Skip to Main Navigation

Second Rural Investment Project Additional Financing

Development Objective

The Project Development Objective is to improve access to and use of community-driven rural infrastructure and expand economic activities for rural households. This would be achieved through: (i) the provision of grants to finance eligible demand-driven micro-projects in rural infrastructure; (ii) the provision of training and consultants’ services to support micro-project development by enhancing the capacity of engaged local stakeholders in all aspects of micro-project program development; (iii) building opportunities for rural employment and livelihood support services through the provision of training and consultants’ services to carry out pilot livelihood support services in six communities; and, (iv) supporting project management capacity at the Project Management Unit and its Regional Operations Offices for the purposes of effective management, implementation and monitoring and evaluation of Project activities.

Key Details

Project Details

  • P147861

  • Closed

  • Satoshi Ishihara

  • N/A

  • Azerbaijan

  • March 10, 2014

  • (as of board presentation)

    July 9, 2014

  • N/A

  • US$ 50.00 million

  • B

  • October 12, 2023

  • N/A

  • Yes

  • BANK APPROVED

  • P122944

  • Notes

Finances

Financing Plan (US$ Millions)

No data available.
Financier Commitments
International Bank for Reconstruction and Development 50.00

Total Project Financing (US$ Millions)

Product Line IBRD/IDA
IBRD Commitment 50.00
IDA Commitment N/A
IBRD + IDA Commitment 50.00
Lending Instrument
Grant Amount N/A
Total Project Cost** 50.00

Summary Status of World Bank Financing (US$ Millions) as of February 28, 2025

Download:
No data available.
Financier Approval Date Closing Date Principal Disbursed Repayments Interest, Charges & Fees

Detailed Financial Activity as of February 28, 2025

Download:
No data available.
Period Financier Transaction Type Amount (US$)

Footnotes

Ratings

IMPLEMENTATION RATINGS

No data available.

COMPLETION RATINGS

No data available.

INDEPENDENT EVALUATION RATINGS

No data available.

Results Framework

PROJECT DEVELOPMENT OBJECTIVE INDICATORS

INDICATORBASELINECURRENTTARGET
  • Percentage change inincome from household economic activityValue0.000.000.00
    DateFebruary 11, 2013February 25, 2014
    CommentMajority of respondents indicated that their monthly salary is AZN 125-225.Awaiting livelihood project operations.
  • Percentage increase in access to and use of rural infrastructureValue0.007.000.00
    DateFebruary 11, 2013February 25, 2014
    CommentCalculation of this indicator was based on the average rating of infrastructure facilities (in total 15 facilities) rating byrespondents during the baseline survey.This 7% increase preliminarily was calculated based on PMU, Regional Office (ROO) and Project Assistance Teams (PAT) projectmonitoring. The exact calculations will be carried out during the Mid-term survey.
  • Percentage of households that are satisfied with the quality of basic rural infrastructureValue10.0018.000.00
    DateFebruary 11, 2013February 25, 2014
    CommentCalculation of this indicator was based on the overall average rating of basic infrastructure facilities (road and water supply)byrespondents during the baseline survey.8% increase calculated based on PMU, ROOs and PAT project monitoring. Exact calculations will be carried out during the Mid-termsurvey.
  • Percentage reduction intravel time to market,hospital, school, safewater sourceValue0.0010.000.00
    DateFebruary 11, 2013February 25, 2014
    CommentCalculation of this indicator based on the overall average time and distance taken to reach infrastructure facilities byrespondents during the baseline survey.10% reduction calculated based on PMU, ROOs and PAT observations. Precise calculations will be carried out during the Mid-termsurvey.

INTERMEDIATE RESULTS INDICATORS

INDICATORBASELINECURRENTTARGET
  • Number of microprojectsValue0.00215.000.00
    DateDecember 4, 2012February 25, 2014
    CommentCompleted sub-projects 215: of which 139 roads, 10 drainage, 3 electricity system rehabilitation, 20 potable water supply, 12irrigation system rehabilitation, 7 health clinics, 4 kindergartens and 20 community renovations
  • Direct project beneficiariesValue0.00817043.000.00
    DateDecember 4, 2012February 25, 2014
    CommentPotable water 57,099Irrigation 37,439Electricity 3,165Road582,183Health 21,688Drainage 48,871Kindergarten 11,988Community renovation 52,986
  • Participants in consultation activities during project implementationValue0.004340.000.00
    DateFebruary 25, 2014
    Comment
  • Intended beneficiaries that are aware of project information and project supported investmentsValue53.0065.000.00
    DateFebruary 11, 2013February 25, 2014
    CommentEXPRESSED AS PERCENTAGE.An average 53% of the sample respondents of the baseline had heard about AZRIPEXPRESSED AS PERCENTAGE.22% increase calculated based on PMU, ROOs and PAT observations.
  • Number of women in Community Project CommitteesValue0.00927.000.00
    DateFebruary 25, 2014
    Comment
  • Percentage of subprojects where necessary maintenance operations are taking place with community engagementValue0.00100.000.00
    DateFebruary 25, 2014
    Comment
  • Grievances registered related to delivery of project benefits addressed (%)Value0.00100.000.00
    DateFebruary 11, 2013October 15, 2013
    CommentComments, suggestions or queries, appreciation and gratitude - 271Related to performance of community projects - 3Related toproject staff or community groups - 0 Related to corruption and violation practices - 0Questions on technical implementation - 4
  • Change in community members who feel they have some influence in community decision making processes (male/female)Value0.007.000.00
    DateFebruary 25, 2014
    Comment69-74 absolute change (7% increase)
  • Change in degree of people's trust in community groupsValue0.005.000.00
    DateFebruary 25, 2014
    Comment75% to 78% change - 5% increase.
  • Change in people's willingness to contribute to community project costsValue0.003.000.00
    DateFebruary 25, 2014
    Comment74% to 77% change - 3% increase.
  • Trainees in capacity building activities by kind of activity (male/female/youth/minorities/IDPs/municipal/ExComm) community training; cross visits; seminars; conferencesValue0.006368.000.00
    DateFebruary 25, 2014
    CommentCommunity trainings- 2715Cross visits - 2181Seminars- 770Conferences- 812TOTAL 6368
  • illages which hold community-wide meetings organized by Community Group to discuss public matters after project completionValue0.0099.000.00
    DateFebruary 25, 2014
    Comment
  • Communities with new projects implemented with internal resources (including activities with municipality and ExComm)Value0.0025.000.00
    DateFebruary 25, 2014
    Comment25 communities have launched new project initiatives with internal resources out of current completed project set of 215.
  • Communities with projects implemented with external resourcesValue0.0035.000.00
    DateFebruary 25, 2014
    Comment35 communities have launched new project initiatives with external resources out of current completed project set of 215.
  • Female beneficiariesValue0.0052.000.00
    DateDecember 4, 2012February 25, 2014
    Comment
  • Grievances related to delivery of project benefits that are addressed-(number)Value0.003.000.00
    DateFebruary 11, 2013October 15, 2013
    Comment