| Financier | Commitments |
|---|---|
| Borrower/Recipient | 10.00 |
| IDA Credit | 100.00 |
Additional Financing to Second Northern Mountains Poverty Reduction Project
Development Objective
The AF focuses on institutionalizing and mainstreaming the socio-economic development planning approach in the broader planning and budget allocation processes in the project area. The PDO will, therefore, be revised to capture this important element of the AF.
Project Development Objective for the AF is revised to read: The Project Development Objective (PDO) is to enhance the living standards of the Project Beneficiaries by improving: (i) their access to productive infrastructure; (ii) the productive and institutional capacity of local governments and communities; (iii) commune integrated investment planning and (iv) market linkages and business innovations.
Key Details
Project Details
P148733
Closed
Lan Nguyen
N/A
November 26, 2014
(as of board presentation)
February 27, 2015
N/A
US$ 110.00 million
N/A
2015
US$ 100.00 million
B
June 26, 2024
June 30, 2018
TBD
BANK APPROVED
Finances
Financing Plan (US$ Millions)
Total Project Financing (US$ Millions)
| Product Line | IBRD/IDA |
|---|---|
| IBRD Commitment | N/A |
| IDA Commitment | 100.00 |
| IBRD + IDA Commitment | 100.00 |
| Lending Instrument | |
|---|---|
| Grant Amount | N/A |
| Total Project Cost** | 110.00 |
Summary Status of World Bank Financing (US$ Millions) as of March 31, 2025
No data available.
Detailed Financial Activity as of March 31, 2025
No data available.
Results Framework
PROJECT DEVELOPMENT OBJECTIVE INDICATORS
| INDICATOR | BASELINE | CURRENT | TARGET |
|---|
At least 60% of the project beneficiaries report satisfaction on the selection, design, and implementation of project activities. Value 0.00 66.00 60.00 Date November 15, 2010 December 28, 2012 June 30, 2015 Comment Data from Light Survey for the Midterm review. Project beneficiaries report an improvement of per capita income at least by 10% Value 0.00 11.00 10.00 Date November 15, 2010 December 28, 2012 June 30, 2015 Comment Data collection for baseline survey completed on November 15, 2010 Data is from the Light Survey. This is a proxy measure for production and yield of rice only. Task team and client areconsideringassessment of the capacity to measure this before the EOP.
INTERMEDIATE RESULTS INDICATORS
| INDICATOR | BASELINE | CURRENT | TARGET |
|---|
At least 60% of households in the project areas report satisfaction of economic benefits due to productive infrastructure improvement in accessibility to basic infrastructure Value 0.00 48.00 60.00 Date November 15, 2010 December 28, 2012 June 30, 2015 Comment Data is from the Light Survey. 48% of improvement o access to roads. Citizens Report Card: Access to roads – 48% (96%), Access to irrigation – 37% (75%), Access to water supply– 45% (81%), Access tomarkets – 11% (52%)Community Report Card (all-women FGDs):Access to roads – 45% (95%), Access to irrigation – 28% (60%), Access towater supply– 20% (50%),Access to markets – 0% (14%) At least60% of project beneficiaries report satisfaction with public services delivery Value 0.00 77.00 60.00 Date November 15, 2010 December 28, 2012 June 30, 2015 Comment Data from the Light Survey for the MTR Targeted clients satisfied with agricultural services (percentage) Value 0.00 30.00 80.00 Date September 20, 2012 October 2, 2013 June 30, 2015 Comment Core indicators are newly added under the retrofitted request from SDN on September 20, 2012. Hence, baseline isconsideredstartingon September 20, 2012. Data from MTR report. The baseline satisfaction rate was 20%, 2013 81%, At least 60% of communes integrate the NMPRP-2 into their SEDPs Value 0.00 0.00 60.00 Date November 15, 2010 September 16, 2013 June 30, 2015 Comment Integration of the project's activities to SEDP begins this year for 2014 planning so this remains to be updated. Not coveredbytheLight Survey. 41%, (100%) Number of households involved in non-farm income generating activity increase by at least 30% Value 0.00 0.00 30.00 Date November 15, 2010 September 16, 2013 June 30, 2015 Comment Not assessed in the Light Survey. End target is changed to 15% based on the advice from th Baseline survey. Changed is proposed atthe MTR Income data was not collected by Limited Survey At least 60% communes have undertaken risk assessment on their plan before submitting proposals for project interventions Value 0.00 0.00 60.00 Date November 15, 2010 September 16, 2013 June 30, 2015 Comment Not covered by the Light Survey for the MTR. Data will be available to report for the planning for 2014. Improvement in agricultural output at least by 10% Value 0.00 11.00 10.00 Date November 15, 2010 December 28, 2012 June 30, 2015 Comment Data is from the Light Survey. This is a proxy measure for production and yield of rice only. Task team and client are consideringassessment of the capacity to measure this before the EOP. Over 60% of farmers in CIGs market their products beyond the farmgate to retailers, processors and other value chain members Value 0.00 30.00 60.00 Date November 15, 2010 January 7, 2013 June 30, 2015 Comment Data reported at MTR. This is changed from the original indicator at the MTR. At least 60% of women and ethnic minorities satisfied with their levelof participation in planning and decision making process Value 0.00 30.00 60.00 Date December 31, 2013 June 30, 2015 Comment Data from the Light Survey for MTR Community Report Card:Public services delivery – 45%, (75%)Public representation and service delivery – 27% (NA) Targeted clients satisfied with agricultural services - male (number) Value 0.00 1800.00 16000.00 Date September 20, 2012 October 2, 2013 June 30, 2015 Comment Targeted clients satisfied with agricultural services - female (number) Value 0.00 5100.00 44000.00 Date September 20, 2012 October 2, 2013 June 30, 2015 Comment Targeted clients- male (number) Value 0.00 6000.00 20000.00 Date September 20, 2012 October 2, 2013 June 30, 2015 Comment Targeted clients – female (number) Value 0.00 17000.00 55000.00 Date September 20, 2012 October 2, 2013 June 30, 2015 Comment 30% of households report improved opportunities and public support to start or improve businesses Value 0.00 20.00 30.00 Date December 31, 2013 June 30, 2015 Comment At least 80% of communes SEDPs include multiple sources of funding Value 0.00 0.00 80.00 Date June 30, 2015 Comment At least 60% of commune women are satisfied with their level of participation in planning meetings Value 0.00 0.00 60.00 Date June 30, 2015 Comment