Financier | Commitments |
---|---|
Borrower/Recipient | 3.50 |
IDA Credit | 13.92 |
P097329
Closed
Farah Zahir
N/A
September 26, 2005
(as of board presentation)
June 5, 2008
August 11, 2005
US$ 26.10 million
N/A
2008
US$ 13.92 million
B
Not Applicable
December 31, 2013
BANK APPROVED
January 15, 2013
Financier | Commitments |
---|---|
Borrower/Recipient | 3.50 |
IDA Credit | 13.92 |
Product Line | IBRD/IDA |
---|---|
IBRD Commitment | N/A |
IDA Commitment | 13.92 |
IBRD + IDA Commitment | 13.92 |
Lending Instrument | |
---|---|
Grant Amount | N/A |
Total Project Cost** | 26.10 |
Period | Financier | Transaction Type | Amount (US$) |
---|---|---|---|
Mar 15, 2024 | IDA-44120 | Loan Repay | 16,796.34 |
Sep 15, 2023 | IDA-44120 | Loan Repay | 588,423.30 |
Sep 15, 2023 | IDA-44120 | Loan Repay | 8,087.06 |
Sep 15, 2023 | IDA-44120 | Int Charges | 22,369.16 |
Sep 15, 2023 | IDA-44120 | Int Charges | 22,369.16 |
Mar 15, 2023 | IDA-44120 | Int Charges | 24,839.66 |
Mar 15, 2023 | IDA-44120 | Loan Repay | 6,806.82 |
Mar 15, 2023 | IDA-44120 | Loan Repay | 595,366.80 |
Mar 15, 2023 | IDA-44120 | Int Charges | 24,839.66 |
Sep 15, 2022 | IDA-44120 | Loan Repay | 13,566.93 |
Sep 15, 2022 | IDA-44120 | Int Charges | 26,358.28 |
Sep 15, 2022 | IDA-44120 | Int Charges | 26,358.28 |
Sep 15, 2022 | IDA-44120 | Loan Repay | 572,173.20 |
Mar 15, 2022 | IDA-44120 | Int Charges | 30,416.43 |
Mar 15, 2022 | IDA-44120 | Int Charges | 30,416.43 |
Mar 15, 2022 | IDA-44120 | Int Charges | 653.93 |
Mar 15, 2022 | IDA-44120 | Int Charges | 653.93 |
Mar 15, 2022 | IDA-44120 | Loan Repay | 623,926.70 |
Sep 15, 2021 | IDA-44120 | Int Charges | 33,188.42 |
Sep 15, 2021 | IDA-44120 | Int Charges | 33,188.42 |
Sep 15, 2021 | IDA-44120 | Loan Repay | 5,801.14 |
Sep 15, 2021 | IDA-44120 | Loan Repay | 639,236.30 |
Sep 15, 2013 | IDA-44120 | Int Charges | 48,101.57 |
Sep 15, 2013 | IDA-44120 | Int Charges | 48,101.57 |
Mar 15, 2017 | IDA-44120 | Int Charges | 210.47 |
Mar 15, 2017 | IDA-44120 | Int Charges | 210.47 |
Mar 15, 2017 | IDA-44120 | Int Charges | 45,785.91 |
Mar 15, 2017 | IDA-44120 | Int Charges | 45,785.91 |
Sep 15, 2017 | IDA-44120 | Int Charges | 47,116.22 |
Sep 15, 2017 | IDA-44120 | Int Charges | 47,116.22 |
Sep 15, 2016 | IDA-44120 | Int Charges | 350.51 |
Sep 15, 2016 | IDA-44120 | Int Charges | 350.51 |
Sep 15, 2016 | IDA-44120 | Int Charges | 47,287.89 |
Sep 15, 2016 | IDA-44120 | Int Charges | 47,287.89 |
Mar 15, 2016 | IDA-44120 | Int Charges | 431.77 |
Mar 15, 2016 | IDA-44120 | Int Charges | 431.77 |
Mar 15, 2016 | IDA-44120 | Int Charges | 46,934.52 |
Mar 15, 2016 | IDA-44120 | Int Charges | 46,934.52 |
Sep 15, 2015 | IDA-44120 | Int Charges | 1,921.20 |
Mar 15, 2019 | IDA-44120 | Loan Repay | 629,820.70 |
Mar 15, 2019 | IDA-44120 | Int Charges | 44,874.70 |
Mar 15, 2019 | IDA-44120 | Int Charges | 44,874.70 |
Sep 15, 2018 | IDA-44120 | Int Charges | 681.61 |
Sep 15, 2018 | IDA-44120 | Int Charges | 681.61 |
Sep 15, 2018 | IDA-44120 | Loan Repay | 634,497.94 |
Sep 15, 2018 | IDA-44120 | Int Charges | 47,241.76 |
Sep 15, 2018 | IDA-44120 | Int Charges | 47,241.76 |
Mar 15, 2018 | IDA-44120 | Int Charges | 1,154.49 |
Mar 15, 2018 | IDA-44120 | Int Charges | 1,154.49 |
Mar 15, 2018 | IDA-44120 | Int Charges | 48,597.45 |
Mar 15, 2018 | IDA-44120 | Int Charges | 48,597.45 |
Sep 15, 2017 | IDA-44120 | Int Charges | 56.23 |
Sep 15, 2017 | IDA-44120 | Int Charges | 56.23 |
Jun 5, 2008 | IDA-44120 | Loan Commitment | 22,600,000.00 |
Mar 15, 2024 | IDA-44120 | Loan Repay | 0.01 |
Mar 15, 2024 | IDA-44120 | Int Charges | -0.01 |
Mar 15, 2024 | IDA-44120 | Int Charges | -0.01 |
Mar 15, 2024 | IDA-44120 | Int Charges | 20,328.82 |
Mar 15, 2024 | IDA-44120 | Int Charges | 20,328.82 |
Mar 15, 2024 | IDA-44120 | Loan Repay | 585,540.10 |
Sep 15, 2015 | IDA-44120 | Int Charges | 1,921.20 |
Sep 15, 2015 | IDA-44120 | Int Charges | 45,493.82 |
Sep 15, 2015 | IDA-44120 | Int Charges | 45,493.82 |
Mar 15, 2015 | IDA-44120 | Int Charges | 1,554.39 |
Mar 15, 2015 | IDA-44120 | Int Charges | 1,554.39 |
Sep 15, 2014 | IDA-44120 | Int Charges | 50,884.66 |
Sep 15, 2014 | IDA-44120 | Int Charges | 50,884.66 |
Sep 15, 2014 | IDA-44120 | Int Charges | 542.37 |
Sep 15, 2014 | IDA-44120 | Int Charges | 542.37 |
Mar 15, 2015 | IDA-44120 | Int Charges | 44,954.47 |
Mar 15, 2015 | IDA-44120 | Int Charges | 44,954.47 |
May 7, 2014 | IDA-44120 | Loan Disb | -4,968.47 |
May 7, 2014 | IDA-44120 | Loan Cancel | 4,968.47 |
Mar 15, 2014 | IDA-44120 | Int Charges | 51,509.03 |
Mar 15, 2014 | IDA-44120 | Int Charges | 51,509.03 |
Mar 15, 2014 | IDA-44120 | Int Charges | 675.43 |
Mar 15, 2014 | IDA-44120 | Int Charges | 675.43 |
Sep 15, 2013 | IDA-44120 | Int Charges | 1,108.32 |
Sep 15, 2013 | IDA-44120 | Int Charges | 1,108.32 |
Nov 14, 2013 | IDA-44120 | Loan Disb | 450,272.84 |
Sep 15, 2020 | IDA-44120 | Loan Repay | 639,215.60 |
Sep 15, 2020 | IDA-44120 | Int Charges | 25,857.01 |
Sep 15, 2020 | IDA-44120 | Int Charges | 25,857.01 |
Mar 15, 2021 | IDA-44120 | Int Charges | 12,696.40 |
Mar 15, 2021 | IDA-44120 | Int Charges | 12,696.40 |
Mar 15, 2021 | IDA-44120 | Loan Repay | 646,159.25 |
Mar 15, 2021 | IDA-44120 | Int Charges | 36,346.45 |
Mar 15, 2021 | IDA-44120 | Int Charges | 36,346.45 |
Sep 15, 2020 | IDA-44120 | Loan Repay | 1,587.88 |
Mar 15, 2020 | IDA-44120 | Loan Repay | 617,810.60 |
Mar 15, 2020 | IDA-44120 | Int Charges | 39,741.59 |
Mar 15, 2020 | IDA-44120 | Int Charges | 39,741.59 |
Mar 15, 2020 | IDA-44120 | Loan Repay | 5,586.84 |
Sep 15, 2019 | IDA-44120 | Int Charges | 41,926.97 |
Sep 15, 2019 | IDA-44120 | Int Charges | 41,926.97 |
Sep 15, 2019 | IDA-44120 | Loan Repay | 1,435.06 |
Sep 15, 2019 | IDA-44120 | Loan Repay | 619,705.25 |
Mar 15, 2019 | IDA-44120 | Int Charges | 343.05 |
Mar 15, 2019 | IDA-44120 | Int Charges | 343.05 |
Name | Review | Date |
---|---|---|
Financial Management | Moderately Satisfactory | 2013-12-25 |
Monitoring and Evaluation | Moderately Satisfactory | 2013-12-25 |
Overall | Moderately Low | 2013-12-25 |
Overall Safeguards Rating | Satisfactory | 2013-12-25 |
Progress towards achievement of PDO | Moderately Unsatisfactory | 2013-12-25 |
Procurement | Moderately Satisfactory | 2013-12-25 |
Overall Implementation Progress (IP) | Moderately Satisfactory | 2013-12-25 |
Counterpart Funding | Satisfactory | 2013-12-25 |
Project Management | Moderately Satisfactory | 2013-12-25 |
Overall Safeguards Rating | Satisfactory | 2013-12-25 |
INDICATOR | IMPLEMENTATION COMPLETION & RESULTS REPORT: 06-11-2014 |
---|---|
Outcomes | |
Risk to Development Outcome | Substantial |
Bank Performance | |
Borrower Performance | |
Government Performance | |
Implementing Agency |
INDICATOR | ICR REVIEW: 05-04-2015 | PROJECT PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT REPORT: |
---|---|---|
Outcome Rating | Moderately Unsatisfactory | N/a |
Risk To Development Outcome | Significant | N/a |
Bank Performance | Moderately Unsatisfactory | N/a |
Borrower Performance | Moderately Satisfactory | N/a |
Government Performance | Moderately Satisfactory | N/a |
Implementing Agency | Moderately Satisfactory | N/a |
Icr Quality | Satisfactory | N/a |
M&e Quality | Modest | N/a |
INDICATOR | BASELINE | CURRENT | TARGET |
---|
DCS is the main source of national statistical data for the country, as reflected in the National Data Committee reports. | Value | National Accounts data not harmonized within the s | N.A. | Quarterly/Biannual NDC meetings. |
Date | February 5, 2008 | November 15, 2013 | December 30, 2011 | |
Comment | DCS component was cancelled in 2011 |
Evidence that improved public audit functions by AGD have increased accountability and transparency in the use of public funds, as reflected in the annual public audit cycle submissions by AGD to Parl | Value | AGD submissions to Parliament indicate that audits | Max audit delay is less than 6 months and 100% of | Audit delay reduced to max 1 yr and 100% of SOEs c |
Date | February 5, 2008 | November 26, 2013 | May 17, 2012 | |
Comment | The achievement under this indicator has increased accountability and transparency in public fund use thereby improving andstrengthening evidence based decision making |
Evidence of the improved effectiveness, efficiency, and productivity for two key public sector agencies (DCS and AGD) | Value | No evidence of effectiveness and productivity | In addition to enhanced timeliness, expanded cover | Strong evidence of effectiveness and productivity |
Date | March 18, 2008 | November 26, 2013 | December 30, 2011 | |
Comment | DCS component had started picking up well with new National Data Committee being set-up, improvement in HH survey design andlimiting the delays in reporting with substantial training being conducted, national account strengthening and devleopment of ICTplans for linking various regional offices through a LAN system. |
INDICATOR | BASELINE | CURRENT | TARGET |
---|
Decreased processing times and increased quality for key national economic and social surveys produced by DCS | Value | 48 month processing time (National Census) and 18 | N.A. | National census reduced to 24 months |
Date | March 18, 2008 | December 31, 2011 | July 31, 2012 | |
Comment | Component cancelled in December 2011. |
Data processing of next HIES survey incorporates to a reasonable extent the data entry methodology as tested by the HIES pilot | Value | Fully centralized data entry | HIES surevey completed according to a new data co | |
Date | March 18, 2008 | December 31, 2011 | December 30, 2011 | |
Comment | Component closed in December 2011 |
Improved access to data and dissemination of data outputs; facilitating user-education through workshops and website | Value | A data sharing policy has been articulated; Inadeq | Review of new data sharing policy based on feedbac | |
Date | March 18, 2008 | December 31, 2011 | May 30, 2011 | |
Comment | DCS component cancelled in December 2011. |
Increasing percentage of investigative and performance audits conducted over total audits by AGD | Value | zero | 14 PAs completed and another 8 PA's are in progres | 50 (in number) |
Date | March 18, 2008 | November 26, 2013 | December 31, 2012 | |
Comment | Following Level 1 Restructuring in July 2012, the above indicator was revised. Instead of '% age", number of IA and PA are tracked | New performance audit and investigative audit departments have been established and staffed |
Percent of technical staff trained and using recommended practices (including IT-based audits) | Value | 0 percent | Computer 419 = 42% Post Graduate 77 =8%Financial | 75 percent |
Date | March 18, 2008 | November 26, 2013 | December 31, 2013 | |
Comment | Number and % of technical staff trained :English (NIBM) 544 = 54%Advanced English Training -British Council (419officers)-31%Computer 419 = 42%Post Graduate 77 = 8%Financial Audit 590 = 60%Investigative Audit 83 = 8%Performance Audit 130=13%IFRS 693 = 70%Outward bound training i Leadership skills- 205-21%Construction Audits 120 officers- 12% |
Increase in the percentage of designated technical staff trained on relevant statistical training, as planned | Value | 0.00 | 50.00 | 50.00 |
Date | March 18, 2008 | August 30, 2012 | December 31, 2011 | |
Comment | Insufficient Training |
Improved audit quality and timeliness at AGD | Value | 0.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 |
Date | March 18, 2008 | November 26, 2013 | December 31, 2012 | |
Comment | Audit 2-4 years late | AGD has achieved100% of audits within annual plan. All the reports relating to FY 2011 have been tabled inParliament and areposted to AGD website together with reports of previous years. | 100 perecnt within annual plan |
Widened public audit coverage | Value | 50.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 |
Date | March 18, 2008 | November 26, 2013 | December 31, 2011 | |
Comment | 100% coverage. All the SOES are audited by the AGD except Government owned Companies incorporated underthe Companies Act whicharenot covered by the mandate of AG. |