| Financier | Commitments |
|---|---|
| IDA Grant | 7.50 |
Haiti - Urban Community Driven Development Project - AF
Development Objective
To improve access to, and satisfaction with: (i) basic and social infrastructure and services, including housing repair, reconstruction and community infrastructure improvements needed as a result of the Emergency; and (ii) income-generating opportunities for residents of selected disadvantaged urban areas.
Key Details
Project Details
P149116
Closed
Jonas Parby
N/A
Haiti
May 7, 2014
(as of board presentation)
June 20, 2014
N/A
US$ 7.50 million
N/A
2014
US$ 7.50 million
B
Not Applicable
December 31, 2016
Yes
BANK APPROVED
August 15, 2024
Finances
Financing Plan (US$ Millions)
Total Project Financing (US$ Millions)
| Product Line | IBRD/IDA |
|---|---|
| IBRD Commitment | N/A |
| IDA Commitment | 7.50 |
| IBRD + IDA Commitment | 7.50 |
| Lending Instrument | |
|---|---|
| Grant Amount | N/A |
| Total Project Cost** | 7.50 |
Summary Status of World Bank Financing (US$ Millions) as of July 31, 2025
No data available.
Detailed Financial Activity as of July 31, 2025
No data available.
Results Framework
PROJECT DEVELOPMENT OBJECTIVE INDICATORS
| INDICATOR | BASELINE | CURRENT | TARGET |
|---|
Residents that have returned to neighborhoods upon completion of housing reconstruction and repair works or receiving a rental grant Value 0.00 2000.00 5480.00 Date October 26, 2010 March 21, 2014 June 30, 2016 Comment Target revised. Change in end target date. Percent of beneficiaries for whom the majority of expected subproject results, as defined by beneficiaries at the start of theproject, were achieved (as per results from community evaluation forms) Value 0 85% Date June 3, 2008 June 28, 2013 June 30, 2015 Comment No PRODEPUR beneficiaries To be measured at end of project by a beneficiary survey or community evaluation forms Change in target date Number of productive/income generating subprojects that are self-sustaining six months after being fully operational. Value 0 25 25 Date June 3, 2008 June 28, 2013 June 30, 2015 Comment No PRODEPUR subprojects underway Effort to streamline the result indicator in line with counterpart capacity. Target has been revised to be a number rather thanapercentage, for consistency with indicator wording. Increased access to social infrastructure and services in disadvantaged urban areas that selected such subprojects (daycarecenters,primary schools, secondary schools, health clinics, job training, e Value 24.51% 38.8% Original: +10%Revised: +10% Date July 15, 2010 June 28, 2013 June 30, 2015 Comment As measured from the PRODEPUR baseline survey. Incremental increase in access to services Increased access to rehabilitated street and drainage infrastructure in disadvantaged urban areas that selected such subprojects(i.e., cleared and rehabilitated drainage canals, ditches, etc.) Value 27.85% 41.47% Original: +10%Revised: +10% Date July 15, 2010 June 28, 2013 June 30, 2015 Comment As measured from the PRODEPUR baseline survey. Incremental increase in access to services Increased access to sanitation in disadvantaged urban areas that selected such subprojects (i.e., garbage collection, solid wastedisposal, recycling, composting, sanitary blocks, etc.). Value 13.47% 23.78% Original: +20%Revised: +23.47% Date July 15, 2010 June 28, 2013 June 30, 2015 Comment As measured from the PRODEPUR baseline survey. Incremental increase in access to services. Note: Target reduced by half (from baseline +20%) at mid-term review in light ofthelow demand for this type of subproject from community beneficiary groups (OCBs). Increased access to water in disadvantaged urban areas that selected such subprojects (i.e., water kiosks, standpipes, communitycisterns, rainwater capture, etc.). Value 85.51% 92.63% (+7.12%) Original: +15%Revised: +7.5% Date July 15, 2010 June 28, 2013 June 30, 2015 Comment As measured from the PRODEPUR baseline survey. Incremental increase in access to services.Note: Target reduced by half (from baseline +15%) at mid-term review in light ofthelowdemand for this type of subproject from community beneficiary groups (OCBs), and due to constraints on implementation ofwatersub-projects due to restrictions set by the principal water provider. Increased access to water in disadvantaged urban areas that selected such subprojects (i.e., water kiosks, standpipes, community cisterns, rainwater capture, etc.). Value 85.51 92.63 95.00 Date July 15, 2010 March 21, 2014 June 30, 2016 Comment As measured from the PRODEPUR baseline survey. Incremental increase in access to services. Change in end target date. Increased access to sanitation in disadvantaged urban areas that selected such subprojects (i.e., garbage collection, solid waste disposal, recycling, composting, sanitary blocks, etc.). Value 13.47 23.47 29.00 Date July 15, 2010 March 21, 2014 June 30, 2016 Comment As measured from the PRODEPUR baseline survey. Incremental increase in access to services. Incremental increase in access to services. Change in end target date. Increased access to rehabilitated street and drainage infrastructure in disadvantaged urban areas that selected such subprojects (i.e., cleared and rehabilitated drainage canals, ditches, etc.) Value 27.85 44.00 53.00 Date July 15, 2010 March 21, 2014 June 30, 2016 Comment As measured from the PRODEPUR baseline survey. Incremental increase in access to services. Incremental increase in access to services. Change in end target date. Increased access to social infrastructure and services in disadvantaged urban areas that selected such subprojects (daycare centers, primary schools, secondary schools, health clinics, job training Value 24.51 41.00 51.00 Date July 15, 2010 March 21, 2014 June 30, 2016 Comment As measured from the PRODEPUR baseline survey. Incremental increase in access to services. Incremental increase in access to services. Change in end target date. Percent of beneficiaries for whom the majority of expected subproject results, as defined by beneficiaries at the start of the project, were achieved (as per results from community evaluation forms) Value 0.00 0.00 85.00 Date June 3, 2008 March 21, 2014 June 30, 2016 Comment No PRODEPUR beneficiaries at outset of project. To be measured at end of project by a beneficiary survey or community evaluation forms. New activities will result in additional beneficiaries. Change in end target date. Number of productive/income generating subprojects fully operational. Value 0.00 493.00 650.00 Date June 3, 2008 March 21, 2014 June 30, 2016 Comment No PRODEPUR subprojects underway at outset of project. Effort to streamline the result indicator in line with counterpart capacity. Target has been revised to be a number rather than apercentage, for consistency with indicator wording. Sub-indicator added to capture percentage of subprojects self-sufficient New subprojects financed. Final target to be determined. Change in end target date. Percentage of productive/income generating subprojects that are self-sustaining six months after being fully operational. Value 0.00 15.00 80.00 Date June 3, 2008 March 21, 2014 June 30, 2016 Comment
INTERMEDIATE RESULTS INDICATORS
| INDICATOR | BASELINE | CURRENT | TARGET |
|---|
Health facilities constructed, renovated, and/or equipped (number) Value 0.00 3.00 5.00 Date June 3, 2008 March 21, 2014 June 30, 2016 Comment Based on Mid Term Review, baseline set to 3 and Target was met. Additional financing to finance additional 2 health facilities, bringing end target to 5. Change in end target date. AF. Cumulative number of housing repair and reconstruction works financed through grants and completed Value 1153 1153 Original: 5000Revised: 1204 Date September 30, 2013 September 30, 2013 June 30, 2015 Comment BMPAD Report September 30, 2013 BMPAD Report September 30, 2013 Target reduced in line with s a GoH shift in building multi-family housing rather than individual house. Includes:Repairs,Retrofits, and multi-family complexes. Number of people in urban areas provided with access to Improved Water Sources under the project Value 0.00 47150.00 63650.00 Date June 3, 2008 March 21, 2014 June 30, 2016 Comment Note: indicator's scope is currently only CDD portion of the Project (does not include first Additional Financing beneficiaries,calculated separately). The Additional Financing will finance an additional 16500 beneficiaries, an increase of 35% from the previous target. Change inend target date. Roads rehabilitated, Non-rural Value 0.00 7.44 16.00 Date June 3, 2008 March 21, 2013 June 30, 2016 Comment Change in end target date. Percent of subprojects completed in a timely manner Value 0 39% 85% Date June 3, 2008 June 28, 2013 June 30, 2015 Comment Timely manner is equivalent to less than 6 months.The revision is for the measurement methodology. Percent of municipal governments successfully proposing and implementing subprojects in coordination with CBOs Value 0 100% Original: 65%Revised: 100% Date June 3, 2008 June 28, 2013 June 30, 2015 Comment 6 out of 6 Target met Percent of subprojects successfully implemented, operated, and maintained (as per technical audits) Value 0 40 % Original: 95%Revised: 70%R Date June 3, 2008 June 28, 2013 June 30, 2015 Comment Target reduced to 70% to be more realistic in light of current project implementation, and the results of the first technical audit. Number of eligible CBOs joining COPRODEPs. Value N/A 1275 Original: 80%Revised: 1000 Date June 3, 2008 June 28, 2013 June 30, 2015 Comment 1090 CBO over a total of 1433 eligible ones joined the COPRODEPs established Target to be revised from a % to a number (1,000) in light of indicator redefinition with clearer measurement methodology. Number of corridors repaired Value 0.00 31.00 108.00 Date February 21, 2011 September 30, 2013 June 30, 2016 Comment BMPAD report end of September 2013. Additional activities will result in additional corridors repaired. Change in end target date. Volume of construction debris cleared in Project neighborhoods Value 0.00 13347.00 41747.00 Date February 21, 2011 September 30, 2013 June 30, 2016 Comment BMPAD report end of September 2013. Additional activities will result in additional debris cleared. Change in end target date. Percent of women holding membership in COPRODEP’s executive committee Value 24.00 24.00 30.00 Date March 21, 2014 March 21, 2014 June 30, 2016 Comment Percent of prioritized projects submitted by women’s CBOs Value 13.00 13.00 15.00 Date March 21, 2014 March 21, 2014 June 30, 2016 Comment Number of eligible CBOs joining COPRODEPs Value 0.00 1119.00 1173.00 Date June 3, 2008 March 21, 2014 June 30, 2016 Comment 1119 CBO over a total of 1466 eligible ones joined the COPRODEPs established, a total of 76% of total CBOs. Change in end target date. Percent of subprojects successfully implemented, operated, and maintained (as per technical audits) Value 0.00 70.00 70.00 Date June 3, 2008 March 21, 2014 June 30, 2016 Comment Target reduced to 70% from 95% to be more realistic in light of current project implementation, and the results of the firsttechnical audit. Change in end target date. Percent of municipal governments successfully proposing and implementing subprojects in coordination with CBOs Value 0.00 100.00 100.00 Date June 3, 2008 March 21, 2014 June 30, 2016 Comment 6 out of 6. Target met. Target met. Percent of subprojects completed in a timely manner Value 0.00 74.00 85.00 Date June 3, 2008 March 21, 2014 June 30, 2016 Comment Timely manner is equivalent to less than 6 months.The revision is for the measurement methodology. Change in end target date. Cumulative number of housing repair and reconstruction works financed through grants and completed Value 0.00 1153.00 1384.00 Date February 21, 2011 September 30, 2013 June 30, 2016 Comment BMPAD Report September 30, 2013. End target increased by 231 as a result of the Additional Financing for Component 3, and repair/retrofit/reconstruction ofadditional houses in Martissant. Change in end target date.