Skip to Main Navigation

Urban Transport Corridor Development in Surabaya - RETF

Development Objective

The objective of the Project is to provide technical assistance to the Recipient to conduct a feasibility study to support the development of a mass rapid transit system in Surabaya, which aims: (I) to facilitate improvements in accessibility and mobility in Surabaya, and; (ii) to strengthen the capacity for integrated urban transport planning and management in the territory of the Recipient,particularly for implementing agencies such as the Directorate for Transport of Bappenas and the City of Surabaya.

Key Details

Project Details

  • P147893

  • Closed

  • Thalyta Yuwono , Elisabeth Goller

  • Ministry of Finance

  • Indonesia

  • February 28, 2014

  • (as of board presentation)

    March 26, 2014

  • N/A

  • US$ 1.25 million

  • C

  • Not Applicable

  • September 30, 2016

  • BANK APPROVED

  • August 15, 2024

  • Notes

Finances

Financing Plan (US$ Millions)

No data available.
Financier Commitments
Indonesia - AUSAID TF for Insfrastructure Support 1.25

Total Project Financing (US$ Millions)

Product Line IBRD/IDA
IBRD Commitment N/A
IDA Commitment N/A
IBRD + IDA Commitment N/A
Lending Instrument
Grant Amount 1.25
Total Project Cost** 1.25

Summary Status of World Bank Financing (US$ Millions) as of July 31, 2025

Download:
No data available.
Financier Approval Date Closing Date Principal Disbursed Repayments Interest, Charges & Fees

Detailed Financial Activity as of July 31, 2025

Download:
No data available.
Period Financier Transaction Type Amount (US$)

Footnotes

Ratings

IMPLEMENTATION RATINGS

Name Review Date
Overall Implementation Progress (IP) Unsatisfactory 2017-03-31
Progress towards achievement of PDO Unsatisfactory 2017-03-31
Overall High 2017-03-31

COMPLETION RATINGS

No data available.

INDEPENDENT EVALUATION RATINGS

No data available.

Results Framework

PROJECT DEVELOPMENT OBJECTIVE INDICATORS

INDICATORBASELINECURRENTTARGET
  • Completed Feasibility Analysis as a basis for Reference DesignValueNo written CGS adoptionMarket analysis and Alternative analysis, or the PCGS's written adoption of the completed Feasibilit
    DateFebruary 3, 2014March 29, 2017September 30, 2016
    Comment
  • Full Completed Feasibility Report as a basis for tendering the follow on investmentValueNo written acceptance of the institutional framewoThe completed report of Phase 1 has been submittedCGS's written acceptance of the institutional fram
    DateFebruary 3, 2014September 29, 2016September 30, 2016
    Comment
  • Recommended institutional framework and related actions and decisions by CGS to execute the plansValueNo institutional framework is designed for this RESurabaya has sent acceptance letter to Bappenas foCGS' written acceptance of institutional framework
    DateFebruary 3, 2014September 29, 2016September 30, 2016
    Comment
  • Completed feasibility report, satisfactory to the CGS as a basis for tendering the desired follow on investment and the preparationthereof.ValueNoNoYes
    DateFebruary 3, 2014March 29, 2017March 31, 2017
    Comment

INTERMEDIATE RESULTS INDICATORS

INDICATORBASELINECURRENTTARGET
  • Successful tender of Feasibility StudyValuestart of tender processFirm consultant have been mobilized and has submitContract signed by the consultant
    DateFebruary 3, 2014February 25, 2016February 25, 2016
    Comment
  • Successful Completion of Feasibility Report Phase 1ValueStart of consultant contract and mobilization of cPhase 1 report consist of Market Assessment and AlCompletion of Phase 1 report submitted to Bappenas
    DateFebruary 25, 2016September 29, 2016April 15, 2016
    Comment
  • Successful Completion of Feasibility Report Phase 2ValueApproval from Steering Committee to continue with The GOI requested to close this activity followingCompletion and submission of Feasibility Report Ph
    DateFebruary 3, 2016March 29, 2017March 31, 2017
    Comment