Financier | Commitments |
---|---|
Borrower/Recipient | 0.42 |
JAPAN: Gov. of (excl. Ministry of Finance - PHRD Grants) | 1.14 |
BELGIUM: MOFA-Directorate-General for Int. Coop.(DGIC) | 3.47 |
FINLAND: Ministry for Foreign Affairs | 1.02 |
Global Environment Facility (GEF) | 2.62 |
Financier | Commitments |
---|---|
Borrower/Recipient | 0.42 |
JAPAN: Gov. of (excl. Ministry of Finance - PHRD Grants) | 1.14 |
BELGIUM: MOFA-Directorate-General for Int. Coop.(DGIC) | 3.47 |
FINLAND: Ministry for Foreign Affairs | 1.02 |
Global Environment Facility (GEF) | 2.62 |
Product Line | IBRD/IDA |
---|---|
IBRD Commitment | N/A |
IDA Commitment | N/A |
IBRD + IDA Commitment | N/A |
Lending Instrument | |
---|---|
Grant Amount | 8.25 |
Total Project Cost** | 8.67 |
Name | Review | Date |
---|---|---|
Summary Global Objective Rating | Moderately Satisfactory | 2013-05-29 |
Overall Implementation Progress (IP) | Moderately Satisfactory | 2013-05-29 |
Overall Safeguards Rating | Satisfactory | 2013-05-29 |
Counterpart Funding | Satisfactory | 2013-05-29 |
Procurement | Moderately Satisfactory | 2013-05-29 |
Project Management | Satisfactory | 2013-05-29 |
Financial Management | Satisfactory | 2013-05-29 |
Monitoring and Evaluation | Satisfactory | 2013-05-29 |
Overall Safeguards Rating | Satisfactory | 2013-05-29 |
INDICATOR | IMPLEMENTATION COMPLETION & RESULTS REPORT: 11-29-2013 |
---|---|
Outcomes | Moderately Satisfactory |
Risk to Development Outcome | Modest |
Bank Performance | Moderately Unsatisfactory |
Borrower Performance | Moderately Satisfactory |
Government Performance | Moderately Satisfactory |
Implementing Agency | Moderately Unsatisfactory |
INDICATOR | ICR REVIEW: 09-29-2016 | PROJECT PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT REPORT: 03-27-2015 |
---|---|---|
Outcome Rating | Unsatisfactory | Unsatisfactory |
Risk To Development Outcome | Low | Moderate |
Bank Performance | Unsatisfactory | Unsatisfactory |
Borrower Performance | Moderately Unsatisfactory | Moderately Unsatisfactory |
Government Performance | Not Rated | Moderately Satisfactory |
Implementing Agency | Not Rated | Moderately Unsatisfactory |
Icr Quality | Not Rated | Satisfactory |
M&e Quality | Negligible | Negligible |
INDICATOR | BASELINE | CURRENT | TARGET |
---|
INDICATOR | BASELINE | CURRENT | TARGET |
---|
PMT functions satisfactorily | Value | PMT not yet functional | PMT satisfactorily maintained throughout project. | |
Date | July 1, 2007 | May 9, 2013 | May 31, 2013 | |
Comment | Not reported. | This is an old indicator and is not in the Results Framework of the Restructuring Paper of 2011. |
The training program under Part D of the project is implemented and the knowledge so acquired is being used by the Recipient | Value | Training program identified | Training program satisfactorily completed | Training program satisfactorily completed |
Date | July 1, 2007 | May 9, 2013 | May 31, 2013 | |
Comment | Not reported. | This is an old indicator and is not in the Results Framework of the Restructuring Paper of 2011. |
Inventory database of publicly held obsolete pesticides stocks and associated waste in place and in use. | Value | Database not available | Database regularly updated and in use | Database regularly updated and in use |
Date | July 1, 2007 | May 9, 2013 | July 1, 2011 | |
Comment | The end of project target was achieved by 06/16/2010. |
Legal and regulatory framework for pesticide management improved, including measures to strengthen compliance with the Basil convention and the Rotterdam convention | Value | Framework compliance unknown | Pesticides Registration and Control Proclamation w | Framework reviewed and measures proposed. |
Date | July 1, 2007 | August 31, 2012 | July 1, 2011 | |
Comment | Several policies and guidelines have been approved/adopted to improve the pesticide management practices in the country. No newlegal or regulatory framework is considered with the project support. | This is an old indicator and is not in the Results Framework of the Restructuring Paper of 2011. |
Completion of CESA and implementation of measures contained therein | Value | Not applicable | CESA cleared by the Bank and disclosed at InfoShop | CESA carried out and mitigation measures implement |
Date | July 1, 2007 | May 9, 2013 | May 31, 2013 | |
Comment | In the Restructuring Paper, the text is "Approved CESA available for use by the disposal company" which has been achieved. | Approved CESA was available for use for disposal company. |
Pesticide management strategy is developed | Value | No strategy available | A final draft container management strategy submit | Strategy formally adopted |
Date | July 1, 2007 | May 9, 2013 | May 31, 2013 | |
Comment | In the Restructuring Paper, the text is "A final draft container management strategy submitted to the Steering Committee forapproval" which has been achieved. |
Inventoried publicly held obsolete pesticide stocks disposed of, as a result of the completion of the disposal services contract(s)in accordance with national and international laws and regulations | Value | No disposal, no inventory | 450 tonnes | 450 tonnes of stocks disposed |
Date | July 1, 2007 | May 9, 2013 | May 31, 2013 | |
Comment | 300 tonnes being incinerated and 150 tonnes in route to disposal facility for incineration. |
Reduction of Obsolete Pesticide Associated waste Re-Accumulation | Value | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Date | June 30, 2011 | May 9, 2013 | May 31, 2013 | |
Comment | Not reported. | This is an old indicator and is not in the Results Framework of the Restructuring Paper of 2011. |
A strategy for sustainable management of future accumulations adopted by the Steering Committee by the end of the project. | Value | No strategy in place | Draft strategy prepared anddiscussed with stakeho | Strategy adopted by SC |
Date | May 9, 2013 | May 31, 2013 | ||
Comment | This is a new indicator as per Project Restructuring of 2011. |
Two planned communication tools implemented | Value | 0.00 | 2.00 | 2.00 |
Date | May 9, 2013 | May 31, 2013 | ||
Comment | This is new indicator per Restructuring Paper of 2011. The target was fully achieved - 1) posters and other similar materials wereprepared to raise awareness on the harmful nature of pesticides to human health the ecosystem; and 2) a one year TV and Radioawareness program were conducted in three local languages to raise awareness on pesticides use. | The target was fully achieved - 1) posters and other similar materials were prepared to raise awareness on the harmful nature ofpesticides to human health the ecosystem; and 2) a one year TV and Radio awareness program were conducted in three local languagesto raise awareness on pesticides use. |
- A final draft sustainable management plan for obsolete pesticides and associated wastes prepared and submitted to the SC for endorsement | Value | No plan in place | A draft prevention strategy for preventing future | A final draftstrategy finalizedand submitted to |
Date | May 9, 2013 | May 31, 2013 | ||
Comment | New indicator as per Restructuring Paper of 2011.The target has already been achieved since these strategies are drafted,presented to stakeholders and are being tabled to SC. | SC is expected to endorse |
A Pesticide Registration and Control Proclamation drafted for submission to Parliament | Value | None in place. | A revised pesticide registration and control procl | Workshops for updatingand merger of ministeriald |
Date | May 9, 2013 | May 31, 2013 | ||
Comment | New indicator as per Restructuring Paper of 2011. |
Availability of one new storage warehouse for pesticide management | Value | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Date | May 9, 2013 | May 31, 2013 | ||
Comment | New indicator as per Restructuring Paper of 2011, but the activity was dropped to release funds for disposal of OPs. | No longer reported. It is canceled. |