Skip to Main Navigation

Judicial Reform Project 2

Abstract*

The Second Judicial Reform Project in Armenia has two primary objectives: to provide Armenia's judiciary with the administration, facilities and expanded capacity necessary to improve the efficiency, reliability and transparency of judicial operations and services; and continue to improve public awareness of judicial services and access to legal and judicial information. The project has several components to support these objectives. The first component...

* The project abstract is drawn from the PAD, SAR or PGD and may not accurately reflect the project's current nature

Show More

Development Objective

The primary development objectives of JRP2 are to: (1) provide Armenia's judiciary with the administration, facilities and expanded capacity necessary to improve the efficiency, reliability and transparency of judicial operations and services; and (2) continue to improve awareness of judicial services and access to legal and judicial information. JRP2 will support the Armenian judiciary in implementing a second stage of judicial reforms launched by passage of Constitutional amendments and the introduction of a new Judicial Code. Achievement of the Project Development Objectives will be measured by performance indicators, including Government and judicial operational statistics supplemented by: (i) measures of court performance and user perceptions (BEEPS); (ii) expert assessments of judicial qualifications and training (American Bar Association's CEELI Judicial Reform Index); and (iii) project funded monitoring and evaluation efforts (court users survey and NGO court monitoring).

Key Details

Project Details

  • P099630

  • Closed

  • Klaus Decker

  • N/A

  • Armenia

  • January 24, 2007

  • (as of board presentation)

    March 8, 2007

  • July 5, 2007

  • US$ 25.50 million

  • B

  • October 2, 2013

  • June 30, 2013

  • BANK APPROVED

  • Notes

Finances

Financing Plan (US$ Millions)

No data available.
Financier Commitments
IDA Credit 22.50
JAPAN: Ministry of Finance - PHRD Grants 3.00
Borrower/Recipient 7.19

Total Project Financing (US$ Millions)

Product Line IBRD/IDA
IBRD Commitment N/A
IDA Commitment 22.50
IBRD + IDA Commitment 22.50
Lending Instrument
Grant Amount 3.00
Total Project Cost** 32.69

Summary Status of World Bank Financing (US$ Millions) as of March 31, 2025

Download:
No data available.
Financier Approval Date Closing Date Principal Disbursed Repayments Interest, Charges & Fees

Detailed Financial Activity as of March 31, 2025

Download:
No data available.
Period Financier Transaction Type Amount (US$)
Apr 15, 2021 IDA-42650 Loan Repay 0.01
Apr 15, 2021 IDA-42650 Int Charges 48,658.49
Apr 15, 2021 IDA-42650 Int Charges 48,658.49
Apr 15, 2021 IDA-42650 Int Charges -0.01
Apr 15, 2021 IDA-42650 Int Charges -0.01
Oct 15, 2020 IDA-42650 Loan Repay 776,040.25
Oct 15, 2020 IDA-42650 Int Charges 50,622.56
Oct 15, 2020 IDA-42650 Int Charges 50,622.56
Oct 15, 2020 IDA-42650 Loan Repay 291,614.88
Oct 15, 2020 IDA-42650 Loan Repay 716.97
Apr 15, 2020 IDA-42650 Loan Repay 2,934.47
Apr 15, 2020 IDA-42650 Loan Repay 290,435.53
Apr 15, 2020 IDA-42650 Loan Repay 741,010.00
Apr 15, 2020 IDA-42650 Int Charges 54,304.95
Apr 15, 2020 IDA-42650 Int Charges 54,304.95
Oct 15, 2019 IDA-42650 Int Charges 3,148.50
Mar 8, 2007 IDA-42650 Loan Commitment 22,500,000.00
Apr 15, 2024 IDA-42650 Loan Repay 17,644.95
Apr 15, 2024 IDA-42650 Loan Repay 978,708.60
Apr 15, 2024 IDA-42650 Int Charges 22,417.99
Apr 15, 2024 IDA-42650 Int Charges 22,417.99
Oct 15, 2023 IDA-42650 Int Charges 22,023.48
Oct 15, 2023 IDA-42650 Int Charges 22,023.48
Oct 15, 2023 IDA-42650 Int Charges 12,974.50
Oct 15, 2023 IDA-42650 Int Charges 12,974.50
Oct 15, 2023 IDA-42650 Loan Repay 991,471.60
Oct 15, 2023 IDA-42650 Int Charges 4,002.64
Oct 15, 2023 IDA-42650 Int Charges 4,002.64
Apr 15, 2023 IDA-42650 Int Charges 17,341.52
Apr 15, 2023 IDA-42650 Int Charges 17,341.52
Apr 15, 2023 IDA-42650 Loan Repay 960,405.50
Apr 15, 2023 IDA-42650 Loan Repay 34,341.29
Apr 15, 2023 IDA-42650 Loan Repay 30,535.29
Oct 15, 2022 IDA-42650 Loan Repay 79,752.46
Oct 15, 2022 IDA-42650 Loan Repay 27,044.99
Oct 15, 2022 IDA-42650 Loan Repay 859,378.75
Oct 15, 2022 IDA-42650 Int Charges 32,608.42
Oct 15, 2022 IDA-42650 Int Charges 32,608.42
Apr 15, 2014 IDA-42650 Int Charges 684.56
Apr 15, 2014 IDA-42650 Int Charges 684.56
Oct 15, 2017 IDA-42650 Int Charges 7,354.64
Apr 15, 2017 IDA-42650 Loan Repay 351,450.30
Apr 15, 2017 IDA-42650 Int Charges 70,060.63
Apr 15, 2017 IDA-42650 Int Charges 70,060.63
Apr 15, 2017 IDA-42650 Loan Repay 675,898.30
Apr 15, 2017 IDA-42650 Loan Repay 961.07
Oct 15, 2019 IDA-42650 Int Charges 3,148.50
Oct 15, 2019 IDA-42650 Loan Repay 1,037,498.40
Oct 15, 2019 IDA-42650 Int Charges 58,359.27
Oct 15, 2019 IDA-42650 Int Charges 58,359.27
Apr 15, 2019 IDA-42650 Int Charges 59,954.27
Apr 15, 2019 IDA-42650 Int Charges 59,954.27
Apr 15, 2019 IDA-42650 Int Charges 11,589.30
Apr 15, 2019 IDA-42650 Int Charges 11,589.30
Apr 15, 2019 IDA-42650 Loan Repay 62,936.43
Apr 15, 2019 IDA-42650 Loan Repay 989,533.30
Oct 15, 2018 IDA-42650 Loan Repay 3,387.13
Oct 15, 2018 IDA-42650 Loan Repay 334,138.00
Oct 15, 2018 IDA-42650 Loan Repay 720,500.25
Oct 15, 2018 IDA-42650 Int Charges 55,798.66
Oct 15, 2018 IDA-42650 Int Charges 55,798.66
Apr 15, 2022 IDA-42650 Loan Repay 206,403.12
Apr 15, 2022 IDA-42650 Loan Repay 821,142.56
Apr 15, 2022 IDA-42650 Int Charges 38,783.27
Apr 15, 2022 IDA-42650 Int Charges 38,783.27
Apr 15, 2022 IDA-42650 Loan Repay 6,675.34
Oct 15, 2021 IDA-42650 Loan Repay 1,059,021.90
Oct 15, 2021 IDA-42650 Int Charges 44,081.58
Oct 15, 2021 IDA-42650 Int Charges 44,081.58
Oct 15, 2021 IDA-42650 Loan Repay 9,622.68
Apr 15, 2021 IDA-42650 Int Charges 1,478.26
Apr 15, 2021 IDA-42650 Int Charges 1,478.26
Apr 15, 2021 IDA-42650 Loan Repay 49,084.90
Apr 15, 2021 IDA-42650 Loan Repay 1,032,215.00
Apr 15, 2014 IDA-42650 Int Charges 87,668.86
Apr 15, 2014 IDA-42650 Int Charges 87,668.86
Dec 4, 2013 IDA-42650 Loan Cancel 95,299.36
Oct 15, 2013 IDA-42650 Int Charges 1,120.33
Oct 15, 2013 IDA-42650 Int Charges 1,120.33
Oct 23, 2013 IDA-42650 Loan Disb -95,935.93
Oct 15, 2013 IDA-42650 Int Charges 85,414.22
Oct 15, 2013 IDA-42650 Int Charges 85,414.22
Oct 15, 2014 IDA-42650 Int Charges 215.63
Oct 15, 2014 IDA-42650 Int Charges 215.63
Oct 15, 2014 IDA-42650 Int Charges 84,261.68
Oct 15, 2014 IDA-42650 Int Charges 84,261.68
Oct 15, 2016 IDA-42650 Int Charges 13.19
Oct 15, 2016 IDA-42650 Int Charges 13.19
Oct 15, 2016 IDA-42650 Int Charges 78,248.20
Oct 15, 2016 IDA-42650 Int Charges 78,248.20
Apr 15, 2016 IDA-42650 Int Charges 803.59
Apr 15, 2016 IDA-42650 Int Charges 803.59
Apr 15, 2016 IDA-42650 Int Charges 79,791.27
Apr 15, 2016 IDA-42650 Int Charges 79,791.27
Oct 15, 2015 IDA-42650 Int Charges 2,434.74
Oct 15, 2015 IDA-42650 Int Charges 77,245.83
Oct 15, 2015 IDA-42650 Int Charges 77,245.83
Oct 15, 2015 IDA-42650 Int Charges 2,434.74
Apr 15, 2015 IDA-42650 Int Charges 75,374.54
Apr 15, 2015 IDA-42650 Int Charges 2,544.54
Apr 15, 2015 IDA-42650 Int Charges 2,544.54
Apr 15, 2015 IDA-42650 Int Charges 75,374.54
Apr 15, 2018 IDA-42650 Int Charges 6,216.19
Apr 15, 2018 IDA-42650 Int Charges 6,216.19
Apr 15, 2018 IDA-42650 Loan Repay 74,537.80
Apr 15, 2018 IDA-42650 Loan Repay 1,026,305.10
Apr 15, 2018 IDA-42650 Int Charges 74,306.93
Apr 15, 2018 IDA-42650 Int Charges 74,306.93
Oct 15, 2017 IDA-42650 Loan Repay 1,057,868.80
Oct 15, 2017 IDA-42650 Loan Repay 12,963.23
Oct 15, 2017 IDA-42650 Int Charges 70,250.09
Oct 15, 2017 IDA-42650 Int Charges 70,250.09
Oct 15, 2017 IDA-42650 Int Charges 7,354.64

Footnotes

Ratings

IMPLEMENTATION RATINGS

Name Review Date
Counterpart Funding Satisfactory 2013-09-28
Procurement Satisfactory 2013-09-28
Project Management Moderately Satisfactory 2013-09-28
Progress towards achievement of PDO Moderately Satisfactory 2013-09-28
Financial Management Satisfactory 2013-09-28
Monitoring and Evaluation Moderately Satisfactory 2013-09-28
Overall Implementation Progress (IP) Moderately Satisfactory 2013-09-28

COMPLETION RATINGS

INDICATORIMPLEMENTATION COMPLETION & RESULTS REPORT: 12-30-2013
OutcomesModerately Satisfactory
Risk to Development OutcomeSubstantial
Bank PerformanceSubstantial
Borrower PerformanceModerately Satisfactory
Government PerformanceSubstantial
Implementing AgencyModerately Satisfactory

INDEPENDENT EVALUATION RATINGS

INDICATORICR REVIEW: 03-19-2015PROJECT PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT REPORT:
Outcome RatingModerately Satisfactory N/a
Risk To Development OutcomeHighN/a
Bank PerformanceModerately SatisfactoryN/a
Borrower PerformanceModerately SatisfactoryN/a
Government PerformanceModerately SatisfactoryN/a
Implementing AgencyModerately SatisfactoryN/a
Icr QualitySatisfactoryN/a
M&e QualityModestN/a

Results Framework

PROJECT DEVELOPMENT OBJECTIVE INDICATORS

INDICATORBASELINECURRENTTARGET
  • Total area of planned courthouses and other judicial buildings rehabilitated by the end of the project.Value0 sqm20200 sqm20000 sqm
    DateMarch 8, 2007May 15, 2012December 31, 2012
    CommentTarget achieved as of completion of 14 court and 2 non-court judicial buildings. 2 additional courts will be completed by the endof the project with total area of 3100 sqm.
  • Increase in Judicial Reform Index Factor 1 on Judicial Qualification and Preparation.ValueJRI factor 1- Negative (from ABA CEELI Judicial ReJRI factor 1- NeutralJRI factor 1- Neutral (According to the last avai
    DateDecember 31, 2004December 31, 2012December 31, 2012
    CommentTarget achieved
  • Percent of surveyed firms saying that courts are able to enforce their decisions.Value41.7%64.8%55%
    DateApril 20, 2005June 30, 2013December 31, 2012
    CommentBEEPs indicator replaced with survey indicator (completely and partially satisfied) for firms that have been to court ##Satisfaction from enforcement service#].Target achieved
  • Increase in the number of completed cases versus the number of filed cases at the 1st instance courts with CAST system.Value79.6%95%10% increase over the baseline.
    DateDecember 31, 2008June 30, 2013December 31, 2012
    CommentThe 2007 indicator is replaced with 2008 as a baseline, to ensure consistency of statistics managed by JD since 2008.Target achieved
  • Increase in general satisfaction with the operation of courts of respondents to a court users survey over a 2008 baseline.Value67.5% completely and mainly satisfied with trial r65.6%25% increase over the baseline.
    DateDecember 31, 2009June 30, 2013December 31, 2012
    CommentBaseline survey completed in December 2009.Target not achievedNote that if tracing only the complete satisfaction (without including "mainly satisfied", as in the ICR)there is a slight improvement from 39% in 2009 to 40.8% in 2013.
  • Implementation of laws and regulations affecting my firm are consistent and predictableValue25.3%46.0%60% increase over baseline
    DateDecember 31, 2009June 30, 2013December 31, 2012
    CommentTarget achieved

INTERMEDIATE RESULTS INDICATORS

INDICATORBASELINECURRENTTARGET
  • Renovated and new courthouses (funded by JRP2 and state budget) upgraded according to improved design standard reflecting best international practice and cost efficiency principles.ValueDesign standards not developed yet.All renovated and new courthouses meet targeted deAll remaining courthouses (after 1st project) reha
    DateMarch 8, 2007June 30, 2013December 31, 2012
    CommentTarget achieved.
  • Percentage increase in the number of enforced decisions vs. the number of new decisions submitted for enforcement annually.Value42.8%41.3%62.8%
    DateDecember 31, 2006December 31, 2012December 31, 2012
    CommentTarget not achieved in absolute terms, but may be considered as partially achieved if the impact of other factors is taken intoaccount. While number of enforced judicial decisions has increased from 22,904 in 2006 to 43,602 in 2012, the sharp increase in thenumber of incoming judicial decisions (53,556 in 2006 versus 105,570 in 2012) and flat number of bailiffs, has resulted in thefailure to improve the ratio.
  • Number of people internationally trained and becoming certified arbitration specialists.ValueNo internationally certified professionals.20 Armenians trained on arbitration services. No Proposed number of people trained and back, workin
    DateMarch 8, 2007June 30, 2013December 31, 2012
    CommentTarget partially achieved.Although the number of lawyers trained by the Armenian law firm, together with the British Institute ofInternational and Comparative Law, exceeded the originally planned number, in absence of certification, the achievement has beenonly partial.
  • Increase in the average monthly number of pages viewed through the ARLIS webpage by the end of the projectValue140,000 pages (2,000 visitors). This baseline valu1,614,929 pages (182,520 visitors)175,000 pages (1550 visitors)
    DateDecember 31, 2005June 30, 2013December 31, 2012
    CommentMore robust baseline is the average monthly data for 2006 - 155,000 pages (1,330 visitors).Target achievedFar exceed the original modest targets.
  • Increase in the average monthly number of pages (of judicial decisions) viewed through the Judicial Portal by the end of the Project.Value7,125 pages viewed36,705 pages viewed10% increase over the baseline.
    DateApril 30, 2011June 30, 2013December 31, 2012
    CommentDataLex portal was introduced in October 2010. The baseline is the average in first six months of operation).Target achieved