Skip to Main Navigation

National Emergency Rural Access Project

Development Objective

The project development objective of the proposed project, derived from the overarching program objective of NRAP, is to provide year-round access to basic services and facilities in the rural areas of Afghanistan covered by the project. This will be achieved through rehabilitation and maintenance of rural access infrastructure by contracting with the private sector and, to a lesser extent, with the communities. The achievement of the PDO will enhance the well being of the population and promote equitable licit economic growth in the country.

Key Details

Project Details

  • P103343

  • Closed

  • Mohammad Ajmal Askerzoy

  • N/A

  • Afghanistan

  • January 8, 2007

  • (as of board presentation)

    December 13, 2007

  • November 17, 2008

  • US$ 142.00 million

  • N/A

  • South Asia

  • 2008

  • US$ 142.00 million

  • B

  • March 11, 2021

  • December 31, 2013

  • BANK APPROVED

  • Notes

Finances

Financing Plan (US$ Millions)

No data available.
Financier Commitments
Afghanistan Resilience Trust Fund 30.00
IDA Grant 112.00

Total Project Financing (US$ Millions)

Product Line IBRD/IDA
IBRD Commitment N/A
IDA Commitment 112.00
IBRD + IDA Commitment 112.00
Lending Instrument
Grant Amount 30.00
Total Project Cost** 142.00

Summary Status of World Bank Financing (US$ Millions) as of March 31, 2025

Download:
No data available.
Financier Approval Date Closing Date Principal Disbursed Repayments Interest, Charges & Fees

Detailed Financial Activity as of March 31, 2025

Download:
No data available.
Period Financier Transaction Type Amount (US$)
Jul 10, 2013 IDA-H6360 Loan Disb 2,529,652.20
Aug 19, 2013 IDA-H6360 Loan Disb 2,708,634.20
Jul 2, 2013 IDA-H6360 Loan Disb 2,483,572.50
Dec 16, 2014 IDA-H6360 Loan Disb 30.00
Dec 16, 2014 IDA-H6360 Loan Disb -30.00
Dec 16, 2014 IDA-H6360 Loan Disb -10,127.52
Dec 13, 2007 IDA-H3440 Loan Commitment 112,000,000.00
Dec 16, 2014 IDA-H6360 Loan Cancel 51,582.80
Jan 21, 2015 IDA-H3440 Loan Disb -17,870.88
Aug 25, 2014 IDA-H6360 Loan Disb -9,843.37
Jan 21, 2015 IDA-H3440 Loan Cancel 22,075.82
Dec 16, 2010 IDA-H6360 Loan Commitment 40,000,000.00
Jan 21, 2015 IDA-H3440 Loan Disb -492.20

Footnotes

Ratings

IMPLEMENTATION RATINGS

Name Review Date
Counterpart Funding Satisfactory 2014-02-24
Overall Safeguards Rating Satisfactory 2014-02-24
Progress towards achievement of PDO Moderately Satisfactory 2014-02-24
Financial Management Satisfactory 2014-02-24
Monitoring and Evaluation Moderately Satisfactory 2014-02-24
Overall Implementation Progress (IP) Moderately Satisfactory 2014-02-24
Procurement Satisfactory 2014-02-24
Project Management Satisfactory 2014-02-24

COMPLETION RATINGS

INDICATORIMPLEMENTATION COMPLETION & RESULTS REPORT: 06-24-2014
Outcomes
Risk to Development OutcomeSubstantial
Bank Performance
Borrower Performance
Government Performance
Implementing Agency

INDEPENDENT EVALUATION RATINGS

INDICATORICR REVIEW: 12-30-2014PROJECT PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT REPORT:
Outcome RatingModerately Satisfactory N/a
Risk To Development OutcomeHighN/a
Bank PerformanceModerately SatisfactoryN/a
Borrower PerformanceModerately SatisfactoryN/a
Government PerformanceModerately SatisfactoryN/a
Implementing AgencyModerately SatisfactoryN/a
Icr QualitySatisfactoryN/a
M&e QualityModestN/a

Results Framework

PROJECT DEVELOPMENT OBJECTIVE INDICATORS

INDICATORBASELINECURRENTTARGET
  • % of reduction in travel time of beneficiaries living along the improved road to first available schools, health care facilities aswell as administrative servicesValue1 hr for motorized transport2.2 hr for non-motoriTo district center: 0.9 hoursTo hospital: 2.0 houat least 30%
    DateOctober 30, 2008December 31, 2013December 31, 2013
    Comment
  • % of increase in the no. of trips taken by beneficiaries living along the improved road to first available schools, health care facilities as well as administrative servicesValue58% of population travel to market at least once a64.9 trips to district center.39.8% of those who at least 30%
    DateOctober 30, 2008December 31, 2013December 31, 2013
    Comment
  • % of difference in price of key consumption and production commodities between at beneficiary villages and in the nearest townValueDifference in wheat grain prices at local markets at most 15%
    DateOctober 30, 2008December 31, 2013December 31, 2013
    Commentbaseline data proved to have problems and will be modified with a difference method of control versus projects as opposed todifference- in- difference method, which may lack the filter for net attribution
  • Diversification of cropping patterns and income sources of beneficiaries living along the improved roadValue68% of population draw income including from off-fdiversification
    DateOctober 30, 2008May 14, 2013December 31, 2013
    Commentdata collection has been completed and data analysis is ongoing. The impact evaluation team is working hard to finalize the databefore the grant closing date..
  • Share of rural population with access to an all-season roadValue40.000.0064.00
    DateJuly 31, 2009October 1, 2012December 31, 2013
    Commentend line data is being collected
  • Number of rural people with access to an all-season roadValue0.000.000.00
    DateJuly 31, 2009October 1, 2012December 31, 2013
    CommentRural accessibility index (% of population whose community located within 2 Km of all season roads) from National RuralVulnerability Analysis (NRVA) 2007/08 was at 61.4 %. This figure was obtained from preliminary analysis of the data of NRVA2007/08 and is notconsidered very accurate. Accurate reporting on this indicator will be possible after the data has been morethoroughly analyzed.The figure needs updating and verification of data collected by NRVA during 2007/08. Traget will be set once the projectestablishes the total network in the country, which is not clear presently.The end of project target value is yet to be decided

INTERMEDIATE RESULTS INDICATORS

INDICATORBASELINECURRENTTARGET
  • Km of secondary rural roads rehabilitatedValue01124 km1105km
    DateJune 23, 2008December 31, 2013December 31, 2013
    CommentThe target has been revised from 1075 to 1105 in November 2010 as part of the Additional Financing Process
  • Km of tertiary rural roads rehabilitatedValue01349 km1195km
    DateJune 23, 2008December 31, 2013December 31, 2013
    CommentThe target has been revised for the second time from (i) 1054 to 1195 in November 2010 as part of the Additional FinancingProcess,(ii) in this mission to add more civil works to be financed out of the potential savings made from completed contracts
  • Running meters of culverts, retaining walls and bridges to be rehabilitated for secondary roadsValue01458 linear meter1506 linear meter
    DateJune 23, 2008December 31, 2013December 31, 2013
    CommentTarget revised to focus only on bridge structures
  • Running meters of culverts, retaining walls and bridges to be rehabilitated for tertiary roadsValue01602 linear meter1570 linear meter
    DateJune 23, 2008December 31, 2013December 31, 2013
    CommentTarget revised to focus only on bridge structures
  • Km of rural roads, rehabilitated under NRAP, maintained by the communitiesValue532440 km2400 km
    DateJune 23, 2008December 31, 2013December 31, 2013
    Commentend target adjusted for the second time after having the actual cost of supervision, and maintenance taken into account
  • No. of CDCs/CBOs which manage rural road maintenanceValue0250360
    DateJune 23, 2008December 31, 2013December 31, 2013
    CommentThis was dropped during additional financing.Target revised to reflect the change in the scope of maintenance
  • A rural access policy and strategy is in place by the MTRValueNo startegy in placeStrategy devloped but in draft version.strategy developed
    DateJune 23, 2008December 31, 2013December 31, 2013
    Comment
  • A maintenance scheme is in place by the end of 2nd yearValueno mechanism in placeScheme is in place covering over 2400 km of rural mechanism in place
    DateJune 23, 2008December 31, 2013December 31, 2013
    Commenttarget date revised
  • # of engineering, social development students which successfully complete internships with NRAPValue0221at least 120
    DateJune 23, 2008May 14, 2013December 31, 2013
    Commenttarget date revised
  • An improved and interactive M&E system established at each PIU along with an improved MISValueMRRD & MPW MIS exists but MPW needs considerable ifully integrated MIS in place.fully integrated MIS in place
    DateJune 23, 2008December 31, 2012December 31, 2013
    CommentImproved M&E and MIS, target date revised
  • Roads rehabilitated, RuralValue0.002473.002300.00
    DateDecember 31, 2013December 31, 2013
    Commentno reliable network data available
  • Roads rehabilitated, Non-ruralValue0.000.000.00
    DateDecember 31, 2013December 31, 2013
    Commentno reliable network data availableThe Afghan governments classifies all secondary road as rural roads. We followed the government classification on roads andtherefore, no non-rural road is financed under the project.
  • Roads in good and fair condition as a share of total classified roadsValue0.000.000.00
    DateDecember 31, 2013December 31, 2013
    CommentData is not available currentlydate collection is still underway by the client ministries under the successor project.
  • Size of the total classified networkValue0.000.000.00
    DateDecember 31, 2013December 31, 2013
    CommentData is not available currently