Financier | Commitments |
---|---|
Afghanistan Resilience Trust Fund | 30.00 |
IDA Grant | 112.00 |
P103343
Closed
Mohammad Ajmal Askerzoy
N/A
January 8, 2007
(as of board presentation)
December 13, 2007
November 17, 2008
US$ 142.00 million
N/A
2008
US$ 142.00 million
B
March 11, 2021
December 31, 2013
BANK APPROVED
Financier | Commitments |
---|---|
Afghanistan Resilience Trust Fund | 30.00 |
IDA Grant | 112.00 |
Product Line | IBRD/IDA |
---|---|
IBRD Commitment | N/A |
IDA Commitment | 112.00 |
IBRD + IDA Commitment | 112.00 |
Lending Instrument | |
---|---|
Grant Amount | 30.00 |
Total Project Cost** | 142.00 |
Period | Financier | Transaction Type | Amount (US$) |
---|---|---|---|
Jul 10, 2013 | IDA-H6360 | Loan Disb | 2,529,652.20 |
Aug 19, 2013 | IDA-H6360 | Loan Disb | 2,708,634.20 |
Jul 2, 2013 | IDA-H6360 | Loan Disb | 2,483,572.50 |
Dec 16, 2014 | IDA-H6360 | Loan Disb | 30.00 |
Dec 16, 2014 | IDA-H6360 | Loan Disb | -30.00 |
Dec 16, 2014 | IDA-H6360 | Loan Disb | -10,127.52 |
Dec 13, 2007 | IDA-H3440 | Loan Commitment | 112,000,000.00 |
Dec 16, 2014 | IDA-H6360 | Loan Cancel | 51,582.80 |
Jan 21, 2015 | IDA-H3440 | Loan Disb | -17,870.88 |
Aug 25, 2014 | IDA-H6360 | Loan Disb | -9,843.37 |
Jan 21, 2015 | IDA-H3440 | Loan Cancel | 22,075.82 |
Dec 16, 2010 | IDA-H6360 | Loan Commitment | 40,000,000.00 |
Jan 21, 2015 | IDA-H3440 | Loan Disb | -492.20 |
Name | Review | Date |
---|---|---|
Counterpart Funding | Satisfactory | 2014-02-24 |
Overall Safeguards Rating | Satisfactory | 2014-02-24 |
Progress towards achievement of PDO | Moderately Satisfactory | 2014-02-24 |
Financial Management | Satisfactory | 2014-02-24 |
Monitoring and Evaluation | Moderately Satisfactory | 2014-02-24 |
Overall Implementation Progress (IP) | Moderately Satisfactory | 2014-02-24 |
Procurement | Satisfactory | 2014-02-24 |
Project Management | Satisfactory | 2014-02-24 |
INDICATOR | IMPLEMENTATION COMPLETION & RESULTS REPORT: 06-24-2014 |
---|---|
Outcomes | |
Risk to Development Outcome | Substantial |
Bank Performance | |
Borrower Performance | |
Government Performance | |
Implementing Agency |
INDICATOR | ICR REVIEW: 12-30-2014 | PROJECT PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT REPORT: |
---|---|---|
Outcome Rating | Moderately Satisfactory | N/a |
Risk To Development Outcome | High | N/a |
Bank Performance | Moderately Satisfactory | N/a |
Borrower Performance | Moderately Satisfactory | N/a |
Government Performance | Moderately Satisfactory | N/a |
Implementing Agency | Moderately Satisfactory | N/a |
Icr Quality | Satisfactory | N/a |
M&e Quality | Modest | N/a |
INDICATOR | BASELINE | CURRENT | TARGET |
---|
% of reduction in travel time of beneficiaries living along the improved road to first available schools, health care facilities aswell as administrative services | Value | 1 hr for motorized transport2.2 hr for non-motori | To district center: 0.9 hoursTo hospital: 2.0 hou | at least 30% |
Date | October 30, 2008 | December 31, 2013 | December 31, 2013 | |
Comment |
% of increase in the no. of trips taken by beneficiaries living along the improved road to first available schools, health care facilities as well as administrative services | Value | 58% of population travel to market at least once a | 64.9 trips to district center.39.8% of those who | at least 30% |
Date | October 30, 2008 | December 31, 2013 | December 31, 2013 | |
Comment |
% of difference in price of key consumption and production commodities between at beneficiary villages and in the nearest town | Value | Difference in wheat grain prices at local markets | at most 15% | |
Date | October 30, 2008 | December 31, 2013 | December 31, 2013 | |
Comment | baseline data proved to have problems and will be modified with a difference method of control versus projects as opposed todifference- in- difference method, which may lack the filter for net attribution |
Diversification of cropping patterns and income sources of beneficiaries living along the improved road | Value | 68% of population draw income including from off-f | diversification | |
Date | October 30, 2008 | May 14, 2013 | December 31, 2013 | |
Comment | data collection has been completed and data analysis is ongoing. The impact evaluation team is working hard to finalize the databefore the grant closing date.. |
Share of rural population with access to an all-season road | Value | 40.00 | 0.00 | 64.00 |
Date | July 31, 2009 | October 1, 2012 | December 31, 2013 | |
Comment | end line data is being collected |
Number of rural people with access to an all-season road | Value | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Date | July 31, 2009 | October 1, 2012 | December 31, 2013 | |
Comment | Rural accessibility index (% of population whose community located within 2 Km of all season roads) from National RuralVulnerability Analysis (NRVA) 2007/08 was at 61.4 %. This figure was obtained from preliminary analysis of the data of NRVA2007/08 and is notconsidered very accurate. Accurate reporting on this indicator will be possible after the data has been morethoroughly analyzed. | The figure needs updating and verification of data collected by NRVA during 2007/08. Traget will be set once the projectestablishes the total network in the country, which is not clear presently. | The end of project target value is yet to be decided |
INDICATOR | BASELINE | CURRENT | TARGET |
---|
Km of secondary rural roads rehabilitated | Value | 0 | 1124 km | 1105km |
Date | June 23, 2008 | December 31, 2013 | December 31, 2013 | |
Comment | The target has been revised from 1075 to 1105 in November 2010 as part of the Additional Financing Process |
Km of tertiary rural roads rehabilitated | Value | 0 | 1349 km | 1195km |
Date | June 23, 2008 | December 31, 2013 | December 31, 2013 | |
Comment | The target has been revised for the second time from (i) 1054 to 1195 in November 2010 as part of the Additional FinancingProcess,(ii) in this mission to add more civil works to be financed out of the potential savings made from completed contracts |
Running meters of culverts, retaining walls and bridges to be rehabilitated for secondary roads | Value | 0 | 1458 linear meter | 1506 linear meter |
Date | June 23, 2008 | December 31, 2013 | December 31, 2013 | |
Comment | Target revised to focus only on bridge structures |
Running meters of culverts, retaining walls and bridges to be rehabilitated for tertiary roads | Value | 0 | 1602 linear meter | 1570 linear meter |
Date | June 23, 2008 | December 31, 2013 | December 31, 2013 | |
Comment | Target revised to focus only on bridge structures |
Km of rural roads, rehabilitated under NRAP, maintained by the communities | Value | 53 | 2440 km | 2400 km |
Date | June 23, 2008 | December 31, 2013 | December 31, 2013 | |
Comment | end target adjusted for the second time after having the actual cost of supervision, and maintenance taken into account |
No. of CDCs/CBOs which manage rural road maintenance | Value | 0 | 250 | 360 |
Date | June 23, 2008 | December 31, 2013 | December 31, 2013 | |
Comment | This was dropped during additional financing. | Target revised to reflect the change in the scope of maintenance |
A rural access policy and strategy is in place by the MTR | Value | No startegy in place | Strategy devloped but in draft version. | strategy developed |
Date | June 23, 2008 | December 31, 2013 | December 31, 2013 | |
Comment |
A maintenance scheme is in place by the end of 2nd year | Value | no mechanism in place | Scheme is in place covering over 2400 km of rural | mechanism in place |
Date | June 23, 2008 | December 31, 2013 | December 31, 2013 | |
Comment | target date revised |
# of engineering, social development students which successfully complete internships with NRAP | Value | 0 | 221 | at least 120 |
Date | June 23, 2008 | May 14, 2013 | December 31, 2013 | |
Comment | target date revised |
An improved and interactive M&E system established at each PIU along with an improved MIS | Value | MRRD & MPW MIS exists but MPW needs considerable i | fully integrated MIS in place. | fully integrated MIS in place |
Date | June 23, 2008 | December 31, 2012 | December 31, 2013 | |
Comment | Improved M&E and MIS, target date revised |
Roads rehabilitated, Rural | Value | 0.00 | 2473.00 | 2300.00 |
Date | December 31, 2013 | December 31, 2013 | ||
Comment | no reliable network data available |
Roads rehabilitated, Non-rural | Value | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Date | December 31, 2013 | December 31, 2013 | ||
Comment | no reliable network data available | The Afghan governments classifies all secondary road as rural roads. We followed the government classification on roads andtherefore, no non-rural road is financed under the project. |
Roads in good and fair condition as a share of total classified roads | Value | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Date | December 31, 2013 | December 31, 2013 | ||
Comment | Data is not available currently | date collection is still underway by the client ministries under the successor project. |
Size of the total classified network | Value | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Date | December 31, 2013 | December 31, 2013 | ||
Comment | Data is not available currently |