Financier | Commitments |
---|---|
State and Peace Building Fund | 5.00 |
P114936
Closed
Christophe Prevost
N/A
Haiti
November 25, 2008
(as of board presentation)
November 25, 2008
April 2, 2009
US$ 5.00 million
N/A
2009
US$ 5.00 million
B
Not Applicable
November 30, 2013
BANK APPROVED
November 1, 2014
Financier | Commitments |
---|---|
State and Peace Building Fund | 5.00 |
Product Line | IBRD/IDA |
---|---|
IBRD Commitment | N/A |
IDA Commitment | N/A |
IBRD + IDA Commitment | N/A |
Lending Instrument | |
---|---|
Grant Amount | 5.00 |
Total Project Cost** | 5.00 |
Name | Review | Date |
---|---|---|
Progress towards achievement of PDO | Satisfactory | 2013-11-30 |
Project Management | Satisfactory | 2013-11-30 |
Financial Management | Satisfactory | 2013-11-30 |
Counterpart Funding | Satisfactory | 2013-11-30 |
Monitoring and Evaluation | Satisfactory | 2013-11-30 |
Overall Implementation Progress (IP) | Satisfactory | 2013-11-30 |
Procurement | Moderately Satisfactory | 2013-11-30 |
Overall Safeguards Rating | Moderately Satisfactory | 2013-11-30 |
INDICATOR | BASELINE | CURRENT | TARGET |
---|
Number of people in rural areas provided with access to Improved Water Sources under the project | Value | 0.00 | 52277.00 | 51000.00 |
Date | October 31, 2008 | November 5, 2013 | November 30, 2013 | |
Comment | By definition, nobody was furnished with Improved water by this project at its outset. | This number includes 9 communities managed by an OP, 3 communities managed by a CAEPA, as well as 3 communities having receivedboreholes with and pumps. |
Number of households using basic sanitation in participating communities | Value | 3060.00 | 5399.00 | 4060.00 |
Date | October 31, 2008 | November 5, 2013 | November 30, 2013 | |
Comment | Based on 3825 existing latrines, out of which 20% are not being used. | This is based on initial estimates and the Project Team is awaiting the final project evaluation report to further evaluate theimpacts that training and promotion activities had on the sanitation situation in the selected communities. |
INDICATOR | BASELINE | CURRENT | TARGET |
---|
Proportion of CAEPAs which meet the requirements stated in Standard Minutes of Comm. Meeting to Accept Project | Value | 0.00 | 30.00 | 90.00 |
Date | October 31, 2008 | November 5, 2013 | November 30, 2013 | |
Comment | 50 communities were initially selected for consideration, of which 15 currently have satisfied all criteria and received watersupply systems with project financing. | This goal, set in the original project document, appears unrealistic. On the positive side, it shows the conditions of agreementare effective screens. |
Proportion of communities using professional operators with signed contracts with professional operators | Value | 0.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 |
Date | October 31, 2008 | November 5, 2013 | November 30, 2013 | |
Comment | All project communities in have signed contracts with operators. |
Proportion of Operators trained in FM, technical O&M, and community relations | Value | 0.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 |
Date | October 31, 2008 | November 5, 2013 | November 30, 2013 | |
Comment | 9 out of 9 private operators have been trained. The other communities use a management committee (Ile a Vache) or CAEPAs (FondTortue, Fond des Blancs, Baie du Mesle, Garatte and Laval). |
Number of water utilities that the project is supporting | Value | 0.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 |
Date | October 31, 2008 | November 5, 2013 | November 30, 2013 | |
Comment | DINEPA, which acts as a utility. |
Number of masons trained in latrine construction | Value | 0.00 | 14.00 | 40.00 |
Date | October 31, 2008 | November 5, 2013 | November 30, 2013 | |
Comment | Sanitation activities were scaled down and training of masons was limited to 2 masons per community in 7 communities. |
Percent of target audience receiving training on hygiene and sanitation in communities | Value | 0.00 | 56.00 | 80.00 |
Date | October 31, 2008 | November 5, 2013 | November 30, 2013 | |
Comment | The Project Team is awaiting the final project evaluation report to further evaluate the impacts that training and promotionactivities had on the sanitation situation in the selected communities. |
Number of water systems rehabilitated or newly built | Value | 0.00 | 15.00 | 11.00 |
Date | October 31, 2008 | November 5, 2013 | November 30, 2013 | |
Comment | 10 rehabilitated, 2 new systems piped water systems, and 3 borehole systems. |
New piped household water connections that are resulting from the project intervention | Value | 0.00 | 1210.00 | 200.00 |
Date | October 31, 2008 | November 5, 2013 | November 30, 2013 | |
Comment | This number was updated during the last site visit and includes 12 communities, although the Project Team is still awaitingconfirmation on this number. | Original target was set to reflect uncertainty about demand for private connections |
Improved community water points constructed or rehabilitated under the project | Value | 0.00 | 62.00 | 40.00 |
Date | October 31, 2008 | November 5, 2013 | November 30, 2013 | |
Comment | This number was updated during the last site visit and includes 15 communities (kiosks, public fountains and hand pumps which arefunctioning). This number was revised from the last ISR to include only functioning water points. |