Skip to Main Navigation

TG-Community Dev. Project ERL (FY08)

Development Objective

To provide poor communities with improved basic socio-economic infrastructures and income generating activities by financing, among others, at least 350 subprojects to be identified and implemented directly to communities.

Key Details

Project Details

  • P110943

  • Closed

  • John Van Dyck

  • N/A

  • Togo

  • May 1, 2008

  • (as of board presentation)

    June 26, 2008

  • September 10, 2008

  • US$ 25.90 million

  • B

  • Not Applicable

  • September 30, 2013

  • BANK APPROVED

  • January 15, 2013

  • Notes

Finances

Financing Plan (US$ Millions)

No data available.
Financier Commitments
IDA Grant 25.90

Total Project Financing (US$ Millions)

Product Line IBRD/IDA
IBRD Commitment N/A
IDA Commitment 25.90
IBRD + IDA Commitment 25.90
Lending Instrument
Grant Amount N/A
Total Project Cost** 25.90

Summary Status of World Bank Financing (US$ Millions) as of April 30, 2025

Download:
No data available.
Financier Approval Date Closing Date Principal Disbursed Repayments Interest, Charges & Fees

Detailed Financial Activity as of April 30, 2025

Download:
No data available.
Period Financier Transaction Type Amount (US$)
Apr 1, 2014 IDA-H6020 Loan Disb -6,173.84
Apr 1, 2014 IDA-H6020 Loan Cancel 12,937.07
Jun 26, 2008 IDA-H4090 Loan Commitment 17,200,000.00
Jun 29, 2010 IDA-H6020 Loan Commitment 8,700,000.00

Footnotes

Ratings

IMPLEMENTATION RATINGS

Name Review Date
Counterpart Funding Satisfactory 2013-06-25
Overall Implementation Progress (IP) Satisfactory 2013-06-25
Project Management Satisfactory 2013-06-25
Monitoring and Evaluation Moderately Unsatisfactory 2013-06-25
Progress towards achievement of PDO Satisfactory 2013-06-25
Procurement Satisfactory 2013-06-25
Financial Management Satisfactory 2013-06-25

COMPLETION RATINGS

INDICATORIMPLEMENTATION COMPLETION & RESULTS REPORT: 03-28-2014
Outcomes
Risk to Development OutcomeSubstantial
Bank Performance
Borrower Performance
Government Performance
Implementing Agency

INDEPENDENT EVALUATION RATINGS

INDICATORICR REVIEW: 08-27-2014PROJECT PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT REPORT:
Outcome RatingSatisfactory N/a
Risk To Development OutcomeModerateN/a
Bank PerformanceSatisfactoryN/a
Borrower PerformanceModerately SatisfactoryN/a
Government PerformanceModerately SatisfactoryN/a
Implementing AgencyModerately SatisfactoryN/a
Icr QualitySatisfactoryN/a
M&e QualitySubstantialN/a

Results Framework

PROJECT DEVELOPMENT OBJECTIVE INDICATORS

INDICATORBASELINECURRENTTARGET
  • Female beneficiariesValue0.000.0050.00
    DateSeptember 30, 2013September 30, 2013
    Comment
  • People with access to an improved water sourceValue0.0067652.0030000.00
    DateSeptember 17, 2012June 30, 2013
    Comment
  • Students enrolled in constructed/rehabilitated schoolsValue0.00185758.0072000.00
    DateSeptember 30, 2013September 30, 2013
    Commentboys: 107562girls: 78196This indicator measures all students in schools that benefited from construction, rehabilitation, orreceiving equipment under the project.
  • People directly involved in new or improved income-generating activitiesValue0.005555.001500.00
    DateSeptember 30, 2013September 30, 2013
    Comment
  • Farmers with access to fertilizer/seedsValue0.0013377.0014000.00
    DateSeptember 30, 2013September 30, 2013
    Comment
  • Students receiving at least a meal per dayValue0.0061466.0057000.00
    DateSeptember 30, 2013September 30, 2013
    Commenta sample of 16,895 students drawn from 4 regions showed that 46% of students receiving school meals were girls.
  • Beneficiaries of public works programsValue0.0025766.0025000.00
    DateSeptember 30, 2013September 30, 2013
    Comment
  • Repartition of financing of subprojects consistent with regional targeting criteria as estimated by the QUIBB 2006 SurveyValue09%Variance between QUIBB2006 repartition and actual
    DateSeptember 10, 2008September 30, 2013September 30, 2013
    CommentNB. This indicator measures the average percentage difference between each region's relative contribution to national poverty andthe actual disbursements to each region for sub-projects.
  • Number of subprojects functioning one year after completionValue090%
    DateSeptember 10, 2008September 30, 2013September 30, 2013
    Comment
  • Direct project beneficiariesValue0.00329596.00199500.00
    DateSeptember 30, 2013September 30, 2013
    Comment
  • Area under improved land managementValue0.002064.002200.00
    DateSeptember 30, 2013September 30, 2013
    Comment

INTERMEDIATE RESULTS INDICATORS

INDICATORBASELINECURRENTTARGET
  • Young people (aged less than 35) employed (%)Value0.0058.0075.00
    DateMarch 12, 2013June 30, 2013
    Comment
  • Female participation (%)Value0.0040.5050.00
    DateMarch 12, 2013June 30, 2013
    Comment
  • Annual Net Increase in Cash Income of Targeted Participants compared to Control Group (%)Value0.000.0030.00
    DateSeptember 17, 2012June 30, 2013
    Commentdata not available
  • Total cost allocated to wages (%)Value0.0071.1270.00
    DateMarch 12, 2013June 30, 2013
    Comment
  • Basic Socio-Economic Infrastructure Subprojects completed (Number)Value0.00290.00200.00
    DateMarch 12, 2013June 30, 2013
    Comment
  • Health Facilities constructed, renovated and/or equipped (number)Value0.0015.0040.00
    DateSeptember 17, 2012June 30, 2013
    Comment
  • Meals provided to Primary School Students (in thousands) (annual)Value23521701312100
    DateMarch 12, 2013June 30, 2013
    Comment
  • Basic Socio-Economic Infrastructures Assessed as Having Satisfactory Technical Quality (%)Value0.000.000.00
    DateSeptember 17, 2012June 30, 2013
    Commentto be assessed in Technical Audit
  • Schools providing Primary School Children with one Fruit per day (%)Value0.000.0050.00
    DateSeptember 17, 2012June 30, 2013
    CommentWhile fruit was sometimes available to children, there is no data available.
  • Person Days of Work Provided (number)Value0.00783391.001000000.00
    DateMarch 12, 2013June 30, 2013
    Comment
  • Classrooms built or rehabilitated (number)Value0.00705.00360.00
    DateSeptember 17, 2012June 30, 2013
    Comment
  • Improved Community Water points constructed or rehabilitated under the Project (number)Value0.0081.0030.00
    DateSeptember 17, 2012June 30, 2013
    Comment
  • Income-Generating Activities Sub-Projects (number)Value0.00294.00150.00
    DateSeptember 17, 2012June 30, 2013
    Comment
  • Schools Successfully Implementing the School Feeding Program (number)Value84.00256.00180.00
    DateMarch 12, 2013June 30, 2013
    Comment
  • (i) Commercial SeedsValue0844356
    DateSeptember 17, 2012June 30, 2013
    Comment
  • (2) Foundation Seeds DistributedValue01414
    DateSeptember 17, 2012June 30, 2013
    Comment
  • Number of DVC members successfully trainedValue082802100
    DateSeptember 10, 2008September 17, 2012June 30, 2013
    Comment
  • AGAIB Project management expenses as a % of disbursements for subprojects.Value015.1115
    DateSeptember 10, 2008September 17, 2012June 30, 2013
    Comment
  • Percentage of DVC's that are inclusive (at least 25% of members are women, well-representative and well-trained)Value0100%90%
    DateSeptember 10, 2008May 17, 2012June 30, 2013
    CommentAll Development village committee have at least 30% of women as members
  • Number of IFR submitted by AGAIB to the TS on a monthly basis, within 15 days following the end of the monthValue08090
    DateSeptember 10, 2008March 12, 2013June 30, 2013
    Comment1 IFR submitted by each AGAIB each quarter
  • Number of IFR submitted by TS to the World Bank within 45 days from the end of each quarterValue01618
    DateSeptember 10, 2008March 12, 2013June 30, 2013
    Comment
  • Quantity of fertilizer procured and distributed by farmers (Tons)Value042754,275
    DateSeptember 10, 2008September 17, 2012June 30, 2013
    Comment
  • Seeds procured and distributed to farmers (Tons) (Includes both commerical and foundation seeds)Value0858370
    DateSeptember 10, 2008September 17, 2012June 30, 2010
    Comment
  • Participants below the poverty line (%)Value0.000.0075.00
    DateSeptember 17, 2012June 30, 2013
    CommentData not available
  • Public works scheme completed with satisfactory technical quality (%)Value0.000.0075.00
    DateSeptember 17, 2012June 30, 2013
    Commentto be assessed in technical audit