Skip to Main Navigation

Ministry of Public Works Institutional Strengthening TAL

Abstract*

The Project Development Objective of the Institutional Strengthening of the Ministry of Public Works Technical Assistance Project is to assist the Government of Chile in achieving a sustainable and integrated approach to the planning of infrastructure; levels of service standards for infrastructure as well as model contracts and procedures that promote competition and assign risks appropriately; an integrated project management process; a regulatory...

* The project abstract is drawn from the PAD, SAR or PGD and may not accurately reflect the project's current nature

Show More

Development Objective

The Project Development Objective is to assist the Government in achieving a sustainable and integrated approach to the planning of infrastructure; levels of service standards for infrastructure as well as model contracts and procedures that promote competition and assign risks appropriately; an integrated project management process; a regulatory framework for all of MOPW#s sectors of responsibility that increases consumer confidence in infrastructure service provision; and the legal and organizational separation of the areas of planning, contracting, execution and regulation of infrastructure provision.

Key Details

Project Details

  • P102931

  • Closed

  • Daniel Benitez

  • N/A

  • Chile

  • November 30, 2006

  • (as of board presentation)

    June 14, 2007

  • February 27, 2008

  • US$ 11.70 million

  • C

  • Not Applicable

  • January 31, 2014

  • BANK APPROVED

  • March 11, 2021

  • Notes

Finances

Financing Plan (US$ Millions)

No data available.
Financier Commitments
International Bank for Reconstruction and Development 11.70

Total Project Financing (US$ Millions)

Product Line IBRD/IDA
IBRD Commitment 11.70
IDA Commitment N/A
IBRD + IDA Commitment 11.70
Lending Instrument
Grant Amount N/A
Total Project Cost** 11.70

Summary Status of World Bank Financing (US$ Millions) as of July 31, 2025

Download:
No data available.
Financier Approval Date Closing Date Principal Disbursed Repayments Interest, Charges & Fees

Detailed Financial Activity as of July 31, 2025

Download:
No data available.
Period Financier Transaction Type Amount (US$)
Apr 15, 2017 IBRD-74580 Int Charges 33,024.90
Apr 15, 2017 IBRD-74580 Loan Repay 453,204.16
Oct 15, 2017 IBRD-74580 Int Charges 33,414.61
Oct 15, 2017 IBRD-74580 Loan Repay 453,204.16
Apr 15, 2018 IBRD-74580 Int Charges 230.46
Apr 15, 2018 IBRD-74580 Int Charges 32,591.35
Apr 15, 2018 IBRD-74580 Loan Repay 453,204.16
Jun 14, 2007 IBRD-74580 Loan Commitment 11,700,000.00
Oct 15, 2018 IBRD-74580 Int Charges 46,645.55
Oct 15, 2018 IBRD-74580 Loan Repay 453,204.16
Apr 15, 2019 IBRD-74580 Int Charges 43,161.14
Apr 15, 2019 IBRD-74580 Loan Repay 453,204.16
Oct 15, 2019 IBRD-74580 Int Charges 37,062.81
Oct 15, 2019 IBRD-74580 Loan Repay 453,204.16
Apr 15, 2020 IBRD-74580 Int Charges 23,397.00
Apr 15, 2020 IBRD-74580 Loan Repay 453,204.16
Oct 15, 2020 IBRD-74580 Int Charges 11,803.94
Oct 15, 2020 IBRD-74580 Loan Repay 453,204.16
Apr 15, 2021 IBRD-74580 Loan Repay 453,204.16
Apr 15, 2021 IBRD-74580 Int Charges 2,064.05
Oct 15, 2021 IBRD-74580 Int Charges 1,245.86
Oct 15, 2021 IBRD-74580 Loan Repay 453,204.16
Apr 15, 2022 IBRD-74580 Int Charges 482.54
Apr 15, 2022 IBRD-74580 Loan Repay 454,518.20
Oct 15, 2014 IBRD-74580 Int Charges 65.84
Oct 15, 2014 IBRD-74580 Int Charges 13,640.90
Oct 15, 2014 IBRD-74580 Loan Repay 453,204.16
Oct 15, 2013 IBRD-74580 Int Charges 8,959.56
Oct 15, 2013 IBRD-74580 Loan Repay 199,834.64
Jan 30, 2014 IBRD-74580 Loan Disb 445,953.80
Oct 30, 2013 IBRD-74580 Loan Disb 1,936,579.90
Nov 15, 2013 IBRD-74580 Loan Disb 902,327.70
Apr 9, 2014 IBRD-74580 Loan Disb 963,514.94
Apr 15, 2014 IBRD-74580 Int Charges 12,657.56
Apr 15, 2014 IBRD-74580 Loan Repay 392,984.50
May 31, 2014 IBRD-74580 Loan Cancel 3,454,930.80
Apr 15, 2015 IBRD-74580 Loan Repay 453,204.16
Apr 15, 2015 IBRD-74580 Int Charges 12,718.60
Oct 15, 2015 IBRD-74580 Int Charges 14,839.47
Oct 15, 2015 IBRD-74580 Loan Repay 453,204.16
Apr 15, 2016 IBRD-74580 Int Charges 17,074.88
Apr 15, 2016 IBRD-74580 Loan Repay 453,204.16
Oct 15, 2016 IBRD-74580 Int Charges 26,269.53
Oct 15, 2016 IBRD-74580 Loan Repay 453,204.16

Footnotes

Ratings

IMPLEMENTATION RATINGS

Name Review Date
Procurement Satisfactory 2014-02-10
Project Management Satisfactory 2014-02-10
Overall Implementation Progress (IP) Moderately Satisfactory 2014-02-10
Progress towards achievement of PDO Moderately Satisfactory 2014-02-10
Financial Management Moderately Satisfactory 2014-02-10
Monitoring and Evaluation Moderately Satisfactory 2014-02-10
Counterpart Funding Satisfactory 2014-02-10

COMPLETION RATINGS

INDICATORIMPLEMENTATION COMPLETION & RESULTS REPORT: 07-31-2014
Outcomes
Risk to Development OutcomeSubstantial
Bank Performance
Borrower Performance
Government Performance
Implementing Agency

INDEPENDENT EVALUATION RATINGS

INDICATORICR REVIEW: 04-19-2016PROJECT PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT REPORT:
Outcome RatingModerately Satisfactory N/a
Risk To Development OutcomeNegligible To LowN/a
Bank PerformanceModerately SatisfactoryN/a
Borrower PerformanceModerately SatisfactoryN/a
Government PerformanceModerately SatisfactoryN/a
Implementing AgencyModerately SatisfactoryN/a
Icr QualitySatisfactoryN/a
M&e QualityModestN/a

Results Framework

PROJECT DEVELOPMENT OBJECTIVE INDICATORS

INDICATORBASELINECURRENTTARGET
  • Increased return of infrastructure projects due to the new planning methodologyValue0%
    DateDecember 31, 2013January 31, 2014
    CommentIndicator was changed in 2009
  • Greater competition in bidding supported by fair risk-sharing arrangements embedded in contracts and consumer-responsive service targetsValue
    DateDecember 31, 2013January 31, 2014
    CommentSee Key Issues and Actions for Management Attention
  • Greater responsiveness to consumer concerns related to levels of service; and greater oversight of performance by public sector service providers as well as concessionairesValueService standards defined for 13 types of infrastrService standards defined for 13 types of infrastr
    DateDecember 31, 2013January 31, 2014
    CommentSee attached excel file with a description of the activities and a definition of the infrastructuresSee Key Issues and Actions for Management Attention
  • Reduction in variance between values established at contract signature and final values at project executionValueReduction of 14% of projects in 2012 using the neweduction of 15% in the variance of cost deviations
    DateJune 30, 2013January 31, 2014
    CommentNo information provided for 2013See attached document discussing some issues and possible solutions for PDO and intermediate result indicators.
  • Normative and organizational structure that provides clear separation and definition of roles and responsibilities for planning, contracting, works execution and oversight.ValueConcession law approved as Law 20410 (January 2010
    DateJune 30, 2013January 31, 2014
    CommentSee Key Issues and Actions for Management Attention

INTERMEDIATE RESULTS INDICATORS

INDICATORBASELINECURRENTTARGET
  • Share of projects approved based on new integrated planning methodology.Value0%93% of projects to be executed using the new metho25% of projects that initiate a phase of the proje
    DateJune 29, 2007June 30, 2013January 31, 2014
    CommentA new planning methodology is a key feature of the Modernization Program of the Ministry of PUblic WorksSee Key Issues and Actions for Management Attention
  • Identify, define and adopt service quality standards in a wide set of works typologies under the responsibility of the MOPWValue0%Service standards defined for 13 typology of worksService standards defined for 9 typology of works
    DateJune 29, 2007June 30, 2013January 31, 2014
    CommentIdentification of service quality attributes relevant, indicators and standards of service in the following 13 types of works(Airport Concession, Concession Road Works; jail concession; Lakeside Connectivity Project, Maritime and Fluvial Isolated Areas,Buildings MOP, Storm water; Rural Water, hospital). Standards included in performance based road maintenance contractsSee Key Issues and Actions for Management Attention
  • Number of concession contracts under the jurisdiction of the MOPW that incorporate (explicitly) quality standardsValue07 contracts7 contracts include, from bidding stage, explicit
    DateOctober 26, 2009June 30, 2013January 31, 2014
    Comment7 contracts in total – 2 contracts added in 2012 (inclusion of quality standards in bidding of Calama and Antofagasta airports)See Key Issues and Actions for Management Attention
  • More competition in biddings to be reached by (i) improvements in bidders registry (reglamento de obras y consultoria) and (ii) improved standard bidding documentsValueBidding documents and firms and consultants registProposal to change contractors registry elaborated80% of contracts signed by MOPW during the year 20
    DateDecember 31, 2007June 30, 2013January 31, 2014
    CommentProposal to change contractors registry elaborated and under review by MOPW authorities. No progress in improved standard biddingdocumentsSee Key Issues and Actions for Management Attention
  • Reduction in the variance of the difference between costs forecasted when contract is signed and actual cost of worksValueNo baseline availableReduction of 14% of projects in 2012 using the newReduction of 15% in the variance of cost deviation
    DateOctober 26, 2009June 30, 2013January 31, 2014
    CommentConsulting firm being hired to prepare baseline. Note that more than 60 projects currently under integrated project management.No information provided for 2013See Key Issues and Actions for Management Attention
  • A normative and organizational framework in place that provides for clear separation of roles and responsibilitiesValueMOPW does not have an internal organization law thsame as 2011Following laws approved by Congress: (i) New organ
    DateOctober 26, 2009June 30, 2013December 31, 2013
    CommentConcession law approved as Law 20410 (January 2010). Law that creates the Superintendency in Congress but not a priority forcurrent administrationSee Key Issues and Actions for Management Attention
  • Reduction of variance of construction time between time envisaged when contract is signed and actual construction timeValue0.0019.0015.00
    DateJune 30, 2013January 31, 2013
    Comment19% time reduction to the projects implemented using the new methodology (GIP) finished in year 2011. There is no update for 2013% reduction in indicator (variance).See attached document discussing some issues and possible solutions for PDO and intermediateresult indicators.
  • Regulatory oversight system in place to be used by entity independent of planning and execution divisionos of MOPWValueNo regulatory oversight system by an independent a3 web based systems put in placeRegulatory oversight system and mechanisms in plac
    DateOctober 26, 2009June 30, 2013January 31, 2013
    CommentImplementation of web based system to oversight and report concessions (roads, airports, water).See Key Issues and Actions for Management Attention