Financier | Commitments |
---|---|
Nile Basin Initiative Trust Fund | 7.00 |
Borrower/Recipient | 0.12 |
Financier | Commitments |
---|---|
Nile Basin Initiative Trust Fund | 7.00 |
Borrower/Recipient | 0.12 |
Product Line | IBRD/IDA |
---|---|
IBRD Commitment | N/A |
IDA Commitment | N/A |
IBRD + IDA Commitment | N/A |
Lending Instrument | |
---|---|
Grant Amount | 7.00 |
Total Project Cost** | 7.12 |
Name | Review | Date |
---|---|---|
Progress towards achievement of PDO | Satisfactory | 2013-02-01 |
Counterpart Funding | Moderately Satisfactory | 2013-02-01 |
Project Management | Satisfactory | 2013-02-01 |
Financial Management | Satisfactory | 2013-02-01 |
Monitoring and Evaluation | Satisfactory | 2013-02-01 |
Overall Implementation Progress (IP) | Satisfactory | 2013-02-01 |
Procurement | Satisfactory | 2013-02-01 |
INDICATOR | IMPLEMENTATION COMPLETION & RESULTS REPORT: 06-28-2013 |
---|---|
Outcomes | Substantial |
Risk to Development Outcome | Substantial |
Bank Performance | Moderately Satisfactory |
Borrower Performance | Substantial |
Government Performance | Moderately Satisfactory |
Implementing Agency | Substantial |
INDICATOR | ICR REVIEW: 06-02-2014 | PROJECT PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT REPORT: |
---|---|---|
Outcome Rating | Moderately Satisfactory | N/a |
Risk To Development Outcome | High | N/a |
Bank Performance | Moderately Satisfactory | N/a |
Borrower Performance | Moderately Satisfactory | N/a |
Government Performance | Moderately Satisfactory | N/a |
Implementing Agency | Moderately Satisfactory | N/a |
Icr Quality | Satisfactory | N/a |
M&e Quality | Modest | N/a |
INDICATOR | BASELINE | CURRENT | TARGET |
---|
Direct project beneficiaries | Value | 0.00 | 350.00 | 250.00 |
Date | November 11, 2009 | December 14, 2012 | December 31, 2012 | |
Comment | Beneficiaries are regional project staff, Project Steering Committee, and other key officials in NBI Countries. |
Options for NBI agricultural agenda presented to the NBI bodies | Value | 0.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 |
Date | November 11, 2009 | August 8, 2012 | December 31, 2012 | |
Comment | Agricultural functions not defined | Options presented to NBI Governance in July 2012. | Options presented to NBI governing bodies. |
Analytical tools developed and information disseminated to increase water use productivity in Basin agriculture | Value | 0.00 | 98.00 | 100.00 |
Date | November 11, 2009 | December 14, 2012 | December 31, 2012 | |
Comment | Analytical tools are not adequate | Ag model will be integrated into the Nile DSS both regionally and nationally. The Irrigation Potential study, phase 1, builds onwork done under EWAP to provide more in-depth analysis of irrigation potential in seven NELSAP Countries and delivered it togovernments. Phase 2 builds on that to prepare pre-feasibility studies of 34 schemes in those five countries. There are alreadyregional and national plans to utilize this work for preparing future investments through the newly approved Nile Cooperation forResults (NCORE) Project. | Model analysis & database disseminated at region, country levels. |
Analytical tools developed and information disseminated to promote agricultural trade in the Nile Basin | Value | 0.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 |
Date | November 11, 2009 | December 14, 2012 | December 31, 2012 | |
Comment | Basin countries and institutions lack basic tools and knowledge | Three commodity categories, 5 trade corridors studied. Uptake by commodity groups and RECS with commitment to further this work.Aseries of potential investments have been identified. Virtual Water/water footprint study disseminated, to be launched oversummer2012, possibly at SIWA World Water Week – appears to have engaged non-water decision makers (Ministries of Finance, Planning,trade, etc. and private sector) in the water agenda. | Analytical tools and information developed and disseminated to promote agricultural trade in the Nile Basin. |
INDICATOR | BASELINE | CURRENT | TARGET |
---|
Agricultural database for major crops in nine countries and one information retrieval system established, integrated into DSS, and functioning | Value | 0.00 | 85.00 | 100.00 |
Date | November 11, 2009 | December 14, 2012 | December 31, 2012 | |
Comment | Scattered unintegrated databases | Indicator is overly ambitious and/or poorly defined. Creating complete ag data bases for 10 countries is found to be beyond thescope of the consultancy and the project (budget/time/personal constraints). The Project and consultants have agreed to createdatabase with sufficient information to validate the model. The database can, and should be, augmented over time by the NBI andcountriesusing the model. | Agricultural database and information system established and plans for integrating it into the Nile DSS developed. |
One report on water resources for irrigation produced for each of the six specified countries and disseminated through at least oneworkshop per country | Value | 0.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 |
Date | November 11, 2009 | December 14, 2012 | December 31, 2012 | |
Comment | No consistent information on irrigation potential available | Good indication of how RATP fits into the progression of NBTF/Bank interventions as it goes from concept under EWUAP to RAPT tofollow-on work being planned under the NELSAP component of the new NCORE Project. | One report on water resources for irrigation produced for each of the six specified countries and disseminated. |
Best practices on water harvesting and irrigation identified by the past NBI projects and other organizations disseminated in the basin | Value | 0.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 |
Date | November 11, 2009 | December 14, 2012 | December 31, 2012 | |
Comment | Practices assembled but not user-friendly with limited dissemination | Training well attended by all 7 countries – target audience was reached. Report has been widely disseminated within the NBICountries. | Practices disseminated at country level by trainers. |
Agricultural trade data and information base acquired and integrated into NBI-DSS | Value | 0.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 |
Date | November 11, 2009 | December 14, 2012 | December 31, 2012 | |
Comment | Scattered and country-based information | Trade database complete for the 5 corridors studied and the virtual water/water footprint. In final stages of creating meta-datafor integrating into Nile IS/DSS. Water footprint already integrated. | Agricultural trade data and information base established and plans for integrating it into the Nile IS/DSS developed. |
Facilitating policies and investments along selected transboundary agricultural trade corridors indicated | Value | 0.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 |
Date | November 11, 2009 | December 14, 2012 | December 31, 2012 | |
Comment | Scattered information on transboundary trade issues | Policies and potential investments identified, champions for continuing the work also committed to follow-up. Final reportsvalidated and disseminated – including extra-output on livestock export potential to the Gulf. | Policy and investment options presented and disseminated. |
Virtual water for agriculture documented in nine basin countries and virtual water trade introduced as a tool for water resource decision making | Value | 0.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 |
Date | November 11, 2009 | December 14, 2012 | December 31, 2012 | |
Comment | Concept poorly understood and proper virtual water estimates for Nile Basin countries do not exist | Positively received, requested follow-on training, provided. Final report uploaded into the Nile IS and widely disseminated inallNBI Countries and internationally through a workshop at Stockholm International Water Week in August 2012. Covered whole NBI. | Concrete illustrations of concept in Nile basin environment developed. |
One or more options identified for core agricultural functions of NBI and successor River Basin Organization, and consensus reachedon roles and functions | Value | 0.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 |
Date | November 11, 2009 | December 10, 2011 | December 31, 2012 | |
Comment | Options for agriculture functions not properly defined | Report finalized and institutional options identified and prioritized for presentation to NBI Governance. | Institutional options prioritized. |
Model that includes supply and demand blocks for Nile basin agriculture developed and integrated into the Nile Basin DSS model | Value | 0.00 | 95.00 | 100.00 |
Date | November 11, 2009 | December 14, 2012 | December 31, 2012 | |
Comment | Agricultural model in DSS is not developed | Model completed and under testing by RATP and DSS Team. Consultant working closely with RATP and expected to finalize based ontesting results by December 21, 2012. | Model and database established and plans for integrating it into the Nile DSS developed. |