Financier | Commitments |
---|---|
IDA Credit | 50.00 |
P146923
Closed
Suleiman Namara
N/A
April 1, 2014
(as of board presentation)
May 27, 2014
N/A
US$ 50.00 million
N/A
2014
US$ 50.00 million
B
January 17, 2024
May 31, 2018
Yes
BANK APPROVED
Financier | Commitments |
---|---|
IDA Credit | 50.00 |
Product Line | IBRD/IDA |
---|---|
IBRD Commitment | N/A |
IDA Commitment | 50.00 |
IBRD + IDA Commitment | 50.00 |
Lending Instrument | |
---|---|
Grant Amount | N/A |
Total Project Cost** | 50.00 |
INDICATOR | BASELINE | CURRENT | TARGET |
---|
Direct project beneficiaries | Value | 0.00 | 156000.00 | 390000.00 |
Date | May 20, 2010 | March 31, 2014 | June 30, 2017 | |
Comment | Cumulative target |
Average annual earnings of unskilled workers in LIPWs (cedi) | Value | 0.00 | 245.00 | 200.00 |
Date | May 20, 2010 | September 30, 2013 | June 30, 2017 | |
Comment | Revised: The indicator has been revised for clarity to mean earnings per year (1 July to 30 June) per worker on average. Annualtarget and inflation-corrected using consumer price indexThe end-of-project targets is based on: minimum of 34 person-days peryear for each beneficiary and 6 GHc daily wage. |
Person days of unskilled workers | Value | 0.00 | 3200000.00 | 9500000.00 |
Date | May 20, 2010 | September 30, 2013 | June 30, 2017 | |
Comment | Cumulative targetDefinition of person-day has been redefined to be: six hours per day work |
LEAP and Ghana Health Insurance indigent exemption expenditures in GoG's overall package of pro-poor expenditures as defined by MoFEP | Value | 0.19 | 0.70 | 3.00 |
Date | May 20, 2010 | September 30, 2013 | June 30, 2016 | |
Comment | LEAP only | Dropped: This indicator will be dropped due to lack of clarity on definition of indigents, tracking registration of indigents anddefinition of pro-poor spending. |
Social protection spending allocated to programs targeted to the poor | Value | 0.00 | 0.00 | 6.00 |
Date | May 20, 2010 | June 30, 2016 | June 30, 2016 | |
Comment | This indicator was introduced during project design, however, obtaining a baseline and data for subsequent periods has beendifficult. | Revised: This indicator does not adequately measure the PDO and will be revised. |
Beneficiaries of Safety Nets programs - Other cash transfers programs (number) | Value | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Date | June 11, 2013 | June 30, 2016 | ||
Comment | This indicator was introduced during project design, however, obtaining a baseline and data for subsequent periods has beendifficult. | This indicator needs to be re-visited during the MTR given the difficulty in obtaining the necessary data. | Dropped. This indicator was difficult to capture and therefore dropped. |
Beneficiaries of Safety Nets programs - Conditional cash transfers (number) | Value | 14000.00 | 74347.00 | 200000.00 |
Date | September 30, 2013 | June 30, 2016 | ||
Comment | Dropped. This is a World Bank core indicator not included in the original results framework but reported in the ISR. It has beendropped due to lack of application of hard conditions in cash transfers. However, soft conditions have been implemented. |
Beneficiaries of Safety Nets programs - Female (number) | Value | 0.00 | 101400.00 | 253500.00 |
Date | March 5, 2010 | March 31, 2014 | June 30, 2017 | |
Comment | Cumulative Target |
Beneficiaries of Safety Nets programs - Cash-for-work, food-for-work and public works (number) | Value | 0.00 | 80678.00 | 190000.00 |
Date | March 5, 2010 | September 30, 2013 | June 30, 2017 | |
Comment | Cumulative target |
Female beneficiaries | Value | 0.00 | 65.00 | 65.00 |
Date | May 20, 2010 | June 11, 2013 | June 30, 2017 | |
Comment |
Direct project beneficiaries under cash transfer component | Value | 0.00 | 74347.00 | 200000.00 |
Date | May 20, 2010 | December 31, 2013 | June 30, 2017 | |
Comment | Cumulative target |
Direct project beneficiaries under LIPW component | Value | 0.00 | 80678.00 | 190000.00 |
Date | May 20, 2010 | September 30, 2013 | June 30, 2017 | |
Comment | Cumulative target |
Potential and actual beneficiaries in participating districts satisfied with subprojects, LIPW program and LEAP transfers (%) | Value | 0.00 | 0.00 | 70.00 |
Date | May 20, 2010 | June 30, 2017 | ||
Comment | Annual target |
Share of beneficiaries from the poorest 20% of population for LEAP and poorest 30% of the population for LIPW. | Value | 0.00 | 0.00 | 50.00 |
Date | March 31, 2014 | June 30, 2017 | ||
Comment | As of March 31, 2014:LEAP indicator baseline is 19%LIPW indicator baseline is 39%(cannot enter these numbers separately underthe current format in the portal). | Baseline data for LIPW is from survey done in 2013 as per report titled ‘Validation of targeting effectiveness using the commontargeting mechanism’. Baseline for LEAP is from 2012 Report titled “Options for Targeting of Safety Nets in Ghana”. |
Beneficiaries of Safety Nets programs (number) | Value | 0.00 | 156000.00 | 390000.00 |
Date | March 5, 2010 | September 30, 2013 | June 30, 2017 | |
Comment | Cumulative target |
INDICATOR | BASELINE | CURRENT | TARGET |
---|
Original name: Payments made to contractors after receipt of performance security. Revised name: Avg time lapse between submission of interim certificate by LIPW contractors and payments by DAs | Value | 30.00 | 100.00 | 20.00 |
Date | September 30, 2013 | June 11, 2013 | June 30, 2017 | |
Comment | Only one contractor received a performance security Bank guarantee was given the advance payment. | Revised: Average time lapse between submission of interim certificate by LIPW contractors and payments made to them by MDAs(calendar days). The indicator has been revised because contractors are in almost all cases not able to obtain a bank guaranteeneeded for the submission of security performance. The revised indicator captures the time efficiency by District Assemblies inpayment. |
LEAP operational review completed and action plan prepared | Value | No | Yes | Yes |
Date | May 20, 2010 | September 30, 2013 | June 30, 2016 | |
Comment | Completed. Target has been achieved. |
Original name: Working group to set priorities for social protection indicators to be set under MoFEP leadership. Revised name: Social Protection Policy drafted by MoGCSP and submitted to cabinet | Value | No | No | Yes |
Date | May 20, 2010 | September 30, 2013 | June 30, 2016 | |
Comment | The work on rationalization of social safety nets has been completed and recommended preparation of a Social Protection Policy. | Revised to “Social Protection Policy drafted by MOGCSP and submitted to cabinet". |
Area Planted for Fruit Trees and Multi-Purpose Woodlots (ha) | Value | 672.00 | 0.00 | 2360.00 |
Date | March 31, 2014 | June 30, 2014 | ||
Comment | New. This indicator has been added to capture the revised PDO in terms of LIPW infrastructure. |
Small earth dams and dug-outs rehabilitated (number) | Value | 62.00 | 0.00 | 300.00 |
Date | March 31, 2014 | June 30, 2017 | ||
Comment | New. This has been added to capture the revised PDO in terms of LIPW infrastructure in targeted districts. |
Private contractors techically capable of implementing and supervising LIPW. | Value | 74.00 | 0.00 | 125.00 |
Date | March 31, 2014 | June 30, 2017 | ||
Comment | New. This indicator was not initially in the results framework (but in the results monitoring table). |
A policy and institutional framework favorable to scaling-up the project is in place | Value | No | No | Yes |
Date | May 20, 2010 | September 30, 2013 | June 30, 2016 | |
Comment | Dropped. Since a dedicated indicator on social protection policy has been added. |
Project resources used in compliance with project objectives and procedures | Value | No | Yes | Yes |
Date | May 20, 2010 | September 30, 2013 | June 30, 2016 | |
Comment | Dropped. This indicator relates to compliance in project management and is being dropped. |
Pilot formally evaluated against agreed upon indicators (coverage and targeting performance) and lessons learned incorporated into rollout plan | Value | No | Yes | Yes |
Date | May 20, 2010 | September 30, 2013 | June 30, 2016 | |
Comment | Dropped. The target has been achieved. |
Targeting performance (share of beneficiaries from the poorest 20% of population) | Value | 19.00 | 50.00 | 50.00 |
Date | March 31, 2014 | June 11, 2013 | June 30, 2017 | |
Comment | Revised and updated. This indicator has been elevated as PDO indicator given that this is an outcome indicator capturing theoutcome on improved targeting. Furthermore, the indicator has become clearer by removing "targeting performance". |
Enrolled beneficiaries in the districts where LEAP pilot will be intensified (% increase) | Value | 0.00 | 100.00 | 270.00 |
Date | May 20, 2010 | March 31, 2014 | June 30, 2017 | |
Comment | Status (2013) in absolute numbers is 74,000. |
LEAP administrative costs compared to total costs | Value | 15.00 | 8.12 | 11.00 |
Date | September 30, 2013 | June 11, 2013 | June 30, 2017 | |
Comment |
Total unskilled worker earnings as share of LIPW cost | Value | 40.00 | 48.00 | 62.00 |
Date | May 20, 2010 | March 31, 2014 | June 30, 2017 | |
Comment | Annual Target |
Original name: Maintenance program established for roads and dams. Revised name: District Assemblies with maintenance programs established for completed sub-projects (number) | Value | 10.00 | 10.00 | 60.00 |
Date | May 20, 2010 | March 31, 2014 | June 30, 2017 | |
Comment | Revised. District Assemblies with maintenance programs established for completed sub-projects (number). This indicator has beenrevised to include all LIPW sub-projects. DA maintenance programs include communities and maintenance activities by type of project(dams/dug-outs, roads, tree-planting) |
Original name: Rehabilitated dams inspected annually by communities for dam safety concerns. Revised name: Completed subprojects inspected annually by Communities (under spn of district tech. spc). | Value | 50.00 | 50.00 | 90.00 |
Date | May 20, 2010 | September 30, 2013 | June 30, 2017 | |
Comment | Revised indicator name: Completed sub-projects inspected annually by communities (under supervision of district technicalspecialist) (%) |
Roads rehabilitated, Rural | Value | 0.00 | 421.00 | 700.00 |
Date | May 20, 2010 | March 31, 2014 | June 30, 2017 | |
Comment | Revised. The target has been changed from annual to cumulative targets and annual and end-of-project targets have been revisedupward. |
Updated and tested menu of LIPW with costs and labor contribution unit | Value | No | Yes | Yes |
Date | May 20, 2010 | September 30, 2013 | June 30, 2016 | |
Comment | Dropped. The target for this indicator has been achieved and the indicator will not be included in the revised results frameworkbut included in the table which reports achieved results. |
Payments to workers under LIPW program made within 20 days after the attendance at work sites | Value | 0.00 | 60.00 | 80.00 |
Date | May 20, 2010 | March 31, 2014 | June 30, 2017 | |
Comment | Annual Target |