Skip to Main Navigation

China Technology Needs Assessment (TNA)

Abstract*

The development objective of the Climate Technology Needs Assessment Project is to support China's efforts to assess climate mitigation and adaptation technology needs and to adopt corresponding global best practices. There are five components to the project. The first component of the project is methodology development, technical oversight, synthesis and dissemination. The second component of the project is technology assessments at the sector and...

* The project abstract is drawn from the PAD, SAR or PGD and may not accurately reflect the project's current nature

Show More

Development Objective

The proposed project development objective is to support China's efforts to assess climate mitigation and adaptation technology needs and adopt corresponding global best practices.

Key Details

Project Details

  • P120932

  • Closed

  • Garo J. Batmanian

  • PEOPLE’S REPUBLIC OF CHINA

  • China

  • June 23, 2010

  • (as of board presentation)

    May 29, 2012

  • July 17, 2012

  • US$ 6.70 million

  • Department of Climate Change, NDRC

  • East Asia and Pacific

  • 2012

  • US$ 5.00 million

  • C

  • Not Applicable

  • June 30, 2016

  • Yes

  • BANK APPROVED

  • July 16, 2019

  • Notes

Finances

Financing Plan (US$ Millions)

No data available.
Financier Commitments
Borrower/Recipient 1.70
Global Environment Facility (GEF) 5.00

Total Project Financing (US$ Millions)

Product Line IBRD/IDA
IBRD Commitment N/A
IDA Commitment N/A
IBRD + IDA Commitment N/A
Lending Instrument
Grant Amount 5.00
Total Project Cost** 6.70

Summary Status of World Bank Financing (US$ Millions) as of July 31, 2025

Download:
No data available.
Financier Approval Date Closing Date Principal Disbursed Repayments Interest, Charges & Fees

Detailed Financial Activity as of July 31, 2025

Download:
No data available.
Period Financier Transaction Type Amount (US$)

Footnotes

Ratings

IMPLEMENTATION RATINGS

Name Review Date
Project Management Satisfactory 2016-06-14
Financial Management Satisfactory 2016-06-14
Overall Implementation Progress (IP) Moderately Satisfactory 2016-06-14
Summary Global Objective Rating Moderately Satisfactory 2016-06-14
Procurement Moderately Satisfactory 2016-06-14
Counterpart Funding Satisfactory 2016-06-14
Monitoring and Evaluation Satisfactory 2016-06-14

COMPLETION RATINGS

INDICATORIMPLEMENTATION COMPLETION & RESULTS REPORT: 12-22-2016
OutcomesSubstantial
Risk to Development OutcomeModest
Bank PerformanceModerately Satisfactory
Borrower PerformanceModerately Satisfactory
Government PerformanceSubstantial
Implementing AgencyModerately Satisfactory

INDEPENDENT EVALUATION RATINGS

INDICATORICR REVIEW: 06-21-2017PROJECT PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT REPORT:
Outcome RatingModerately Satisfactory N/a
Risk To Development OutcomeModestN/a
Bank PerformanceModerately SatisfactoryN/a
Borrower PerformanceModerately SatisfactoryN/a
Government PerformanceModerately SatisfactoryN/a
Implementing AgencyModerately SatisfactoryN/a
Icr QualitySubstantialN/a
M&e QualityModestN/a

Results Framework

PROJECT DEVELOPMENT OBJECTIVE INDICATORS

INDICATORBASELINECURRENTTARGET

INTERMEDIATE RESULTS INDICATORS

INDICATORBASELINECURRENTTARGET
  • 1.1 Technology assessments completedValue0.0020.0020.00
    DateJuly 17, 2012May 30, 2016June 30, 2016
    Comment
  • 1. Production of 3 Synthesis Reports (1 for mitigation, 1 for adaptation, and 1 for province), collating and disseminating the results from the individual sector technology assessmentsValue0.000.003.00
    DateJuly 17, 2012May 30, 2016June 30, 2016
    Comment
  • 1.2 Stakeholder demand for and use of the completed technology assessmentsValueNAStakeholder survey conducted to evaluate the use oStakeholder survey evaluates the use of the comple
    DateJuly 17, 2012May 30, 2016June 30, 2016
    Comment
  • 2. Development of a database which houses information on priority technologies collected at the sector and provincial levelValueNADesign is completed.Database established
    DateJuly 17, 2012October 12, 2015June 30, 2016
    Comment
  • 2.1 Capacity building activities completedValueNA7 capacity building plans implemented7 capacity building plans implemented at least 80%
    DateJuly 17, 2012May 30, 2016June 30, 2016
    Comment
  • 3. Organization of workshops for dissemination and evaluationValue0.003.004.00
    DateJuly 17, 2012May 30, 2016June 30, 2016
    Comment
  • 2.2 Stakeholder demand for and use of network functions provided by the project-supported centers and networks, including of futurepilot technology transfer programsValueNAStakeholder survey conducted to evaluate the use oStakeholder survey confirms demand for and evaluat
    DateJuly 17, 2012May 30, 2016June 30, 2016
    Comment
  • 4. Competitively selected “Technology improvement grants” madeValue0.008.008.00
    DateJuly 17, 2012May 30, 2016June 30, 2016
    Comment
  • 3. Measurable financial and economic benefits of accelerating technology transfer through small grant support to companiesValue0.000.001.00
    DateJuly 17, 2012May 30, 2016November 30, 2015
    Comment
  • 4. Lifetime direct GHG emissions avoidedValue0.000.00500000.00
    DateJuly 17, 2012June 30, 2016June 30, 2016
    Comment