Financier | Commitments |
---|---|
International Bank for Reconstruction and Development | 500.00 |
P126094
Closed
Antonio Nucifora
N/A
April 18, 2011
(as of board presentation)
June 21, 2011
July 27, 2011
US$ 500.00 million
N/A
2011
US$ 500.00 million
N/A
May 1, 2024
June 30, 2012
BANK APPROVED
Financier | Commitments |
---|---|
International Bank for Reconstruction and Development | 500.00 |
Product Line | IBRD/IDA |
---|---|
IBRD Commitment | 500.00 |
IDA Commitment | N/A |
IBRD + IDA Commitment | 500.00 |
Lending Instrument | |
---|---|
Grant Amount | N/A |
Total Project Cost** | 500.00 |
Period | Financier | Transaction Type | Amount (US$) |
---|---|---|---|
Jul 15, 2016 | IBRD-80750 | Loan Repay | 3,748,714.20 |
Jul 15, 2016 | IBRD-80750 | Int Charges | 1,807,361.10 |
Jul 15, 2016 | IBRD-80750 | Loan Repay | 5,000,000.00 |
Jan 15, 2017 | IBRD-80750 | Int Charges | 1,991,033.40 |
Jan 15, 2017 | IBRD-80750 | Loan Repay | 6,250,000.00 |
Jan 15, 2017 | IBRD-80750 | Int Charges | 376,930.50 |
Jan 15, 2017 | IBRD-80750 | Loan Repay | 4,479,304.50 |
Jul 15, 2017 | IBRD-80750 | Int Charges | 2,364,752.50 |
Jul 15, 2017 | IBRD-80750 | Int Charges | 378,185.03 |
Jul 15, 2015 | IBRD-80750 | Int Charges | 1,118,680.50 |
Jul 15, 2015 | IBRD-80750 | Int Charges | 652,709.75 |
Jan 15, 2016 | IBRD-80750 | Int Charges | 562,674.00 |
Jan 15, 2016 | IBRD-80750 | Int Charges | 1,290,555.50 |
Jul 15, 2016 | IBRD-80750 | Int Charges | 492,747.66 |
Jul 15, 2013 | IBRD-80750 | Int Charges | 870,759.75 |
Jul 15, 2013 | IBRD-80750 | Int Charges | 1,206,666.60 |
Jan 15, 2014 | IBRD-80750 | Int Charges | 1,111,666.60 |
Jan 15, 2021 | IBRD-80750 | Loan Repay | 5,000,000.00 |
Jan 15, 2021 | IBRD-80750 | Int Charges | 326,064.70 |
Jan 15, 2021 | IBRD-80750 | Loan Repay | 4,080,938.50 |
Apr 16, 2021 | IBRD-80750 | Loan Disb | 206,250,000.00 |
Apr 16, 2021 | IBRD-80750 | Loan Disb | -206,250,000.00 |
Apr 16, 2021 | IBRD-80750 | Loan Disb | 206,250,000.00 |
Apr 16, 2021 | IBRD-80750 | Loan Disb | -206,250,000.00 |
Jul 15, 2021 | IBRD-80750 | Int Charges | 505,713.53 |
Jul 15, 2021 | IBRD-80750 | Loan Repay | 3,977,938.80 |
Jul 15, 2021 | IBRD-80750 | Loan Repay | 5,000,000.00 |
Jul 15, 2021 | IBRD-80750 | Int Charges | 156,751.53 |
Jul 15, 2021 | IBRD-80750 | Int Charges | 1,452,229.10 |
Jul 15, 2019 | IBRD-80750 | Int Charges | 4,004,876.50 |
Jul 15, 2019 | IBRD-80750 | Loan Repay | 7,500,000.00 |
Jul 15, 2019 | IBRD-80750 | Int Charges | 392,892.00 |
Jul 15, 2019 | IBRD-80750 | Loan Repay | 5,694,262.00 |
Jan 15, 2020 | IBRD-80750 | Loan Repay | 5,000,000.00 |
Jan 15, 2020 | IBRD-80750 | Int Charges | 3,205,305.50 |
Jan 15, 2020 | IBRD-80750 | Int Charges | 290,322.40 |
Jan 15, 2020 | IBRD-80750 | Loan Repay | 3,752,416.80 |
Jan 15, 2018 | IBRD-80750 | Int Charges | 382,560.16 |
Jan 15, 2018 | IBRD-80750 | Loan Repay | 4,125,033.00 |
Jan 15, 2018 | IBRD-80750 | Int Charges | 2,574,786.00 |
Jan 15, 2018 | IBRD-80750 | Loan Repay | 5,000,000.00 |
Jul 15, 2018 | IBRD-80750 | Loan Repay | 3,912,806.80 |
Jul 15, 2018 | IBRD-80750 | Int Charges | 2,985,117.20 |
Jul 15, 2018 | IBRD-80750 | Loan Repay | 5,000,000.00 |
Jul 15, 2018 | IBRD-80750 | Int Charges | 358,682.90 |
Jan 15, 2019 | IBRD-80750 | Int Charges | 368,931.38 |
Jan 15, 2019 | IBRD-80750 | Loan Repay | 3,848,179.50 |
Jan 15, 2019 | IBRD-80750 | Int Charges | 3,741,333.20 |
Jan 15, 2019 | IBRD-80750 | Loan Repay | 5,000,000.00 |
Jan 15, 2014 | IBRD-80750 | Int Charges | 937,067.50 |
Sep 15, 2014 | IBRD-80750 | Int Charges | 315,988.56 |
Jan 15, 2015 | IBRD-80750 | Int Charges | 814,828.30 |
Jan 15, 2015 | IBRD-80750 | Int Charges | 1,060,555.50 |
Jan 15, 2015 | IBRD-80750 | Int Charges | 70,362.59 |
Jul 15, 2014 | IBRD-80750 | Int Charges | 1,018,125.00 |
Jul 15, 2014 | IBRD-80750 | Int Charges | 575,557.44 |
Jul 15, 2023 | IBRD-80750 | Int Charges | 606,736.75 |
Jul 15, 2023 | IBRD-80750 | Int Charges | 2,719,500.00 |
Jul 15, 2023 | IBRD-80750 | Int Charges | 1,828,638.10 |
Jul 15, 2023 | IBRD-80750 | Loan Repay | 4,720,815.00 |
Jul 15, 2023 | IBRD-80750 | Loan Repay | 6,250,000.00 |
Jan 15, 2024 | IBRD-80750 | Int Charges | 1,316,957.00 |
Jan 15, 2024 | IBRD-80750 | Int Charges | 2,627,000.00 |
Jan 15, 2024 | IBRD-80750 | Loan Repay | 6,250,000.00 |
Jan 15, 2024 | IBRD-80750 | Loan Repay | 4,605,319.00 |
Jan 15, 2024 | IBRD-80750 | Int Charges | 1,738,031.60 |
Jun 21, 2011 | IBRD-80750 | Loan Commitment | 250,000,000.00 |
Jun 21, 2011 | IBRD-80750 | Loan Commitment | 250,000,000.00 |
Jul 15, 2024 | IBRD-80750 | Int Charges | 1,250,567.60 |
Jul 15, 2024 | IBRD-80750 | Int Charges | 1,680,793.00 |
Jul 15, 2024 | IBRD-80750 | Loan Repay | 3,672,306.00 |
Jul 15, 2024 | IBRD-80750 | Int Charges | 2,534,500.00 |
Jul 15, 2024 | IBRD-80750 | Loan Repay | 5,000,000.00 |
Jul 15, 2022 | IBRD-80750 | Int Charges | 2,886,000.00 |
Jul 15, 2022 | IBRD-80750 | Loan Repay | 5,000,000.00 |
Jul 15, 2022 | IBRD-80750 | Int Charges | 99,586.60 |
Jul 15, 2022 | IBRD-80750 | Loan Repay | 3,385,859.50 |
Jan 15, 2022 | IBRD-80750 | Int Charges | 174,469.00 |
Jan 15, 2022 | IBRD-80750 | Loan Repay | 4,818,639.50 |
Jan 15, 2022 | IBRD-80750 | Int Charges | 2,978,500.00 |
Jan 15, 2022 | IBRD-80750 | Loan Repay | 6,250,000.00 |
Jan 15, 2023 | IBRD-80750 | Int Charges | 728,041.75 |
Jan 15, 2023 | IBRD-80750 | Loan Repay | 4,549,149.00 |
Jan 15, 2023 | IBRD-80750 | Int Charges | 2,812,000.00 |
Jan 15, 2023 | IBRD-80750 | Loan Repay | 6,250,000.00 |
Jul 15, 2020 | IBRD-80750 | Int Charges | 296,112.84 |
Jul 15, 2020 | IBRD-80750 | Int Charges | 2,723,364.50 |
Jan 15, 2021 | IBRD-80750 | Int Charges | 1,122,911.10 |
INDICATOR | IMPLEMENTATION COMPLETION & RESULTS REPORT: 12-30-2012 |
---|---|
Outcomes | Moderately Satisfactory |
Risk to Development Outcome | Substantial |
Bank Performance | Substantial |
Borrower Performance | Moderately Satisfactory |
Government Performance | Substantial |
Implementing Agency | Moderately Satisfactory |
INDICATOR | ICR REVIEW: 05-01-2014 | PROJECT PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT REPORT: |
---|---|---|
Outcome Rating | Moderately Unsatisfactory | N/a |
Risk To Development Outcome | High | N/a |
Bank Performance | Moderately Satisfactory | N/a |
Borrower Performance | Moderately Unsatisfactory | N/a |
Government Performance | Moderately Unsatisfactory | N/a |
Implementing Agency | Moderately Unsatisfactory | N/a |
Icr Quality | Satisfactory | N/a |
M&e Quality | Modest | N/a |
INDICATOR | BASELINE | CURRENT | TARGET |
---|
INDICATOR | BASELINE | CURRENT | TARGET |
---|
Number of statistical surveys that are anynomized, published and open to public access | Value | Number of statistical data and surveys that are op | i) LFSs = 4 (2007, 2008, 2009 and 2010), but micro | Anonymize and publish at least the following surv |
Date | December 31, 2010 | June 30, 2012 | June 30, 2012 | |
Comment | The Bank is providing TA to solve remaining issues with microdata online. Additional data and reports are available online: A 22%sample of 2004 census; Microenterprise survey 2007; ITC survey 2009; Enterprise Census 2011; and Trade Statistics 2011 |
Number of detailed national account statistics published | Value | 0 | The report with aggregate data is published but no | Publish the detailed national accounts (400 produc |
Date | December 31, 2010 | June 30, 2012 | June 30, 2012 | |
Comment | The report with semi-disaggregate data is available online, but desegregated data at the 400 products has not published, as thetechnical capacity of the system is not able to host such a large databank. AfDB is providing TA to improve the IT system at theINS. |
Number of .tn domain names (internet websites) | Value | 8000.00 | 15440.00 | 80000.00 |
Date | December 31, 2010 | June 30, 2012 | June 30, 2012 | |
Comment | The number of .tn sites has more than doubled (it had reached 15,440 by end-June 2012) , yet the increase was much slower thanexpected due to: (i) more severe economic downturn; (ii) delay in establishing electronic registry; (iii) low competitive pricingin web-hosting services; (iv) limited confidence of the population in the internet freedom. |
Average time needed to award a public contract | Value | 312 days | Average time from proposals submission deadline to | Decrease by 50 % the average of the duration of co |
Date | December 31, 2010 | June 30, 2012 | June 30, 2012 | |
Comment | The average duration of contract award time cannot be calculated as the time from transmission of the draft bidding document totheconcerned committee to the signing date of the contract is not available. However based on available data on the time fromproposalssubmission deadline to publication of the bidding results decreased (which accounted for 2/3 of the process in 2010), thisindicatorappears likely to have been met. |
Number of contracts subject to more than one stage process | Value | The percentage of contracts subject to more than o | The percentage of contracts not subject to one sta | Reduce by 75 % the percentage of contracts not sub |
Date | December 31, 2010 | June 30, 2012 | June 30, 2012 | |
Comment | The new bidding procedure is based on a one-stage process. Although the regulatory framework established an exceptional procedurefor a two-stage bidding process, it was not used during the program period. |
Share of contract awards published on the website of the Observatoire National des Marchés Publics | Value | Share of contract awards (competitive/limited bidd | Most awards are now published online, but exact d | Share of contract awards (competitive/limited bid |
Date | December 31, 2010 | June 30, 2012 | June 30, 2012 | |
Comment | Most of the bidding and contract awards information is now posted on the web-site. However, the Observatoire is not aware if allof the bidding / contract awards information has been published, as publication power is delegated to the bidding agencies |
Quantitative estimate of cost of compliance of selected administrative procedures | Value | Baseline will be determined upon launching the rev | 0%: No reduction of compliance costs with selected | For each of the administrative procedures identifi |
Date | December 31, 2010 | June 30, 2012 | June 30, 2012 | |
Comment |
For each of the administrative procedures identified in the areas of customs, trade, tourism, taxes: Quantitative estimate of compliance time: number of steps and number of days for each step | Value | Baseline will be determined upon launching the rev | 0%: compliance time with procedures was not reduce | For each of the administrative procedures identifi |
Date | December 31, 2010 | June 30, 2012 | June 30, 2012 | |
Comment |
Proxy of the extent to which regulation is prone to discretion and arbitrariness | Value | Baseline will be determined upon launching the rev | 0%: No publication, as the review of selected proc | Procedures, decision criteria, decision processes |
Date | December 31, 2010 | June 30, 2012 | June 30, 2012 | |
Comment |
Number of programs financed by the National Employment Fund assessed through an impact evaluation | Value | ONEQ (i) Number of programs financed by the Fund a | Number of programs financed by the Fund that have | Number of programs financed by the Fund that have |
Date | December 31, 2010 | June 30, 2012 | June 30, 2012 | |
Comment | ONEQ prepared a progress report with the Bank's TA to assess the progress of the AMAL program in 2011, and the Bank's TA helped toassess the National Employment Funds in June 2012. (AMAL2 was dropped) |
Indicators related to AMAL 2: (ii) non-governmental participation | Value | Number of AMAL2 projects that have been implemente | None | 100 projects |
Date | December 31, 2010 | June 30, 2012 | June 30, 2012 | |
Comment | AMAL2 was abandoned. |
Number of employment programs financed by the National Employment Fund that have a baseline indicators for insertion rate and cost of insertion | Value | ANETI / ONEQ: (ii) Employment programs financed by | None | Employment programs financed by the Fund have init |
Date | December 31, 2010 | June 30, 2012 | June 30, 2012 | |
Comment | The Bank ir providing TA to establish an institutionalized M&E system of employment programs in place with the help of the Bank'stechnical assistance. | (i) 22,350 beneficiaries received 3 days training across the country (ii) 7,765 beneficiaries have been enrolled into a paidinternship |
Provision of basic training package, internships and additional employment services to AMAL program beneficiaries | Value | ANETI: (i) Number of AMAL1 beneficiaries who recei | (i) 22,350 beneficiaries received 3 days training | (i) 10,000 beneficiaries received the introductory |
Date | December 31, 2010 | June 30, 2012 | June 30, 2012 | |
Comment | (i) The number of beneficiaries who received 3 days training (instead of initially planned 2 days) surpassed the targetedvalue.(ii) The weak institutional capacity of the Ministry and lower economic activity limited the number of paid internships. |
Indicators related to AMAL 2: (i) provision of additional employment services to beneficiaries | Value | Number of AMAL2 public works beneficiaries who rec | None | 1,000 beneficiaries |
Date | December 31, 2010 | June 30, 2012 | June 30, 2012 | |
Comment | AMAL2 was abandoned, as the government found that the implementation of AMAL-1 was already more challenging than had beenanticipated. |
Number of regions that have publicly disseminated participatory monitoring operational guidelines | Value | 0 | 0 | 100% (24 of 24 regions) |
Date | December 31, 2010 | June 30, 2012 | June 30, 2012 | |
Comment | The guidelines were published by the Prime Ministry at the national level as part of results dissemination report on the website |
Number of regions that have published performance standards for community-based health and social workers | Value | 0 | 0 | 100% (24 of 24 regions) |
Date | December 31, 2010 | June 30, 2012 | June 30, 2012 | |
Comment | While the administration has disseminated guidance and information at the local level through regional bureaus, more effort isneeded to more frequently and more widely publish online detailed performance indicators of outreach services. |
Number of independent board members in private and state owned banks | Value | 2 banks have an independent board member | 89% of banks (16 out of 18 banks) have 2 independe | All banks have at least 2 independent board member |
Date | December 31, 2010 | June 30, 2012 | June 30, 2012 | |
Comment |
Improved independence of the internal audit function in banks | Value | Head of internal audit is hired, fired, promoted a | 67% of banks (12 out 18 banks) formalized the Audi | 100% banks' head of audit are hired, fired, promo |
Date | December 31, 2010 | June 30, 2012 | June 30, 2012 | |
Comment |
Improved risk management function access to boards | Value | Less than 20% of the banks have independent report | 89% of banks (16 out of 18 banks) appointed indepe | All banks implement independent reporting lines fr |
Date | December 31, 2010 | June 30, 2012 | June 30, 2012 | |
Comment | First national online scorecard (on 10 public services) completed and results published (with 8,555 citizens). Second onlinescorecard (on health insurance) initiated. Scorecard with NGOs (800 households) completed in June 2012 (not yet published) |
Number of participatory monitoring assessments of public and social services | Value | Number of regions where at least one local-level p | First national online scorecard (on 10 public serv | Number of regions where at least one local-level p |
Date | December 31, 2010 | June 30, 2012 | June 30, 2012 | |
Comment |
Number of regions for which social sector data are published: health, education and social assistance data | Value | 0 | - Health Ministry published health indicators incl | 24/24 regions |
Date | December 31, 2010 | June 30, 2012 | June 30, 2012 | |
Comment | - The Health Ministry published health indicators for each of the governorates at the end of 2011, including expenditures andoutcome indicators.- The Ministries of Education and Social Affairs have not yet published their data. |
Number of regions with community health and social teams trained and operating | Value | Number of regions with community health and social | Number of community social workers increased in 23 | Number of regions with community health and social |
Date | December 31, 2010 | June 30, 2012 | June 30, 2012 | |
Comment | The government has increased mobile social workers, but has not yet institutionalized a coordinated package for health, educationand social protection mobile services. The Ministry of Health has had 89 mobile reproductive health workers since 2011. |