Financier | Commitments |
---|---|
Single Purpose Trust Fund | 3.70 |
P109775
Closed
Ismaila Ceesay
N/A
December 12, 2008
(as of board presentation)
December 12, 2008
March 20, 2009
US$ 3.70 million
N/A
2009
US$ 3.70 million
C
Not Applicable
May 31, 2012
BANK APPROVED
January 15, 2013
Financier | Commitments |
---|---|
Single Purpose Trust Fund | 3.70 |
Product Line | IBRD/IDA |
---|---|
IBRD Commitment | N/A |
IDA Commitment | N/A |
IBRD + IDA Commitment | N/A |
Lending Instrument | |
---|---|
Grant Amount | 3.70 |
Total Project Cost** | 3.70 |
Name | Review | Date |
---|---|---|
Procurement | Satisfactory | 2012-07-22 |
Progress towards achievement of PDO | Satisfactory | 2012-07-22 |
Financial Management | Satisfactory | 2012-07-22 |
Monitoring and Evaluation | Satisfactory | 2012-07-22 |
Counterpart Funding | Satisfactory | 2012-07-22 |
Project Management | Satisfactory | 2012-07-22 |
Overall Implementation Progress (IP) | Satisfactory | 2012-07-22 |
INDICATOR | BASELINE | CURRENT | TARGET |
---|
Reduction in number of days taken to process payment vouchers. | Value | 14.00 | 7.00 | 4.00 |
Date | December 31, 2009 | May 20, 2011 | January 31, 2012 | |
Comment | Number of Days | Number of days | No of Days |
Improvement in the effectiveness of payroll controls, as measured by PEFA indicator 18. | Value | PEFA PI-18 Score 'D+' | PEFA PI-18 Score 'C' | PEFA PI-18 Score C+ |
Date | December 31, 2009 | May 20, 2011 | January 31, 2012 | |
Comment | PEFA PI-18 Score 'D' | PEFA PI-18 Score 'C' | PEFA PI-18 Score C+ |
Regularity and timeliness of account reconciliations improved. | Value | 25.00 | 5.00 | 5.00 |
Date | December 31, 2009 | May 31, 2011 | May 31, 2012 | |
Comment | Days | Bank reconciliation for all centrally managed bank accounts take place at the end of the each month. System generated reports arerun within 5 days. | Days |
Improvement in quality of in-year budget reports as measured by PEFA indicator 24. | Value | PEFA PI-24 Score 'C' | PEFA PI-24 Score 'D+' | PEFA PI-24 Score 'B' |
Date | December 31, 2009 | May 31, 2012 | May 31, 2012 | |
Comment | PEFA PI-24 Score 'C' | Improved quality and coverage of in-year budget information will depend on effective use of IFMIS for financial recording andreporting, and effective bank reconciliation under IFMIS. The in-year budget reports for FY2010/11 were compiled from differentsources in a fragmented arrangement but with introduction of an IFMIS system this situation will soon be ameliorated. | PEFA PI-24 Score 'B' |
Reduction in number of months taken from close of the fiscal year to submit external audit reports to the legislature. | Value | 0.00 | 18.00 | 12.00 |
Date | December 31, 2009 | May 31, 2012 | May 31, 2012 | |
Comment | No reports submitted | IFMIS went live in July 2011. The first full year of the systems operation will be June 30, 2012. First final account from thesystem is yet to be prepared. | Reports to be submitted within 6-12 months of FY end. |
INDICATOR | BASELINE | CURRENT | TARGET |
---|
Number of departments/units where IFMIS is operational. | Value | 0.00 | 0.00 | 3.00 |
Date | December 31, 2009 | June 18, 2010 | January 31, 2012 | |
Comment | IFMIS Roll out to Departments and Units | IFMIS Roll out to Departments and Units | IFMIS Roll out to Departments and Units |
In-year reports are generated using IFMIS and published. | Value | 0 | 0 | 10 |
Date | December 31, 2009 | May 20, 2011 | January 31, 2012 | |
Comment | Report generation is manual but publication not regular | Reports generated through interim IT system but publication remains irregular | Reports generated by the IFMIS and published within 10 days of month-end. |
Percentage of civil servants registered in the HRMIS | Value | 0.00 | 40.00 | 75.00 |
Date | December 31, 2009 | May 20, 2011 | January 31, 2012 | |
Comment | HRMIS not fully functional | HRMIS only beginning to function. | Full productivity of HRMIS as IFMIS module |
Number of days taken to process payment vouchers | Value | 14.00 | 4.00 | 4.00 |
Date | December 31, 2009 | May 31, 2012 | May 31, 2012 | |
Comment | Number of days taken to process payment vouchers | Number of days taken to process payment vouchers | Number of days taken to process payment vouchers |
% of spending units that are using the new and simplified accounting manual | Value | 0.00 | 90.00 | 90.00 |
Date | December 31, 2009 | May 31, 2012 | May 31, 2012 | |
Comment | No simplified accounting manual in place | 90% transactions of the consolidated fund via the IFMIS – an upgrade from the traditional spending unit manual accounting processes. | Simplified accounting manual publicly available |
% of spending units where improved cash books are in use | Value | 0.00 | 100.00 | 90.00 |
Date | December 31, 2009 | May 31, 2012 | May 31, 2012 | |
Comment | Very basic and mundane cash books in use | Centralized cash management and systems based cash book covering all GoL consolidated fund transactions. | Spending units have complete knowledge and control of their cash situation through improved book keeping. |