Skip to Main Navigation

Catalytic Fund EFA/FTI

Development Objective

The Project Development Objective is to support the Government of Lao People's Democratic Republic to increase the coverage and improve the quality of Pre-primary and Primary Education with a focus on the most educationally disadvantaged children.

Key Details

Project Details

  • P114609

  • Closed

  • Boun Oum Inthaxoum

  • N/A

  • US$ 51.44 million

  • C

  • Not Applicable

  • August 31, 2014

  • BANK APPROVED

  • August 5, 2024

  • Notes

Finances

Financing Plan (US$ Millions)

No data available.
Financier Commitments
AUSTRALIA: Australian Agency for International Development 21.44
Education for All - Fast Track Initiative 30.00

Total Project Financing (US$ Millions)

Product Line IBRD/IDA
IBRD Commitment N/A
IDA Commitment N/A
IBRD + IDA Commitment N/A
Lending Instrument
Grant Amount 51.44
Total Project Cost** 51.44

Summary Status of World Bank Financing (US$ Millions) as of April 30, 2025

Download:
No data available.
Financier Approval Date Closing Date Principal Disbursed Repayments Interest, Charges & Fees

Detailed Financial Activity as of April 30, 2025

Download:
No data available.
Period Financier Transaction Type Amount (US$)

Footnotes

Ratings

IMPLEMENTATION RATINGS

Name Review Date
Progress towards achievement of PDO Moderately Satisfactory 2014-07-05
Financial Management Moderately Satisfactory 2014-07-05
Counterpart Funding Satisfactory 2014-07-05
Monitoring and Evaluation Satisfactory 2014-07-05
Overall Low 2014-07-05
Procurement Satisfactory 2014-07-05
Overall Implementation Progress (IP) Moderately Satisfactory 2014-07-05
Project Management Satisfactory 2014-07-05
Overall Safeguards Rating Satisfactory 2014-07-05

COMPLETION RATINGS

INDICATORIMPLEMENTATION COMPLETION & RESULTS REPORT: 02-26-2015
OutcomesModerately Satisfactory
Risk to Development OutcomeModest
Bank PerformanceModerately Satisfactory
Borrower PerformanceSubstantial
Government PerformanceSubstantial
Implementing AgencySubstantial

INDEPENDENT EVALUATION RATINGS

INDICATORICR REVIEW: 05-27-2015PROJECT PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT REPORT:
Outcome RatingModerately Satisfactory N/a
Risk To Development OutcomeModerateN/a
Bank PerformanceModerately SatisfactoryN/a
Borrower PerformanceSatisfactoryN/a
Government PerformanceSatisfactoryN/a
Implementing AgencySatisfactoryN/a
Icr QualitySatisfactoryN/a
M&e QualitySubstantialN/a

Results Framework

PROJECT DEVELOPMENT OBJECTIVE INDICATORS

INDICATORBASELINECURRENTTARGET
  • Primary completion survival rate to grade 5 in targeted districtsValue54.2060.0062.00
    DateAugust 11, 2011May 9, 2014August 31, 2014
    CommentThe baseline data is for academic year 2008-2009Academic year 2012-13
  • Gender parity index for primary educationValue0.880.960.97
    DateAugust 11, 2011May 9, 2014August 31, 2014
    CommentData for academic year 2008-2009Data is for academic year 2012-13
  • System for learning assessment at the primary levelValueYesYesYes
    DateAugust 11, 2011May 9, 2014August 31, 2014
    CommentASLO of students grade 5 on 3 subjectsCompleted data collection and conducted workshops on data cleaning, coding and entry. RIES developed four summary versions of theASLO report and shared with four groups : (i) RIES staff, (ii) central MoES staff, (iii) provincial staff and, and (iv) districtstaff and teachers. The results are shared with the first three group and RIES will share with the last group over the next fewmonths.ASLO of students grade 3 on 2 subjects
  • Dropout rate of primary education grade 1 to 5Value7.506.303.50
    DateAugust 11, 2011May 9, 2014August 31, 2014
    CommentData is for academic year 2008-2009Data is for academic year 2012-13
  • Dropout rate for program target area (grade, gender)ValueProgram:G1-5=?Total average: 8 G1: 18.4Female:11.3F: 11.2%G1: 16.2F:16.2G2: 9.1F:9.4G3:4.5F: 4.4Female:4.4
    DateAugust 11, 2011May 9, 2014August 31, 2014
    CommentData is for academic year 2012-13
  • Education Quality Standards (EQS) Framework approved and adopted at school levelValueEQS approved and adopted at school level
    DateAugust 11, 2011May 9, 2014August 31, 2014
    CommentOver 2011and 2012 the MoES transitioned from a Schools of Quality model to the development of minimum service standards forschools- now called the Education Quality Standards (EQS). The SOQ had 72 indicators and the EQS has 42 indicators, which are basedon thesame dimensions present under the SoQ model. The EQS have consolidated indicators from within the initial SoQ approach in anattempt to make the self-assessments easier for school principals and head teachers.EQS approved and adopted at school level. Training provided.EQS approved and adopted at school level. Training in EQS at district and school levels.
  • Net Enrollment Rate (Country and Gender)Value91.60F: 90.496.8F:96.896.50
    DateAugust 11, 2011May 9, 2014August 31, 2014
    CommentData is for academic year 2008-2009Data is for academic year 2012-13
  • Net Enrollment Rate Program target area/genderValue[G1:3.88Female: 4.84G2: 4.83Female: 5.75G3: 6.94.0F:94.1G1: -3.2Female:2.8G2: 1.5Female:2.2G3:4.2
    DateAugust 11, 2011May 9, 2014August 31, 2014
    CommentData is for academic year 2012-13
  • Enrollment in target areas (grade level, gender)ValueG1:112,937Female:52,259G2:65,039Female: 29,713G1:99,201F:46,818G2: 66,797F:31,354G3:58,283G1: 96,965Female: 45,741G2: 70,112Female: 33,30
    DateAugust 11, 2011May 9, 2014August 31, 2014
    CommentBaseline 2008/09Data is for academic year 2012-13
  • Gross Enrollment Rate for Country (by gender)Value123.4F:118.3120.6F:117.6122F:119
    DateAugust 11, 2011May 9, 2014August 31, 2014
    Comment
  • Gross Enrollment Rate in program target area by genderValue121.8F:112.6125.5F:121.1126F:123
    DateSeptember 1, 2009May 9, 2014August 31, 2014
    Comment
  • Utility of the learning assessment systemValue0.002.002.00
    DateAugust 11, 2011May 9, 2014August 31, 2014
    Comment

INTERMEDIATE RESULTS INDICATORS

INDICATORBASELINECURRENTTARGET
  • Number of schools with principals trained on their 7 rolesValue0.002097.002500.00
    DateAugust 11, 2011May 9, 2014August 31, 2013
    Commentdata is for academic year 2010-2011
  • Number of playgroups with a trained care-giver and adequate materialsValue0.0038.00210.00
    DateAugust 11, 2011May 9, 2014August 31, 2014
    CommentData is for academic year 2010-2011Data for academic year 2012-13
  • Number of schools that become "complete schools", offering 5 grades of primary educationValue0.00332.00412.00
    DateAugust 11, 2011May 9, 2014August 31, 2014
    CommentData is for academic year 2010-2011
  • Number of additional qualified primary teachers resulting from project interventionsValue01,4981500
    DateAugust 11, 2011May 9, 2014August 29, 2014
    Comment
  • Percentage of complete primary schools in target areasValue38.6%:1,391 schools67%75%
    DateAugust 11, 2011May 9, 2014August 29, 2014
    CommentAcademic year 2012-13
  • Number of schools with a functioning VEDC (including in their new M&E role)Value09601500
    DateAugust 11, 2011May 9, 2014August 29, 2014
    Comment
  • Number of schools with teachers received quality trainingValue01,5381500
    DateAugust 11, 2011May 9, 2014August 29, 2014
    CommentAcademic year 2012-13
  • Number of villages with Mobile TeachersValue0321 (114 original + 207 in Phase II)300
    DateAugust 11, 2011May 9, 2014August 29, 2014
    CommentAcademic year 2012-13
  • Addition of at least one data point in EMIS reporting (3.1.2, 3.6.1)Value1 data point1 data point2 data points
    DateAugust 11, 2011May 9, 2014August 31, 2014
    Comment
  • Number of schools constructedValue0303412
    DateAugust 11, 2011January 31, 2014August 31, 2014
    CommentAcademic year 2012-13
  • Number of additional classrooms built or rehabilitated at the primary level resulting from project interventionsValue00Primary: 1,461Pre-primary: 343Primary:1,500Pre-primary:350
    DateAugust 11, 2011December 31, 2013August 31, 2014
    Comment