Skip to Main Navigation

First Development Policy Loan

Abstract*

This is the first in a proposed series of two development policy loans supporting Poland's goal of strengthening public finances. This first loan in a programmatic series of two development policy loans (DPLs) aims to strengthen Poland's public finances. Sound macroeconomic policies coupled with limited external imbalances helped Poland maintain economic growth during the 2008-09 global downturns. At the request of the Polish authorities, the DPL...

* The project abstract is drawn from the PAD, SAR or PGD and may not accurately reflect the project's current nature

Show More

Development Objective

This is the first in a proposed series of two development policy loans supporting Poland’s goal of strengthening public finances. The proposed DPL program is central to the Bank’s engagement in the country in the area of public finance reform, as described in theCountry Partnership Strategy Progress Report (CPSPR) presented to the Board on June 7, 2011. The CPSPR highlights that the DPL program is expected to support Poland’s fiscal consolidation agenda, while strengthening fiscal institutions and improving the efficiency and sustainability of social spending. The programmatic DPL is structured around three pillars with the following development objectives: (i) consolidating public finances to ensure a steady decline of the fiscal deficit to stabilize and over the medium-term reduce public debt to maintain favorable access to financial markets; (ii) strengthening fiscal institutions through the introduction of fiscal rules to ingrain a prudent fiscal stance over the medium term; and (iii) advancing long-term fiscal reforms to secure the sustainability of social spending in view of Poland’s demographic challenge. The measures proposed to be supported under each pillarare as follows: Pillar 1 Consolidating Public Finances: Sizable fiscal consolidation is a key policy priority for 2012. Buildingon the progress made in 2011, a further reduction in the fiscal deficit is crucial to adhere to Poland’s commitment under the Excessive Deficit Procedure, to stay clear of the 55 percent of GDP national public debt limit, and to protect priority spending. Pillar 2 Strengthening Fiscal Institutions: Through the introduction of fiscal rules, the Government aims to ensure that once the fiscal deficit has come down after the initial consolidation process, it remains at prudent levels over the business cycle. The Government plans to introduce controls on local government finances in the form of an annual aggregate deficit ceiling. In addition, a new national level fiscal rule would limit the growth of national government expenditures to a rate not exceeding the trend growth rate of GDP. These rules would safeguard against the re-emergence of excessive structural budget deficits in the medium and long term. Pillar 3Advancing Long-Term Fiscal Reforms: Strengthening public finances also requires Poland to initiate structural reforms across various sectors. These reforms are focused on helping to secure the sustainability of pension transfers and public health care services, while improving the coverage and generosity of social assistance for the most vulnerable. In addition, introducing a regular income accounting for farmers will enable moving to a system of regular taxation of the agriculture sector based on income, including for the payment all social insurance contributions over the medium term. These policies aim to enhance Poland’s economic resilience in the face of adverse times. These policies also aim at protecting fiscal space for key growth-enhancing investments.

Key Details

Project Details

  • P127433

  • Closed

  • Gallina Andronova Vincelette

  • N/A

  • Poland

  • June 19, 2012

  • (as of board presentation)

    June 19, 2012

  • July 16, 2012

  • US$ 991.40 million

  • Ministry of Finance

  • Europe and Central Asia

  • 2012

  • US$ 0.99 million

  • N/A

  • March 4, 2021

  • June 30, 2013

  • BANK APPROVED

  • Notes

Finances

Financing Plan (US$ Millions)

No data available.
Financier Commitments
International Bank for Reconstruction and Development 0.99

Total Project Financing (US$ Millions)

Product Line IBRD/IDA
IBRD Commitment 0.99
IDA Commitment N/A
IBRD + IDA Commitment 0.99
Lending Instrument
Grant Amount N/A
Total Project Cost** 991.40

Summary Status of World Bank Financing (US$ Millions) as of February 28, 2025

Download:
No data available.
Financier Approval Date Closing Date Principal Disbursed Repayments Interest, Charges & Fees

Detailed Financial Activity as of February 28, 2025

Download:
No data available.
Period Financier Transaction Type Amount (US$)
May 15, 2019 IBRD-81860 Int Charges 1,393,202.20
Nov 15, 2019 IBRD-81860 Int Charges 1,564,776.20
May 15, 2018 IBRD-81860 Int Charges 1,258,342.10
Nov 15, 2018 IBRD-81860 Int Charges 1,301,052.50
Nov 15, 2017 IBRD-81860 Int Charges 1,362,405.00
May 15, 2016 IBRD-81860 Int Charges 1,892,807.60
Nov 15, 2016 IBRD-81860 Int Charges 1,361,835.80
May 15, 2017 IBRD-81860 Int Charges 1,240,924.80
May 15, 2015 IBRD-81860 Int Charges 2,484,417.20
Jun 19, 2012 IBRD-81860 Loan Commitment 991,400,000.00
May 15, 2024 IBRD-81860 Int Charges 14,648,681.00
May 15, 2024 IBRD-81860 Loan Repay 36,940,312.00
Nov 15, 2023 IBRD-81860 Int Charges 14,208,088.00
Nov 15, 2023 IBRD-81860 Loan Repay 37,080,224.00
May 15, 2022 IBRD-81860 Int Charges 373,891.16
May 15, 2022 IBRD-81860 Loan Repay 35,449,048.00
Nov 15, 2022 IBRD-81860 Int Charges 1,269,821.50
Nov 15, 2022 IBRD-81860 Loan Repay 35,530,952.00
May 15, 2023 IBRD-81860 Int Charges 10,166,946.00
May 15, 2023 IBRD-81860 Loan Repay 37,126,292.00
Nov 15, 2021 IBRD-81860 Int Charges 482,850.50
Nov 15, 2021 IBRD-81860 Loan Repay 39,076,536.00
Nov 15, 2020 IBRD-81860 Int Charges 2,038,605.00
May 15, 2021 IBRD-81860 Int Charges 456,817.60
Nov 15, 2014 IBRD-81860 Int Charges 3,816,620.00
Nov 15, 2015 IBRD-81860 Int Charges 2,026,627.80
May 15, 2020 IBRD-81860 Int Charges 1,024,650.50
Nov 15, 2013 IBRD-81860 Int Charges 3,402,470.50
May 15, 2014 IBRD-81860 Int Charges 3,553,510.80

Footnotes

Ratings

IMPLEMENTATION RATINGS

Name Review Date
Progress towards achievement of PDO Satisfactory 2012-09-25
Monitoring and Evaluation Satisfactory 2012-09-25
Program Management Satisfactory 2012-09-25
Overall Implementation Progress (IP) Satisfactory 2012-09-25

COMPLETION RATINGS

INDICATORIMPLEMENTATION COMPLETION & RESULTS REPORT: 07-14-2015
OutcomesSubstantial
Risk to Development OutcomeModest
Bank PerformanceSubstantial
Borrower PerformanceSubstantial
Government PerformanceSubstantial
Implementing AgencySubstantial

INDEPENDENT EVALUATION RATINGS

INDICATORICR REVIEW: 01-20-2016PROJECT PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT REPORT: 04-26-2019
Outcome RatingSatisfactory Satisfactory
Risk To Development OutcomeModerateModest
Bank PerformanceSatisfactorySatisfactory
Borrower PerformanceSatisfactoryModerately Satisfactory
Government PerformanceSatisfactoryNot Rated
Implementing AgencySatisfactoryNot Rated
Icr QualitySatisfactoryNot Rated
M&e QualityModestSubstantial

Results Framework

PROJECT DEVELOPMENT OBJECTIVE INDICATORS

INDICATORBASELINECURRENTTARGET

INTERMEDIATE RESULTS INDICATORS

INDICATORBASELINECURRENTTARGET
  • By end 2013, local governments' debt-to-GDP ratio (ESA'95) is stabilized at arounnd the 2011 level (not higher than 4.3 percent of GDP)Value4.300.004.30
    DateDecember 31, 2011December 31, 2013
    Commentlocal governments' debt-to-GDP ratio (ESA'95) is stabilized at arounnd the 2011 level (not higher than 4.3 percent of GDP)
  • By end 2013, public debt (national definition) of GDP is stabilized at around the 2011 levelValue54.000.0054.00
    DateDecember 31, 2011December 31, 2013
    Commentpublic debt (national definition) of GDP should stabilize around 2011 levels (not higher than 54 percent)
  • The last-resort minimum income benefit for a “typical” poor family is increased in 2013 compared to 2010Value
    DateDecember 31, 2010December 31, 2013
    CommentThe last-resort minimum income benefit for a “typical” poor family is between 29% and 31% (depending on the age of children) ofthe Eurostat "at-risk-of-poverty" threshold in 2010.The last-resort minimum income benefit for a “typical” poor family (depending on the age of children) is improved in 2013comparedto 2010.
  • By the end of 2013, the social security funds’ deficit-to-GDP ratio (ESA’95 definition) is reduced compared to 2010 (lower than 0.8percent of GDP)Value0.800.000.80
    DateDecember 31, 2010December 31, 2013
    Commentthe social security funds’ deficit-to-GDP ratio (ESA’95 definition) is reduced compared to 2010 (lower than 0.8 percent of GDP)
  • Hospital arrears are reduced by 8 percent by end-2013 compared to end-2011Value2.400.000.00
    DateDecember 31, 2011December 31, 2013
    CommentPLN 2.4 billionreduction of 8 percent of hospital arrears compared to end-2011