, 2016 | IDA-41670 | Int Charges | 880.63 |
Jan 15, 2016 | IDA-41670 | Int Charges | 880.63 |
Jan 15, 2016 | IDA-41670 | Int Charges | 49,433.25 |
Jan 15, 2016 | IDA-41670 | Int Charges | 49,433.25 |
Jul 15, 2015 | IDA-41670 | Int Charges | 1,821.59 |
Jul 15, 2015 | IDA-41670 | Int Charges | 1,821.59 |
Jan 15, 2017 | IDA-41670 | Int Charges | 4,408.35 |
Jan 15, 2017 | IDA-41670 | Int Charges | 4,408.35 |
Jan 15, 2017 | IDA-41670 | Loan Repay | 643,722.70 |
Jan 15, 2017 | IDA-41670 | Int Charges | 44,408.82 |
Jan 15, 2017 | IDA-41670 | Int Charges | 44,408.82 |
Jul 15, 2013 | IDA-41670 | Int Charges | 1,962.56 |
Jul 15, 2013 | IDA-41670 | Int Charges | 1,962.56 |
Jul 15, 2013 | IDA-41670 | Int Charges | 51,590.27 |
Jul 15, 2013 | IDA-41670 | Int Charges | 51,590.27 |
Jan 15, 2014 | IDA-41670 | Int Charges | 409.83 |
Jan 15, 2014 | IDA-41670 | Int Charges | 409.83 |
Jan 15, 2014 | IDA-41670 | Int Charges | 54,411.75 |
Jan 15, 2014 | IDA-41670 | Int Charges | 54,411.75 |
Jan 15, 2015 | IDA-41670 | Int Charges | 49,144.39 |
Jan 15, 2015 | IDA-41670 | Int Charges | 49,144.39 |
Jan 15, 2015 | IDA-41670 | Int Charges | 281.80 |
Jan 15, 2015 | IDA-41670 | Int Charges | 281.80 |
Jul 15, 2021 | IDA-41670 | Loan Repay | 670,831.56 |
Jul 15, 2021 | IDA-41670 | Int Charges | 15,024.83 |
Jul 15, 2021 | IDA-41670 | Int Charges | 15,024.83 |
Jan 15, 2023 | IDA-41670 | Int Charges | 16,862.22 |
Jan 15, 2023 | IDA-41670 | Int Charges | 16,862.22 |
Jan 15, 2022 | IDA-41670 | Loan Repay | 670,710.20 |
Jan 15, 2022 | IDA-41670 | Int Charges | 21,244.11 |
Jan 15, 2022 | IDA-41670 | Int Charges | 21,244.11 |
Jan 15, 2022 | IDA-41670 | Int Charges | 10,302.72 |
Jan 15, 2022 | IDA-41670 | Int Charges | 10,302.72 |
Jul 15, 2024 | IDA-41670 | Int Charges | 9,484.44 |
Jul 15, 2024 | IDA-41670 | Int Charges | 9,484.44 |
Jul 15, 2024 | IDA-41670 | Loan Repay | 632,292.06 |
Jul 15, 2024 | IDA-41670 | Loan Repay | 1.99 |
Apr 27, 2006 | IDA-41670 | Loan Commitment | 15,000,000.00 |
Jan 15, 2024 | IDA-41670 | Loan Repay | 622,144.20 |
Jan 15, 2024 | IDA-41670 | Int Charges | 11,934.03 |
Jan 15, 2024 | IDA-41670 | Int Charges | 11,934.03 |
Jan 15, 2024 | IDA-41670 | Loan Repay | 14,337.38 |
Jul 15, 2023 | IDA-41670 | Loan Repay | 635,938.70 |
Jul 15, 2023 | IDA-41670 | Int Charges | 14,518.67 |
Jul 15, 2023 | IDA-41670 | Int Charges | 14,518.67 |
Jul 15, 2023 | IDA-41670 | Loan Repay | 9,337.04 |
Jan 15, 2023 | IDA-41670 | Int Charges | 10,474.96 |
Jan 15, 2023 | IDA-41670 | Int Charges | 10,474.96 |
Jan 15, 2023 | IDA-41670 | Loan Repay | 642,369.75 |
Jul 15, 2019 | IDA-41670 | Loan Repay | 441.11 |
Jul 15, 2019 | IDA-41670 | Loan Repay | 659,235.90 |
Jul 15, 2019 | IDA-41670 | Int Charges | 34,633.07 |
Jul 15, 2019 | IDA-41670 | Int Charges | 34,633.07 |
Jan 15, 2021 | IDA-41670 | Int Charges | 28,305.44 |
Jan 15, 2021 | IDA-41670 | Int Charges | 28,305.44 |
Jan 15, 2021 | IDA-41670 | Loan Repay | 0.01 |
Jan 15, 2021 | IDA-41670 | Int Charges | -0.01 |
Jan 15, 2021 | IDA-41670 | Int Charges | -0.01 |
Jan 15, 2021 | IDA-41670 | Loan Repay | 25,515.30 |
Jan 15, 2021 | IDA-41670 | Loan Repay | 660,677.56 |
Jul 15, 2020 | IDA-41670 | Loan Repay | 658,549.25 |
Jul 15, 2020 | IDA-41670 | Int Charges | 29,806.38 |
Jul 15, 2020 | IDA-41670 | Int Charges | 29,806.38 |
Jul 15, 2020 | IDA-41670 | Loan Repay | 3,814.58 |
Jan 15, 2020 | IDA-41670 | Loan Repay | 654,291.06 |
Jan 15, 2020 | IDA-41670 | Int Charges | 32,083.05 |
Jul 15, 2022 | IDA-41670 | Int Charges | 8,541.05 |
Jul 15, 2022 | IDA-41670 | Int Charges | 8,541.05 |
Jul 15, 2022 | IDA-41670 | Int Charges | 1,294.88 |
Jul 15, 2022 | IDA-41670 | Int Charges | 1,294.88 |
Jul 15, 2022 | IDA-41670 | Loan Repay | 623,742.90 |
Jul 15, 2021 | IDA-41670 | Loan Repay | 7,824.83 |
Jul 15, 2016 | IDA-41670 | Loan Repay | 555.81 |
Jul 15, 2016 | IDA-41670 | Loan Repay | 663,494.44 |
Jul 15, 2016 | IDA-41670 | Int Charges | 45,256.21 |
Jul 15, 2016 | IDA-41670 | Int Charges | 45,256.21 |
Jan 15, 2018 | IDA-41670 | Loan Repay | 663,230.10 |
Jan 15, 2018 | IDA-41670 | Int Charges | 43,518.55 |
Jan 15, 2018 | IDA-41670 | Int Charges | 43,518.55 |
Jul 15, 2017 | IDA-41670 | Int Charges | 1,498.72 |
Jul 15, 2017 | IDA-41670 | Int Charges | 1,498.72 |
Jul 15, 2017 | IDA-41670 | Loan Repay | 662,406.70 |
Jul 15, 2017 | IDA-41670 | Int Charges | 44,712.43 |
Jul 15, 2017 | IDA-41670 | Int Charges | 44,712.43 |
Jan 15, 2019 | IDA-41670 | Int Charges | 4,494.12 |
Jan 15, 2019 | IDA-41670 | Int Charges | 4,494.12 |
Jan 15, 2019 | IDA-41670 | Loan Repay | 664,717.20 |
Name | Review | Date |
---|---|---|
Procurement | Satisfactory | 2012-06-24 |
Project Management | Satisfactory | 2012-06-24 |
Progress towards achievement of PDO | Satisfactory | 2012-06-24 |
Counterpart Funding | Satisfactory | 2012-06-24 |
Financial Management | Satisfactory | 2012-06-24 |
Monitoring and Evaluation | Satisfactory | 2012-06-24 |
Overall Implementation Progress (IP) | Satisfactory | 2012-06-24 |
INDICATOR | IMPLEMENTATION COMPLETION & RESULTS REPORT: 12-21-2012 |
---|---|
Outcomes | |
Risk to Development Outcome | Substantial |
Bank Performance | |
Borrower Performance | |
Government Performance | |
Implementing Agency |
INDICATOR | ICR REVIEW: 12-09-2013 | PROJECT PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT REPORT: |
---|---|---|
Outcome Rating | Satisfactory | N/a |
Risk To Development Outcome | Moderate | N/a |
Bank Performance | Satisfactory | N/a |
Borrower Performance | Satisfactory | N/a |
Government Performance | Satisfactory | N/a |
Implementing Agency | Satisfactory | N/a |
Icr Quality | Satisfactory | N/a |
M&e Quality | Substantial | N/a |
INDICATOR | BASELINE | CURRENT | TARGET |
---|
Improved speed of making real estate transactions. | Value | 80,000 backlog of cases; transactions take several | 18,200 backlogs remain (FBH); transactions complet | 0 backlog of cases; transactions completed in one |
Date | March 1, 2006 | May 23, 2012 | March 31, 2012 | |
Comment | The backlog situation in FBH is still an issue, although it is improving. The % of unresolved cases in FBH is at 3.7% andconcentrated in the Tuzla court. In the RS, registration of mortgages is completed within one day for 53% of the cases. In theFBH, 39% of all transactions are completed within one day and 21% are completed within 2-5 days. | End target value probably too optimistic, especially when taking into account the very high increase in real estate marketactivityover the period. |
Improved transparency and accuracy in service provision by the registration service. | Value | Poor reputation on the quality of information and | Previously achieved. | Service standards adopted and improved satisfactio |
Date | August 31, 2006 | May 23, 2012 | March 31, 2012 | |
Comment | According to the 2010 Social Survey:Measures on Accuracy: Comparing the data from 2007 and 2010 to that of 2005 shows an increasein the number of visits that end in less than half of one hour; 49.4% of respondents in 2005, 59.6% in 2007 and 56.9% ofrespondentsin 2010 had visits which lasted less than half of one hour. This improvement has occurred in land registry offices inFB&H where visits lasted between half an hour and an hour. The citizens required fewer visits to the land registry office in orderto resolve acertain problem/issue. In 2007 and 2010 surveys, only very few respondents stated that they did not receive theservice they askedfor in the land registry office at all. Most respondents stated that the given service had been provided to themcompletely (60.4%). Also, a significant percentage of respondents state that they are partially satisfied with the receivedservices (33.4%). There is an evident trend in the increase of satisfaction with services received in the municipality cadastres.In 2005 a third of respondents (30.1%) expressed satisfaction with received services, while this year over a half of respondents(52.8%) stated that they are very satisfied with the services given to them in the cadastre. Measures regarding transparency:Compared to the 2005 survey when the respondents were asked whether they, in addition to general fees that accompany specificprocedures, had to set aside resources for other informal expenses where 12.6% of respondents answered in the affirmative, in 2007and 2010 surveys a direct question was asked: "Did you ever need to pay/give a bribe in the land registry office?”. Only a smallpercentage of respondents (3.2% in 2007 and4.3% in 2010) answered in the affirmative. The respondents who gave the bribe in mostcases believe that bribery is part of the system o fland administration. Close to one-half of respondents (45.5%) stated thatcompared to three years ago they feel equally informed about the work of land administration. 41.4% of respondents indicate thatthey are 'better' and 'significantly better' informed now compared to the period three years ago, while 5.3% of respondents statethat they are 'somewhat' and 'significantly less' informed today compared to three years ago. | Achieved. |
Policies developed for completion of the cadastre and commencement of related land administration functions | Value | No official policies in the land administration se | Previously achieved. | Land administration policy and strategy for comple |
Date | December 21, 2005 | May 23, 2012 | March 31, 2011 | |
Comment | Achieved. |
INDICATOR | BASELINE | CURRENT | TARGET |
---|
Registration data entered into automated database for 2 million folders | Value | 150,000 folders completed | 1,609,202 folders completed | 1,600,000 folders completed |
Date | December 21, 2005 | May 23, 2012 | March 31, 2012 | |
Comment | Target achieved. 1,022,918 folders in the FBH (with expectation that total will be 1,030,000 by end of Project) and 586,284 inthe RS. | Target amended during project restructuring. In FBH, 103% of the set target for digialization of land registry has been completed(1,022,918) and 108% of set target for reconciliation of land registry data with cadastral data have been accomplished (236,827).In the RS, all courts have fully completed this work, with the exception of the basic court in Banja Luka. |
Completion of digital cadastre mapping in new system | Value | Zero | 1.4 million hectares | 1.4 million hectares |
Date | December 21, 2005 | May 23, 2012 | March 31, 2012 | |
Comment | Target achieved.272,669 in the FBH and 190,000 in the RS completed using project funds. The rest were completed usinggovernmentfunds (376,000 in FBiH and 550,000 in RS) | Target achieved. |
Completion of systematic registration and cadastre in eight pilot sites | Value | None completed | 8 completed | 8 completed |
Date | December 21, 2005 | May 23, 2012 | March 31, 2012 | |
Comment | Target achieved. | Target achieved. |