Skip to Main Navigation

Mozambique Education Sector Support Program Fast Track Initiative Catalytic Fund

Development Objective

To improve the access, quality and equity of primary and secondary education by supporting the implementation of the Government's Strategic Plan for Education and Culture 2006-2011.

Key Details

Project Details

  • P112052

  • Closed

  • Sophie Naudeau

  • N/A

  • Mozambique

  • August 13, 2008

  • (as of board presentation)

    August 13, 2008

  • September 11, 2008

  • US$ 79.00 million

  • B

  • Not Applicable

  • December 31, 2010

  • BANK APPROVED

  • December 20, 2023

  • Notes

Finances

Financing Plan (US$ Millions)

No data available.
Financier Commitments
EFA-FTI Education Program Development Fund 79.00

Total Project Financing (US$ Millions)

Product Line IBRD/IDA
IBRD Commitment N/A
IDA Commitment N/A
IBRD + IDA Commitment N/A
Lending Instrument
Grant Amount 79.00
Total Project Cost** 79.00

Summary Status of World Bank Financing (US$ Millions) as of April 30, 2025

Download:
No data available.
Financier Approval Date Closing Date Principal Disbursed Repayments Interest, Charges & Fees

Detailed Financial Activity as of April 30, 2025

Download:
No data available.
Period Financier Transaction Type Amount (US$)

Footnotes

Ratings

IMPLEMENTATION RATINGS

Name Review Date
Monitoring and Evaluation Moderately Satisfactory 2010-06-26
Progress towards achievement of PDO Satisfactory 2010-06-26
Project Management Satisfactory 2010-06-26
Financial Management Satisfactory 2010-06-26
Procurement Moderately Satisfactory 2010-06-26

COMPLETION RATINGS

INDICATORIMPLEMENTATION COMPLETION & RESULTS REPORT: 06-27-2012
Outcomes
Risk to Development OutcomeSubstantial
Bank Performance
Borrower Performance
Government Performance
Implementing Agency

INDEPENDENT EVALUATION RATINGS

INDICATORICR REVIEW: 03-14-2013PROJECT PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT REPORT:
Outcome RatingModerately Satisfactory N/a
Risk To Development OutcomeModerateN/a
Bank PerformanceModerately SatisfactoryN/a
Borrower PerformanceModerately SatisfactoryN/a
Government PerformanceModerately SatisfactoryN/a
Implementing AgencyModerately SatisfactoryN/a
Icr QualitySatisfactoryN/a
M&e QualityModestN/a

Results Framework

PROJECT DEVELOPMENT OBJECTIVE INDICATORS

INDICATORBASELINECURRENTTARGET
  • Primary completion rateValue38%49,2% Total for day shift 42,3% Girls attending d48%
    DateDecember 30, 2007March 30, 2010December 30, 2010
    Comment The completion rate is related to the year 2009. The net enrollment rate for girls at 6 years old increased from 73% in 2008 to 75%in 2009. MEC statistics has been based in the census 1997.Adjustments based on the new population census are yet to be done.
  • Students enrolled in primary educationValue4,100,0004.986.3384,600,000
    DateDecember 30, 2007March 30, 2010December 30, 2010
    Comment Published MEC statistics - 2009 and the Joint report presented to the annual review meeting The number is related to the number of students in public schools and does not include 74.297 students that are registered in theevening classes(grades 6 and 7 ). As per MoE statistics the number of studentsin private schools in primary ed ucation is just 86. 124
  • Students enrolled in secondary educationValue425,000735.330 - Day and evening shift public schools 514,000
    DateDecember 30, 2007March 30, 2010December 30, 2010
    Comment Secondary education has a deficit of schools and a great number of students registered in the evening classes would be in normalsituation in the day shift clas ses. For this reason the total above includesincludes lower and upper secondary education (grades 8-12) day and eveningshifts in public schools. (Data is for 2009 and is based on non published MEC statistics.)
  • Illiteracy rate reducedValue57%48%50%
    DateDecember 30, 2007March 30, 2010December 30, 2010
    Comment Data collected from MEC report presented to Joint Committee Group in September 2009 and confirmed in March 2010)

INTERMEDIATE RESULTS INDICATORS

INDICATORBASELINECURRENTTARGET
  • Classrooms built or rehabilitated (number)Value2503601250
    DateDecember 30, 2007March 30, 2010December 30, 2010
    Comment The original target will not be achieved on time. Delays have been explained by deficient supervision and understimation ofcosts. Low quality of civil works has been flagged to MEC. Changes have beendiscussed and MoE will soon pilot a new methodology for school construction.The procurement of independent supervis ors was also initiated.
  • Teachers graduated from pre-service teacher training (number)Value5,8001280210,000
    DateDecember 30, 2007June 9, 2010December 30, 2010
    Comment In 2009 pupil teacher ratio was 67,7. 75% of the teachers graduated in 2009 (10327) were trained under the new model.
  • Teachers recruited into education system per year (number)Value11,245EP- 9810 of which 43% are female; ESG ( grades 8-12,000
    DateDecember 30, 2007December 30, 2009December 30, 2010
    Comment The introduction of quick models of teacher training such as 10+1 for primary education teachers and 12+1 for 8-10 grade led to areduction in pupil teacher rat io. However, the impact in quality is not known.Actual ratio is 67,7 in EP 1( 1 -5 grades)
  • School receiving Direct Budget SupportValueAll primary schoolsSchools EP1- 10027 EP2: 2577 ESG1: 312All primary school
    DateDecember 30, 2007October 19, 2009December 30, 2010
    Comment All primary school and secondary schools receiving grants
  • Textbooks purchased per year (number)Value8,200,00014.000.00014,000,000
    DateDecember 30, 2007March 30, 2010December 30, 2010
    Comment The process of acquisition and distribution of new books for 2010 was finalized in February 2010. The distribution of free schoolbooks is done with the minimu m number of intermediaries and a major achievementwas the reduction of the ille gal selling of books. It is now underway theprocurement for the books to be dis tributed in 2011.