Financier | Commitments |
---|---|
AUSTRALIA: Australian Agency for International Development | 21.44 |
Education for All - Fast Track Initiative | 30.00 |
P114609
Closed
Boun Oum Inthaxoum
N/A
October 1, 2009
(as of board presentation)
July 20, 2010
August 12, 2010
US$ 51.44 million
N/A
2011
US$ 51.44 million
C
Not Applicable
August 31, 2014
BANK APPROVED
August 5, 2024
Financier | Commitments |
---|---|
AUSTRALIA: Australian Agency for International Development | 21.44 |
Education for All - Fast Track Initiative | 30.00 |
Product Line | IBRD/IDA |
---|---|
IBRD Commitment | N/A |
IDA Commitment | N/A |
IBRD + IDA Commitment | N/A |
Lending Instrument | |
---|---|
Grant Amount | 51.44 |
Total Project Cost** | 51.44 |
Name | Review | Date |
---|---|---|
Progress towards achievement of PDO | Moderately Satisfactory | 2014-07-05 |
Financial Management | Moderately Satisfactory | 2014-07-05 |
Counterpart Funding | Satisfactory | 2014-07-05 |
Monitoring and Evaluation | Satisfactory | 2014-07-05 |
Overall | Low | 2014-07-05 |
Procurement | Satisfactory | 2014-07-05 |
Overall Implementation Progress (IP) | Moderately Satisfactory | 2014-07-05 |
Project Management | Satisfactory | 2014-07-05 |
Overall Safeguards Rating | Satisfactory | 2014-07-05 |
INDICATOR | IMPLEMENTATION COMPLETION & RESULTS REPORT: 02-26-2015 |
---|---|
Outcomes | Moderately Satisfactory |
Risk to Development Outcome | Modest |
Bank Performance | Moderately Satisfactory |
Borrower Performance | Substantial |
Government Performance | Substantial |
Implementing Agency | Substantial |
INDICATOR | ICR REVIEW: 05-27-2015 | PROJECT PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT REPORT: |
---|---|---|
Outcome Rating | Moderately Satisfactory | N/a |
Risk To Development Outcome | Moderate | N/a |
Bank Performance | Moderately Satisfactory | N/a |
Borrower Performance | Satisfactory | N/a |
Government Performance | Satisfactory | N/a |
Implementing Agency | Satisfactory | N/a |
Icr Quality | Satisfactory | N/a |
M&e Quality | Substantial | N/a |
INDICATOR | BASELINE | CURRENT | TARGET |
---|
Primary completion survival rate to grade 5 in targeted districts | Value | 54.20 | 60.00 | 62.00 |
Date | August 11, 2011 | May 9, 2014 | August 31, 2014 | |
Comment | The baseline data is for academic year 2008-2009 | Academic year 2012-13 |
Gender parity index for primary education | Value | 0.88 | 0.96 | 0.97 |
Date | August 11, 2011 | May 9, 2014 | August 31, 2014 | |
Comment | Data for academic year 2008-2009 | Data is for academic year 2012-13 |
System for learning assessment at the primary level | Value | Yes | Yes | Yes |
Date | August 11, 2011 | May 9, 2014 | August 31, 2014 | |
Comment | ASLO of students grade 5 on 3 subjects | Completed data collection and conducted workshops on data cleaning, coding and entry. RIES developed four summary versions of theASLO report and shared with four groups : (i) RIES staff, (ii) central MoES staff, (iii) provincial staff and, and (iv) districtstaff and teachers. The results are shared with the first three group and RIES will share with the last group over the next fewmonths. | ASLO of students grade 3 on 2 subjects |
Dropout rate of primary education grade 1 to 5 | Value | 7.50 | 6.30 | 3.50 |
Date | August 11, 2011 | May 9, 2014 | August 31, 2014 | |
Comment | Data is for academic year 2008-2009 | Data is for academic year 2012-13 |
Dropout rate for program target area (grade, gender) | Value | Program:G1-5=?Total average: 8 G1: 18.4Female: | 11.3F: 11.2%G1: 16.2F:16.2G2: 9.1F:9.4G3: | 4.5F: 4.4Female:4.4 |
Date | August 11, 2011 | May 9, 2014 | August 31, 2014 | |
Comment | Data is for academic year 2012-13 |
Education Quality Standards (EQS) Framework approved and adopted at school level | Value | EQS approved and adopted at school level | ||
Date | August 11, 2011 | May 9, 2014 | August 31, 2014 | |
Comment | Over 2011and 2012 the MoES transitioned from a Schools of Quality model to the development of minimum service standards forschools- now called the Education Quality Standards (EQS). The SOQ had 72 indicators and the EQS has 42 indicators, which are basedon thesame dimensions present under the SoQ model. The EQS have consolidated indicators from within the initial SoQ approach in anattempt to make the self-assessments easier for school principals and head teachers. | EQS approved and adopted at school level. Training provided. | EQS approved and adopted at school level. Training in EQS at district and school levels. |
Net Enrollment Rate (Country and Gender) | Value | 91.60F: 90.4 | 96.8F:96.8 | 96.50 |
Date | August 11, 2011 | May 9, 2014 | August 31, 2014 | |
Comment | Data is for academic year 2008-2009 | Data is for academic year 2012-13 |
Net Enrollment Rate Program target area/gender | Value | [G1:3.88Female: 4.84G2: 4.83Female: 5.75G3: 6. | 94.0F:94.1 | G1: -3.2Female:2.8G2: 1.5Female:2.2G3:4.2 |
Date | August 11, 2011 | May 9, 2014 | August 31, 2014 | |
Comment | Data is for academic year 2012-13 |
Enrollment in target areas (grade level, gender) | Value | G1:112,937Female:52,259G2:65,039Female: 29,713 | G1:99,201F:46,818G2: 66,797F:31,354G3:58,283 | G1: 96,965Female: 45,741G2: 70,112Female: 33,30 |
Date | August 11, 2011 | May 9, 2014 | August 31, 2014 | |
Comment | Baseline 2008/09 | Data is for academic year 2012-13 |
Gross Enrollment Rate for Country (by gender) | Value | 123.4F:118.3 | 120.6F:117.6 | 122F:119 |
Date | August 11, 2011 | May 9, 2014 | August 31, 2014 | |
Comment |
Gross Enrollment Rate in program target area by gender | Value | 121.8F:112.6 | 125.5F:121.1 | 126F:123 |
Date | September 1, 2009 | May 9, 2014 | August 31, 2014 | |
Comment |
Utility of the learning assessment system | Value | 0.00 | 2.00 | 2.00 |
Date | August 11, 2011 | May 9, 2014 | August 31, 2014 | |
Comment |
INDICATOR | BASELINE | CURRENT | TARGET |
---|
Number of schools with principals trained on their 7 roles | Value | 0.00 | 2097.00 | 2500.00 |
Date | August 11, 2011 | May 9, 2014 | August 31, 2013 | |
Comment | data is for academic year 2010-2011 |
Number of playgroups with a trained care-giver and adequate materials | Value | 0.00 | 38.00 | 210.00 |
Date | August 11, 2011 | May 9, 2014 | August 31, 2014 | |
Comment | Data is for academic year 2010-2011 | Data for academic year 2012-13 |
Number of schools that become "complete schools", offering 5 grades of primary education | Value | 0.00 | 332.00 | 412.00 |
Date | August 11, 2011 | May 9, 2014 | August 31, 2014 | |
Comment | Data is for academic year 2010-2011 |
Number of additional qualified primary teachers resulting from project interventions | Value | 0 | 1,498 | 1500 |
Date | August 11, 2011 | May 9, 2014 | August 29, 2014 | |
Comment |
Percentage of complete primary schools in target areas | Value | 38.6%:1,391 schools | 67% | 75% |
Date | August 11, 2011 | May 9, 2014 | August 29, 2014 | |
Comment | Academic year 2012-13 |
Number of schools with a functioning VEDC (including in their new M&E role) | Value | 0 | 960 | 1500 |
Date | August 11, 2011 | May 9, 2014 | August 29, 2014 | |
Comment |
Number of schools with teachers received quality training | Value | 0 | 1,538 | 1500 |
Date | August 11, 2011 | May 9, 2014 | August 29, 2014 | |
Comment | Academic year 2012-13 |
Number of villages with Mobile Teachers | Value | 0 | 321 (114 original + 207 in Phase II) | 300 |
Date | August 11, 2011 | May 9, 2014 | August 29, 2014 | |
Comment | Academic year 2012-13 |
Addition of at least one data point in EMIS reporting (3.1.2, 3.6.1) | Value | 1 data point | 1 data point | 2 data points |
Date | August 11, 2011 | May 9, 2014 | August 31, 2014 | |
Comment |
Number of schools constructed | Value | 0 | 303 | 412 |
Date | August 11, 2011 | January 31, 2014 | August 31, 2014 | |
Comment | Academic year 2012-13 |
Number of additional classrooms built or rehabilitated at the primary level resulting from project interventions | Value | 00 | Primary: 1,461Pre-primary: 343 | Primary:1,500Pre-primary:350 |
Date | August 11, 2011 | December 31, 2013 | August 31, 2014 | |
Comment |