| Financier | Commitments |
|---|---|
| International Bank for Reconstruction and Development | 531.19 |
| Borrower/Recipient | 752.42 |
FOURTH NATIONAL PROGRAM FOR COMMUNITY EMPOWERMENT IN RURAL AREA (PNPM IV)
Abstract*
The objective of the Fourth National Program for Community Empowerment in Rural Areas Project for villagers in Program Nasional Pemberdayaan Masyarakat (PNPM)-rural locations Indonesia is to benefit from improved socio-economic and local governance conditions. There are four components to the project. the first component is Kecamatan grants: supports the construction of the economic and social infrastructure needed and requested by the target communities;... Show More
Development Objective
For villagers in PNPM-Rural locations to benefit from improved socio-economic and local governance conditions
Key Details
Project Details
P122810
Closed
Sonya Woo
N/A
May 13, 2011
(as of board presentation)
July 14, 2011
September 1, 2011
US$ 1283.61 million
N/A
2012
US$ 531.19 million
B
December 30, 2014
June 30, 2014
BANK APPROVED
Finances
Financing Plan (US$ Millions)
Total Project Financing (US$ Millions)
| Product Line | IBRD/IDA |
|---|---|
| IBRD Commitment | 531.19 |
| IDA Commitment | N/A |
| IBRD + IDA Commitment | 531.19 |
| Lending Instrument | |
|---|---|
| Grant Amount | N/A |
| Total Project Cost** | 1283.61 |
Summary Status of World Bank Financing (US$ Millions) as of February 28, 2025
No data available.
| Period | Financier | Transaction Type | Amount (US$) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 15, 2018 | IBRD-80790 | Int Charges | 6,709,305.50 |
| Jul 15, 2019 | IBRD-80790 | Int Charges | 9,403,593.00 |
| Jul 15, 2017 | IBRD-80790 | Int Charges | 5,203,674.00 |
| Jan 15, 2018 | IBRD-80790 | Int Charges | 5,665,856.00 |
| Jul 15, 2016 | IBRD-80790 | Int Charges | 3,798,155.00 |
| Jan 15, 2017 | IBRD-80790 | Int Charges | 4,269,531.50 |
| Jul 15, 2013 | IBRD-80790 | Int Charges | 42,530.00 |
| Jul 15, 2013 | IBRD-80790 | Int Charges | 2,561,847.50 |
| Jan 15, 2014 | IBRD-80790 | Int Charges | 2,360,155.20 |
| Jul 15, 2014 | IBRD-80790 | Int Charges | 2,161,559.00 |
| Dec 15, 2014 | IBRD-80790 | Loan Disb | -5,396,514.00 |
| Jan 15, 2015 | IBRD-80790 | Int Charges | 2,247,785.20 |
| Dec 15, 2014 | IBRD-80790 | Loan Cancel | 5,816,984.50 |
| Jul 15, 2015 | IBRD-80790 | Int Charges | 3,857.02 |
| Jul 15, 2015 | IBRD-80790 | Int Charges | 2,347,041.20 |
| Jan 15, 2016 | IBRD-80790 | Int Charges | 2,712,092.20 |
| Jan 15, 2024 | IBRD-80790 | Int Charges | 14,320,097.00 |
| Jan 15, 2024 | IBRD-80790 | Loan Repay | 13,554,624.00 |
| Jan 15, 2024 | IBRD-80790 | Int Charges | 193,277.28 |
| Jul 15, 2024 | IBRD-80790 | Int Charges | 94,024.81 |
| Jul 15, 2024 | IBRD-80790 | Int Charges | 13,963,365.00 |
| Jul 15, 2024 | IBRD-80790 | Loan Repay | 13,869,848.00 |
| Jul 14, 2011 | IBRD-80790 | Loan Commitment | 531,190,016.00 |
| Jan 15, 2023 | IBRD-80790 | Int Charges | 542,520.25 |
| Jan 15, 2023 | IBRD-80790 | Int Charges | 9,614,498.00 |
| Jan 15, 2023 | IBRD-80790 | Loan Repay | 12,924,176.00 |
| Jul 15, 2023 | IBRD-80790 | Int Charges | 611,895.00 |
| Jul 15, 2023 | IBRD-80790 | Int Charges | 12,423,873.00 |
| Jul 15, 2023 | IBRD-80790 | Loan Repay | 13,239,400.00 |
| Jan 15, 2022 | IBRD-80790 | Int Charges | 2,205,398.20 |
| Jan 15, 2022 | IBRD-80790 | Loan Repay | 12,293,729.00 |
| Jul 15, 2022 | IBRD-80790 | Loan Repay | 12,608,952.00 |
| Jul 15, 2022 | IBRD-80790 | Int Charges | 2,737,176.00 |
| Jan 15, 2021 | IBRD-80790 | Int Charges | 2,732,049.00 |
| Jan 15, 2021 | IBRD-80790 | Loan Repay | 11,663,281.00 |
| Jul 15, 2021 | IBRD-80790 | Int Charges | 2,449,733.80 |
| Jul 15, 2021 | IBRD-80790 | Loan Repay | 11,978,505.00 |
| Jan 15, 2020 | IBRD-80790 | Int Charges | 7,787,195.50 |
| Jul 15, 2020 | IBRD-80790 | Loan Repay | 11,400,594.00 |
| Jul 15, 2020 | IBRD-80790 | Int Charges | 6,772,934.00 |
| Jan 15, 2019 | IBRD-80790 | Int Charges | 8,592,768.00 |
Ratings
IMPLEMENTATION RATINGS
| Name | Review | Date |
|---|---|---|
| Counterpart Funding | Highly Satisfactory | 2014-06-28 |
| Progress towards achievement of PDO | Moderately Satisfactory | 2014-06-28 |
| Procurement | Moderately Satisfactory | 2014-06-28 |
| Project Management | Moderately Satisfactory | 2014-06-28 |
| Financial Management | Moderately Satisfactory | 2014-06-28 |
| Monitoring and Evaluation | Moderately Unsatisfactory | 2014-06-28 |
| Overall Implementation Progress (IP) | Moderately Satisfactory | 2014-06-28 |
COMPLETION RATINGS
| INDICATOR | IMPLEMENTATION COMPLETION & RESULTS REPORT: 01-29-2015 |
|---|---|
| Outcomes | Moderately Satisfactory |
| Risk to Development Outcome | Modest |
| Bank Performance | Moderately Satisfactory |
| Borrower Performance | Moderately Satisfactory |
| Government Performance | Moderately Satisfactory |
| Implementing Agency | Moderately Satisfactory |
INDEPENDENT EVALUATION RATINGS
| INDICATOR | ICR REVIEW: 06-05-2015 | PROJECT PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT REPORT: |
|---|---|---|
| Outcome Rating | Moderately Satisfactory | N/a |
| Risk To Development Outcome | Moderate | N/a |
| Bank Performance | Moderately Satisfactory | N/a |
| Borrower Performance | Moderately Satisfactory | N/a |
| Government Performance | Moderately Satisfactory | N/a |
| Implementing Agency | Moderately Satisfactory | N/a |
| Icr Quality | Unsatisfactory | N/a |
| M&e Quality | Modest | N/a |
Results Framework
PROJECT DEVELOPMENT OBJECTIVE INDICATORS
| INDICATOR | BASELINE | CURRENT | TARGET |
|---|
Improved HH expenditure rates and improved access to economic and social services in a minimum of 4,800 sub-districts in 2011 (impacts taken from representative sample) Value 2.00 9.10 2.00 Date June 14, 2011 June 9, 2014 June 30, 2014 Comment The impact evaluation was expected to cover the PNPM engagement from 2007-2012 and not only the one cycle of block grants whichwill be financed by PNPM-Rural IV. However results for this indicator are available for 2007-2010 only due to the loss of thecontrolgroup which occurred when the program reached national scale in 2009/2010. While no additional analysis will be generatedfor the period 2011-2013, the previous results are considered representative of expected project impact 9.1% increase of the consumption rate of poor households in PNPM areas, compared with the Control households (based on 2011 ImpactEvaluation). No additional analysis was generated between 2011-2013 because of the loss of the Control group, which occurred whenthe project was scaled up nationally. Target exceeded. EIRRs >30 % for main rural infrastructure categories Value 39.00 85.20 30.00 Date June 14, 2011 June 9, 2014 June 30, 2014 Comment . The Small Scale EIRR (2012) confirms the following rates for main rural infrastructure categories: 85.2% for water and sanitation,120% for roads and bridges and 108% for irrigation. The last economic evaluation (prior to the Small Scale EIRR) was carried out in2005 (and not 2012 as reported in the previous ISR). It found a weighted average internal rate of return of between 35-50%. The2012 Small Scale EIRR confirms that the target was exceeded. >80% satisfaction levels from beneficiaries regarding improved services and local level governance (impacts taken from representative sample). Value 80.00 78.69 80.00 Date June 9, 2014 June 30, 2014 Comment Based on outcome of KDP2 Reported by the Incidence of Benefits Survey (2012). Result is well within range of target. Direct project beneficiaries Value 49000000.00 45000000.00 49000000.00 Date June 14, 2011 June 9, 2014 June 30, 2014 Comment Cumulative data confirmed by the Annual Report for 2013. However, there is a discrepancy between this figure and the QPR for endMarch 2014, which reports 32,304,204. In either case, target not achieved. Female beneficiaries Value 49.00 50.27 49.00 Date June 14, 2011 June 9, 2014 June 30, 2014 Comment
INTERMEDIATE RESULTS INDICATORS
| INDICATOR | BASELINE | CURRENT | TARGET |
|---|
>85% of agreed work plans completed each year Value 95.00 95.00 85.00 Date January 1, 2006 June 9, 2014 December 31, 2012 Comment Completion rate for 2013 confirmed by mission carried out between Feb-March 2014. Target exceeded. >70% of infrastructure works are evaluated as of high quality Value 65.00 75.00 70.00 Date December 30, 2008 June 9, 2014 June 30, 2014 Comment PNPM Rural annual report The Technical Evaluation (2012) reported that 82% of infrastructure works were evaluated as high quality. While the QPR for endDecember 2013 indicated a reduction in the rate (75%)-target exceeded. By 2011, 90% of facilitators receive the agreed upon number of pre and in service training days Value 85.00 95.00 90.00 Date June 9, 2014 June 30, 2014 Comment Training completed for 10,569 out of the total 11,126 Social (FK) and Technical (FT) Facilitators. Confirmed by mission carriedoutbetween Feb-March 2014. Target exceeded. Min. 50% participation rate of women and poorest community members in planning and decision-making meetings Value 48.00 41.00 50.00 Date June 2, 2008 June 9, 2014 June 30, 2014 Comment data collected in 2008, 48% for women and 56% for poorest community members As reported in the QPR for end March 2014. Target not achieved. O&M arrangements are in place and/ or functioning for >85% of infrastructure works. Value 85.00 90.00 85.00 Date June 14, 2011 June 9, 2014 June 30, 2014 Comment Findings from Technical Evaluation (2012). Target exceeded. By 2011, 4,500 sub-districts with completed subprojects (#/type of infrastructure works, economic, education, health, revolving loans and environmental management, etc.) Value 4100.00 5146.00 4800.00 Date January 1, 2010 June 9, 2014 June 30, 2014 Comment Reconfirmed during ISM mission (February-March 2014). Target exceeded. Through the MDG/Community Conditional Cash Transfers pilot, improvements in priority health and education indicators. Value 0.03 4.10 0.03 Date June 9, 2014 June 30, 2014 Comment from PNPM Generasi 2007 baseline survey; average standardized effects for health and education targets Confirmed by PNPM Generasi Impact Evaluation Endline Report (2012). Target exceeded. from PNPM Generasi 2007 baseline survey; average standardized effects for health and education targets By 2011, >90% of local government councils provide funds and/or oversee PNPM Value 70.00 93.00 90.00 Date June 9, 2014 June 30, 2014 Comment As per budget report. Target achieved. By 2012, 90% of planned facilitators positions are filled (sub-district/district levels). Value 85.00 96.00 90.00 Date June 14, 2011 June 9, 2014 December 31, 2012 Comment Confirmed by mission carried out between Feb-March 2014. Target achieved. Audit sample size increases to min. of 20% of all sub-districts and audit results are made public. Value 13.50 18.57 20.00 Date June 14, 2011 June 9, 2014 June 30, 2014 Comment Result is slightly lower but within range. Target not achieve due to delays in the submission of the audit report by Inspectorateof Kabupaten/Kota, which conducted the audit on behalf of BPKP. >70% of sampled villages receive socialization material packages for PNPM in 2011 onward. Value 70.00 100.00 70.00 Date December 1, 2011 June 9, 2014 June 30, 2014 Comment Confirmed by mission carried out between Feb-March 2014. Target exceeded. Number of project management units established by March every year Value 350.00 393.00 400.00 Date January 1, 2009 June 9, 2014 June 30, 2014 Comment Confirmed by NMC. Result is slightly lower than target but still within range. Kecamatan Grants disbursed and accounted for Value 75.00 98.00 80.00 Date January 1, 2009 June 9, 2014 June 30, 2014 Comment Confirmed by mission carried out between Feb-March 2014. Target exceeded. All oversight consultants and facilitators paid on time, in full every month Value 80.00 85.00 80.00 Date June 14, 2011 June 9, 2014 June 30, 2014 Comment Reported by World Bank FM team. While two of the 7 administrative regions are behind in payments--target is still achieved.