Skip to Main Navigation

Municipal Development Program

Abstract*

The objective of the Municipal Development Program Project for West Bank and Gaza is to improve municipal management practices for better transparency. There are four components to the project: the first component of the project is to provide grant allocations to municipalities for capital investments and service provision. It will cover the costs of goods, works and services. It addresses two key constraints for municipalities: severe municipal deficits...

* The project abstract is drawn from the PAD, SAR or PGD and may not accurately reflect the project's current nature

Show More

Development Objective

The objective of Phase I of the MDP is to improve municipal management practices for better transparency.

Key Details

Project Details

  • P111741

  • Closed

  • Christianna Brotsis

  • N/A

  • West Bank and Gaza

  • October 14, 2008

  • (as of board presentation)

    September 17, 2009

  • January 26, 2010

  • US$ 10.00 million

  • B

  • Not Applicable

  • August 31, 2013

  • BANK APPROVED

  • August 7, 2014

  • Notes

Finances

Financing Plan (US$ Millions)

No data available.
Financier Commitments
Special Financing 10.00

Total Project Financing (US$ Millions)

Product Line IBRD/IDA
IBRD Commitment N/A
IDA Commitment N/A
IBRD + IDA Commitment N/A
Lending Instrument
Grant Amount 10.00
Total Project Cost** 10.00

Summary Status of World Bank Financing (US$ Millions) as of July 31, 2025

Download:
No data available.
Financier Approval Date Closing Date Principal Disbursed Repayments Interest, Charges & Fees

Detailed Financial Activity as of July 31, 2025

Download:
No data available.
Period Financier Transaction Type Amount (US$)

Footnotes

Ratings

IMPLEMENTATION RATINGS

Name Review Date
Overall Implementation Progress (IP) Satisfactory 2014-01-09
Project Management Satisfactory 2014-01-09
Progress towards achievement of PDO Satisfactory 2014-01-09
Procurement Satisfactory 2014-01-09
Counterpart Funding Moderately Satisfactory 2014-01-09
Financial Management Satisfactory 2014-01-09
Monitoring and Evaluation Satisfactory 2014-01-09

COMPLETION RATINGS

INDICATORIMPLEMENTATION COMPLETION & RESULTS REPORT: 04-30-2014
OutcomesSubstantial
Risk to Development OutcomeSubstantial
Bank PerformanceSubstantial
Borrower PerformanceSubstantial
Government PerformanceModerately Satisfactory
Implementing AgencySubstantial

INDEPENDENT EVALUATION RATINGS

INDICATORICR REVIEW: 03-31-2015PROJECT PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT REPORT: 06-16-2015
Outcome RatingSatisfactory Moderately Satisfactory
Risk To Development OutcomeSignificantSubstantial
Bank PerformanceSatisfactoryModerately Satisfactory
Borrower PerformanceModerately SatisfactoryModerately Satisfactory
Government PerformanceModerately SatisfactoryNot Rated
Implementing AgencyModerately SatisfactorySatisfactory
Icr QualitySatisfactoryNot Rated
M&e QualitySubstantialModest

Results Framework

PROJECT DEVELOPMENT OBJECTIVE INDICATORS

INDICATORBASELINECURRENTTARGET
  • Municipalities that apply at least two public disclosure methods (publicly available SDIPs, annual external audits, project relateddata, municipal budgets and performance rankings)Value0.0068.0060.00
    DateSeptember 1, 2009May 16, 2013August 31, 2013
    Comment68 % of municipalities disclosed information in at least two of three areas (a) financial data and municipal budgets, (b)municipal ranking,(c) projects and achievements
  • Municipalities that graduate up the performance category in which they are currently classifiedValue0.0096.0030.00
    DateSeptember 1, 2009September 27, 2013August 31, 2013
    Comment

INTERMEDIATE RESULTS INDICATORS

INDICATORBASELINECURRENTTARGET
  • Investments financed that were identified in the municipal Strategic Development PlansValue0.00100.00100.00
    DateSeptember 1, 2009May 16, 2013August 31, 2013
    Commentll the municipalities that have SDIPs submitted sub-projects that are already identified in their SDIPs. (37 sub-projects) in the1st cycle and (198 ) in the 2nd cycle.
  • Investments financed that are operationalValue0.0097.0080.00
    DateSeptember 1, 2009May 16, 2013August 31, 2013
    CommentBased on the technical audit & usability assessment which was conducted by individual consultants in West Bank and Gaza, the auditreports indicated that the functionality, usability, and sustainability of the selected sample of sub-projects (30) are acceptableand satisfactory.
  • Amalgamation InitiativesValue4.008.006.00
    DateSeptember 1, 2010May 16, 2013August 31, 2013
    Comment(The World Bank is not financing this activity)4 new municipalities have emerged from the Ministry of Local Government's amalgamation process
  • Energy EfficiencyValue0.004.002.00
    DateSeptember 1, 2009May 16, 2013August 31, 2013
    CommentOne year after the installation of energy saving equipment’s, a post process evaluation was conducted. - The results for themeasurement and verification in 2012 indicated a noticeable achievements regarding the energy savings in the 4 pilotedmunicipalities inthe amount reached 1,523,235 KWH (165,479 Euro)
  • One Stop ShopsValue0.003.003.00
    DateSeptember 1, 2009May 16, 2013August 31, 2013
    CommentWork is underway in all 3 targeted municipalities.
  • Municipal Performance ImprovementsValue5.0095.5025.00
    DateSeptember 1, 2009May 16, 2013August 31, 2013
    CommentThe municipal graduation by end of MDPI is described as follows:Graduated E-C: 17Graduated E-B: 6Graduated D-C:61Graduated D-B: 29Graduated C-B : 13No change 5: (3 in C, 2 in E)Two newly amalgamated – BBackward (E-F) : 1(AlOja)
  • MDLF Satisfactory PerformanceValueSatisfactorySatisfactory
    DateSeptember 1, 2009May 16, 2013August 31, 2013
    CommentSatisfactorySatisfactory
  • Operations and MaintenanceValueO & M Planning is ad-hoc and not linked to budgetO & M procedures are piloted in at least 5 Municip
    DateSeptember 1, 2009May 16, 2013August 31, 2013
    CommentThe manual has been developed and is currently under Roll Out to 10 municipalities.
  • Direct project beneficiariesValue0.002117160.004800000.00
    DateSeptember 1, 2009December 1, 2012August 31, 2013
    CommentThis represents the estimated number of direct beneficiaries by the end of Cycle 1 implementation.
  • Roads rehabilitated, Non-ruralValue0.00162.00300.00
    DateSeptember 1, 2009May 16, 2013August 31, 2013
    Comment
  • Female beneficiariesValue0.0049.0049.00
    DateSeptember 1, 2009December 1, 2012August 31, 2013
    Comment