Sixth Poverty Reduction Support Grant

Abstract*

The Sixth Poverty Reduction Support Grant Program (PRSG-6) continues to support the Government of Rwanda as it implements measures to foster broad based growth in the context of enhanced decentralization reforms. PRSG-6 is the third operation in the second series of PRSGs (beginning with PRSG-4). It forms an integral part of the Bank's Country Assistance Strategy (CAS), approved by the Board of Executive Directors on September 26, 2008 in support... Show More

Development Objective

DON'T PUB OLD

Key Details

Project Details

Project ID
P113241
Status
Closed
Team Leader
Kenechukwu Ezemenari
Borrower 2
N/A

Country
Rwanda
Disclosure Date
March 30, 2010
Approval Date
(as of board presentation)
March 30, 2010
Effective Date
June 2, 2010

Total Project Cost 1
US$ 115.90 million
Implementing Agency
N/A
Region
Eastern and Southern Africa
Fiscal Year 3
2010

Commitment Amount
US$ 115.90 million
Environmental Category
N/A
Environmental and Social Risk
Not Applicable
Closing Date
June 30, 2011

Last Stage Reached
BANK APPROVED
Parent Projects
P106083
Last Update Date
August 1, 2024

Associated Projects
P117495

Notes
1. Total project cost includes funding from World Bank and non-bank sources in US$ millions. Active and Closed projects show current commitments. Proposed (pipeline) and dropped projects show the forecast amount. The commitment amount for projects in the pipeline is indicative and may be modified during the project preparation.
2. Borrower refers to the Borrower of a Loan or Recipient of a Grant.
3. ”Fiscal Year” is the fiscal year in which the project was approved (or dropped if the status is dropped). The World Bank's fiscal year is from July 1 - June 30. For example, a fiscal year of 1996 corresponds to July 1, 1995 - June 30, 1996.

Sectors

Themes

FY17 - Human Development and Gender

FY17 - Education16%
- FY17 - Access to Education4%
- FY17 - Science and Technology4%
- FY17 - Standards, Curriculum and Textbooks4%
- FY17 - Teachers4%

FY17 - Private Sector Development

FY17 - Jobs5%
- FY17 - Job Creation5%

FY17 - Public Sector Management

FY17 - Public Administration31%
- FY17 - Administrative and Civil Service Reform23%
- FY17 - Transparency, Accountability and Good Governance8%
FY17 - Public Finance Management8%
- FY17 - Public Expenditure Management8%

FY17 - Urban and Rural Development

FY17 - Rural Development5%
- FY17 - Rural Infrastructure and service delivery5%
FY17 - Urban Development37%
- FY17 - Services and Housing for the Poor32%
- FY17 - Urban Infrastructure and Service Delivery5%

Project Map

Interactive Map

Finances

Financing Plan (US$ Millions)

Financier	Commitments
IDA Grant	115.90

Total Project Financing (US$ Millions)

Product Line	IBRD/IDA
IBRD Commitment	N/A
IDA Commitment	115.90
IBRD + IDA Commitment	115.90

Lending Instrument
Grant Amount	N/A
Total Project Cost**	115.90

Summary Status of World Bank Financing (US$ Millions) as of July 31, 2025

No data available.

Detailed Financial Activity as of July 31, 2025

Download:

Period	Financier	Transaction Type	Amount (US$)
Mar 30, 2010	IDA-H5540	Loan Commitment	115,800,000.00

Footnotes

Ratings

IMPLEMENTATION RATINGS

Name	Review	Date
Program Management	Satisfactory	2011-03-16
Summary Global Objective Rating	Satisfactory	2011-03-16
Counterpart Funding	Satisfactory	2011-03-16
Monitoring and Evaluation	Satisfactory	2011-03-16
Overall Implementation Progress (IP)	Satisfactory	2011-03-16
Progress towards achievement of PDO	Satisfactory	2011-03-16
Procurement	Satisfactory	2011-03-16
Project Management	Satisfactory	2011-03-16
Financial Management	Satisfactory	2011-03-16

COMPLETION RATINGS

INDICATOR	IMPLEMENTATION COMPLETION & RESULTS REPORT: 01-31-2013
Outcomes	Substantial
Risk to Development Outcome	Negligible
Bank Performance	Substantial
Borrower Performance	Substantial
Government Performance	Substantial
Implementing Agency	Substantial

INDEPENDENT EVALUATION RATINGS

INDICATOR	ICR REVIEW: 06-08-2016	PROJECT PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT REPORT: 09-25-2018
Outcome Rating	Moderately Satisfactory	Moderately Satisfactory
Risk To Development Outcome	Moderate	Moderate
Bank Performance	Moderately Satisfactory	Moderately Satisfactory
Borrower Performance	Moderately Satisfactory	Moderately Satisfactory
Government Performance	Moderately Satisfactory
Implementing Agency	Moderately Satisfactory	Moderately Satisfactory
Icr Quality	Unsatisfactory
M&e Quality	Modest	Modest

Results Framework

PROJECT DEVELOPMENT OBJECTIVE INDICATORS

INDICATOR		BASELINE	CURRENT	TARGET

INTERMEDIATE RESULTS INDICATORS

INDICATOR		BASELINE	CURRENT	TARGET

Credit to the private sector (as % of GDP) Value 10.00 11.70 12.20
Date December 31, 2006 June 30, 2010 June 30, 2010
Comment Baseline drawn from CPAF Indicator achieved at 96 percent of target.

Number of households and firms with access to electricity	Value	91332.00	159516.00	139000.00
	Date	December 31, 2006	June 30, 2010	June 30, 2010
	Comment	Baseline drawn from CPAF	Indicator achieved at 115 percent of target

MegaWatt of electricity generated Value 45.00 84.00 80.00
Date December 31, 2006 June 30, 2010 June 30, 2010
Comment Baseline drawn from CPAF Indicator achieved at 105 percent of target.
Classified District Road Network in Good Condition Value 15.00 23.00 28.00
Date December 31, 2006 June 30, 2010 June 30, 2010
Comment Baseline drawn from CPAF Indicator underachieved (82 percent of target)
Population with access to clean drinking water Value 64.00 76.20 75.00
Date December 31, 2006 June 30, 2010 June 30, 2010
Comment Baseline drawn from CPAF Indicator achieved at 102 percent of target.
P0pulation with access to hygienic sanitation Value 38.00 56.30 50.00
Date December 31, 2006 June 30, 2010 June 30, 2010
Comment Baseline drawn from CPAF Indicator achieved at 113 percent of target.

Proportion of arable land protected against soil erosion	Value	40.00	80.90	50.00
	Date	December 31, 2006	June 30, 2010	June 30, 2010
	Comment	Baseline drawn from CPAF	Indicator achieved (at a level of 160 percent of target)

Mineral Fertilizer used (MT) Value 14000.00 27906.00 30800.00
Date December 31, 2006 June 30, 2010 June 30, 2010
Comment Baseline drawn from CPAF Indicator achieved at a level of 91 percent of target.
Employees satisfied with performance of TVET graduates Value 0.00 0.00 9.00
Date June 30, 2010
Comment No baseline No data measurement available

Districts achieving minimum of 80 percent of their service delivery and development targets for which they are responsible	Value	60.00	67.00	65.00
	Date	December 31, 2006	June 30, 2010	June 30, 2010
	Comment	Baseline drawn from CPAF	Indicator achieved at 103 percent of target.

Performing Budget Agencies Value 0.00 0.00 25.00
Date June 30, 2010 June 30, 2010
Comment No baseline No data measurement available

Transition from basic education (TC) to upper secondary education	Value	82.00	90.20	82.00
	Date	December 31, 2006	June 30, 2010	June 30, 2010
	Comment	Baseline drawn from CPAF	Indicator achieved at a level of 110 percent of target.

Credit to the private sector (as % of GDP)	Value	10.00	11.70	12.20
	Date	December 31, 2006	June 30, 2010	June 30, 2010
	Comment	Baseline drawn from CPAF	Indicator achieved at 96 percent of target.

MegaWatt of electricity generated	Value	45.00	84.00	80.00
	Date	December 31, 2006	June 30, 2010	June 30, 2010
	Comment	Baseline drawn from CPAF	Indicator achieved at 105 percent of target.

Classified District Road Network in Good Condition	Value	15.00	23.00	28.00
	Date	December 31, 2006	June 30, 2010	June 30, 2010
	Comment	Baseline drawn from CPAF	Indicator underachieved (82 percent of target)

Population with access to clean drinking water	Value	64.00	76.20	75.00
	Date	December 31, 2006	June 30, 2010	June 30, 2010
	Comment	Baseline drawn from CPAF	Indicator achieved at 102 percent of target.

P0pulation with access to hygienic sanitation	Value	38.00	56.30	50.00
	Date	December 31, 2006	June 30, 2010	June 30, 2010
	Comment	Baseline drawn from CPAF	Indicator achieved at 113 percent of target.

Mineral Fertilizer used (MT)	Value	14000.00	27906.00	30800.00
	Date	December 31, 2006	June 30, 2010	June 30, 2010
	Comment	Baseline drawn from CPAF	Indicator achieved at a level of 91 percent of target.

Employees satisfied with performance of TVET graduates	Value	0.00	0.00	9.00
	Date			June 30, 2010
	Comment	No baseline	No data measurement available

Performing Budget Agencies	Value	0.00	0.00	25.00
	Date		June 30, 2010	June 30, 2010
	Comment	No baseline	No data measurement available