Financier | Commitments |
---|---|
Special Financing | 30.00 |
P103875
Closed
Chantal Reliquet
N/A
October 26, 2006
(as of board presentation)
November 3, 2006
November 29, 2006
US$ 30.00 million
N/A
2007
US$ 30.00 million
B
Not Applicable
April 30, 2012
BANK APPROVED
January 15, 2013
Financier | Commitments |
---|---|
Special Financing | 30.00 |
Product Line | IBRD/IDA |
---|---|
IBRD Commitment | N/A |
IDA Commitment | N/A |
IBRD + IDA Commitment | N/A |
Lending Instrument | |
---|---|
Grant Amount | 30.00 |
Total Project Cost** | 30.00 |
Name | Review | Date |
---|---|---|
Counterpart Funding | Satisfactory | 2012-05-12 |
Project Management | Satisfactory | 2012-05-12 |
Monitoring and Evaluation | Satisfactory | 2012-05-12 |
Overall | Low | 2012-05-12 |
Overall Implementation Progress (IP) | Moderately Satisfactory | 2012-05-12 |
Overall Safeguards Rating | Satisfactory | 2012-05-12 |
Overall Safeguards Rating | Satisfactory | 2012-05-12 |
Progress towards achievement of PDO | Moderately Satisfactory | 2012-05-12 |
Procurement | Satisfactory | 2012-05-12 |
Financial Management | Satisfactory | 2012-05-12 |
INDICATOR | IMPLEMENTATION COMPLETION & RESULTS REPORT: 10-30-2012 |
---|---|
Outcomes | Substantial |
Risk to Development Outcome | Modest |
Bank Performance | Substantial |
Borrower Performance | Substantial |
Government Performance | Substantial |
Implementing Agency | Substantial |
INDICATOR | ICR REVIEW: 12-03-2013 | PROJECT PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT REPORT: |
---|---|---|
Outcome Rating | Satisfactory | N/a |
Risk To Development Outcome | Significant | N/a |
Bank Performance | Satisfactory | N/a |
Borrower Performance | Satisfactory | N/a |
Government Performance | Satisfactory | N/a |
Implementing Agency | Satisfactory | N/a |
Icr Quality | Satisfactory | N/a |
M&e Quality | Modest | N/a |
INDICATOR | BASELINE | CURRENT | TARGET |
---|
Restore basic services and rebuild priority public infrastructure - Physical Works | Value | Reconst. of munic. buildgs: 0Roads repaired: 0Re | Re. Munic. Buildings: 17Roads repaired: 175 kmSt | Re. Munic. Buildings: 18Roads repaired: 183 kmSt |
Date | March 15, 2006 | April 24, 2012 | April 30, 2012 | |
Comment | The work is completed. The marginal difference with the end target is due to the fact that some of the works were conducted byother stakeholders. |
Restore basic services and rebuild priority public infrastructure - Equity monitoring | Value | Ratio of built up area over total area in the proj | Ratio of built up area over total area in the proj | Ratio of average municipal areas served by the Pro |
Date | November 29, 2006 | April 24, 2012 | April 30, 2012 | |
Comment | Reflects the density of municipal infrastructure (% municipal infra/total infra) | Reflects the intensity of damage (% repaired infra/munic. infra)Emergency works are complete. | Reflects share of fin. assistance (% repaired munic. infra/ total infra).The equity indicators show that the grant assistance wasin line with the density of assets with the exception of North Lebanon where add. funds were provided to overcome the Nahr El Baredconflict. |
Support Local Economic Development: LED projects launched in the conflict areas | Value | Nb of cazas (districts) targeted: 0Increased capi | Nb. of cazas: 11Increased cap. inv.: 35% | Nb. of cazas: 10Increased cap. inv.: 35% |
Date | March 15, 2008 | April 24, 2012 | April 30, 2012 | |
Comment | This component was initiated after the emergency reconstruction work and data were only available in 2008. | The ratio shows increased share of the municipal budget allocated to investments. | The number of cazas was raised to 11 following the review in 2008 from the PCU and the Prime Minister's Office rankings showingthat 11 cazas were equally ranked in terms of affected municipalities. |
Mitigate impact of hostilities on municipal finance | Value | Completion of 3 case Studies: 0 | 3 studies | 3 studies |
Date | March 15, 2006 | April 24, 2012 | April 30, 2012 | |
Comment | Studies designed to reduce dependency on Central Gvt subsidy (from the Independent Municipal Fund). The results of the Study aresupported by the declining ratio of municipal revenues/Government transfers shown in the intermediate results indicator. | Completed. | Completed. |
INDICATOR | BASELINE | CURRENT | TARGET |
---|
Municipal revenues/Government transfers. A decreasing ratio will show improved financial sustainability. | Value | Ratio: 70% | Ratio: 49.5% | Ratio: 40% |
Date | March 15, 2006 | April 24, 2012 | April 30, 2012 | |
Comment | A declining ratio of Gvt transfers/munic. revenues shows improved fin. sustainability.The ratio is based on a representativesample of municipalities. | The ratio, which monitors the collection of own resources by the municipalities after the conflict, shows gradual improvement. | Gradual improvement is to be noted but, as of April 2012, the data is not available for 2011. The data to be provided in thesecondhalf of 2012 should permit to confirm the positive trend in terms of financial sustainability. |
Capacity Building: Setting up and operating a Municipal Observatory | Value | Capacity Building: Setting up and operating a Muni | The Municipal Observatory is established. It is su | Produce at least 5 municipal management performanc |
Date | November 29, 2006 | April 24, 2012 | April 30, 2012 | |
Comment | The Municipal Observatory is operating at the Directorate General level and is officially embedded in the Ministry of Interior andMunicipalities since the Decree of October 15, 2011. | The Municipal Observatory is operating and is collecting targeted data and developing the municipal performance indicators. |