| Financier | Commitments |
|---|---|
| IDA Credit | 11.60 |
| Lao PDR - Free-standing Trust Fund Program | 2.40 |
LA-Poverty Reduction Fund II - AF
Development Objective
Help improve the access to and the utilization of basic infrastructure and services for the Project's targeted poor communities. The PDO would be achieved through inclusive community and local development processes with emphasis on ensuring sustainability.
Key Details
Project Details
P153401
Closed
Erik Johnson , Sybounheuang Phandanouvong
N/A
April 15, 2015
(as of board presentation)
June 23, 2015
N/A
US$ 14.00 million
N/A
2015
US$ 14.00 million
B
September 8, 2022
December 31, 2016
BANK APPROVED
Finances
Financing Plan (US$ Millions)
Total Project Financing (US$ Millions)
| Product Line | IBRD/IDA |
|---|---|
| IBRD Commitment | N/A |
| IDA Commitment | 11.60 |
| IBRD + IDA Commitment | 11.60 |
| Lending Instrument | |
|---|---|
| Grant Amount | 2.40 |
| Total Project Cost** | 14.00 |
Summary Status of World Bank Financing (US$ Millions) as of March 31, 2025
No data available.
Detailed Financial Activity as of March 31, 2025
No data available.
Results Framework
PROJECT DEVELOPMENT OBJECTIVE INDICATORS
| INDICATOR | BASELINE | CURRENT | TARGET |
|---|
Decision-making on allocation of PRF resources involve at least 40% women Value 0.00 53.00 40.00 Date June 9, 2011 December 5, 2014 December 31, 2016 Comment Involvement of 60% of poor in decision making would be dropped due to difficulty to separate poor from non-poor participants ofcommunity meetings. The Deepen CDD pilot would continue to roll out under AF which allows separating poor from non poor Direct project beneficiaries Value 0.00 474600.00 700000.00 Date June 9, 2011 December 5, 2014 December 31, 2016 Comment Target value changed to accommodate the AF. The target value of female beneficiaries is modified per implementation experience Improved access to and utilization of basic economic and social services in kum bans supported by PRF Value 0 The supplementary school enrollment indicator has Date October 31, 2012 December 5, 2014 December 31, 2016 Comment End targets have been set for different types of sub-projects. Respective sub-indicators will be assessed through the impact evaluation, and will be available by March 2016 Greater than 75% satisfaction levels reported by beneficiaries in targeted villages regarding improved services and local development planning Value 0.00 80.00 75.00 Date June 9, 2011 December 31, 2013 December 31, 2016 Comment Original target which was incorrectly set above the target value in the indicator corrected.. This indicator will be assessedthrough the impact evaluation, and will be available by March 2016 Female beneficiaries Value 0.00 49.60 50.00 Date June 9, 2011 December 5, 2014 December 31, 2016 Comment Lowest two quintiles benefit from above services Value No Yes Yes Date October 31, 2012 December 5, 2014 December 31, 2016 Comment % increase in school enrollment Value 89.00 0.00 6.00 Date October 31, 2012 December 5, 2014 December 31, 2016 Comment % of HHs with access to and utilization of health services Value 37.00 0.00 43.00 Date October 31, 2012 December 5, 2014 December 31, 2016 Comment % of HHs with improved access to and utilization of safe water resources Value 76.00 0.00 84.00 Date October 31, 2012 December 5, 2014 December 31, 2016 Comment % of HHs with access to all weather roads Value 30.00 0.00 38.00 Date October 31, 2012 December 5, 2014 December 31, 2016 Comment Ethnic beneficiaries Value 0.00 72.00 70.00 Date June 9, 2011 December 5, 2014 December 31, 2016 Comment
INTERMEDIATE RESULTS INDICATORS
| INDICATOR | BASELINE | CURRENT | TARGET |
|---|
#/type of sub-project activities implemented Value 0.00 988.00 1600.00 Date June 9, 2011 December 31, 2014 December 31, 2016 Comment Target changed to accommodate the AF. x% of sub-project activities are of high technical quality Value 0.00 30.00 85.00 Date June 9, 2011 December 31, 2013 December 31, 2016 Comment x% of sub-projects are being maintained and are operational two years after sub-project completion Value 0.00 98.50 90.00 Date June 9, 2011 December 31, 2013 December 31, 2016 Comment # of communities able to plan, implement and monitor their activities Value 0.00 850.00 1300.00 Date June 9, 2011 December 24, 2014 December 31, 2016 Comment Semi annual report Target changed to accommodate the AF. % of districts where district officials provide technical assistance and supervision to communities Value 0.00 95.00 85.00 Date June 9, 2011 December 24, 2014 December 31, 2016 Comment Semi annual report Progress reports prepared on time Value 0 1 1 Date June 9, 2011 November 11, 2014 December 31, 2016 Comment % PRF kum ban plans used by government and/or other development actors for planning and funding Value 0.00 19.00 35.00 Date June 9, 2011 December 31, 2014 December 31, 2016 Comment Semi annual report X studies/evaluations completed in a timely manner Value 0.00 6.00 5.00 Date June 9, 2011 December 31, 2014 December 31, 2016 Comment Participants in consultation activities during project implementation (number) Value 0.00 315896.00 0.00 Date June 9, 2011 December 31, 2014 December 31, 2016 Comment Target to be defined by PRF Community contribution in the total project costs (percentage) Value 0.00 11.00 0.00 Date December 4, 2014 December 31, 2016 Comment Grievances registered related to delivery of project benefits addressed (%) Value 0.00 3.40 0.00 Date December 5, 2014 December 31, 2016 Comment Sub-projects with post-project community engagement or O&M arrangements (%) Value 0.00 64.00 90.00 Date June 9, 2011 December 31, 2013 December 31, 2016 Comment End target of >90% of sub projects are being maintained and operational two years after sub-project completion. Participants in consultation activities during project implementation - female Value 0.00 155222.00 0.00 Date June 9, 2011 December 31, 2014 December 31, 2016 Comment Semi annual report. No target was set, however, PRF will collect information on this indicator through the MIS Total community contribution (US$) Value 0.00 1640000.00 0.00 Date December 4, 2014 December 31, 2016 Comment Grievances related to delivery of project benefits that are addressed-(number) Value 0.00 9.00 0.00 Date December 5, 2014 December 31, 2016 Comment Sub-projects that are expected to have a mechanism for post-completion operation Value 0.00 64.00 90.00 Date June 9, 2011 December 31, 2013 December 31, 2016 Comment Improvement in dietary diversity among pregnant/ lactating women and children aged 6-24 months Value 0.00 0.00 30.00 Date September 1, 2015 December 31, 2016 Comment JSDF funded nutrition activities started too recently to achieve outcome yet. Impact data to be collected through Endline survey No. and type of livelihood activities supported by seed grant Value 1675.00 0.00 2400.00 Date September 1, 2015 December 31, 2016 Comment Current achievement under JSDF funded livelihood activities Impact data to be collected through Endline survey % of beneficiary communities that successfully achieved Open Defecation Free (ODF) status Value 0.00 0.00 30.00 Date September 1, 2015 December 31, 2016 Comment Information will be collected through MIS Community contribution in the total project costs (%) Value 0.00 11.00 10.00 Date June 9, 2011 December 4, 2014 December 31, 2016 Comment Semi annual report This indicator is re-entered to remove the redundant sub-indicator. No end target was set for this indicator. PRF will monitorthrough the MIS. Data on community contribution after sub-project completion for O&M will be collected under 6/ 12 months followingvisits. Grievances registered related to delivery of project benefits addressed (%) Value 0.00 85.00 90.00 Date June 9, 2011 December 5, 2014 December 31, 2016 Comment Semi annual report This indicator is re-entered as new to remove the redundant sub-indicator. Target is revised to be expressed in %. Only thosegrievances related to the delivery of project benefits are measured. Sub-projects with post-project community engagement or O&M arrangements (%) Value 0.00 64.00 90.00 Date June 9, 2011 December 31, 2013 December 31, 2016 Comment Technical and Cost Effectiveness survey This indicator is re-entered as new to remove the redundant sub-indicator. Steps already taken to strengthen O&M arrangements. 6/12 months follow-up visits will monitor this indicator. Results will be entered into MIS.